City April 9, 2012 12:02 PM

Anti-Fracking Protest at Buffalo State College

Anti-Fracking Protest at Buffalo State College
By Amanda Gabryszak:

Buffalo State College is hosting a protest against SUNY's recent contract with EnergyMark. The contract will provide five SUNY schools with hydraulically fractured gas for three years. The deal totaled over $22 million dollars, and the schools include Buffalo State College, UB, Fredonia, Alfred State, and the New York College of Ceramics at Alfred State. The protest is scheduled to take place on April 19th on the Buffalo State College Campus, from 12:15-1:30 pm. Weather permitting, demonstrators will gather between Butler Library and Campbell Student Union. Should it rain, they plan to move the protest beneath the archway of Cleveland Hall. 

Hydraulic-fracturing, or hydro-fracking as it is more commonly called is a controversial method of obtaining natural gas from shale deposits. Students involved in the protest are concerned about the consequences of fracking, and disappointed that the SUNY seems to support it.

"I guess in my opinion, colleges and universities are to be centers of progression and betterment of mankind and not establishments of old and unhealthy addictions to gas and oil," explained protest-organizer, Alex Bornemisza, a sophomore at Buffalo State College. "I don't think that it's right that they went ahead and did that, and didn't even try to tell anyone about it until recently, when there was nothing that could be done about it, especially because it's such a politically controversial issue."

While the numbers seem modest on the facebook page Bornemisza has created for the event, he explained that the movement is expecting attendance from the school's NYPIRG chapter, as well as Occupy Buffalo protestors. He expects a fairly large turn-out. 

Along with being disappointed with the decision to sign with EnergyMark, Bornemisza voiced anger. "I want to send SUNY a message that this is not something the students want to happen in New York State. It's not something they want their school to be funding. [SUNY] didn't tell anybody about it until they started receiving the gas. It was such a big politically controversial issue in New York State. It just seems like they were really trying to trick us, and I have moral issues with that."

When asked about alternatives, Bornemisza suggested green energy. 

"For one, it's cleaner and safer. And if we're going to be investing in these new technologies anyway, I feel like a lot of research for green energy has to start there [at the University level]. I think a lot of people can relate with that idea." 

"If you support the cause, come join us.  Maybe next time we can stop it from happening." 

For more information on the protest, you can check out the group's facebook page

The Buffalo Business First article on the contract:
http://assets.bizjournals.com/buffalo/news/2012/03/28/energymark-inks-22m-gas-deal-with-suny.html
View image

Comments

Leave a comment

This is great to finally see some activism in this but really, Buffalonians thinking about the world around them? That's a shocker.

Score: -3 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Every time I see a "Frack Protest" organizing, all I can think of is how ignorant these people are to push away from domestic energy. Right now we (the US) purchase 12 million barrels of oil, per day, from OPEC. Our own natural gas reserves could help close this festering wound, which sends billions and billions of US dollars over seas, year after year. Please educate yourself people. Natural gas is cleaner than coal & oil, cheaper than coil & oil, and readily available. Hydro-fracking has been used for 50+ years, and is 100% safe, as long as companies follow best practice casing/cementing principles and do not cut corners. If bad concrete is used on a building, it falls down. We blame the people at fault and make them stop constructing building, but we do berate the entire industry. C'mon people, let’s educate ourselves, and not jump on the bandwagon of every high emotion issue that gets politicized.

Score: 3 ( 35 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Fracking is only as safe as the regulations it is held to and the enforcement of those regulations. However, all you need is one change in administration to a group who seek to limit the "red tape" and "bureaucracy" so that companies can operate without "interference" and poof! There goes the safety of Fracking.

replied to chris.e.sanford
Score: 6 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

>Natural gas is cleaner than coal & oil, cheaper than coil & oil, and readily available

We have bought into the dangerous falsehood of “gas is clean energy”, from growing up on TV commercials with that blue flame. (Commercials we are forced to pay for when we pay the gas bill!) On combustion, gas is twice as CO2 polluting as brown coal by weight. A study suggests that concerning climate change, shale gas is worse than conventional gas, in fact, worse than coal or oil. Like coal, gas is nonrenewable. Shale gas depletes rapidly, while discouraging investment in renewable energy. Getting gas out and to your door is one of the dirtiest, deadliest and most toxic mining procedures invented since mercury-enhanced gold mining. Oil and gas emissions from fracking sites now outweigh traffic pollution Fort Worth, Texas.

replied to chris.e.sanford
Score: 2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This company uses hydrofracking for natural gas excavation. This has been considered a clean energy for quite some time. They don't want this to happen which means SUNY would get their energy from dirtier ways that have much more negative impacts on the world. They should use these numbers to get SUNY to install winds turbines on or near the campus to power their campus. I love on their Facebook page it says "incredibly unsafe" and "desecrating the Earth and hurting all those wonderful things that live within it" The problem is its not unsafe what so ever. Its also putting fluids deep into the ground where fossils live. Nothing lives down there. Some fluids could seep up to the water table but normally don't. Compared to how other fuels are found and made this ranks quite low on the list. Now I am not saying that other, more sustainable forms of energy shouldn't be sought out but this is a relatively clean and safe procedure for natural gas fuel extraction.

Score: -5 ( 19 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Chris Sanford is right. Fracking isn't dangerous. Careless construction of the wells is dangerous.

