Real Estate April 19, 2012 9:10 AM

Construction Watch: Donovan Building Stripping Down

Construction Watch: Donovan Building Stripping Down

The Donovan Building on lower Main Street is shedding its façade.  Construction crews are 'de-skinning" the eight-story building down to its structural steel.  A new glass and brick façade will take its place.  Benderson Development is spearheading the project which will see a mix of retail, office and hotel uses in what was previously a State office building.

Phillips Lytle LLP will be the building's anchor tenant, occupying 85,000 square feet of space on the top four floors of the 160,000-square-foot structure.

 

donovanuc2.jpg

"We studied and weighed multiple location options as we considered our firm's long-term future space needs, and none was more appealing to our Partners and staff than being part of Canal Side," said David J. McNamara, Managing Partner, Phillips Lytle.

A 96-room Courtyard by Marriott will occupy the second thru fourth floors. The ground floor is expected to contain retail and/or restaurant uses. A two-story, 130-vehicle parking garage is planned.

The project is slated for completion in December 2013, with Phillips Lytle and other tenants taking up residence in 2014.

Clark Construction Group, LLC, the nation's largest privately-held construction company, is general contractor. Orchard Park-based Fontanese Folts Aubrecht Ernst Architects, P.C. is project architect.

donovanredo1.bmp

donovanlobby.png

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

Thank God. This might be the best news of the year right up there with the Lafayette restoration. And almost as good as finding out from a friend this morning there's a website called [deleted].com. But that's still better news.

Score: 12 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree. Best (as in most visible) improvement of the year.

replied to LouisTully
Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I like the above photos - but where does the 2 story parking garage fit it?
Also- we have a great hockey tourney coming in sept. and once again all of this progress wont even be closed to finished - Canals havent been started, fences still line the other side of the rail line - and the Donovan building will look like a dead zone...

Score: 2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

By that point the new skin should be up or going up and the canals should be well under way. That will be enough to show some decent progress and hopefully change some perceptions of Canalside being a dead zone. Not to mention the waterfront section will still be bustling with people and summertime activities unlike the World Junior hockey events that took place in December/January.

replied to elmdog
Score: 5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Is this the first we have heard about a parking garage attached to this project?

replied to elmdog
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm just happy to see visible work going here so at least visitors won't look at this place as another vacant ugly building. Now it gives the perception that this part of town is growing instead of being abandoned. Hopefully we will see the canal work start soon too adding to that positive vibe.

Score: 10 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Are there really canals scheduled to be built by this building? How? When ? Why ?

replied to brownteeth
Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

They're building replica canals on the Aud sight.
http://www.buffalonews.com/city/capital-connection/albany/article786106.ece

replied to MikeFoligno
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Anyone know the size and depth of canals? Will they be
Connected or dead end? Can a boat be driven through ?

This should be interesting. It took 7 years to build the last
Boat slip which uncovered a sewer line. And still does

replied to JM
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

No boats, will not be connected. Paddle boats only inside. I believe it will be only 4 inches deep.

replied to MikeFoligno
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Are you being sarchastic ? How does a paddle boat
make it through 4 inches of water?

replied to JM
Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I actually meant 4 feet, not that it makes it enough to take a real boat on, other places say it will be 2 feet.http://archpaper.com/news/articles.asp?id=5360

replied to MikeFoligno
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

They've said the canals will be 18 inches deep (not 4)

replied to MikeFoligno
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What is the point of building a canal 18 inches deep?

replied to 300miles
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

maybe as troll-bait for online blogs?

replied to MikeFoligno
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Or maybe you should move home and live here in freezing
Rain and snow and put some stake in the game like the
rest of us.

Arm chair.

replied to 300miles
Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Excellent! Dinosaur BBQ was scouting locations in Buffalo. I'd love for them to take up some of the first floor space in this building.

Score: -1 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'll agree a restaurant would be great but I don't think it's the Dino BBQs style.

replied to AKBuffalo
Score: 6 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Then I hope they at least move close to First Niagara in the Canalside district. The Dino BBQ in Rochester by Blue Cross Arena seems to always be busy before sports events and concerts.

replied to JM
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think most people agree with you on that. Not sure if you saw but BRO had a lot of discussion on the topic not long ago http://www.buffalorising.com/2012/02/dinosaur-bbq-so-close-but-so-far.html

Going along with what you said the Blacksmith place might be very cool for it, although I don't know if it meets the size etc demands, but that is the style they look for rather than a hotel setting and is as close as you can get to the Arena.

replied to AKBuffalo
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This building looks better "de-skinned". How did such a bad design ever get approved when they first built this thing? You know, because checkered buildings were such a huge architectural movement. VERY excited for the future of Lower Main St.