Roads cave in all the time, because of careless construction and settling underneath the pavement. That doesn't stop us from driving.

Fracking, when done properly is perfectly safe, when corners are not cut and guidelines are not followed.

Instead of protesting against something that you don't know, put you sign down and read. All you college kids who are protesting not having job could get one if fracking were allowed.

Score: -3 ( 21 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

>All you college kids who are protesting not having job could get one if fracking were allowed.

Not so fast. Susan Cornell University did a study of economic effects of fracking. She found no change or negative change in a variety of areas.

To read the study, go to aap.cornell.edu/news/newsitem.cfm?customel-datapageid-2892=396599.


I recently stayed in the Bradford PA Best Western. After breakfast, a converted school bus was loading folks with *Southern* accents. I asked one guy (they are all men, by the way) what he was doing. “Frakin’!” he said. Protecting the environment and land values is more important to the local economy than a quick spike in hotel and bar revenue from out-of-towners. Boom towns become ghost towns. (Think Love Canal, & Hinkley PA)

replied to BrianWhite
Score: 1 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Right, the guys with the southern accents are doing the jobs because 21-year-olds with "experience" are "too good to that kind of work."

Score: -2 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The economic benefit of fracking is greatly exaggerated by those that stand to benefit personally. Nothing new here, the extraction industry has a long history of misrepresenting the number of jobs that can be attributed to their abuse of our natural environment. This is simply about profit, nothing more.

Score: 3 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If people get paid, there's an economic benefit. You're not going to tell me all the people doing the work are volunteers.

All private business is about profit -- and I'm sure you still buy stuff.

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: -3 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The other posts are correct. It has been practiced for years and the technology exists to do it safely. I do agree that Fracking needs to be properly regulated.

But all the sheep do what your told and jump on the wagon because anti-fracking is the new cool thing to protest against. Mr. Bornemisza certainly doesn't speak for me when saying that all college students are against Fracking.

We have one of the largest natural gas deposits in the world sitting under portions of NY that have the potential to create thousands of jobs. PA is already heavily vested in the practice and has demostrated it can be done safely.

Score: -1 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There's a simple statement that can be substituted for most protests, including this anti-fracking movement: "Do better."
The process of hydraulic fracturing "hydrofracking" has been going on for a long time, but horizontal exploration with explosives is a relatively new feature with certain advancements in this technology made over the last 8 years making it even more lucrative to developers because extraction rates are significantly increased with this process on areas that used to be deemed unsuitable for traditional methods of drilling, including older methods of hydraulic fracturing. The safety record of such wells may seem viable but long-term effects are understudied; however, the disposal of chemically treated water used in the process remains a significant concern. Also, few people seem to connect the fact that pumping millions of gallons of once-fresh ground water that has to come from somewhere causes a strain on local aquafiers and water supplies. This fresh water is no longer viable for drinking, traditional treatment, or, currently, disposal. We like to think, living on the great lakes loaded with an abundance of fresh water supply that it is endless, but current models indicate that under our current rates of consumption water might become a commodity to surpass all other fuels. By using these wasteful practices we make that future all the closer. So the call should be: "Do Better." It's very likely the current short-term environmental policy based on profits and speed will be the thing our grandchildren will curse us for.

Score: 3 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The self proclaimed experts on fracking are the truly ignorant, not those that seek to protect our environment from the excesses of the the highly profitable extraction industry. We presently do not have near enough history or information on whether fracking is safe. The industry has been waging a propaganda campaign to limit debate and minimize the risks of fracking. Most scientists that do not work for the industry have many questions and concerns around fracking. It is just common sense that injecting large quantities of dangerous chemicals into the earth might result in unanticipated consequences.

I own land on top the Marcellus shale in the Franklinville area. My property has numerous springs ranging from an elevation of 1750 to 2200 feet above sea level. These natural springs have provided fresh water for thousands of years and are the source of a small stream located on my property. That small stream flows into Ischua Creek and then on to the Alleghany River and eventually feeds the Mississippi River. My point is that it is all connected, any impact locally is felt in the entire ecosystem. It is simply naive or worse just basic greed that blinds so many to the risk and long term consequences of fracking.

Score: 5 ( 19 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

How do you get to that land? Teleport? My guess would be that your car, if your land is anything like my brother's hunting cabin in Stueben, -- your gas guzzling truck has to go off road to get to it.

My point is that everything, when done improperly is bad. Studies have shown that if the entire population transitioned from fuel cars to water vapor cars, it would rain everyday, because of the high content of moisture. Are we going to stop trying new methods?

You people buy into "fracking is bad" because some kid with Vans, a canvas belt and a desperate need for a bath says so. Good grief.

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: -1 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I drive a fuel efficent small car, 35 mpg, never owned a 4 wheel drive and I have been going out to the country to hike, canoe, and camp for over 35 years, never had a problem. I also planted over 1200 tress on my property to offset my carbon footprint, actually I am probably offsetting yours as well.

As for the dangers of fracking, it is not about what some college kid says, it is just common sense. With a long history of exploring the country I have seen up close the negative impact of the extraction industry. Contrary to what their PR people would like you to believe they have done great damage to our natural environment.

replied to BrianWhite
Score: 4 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Oh -- I have a unicorn. See, I can make things up for the purposes of blogging as well.

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: -3 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Not sure what you claim is "made up