Score: 8 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

great, now get rid of Surrogates Court and restore the historic Erie County Building which I think houses records. Olmsted planned that building for the entire city block.

Heck, City Hall is Half empty move them in there or move the County into City Hall and move records into the County Building.

and while your at it....that circular skyway access ramp that consumes an entire city block between Franklin, Swan, Seneca...etc....get rid of it. We have the Tifft Street bypass and the Erie Street access...we dont need it. Its far more detrimental to downtown than helpful.

Score: -4 ( 22 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It'd be nice to see the new rendering that was promised. I wish they would go back to the original plan of building a ground floor addition out to Main Street with street-facing retail space.

Kind of lousy to see the first development at Canalside disregard the Canalside design guidelines.

Score: 11 ( 23 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is 100% correct. So frustrating.

replied to JSmith
Score: 7 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Lately, I've been cringing every time I drive down I-190 and see that building. This renovation cannot come soon enough. It's gonna be a nice addition to our mini-skyline.

Score: 10 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It would be too cool to have the HSBC tower striped and covered in glass like the Avant. We would have a modern hot looking downtown while going through on the 190 :)

Score: 19 ( 23 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Or even better, we shouldnt have the 190 through that section of the city at all. Why let people speed past downtown when there could be at grade roads filtering people into these business districts.

I am glad that something is happening with the Donovan building, but I definitely dont like how the development deal went down nor do I like the immediate break from Canalside design standards

replied to crescent1251
Score: 0 ( 26 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Agreed HSBC would look great with a new facade!

And also light up the skyway like the Peace Bridge is. I never admired the Peace Bridge until they lit it up. The skyway would look just like the causeway in Miami does lit up.

Dino BBQ would be a great attraction in this area, something else to do and a reason to draw people in.

replied to crescent1251
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

A new facade for HSBC would be a difficult and pricey endeavour, especially with its future tenant base in doubt.

Personally, I like the tower, it has a certain history behind it, as I've mentioned in other threads. But if lighting can make a difference for the Peace Bridge and Skyway, perhaps a lighting scheme can make a difference for the tower as well. Even if it's simple floodlights or an illuminated 'crown'.

Speaking of the tower's crown, and architectural addition to the roof would also be a lower cost and effective addition to the building for people who don't fully appreciate its otherwise bland features. For example:

Great American Tower in Cincinnati:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_American_Tower_at_Queen_City_Square

Bank of America Tower in Atlanta:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wp-bofa-5.jpg

replied to buffaluv
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It would be too cool to have the HSBC tower striped and covered in glass like the Avant. We would have a modern hot looking downtown while going through on the 190 :)

Score: 8 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I know I'm in the minority here, and this comment will probably break a record for the most thumbs down votes ever on this site. But I am sad to see the Donovan Building being dismantled. I love mid century design, and although this building has looked like hell for several years (decades), it would have been interesting to see what would it would have looked like if they had cleaned it up and refurbished/restored it. It's easy to judge harshly when you're looking at pictures of a building that hasn't been properly maintained for at least half of its life. (Though it hasn't been vacant that long, it was never really cared for since my earliest memories of it in the 1980s.) Are there any pictures of it from when it was new? In the interest of creating urban density and architectural diversity, it would have been better--in my opinion--to see Phillips Lytle construct there own new building on one of the many nearby vacant lots. This could have been made into a mid century hotel, which could have been awesome. I see a missed chance here.

Score: 6 ( 46 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree. With the constant rush to slag on midcentury buildings and design, I think the Donovan building was one that actually worked. I like the clean lines and simple design that made it up - and I think it would have looked great if they stuck to the original design, cleaned it up and spent a whole lot more on the streetscape and making it work with canalside.

Now it looks like a hotel you'd find off of any exit on the Thruway.

replied to NBuffguy
Score: 5 ( 31 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I too absolutely agree. I'd have also preferred to see the original Dulski Building facade preserved and am frankly distressed by the anti-historic, throw-away-the-old-and-"ugly" fad for "re-skinning."

replied to NBuffguy
Score: -7 ( 23 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree with you. This project actually sets Buffalo back as mid century modern is making a huge comeback around the country. This is a lost opportunity to step it up a notch. This rendering is not bad...for across from the airport.

replied to NBuffguy
Score: 0 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

As long as they don't mess with the blue msm buildings up delaware. I'm starting to like those.

replied to ladyinwhite
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Interesting to see that the original architects spent a lot of money to push the columns back away form the skin and these new architects are going to spend a lot of money pretending that the columns are at the outer edge of the building. If it were me I would have taken advantage of those cantilevered slabs.

Score: 6 ( 20 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

yup. what a misfire on the redesign.

replied to STEEL
Score: 3 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

How so?

replied to STEEL
Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Take a cue from the Buffalo News building across the street?

replied to LouisTully
Score: -4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"If it were me I would have taken advantage of those cantilevered slabs."

Legitimate question of how so.

replied to LouisTully
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Glad to see work finally starting on this. Although it's going from a 1950's design that I never thought was that bad actually, to a 1990's design which is OK I guess. Maybe the new secret rendering has a very different look.

I think the most important part of the redevelopment though is what they do on the first floor or two. Get rid of the open plaza and build it out.

Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Agreed. The relatively decent mid-century design could be reused to create something cool with some vision and some cleanup. Redoing it in an already-dated faux-historicist style doesn't really improve the look of the building.

But, the act of reskinning it screams "Change! Development!" Getting people driving by on the 190 to realize that downtown might be worth visiting or revisiting is undoubtedly a good thing.

Of course, if there wasn't a 190 to fly past it on at 65 miles per hour, that would be the ideal. But, one step at a time...

Score: 4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It's deskinning fast, as it should. Looks like they're halfway done.

replied to laldm
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Agreed agreed, but Buffalo hasn't yet adopted a love for mid-century, like most other places in the world (read: typical style lag time).

Instead, we glom on to a bland suburban design, which has absolutely no reference to the Canal Side design suggestions, in the name of "progress". Oh yeah--and by a strip mall developer to boot.

replied to laldm
Score: 0 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think some mid-century architecture is worth appreciating (I like the Tishman building, for example, though I would still rather have the building that predated it on the site.) But more often than not, mid-century design is accompanied by big windswept plazas that smother all pedestrian activity nearby.

Although since it doesn't look like this project will particularly improve the urban design of this block, I suppose they might as well have kept the original appearance.

replied to Travelrrr
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Ah the love-hate relationship I have with you Buffalo....

Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

How about a view of the other side?

Plans call for a parking garage?

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

A parking garage makes sense I suppose but it seems to have been left out of prior announcements and renderings. (mmm?)

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It sure makes sense given the giant underground garage being intended directly across the street and the light rail line right outside the front door of this place................ And I guarantee the Webster block will ruin one of the street fronts with a parking facility of it's own...... It's too bad all of these development parcels aren't being thought about cohesively.

replied to The Boss
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

JM's link above gives some insight about the canal building designs. It sounds like the period styling is not really mandatory at all :


"The canal project is part of a trend of reclaiming waterfronts across the country,” said Hilary Bertsch of EE&K, a Perkins Eastman company, who is overseeing the design. ..... Renderings show a dense mix of traditional styles that echo the architecture of the lost mid-19th century neighborhood. “We’re still looking at this as an early concept,” said Bertsch. “Paying tribute to the site’s history is important, but we can’t lose sight of today’s realities.” While the canal design is complete, the architecture that surrounds it is evolving and could offer a more modern aesthetic."

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment


Canal side!

It is a new investment and ideally it should be able to contextualize the importance of the erie canal. However what is most important for me is recapturing a new place in history with the landmass that we have. There is technically a whole plenitude of social relation's that could be developed because of a viable and visionary plan. Is it possible to claim that we have modernized the harbor with the skyway still there.

Ultimately, buffalo should have the potential to be more inviting because we are a summer destination close to Niagara Falls.

I'd love to see a plan that connects the inner and outer harbor. Something that improves that connecting aesthetic enough to spur change.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Not that i am totally for removing the skyway. demolishing of the skyway or new peace bridge, might make a good poll.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment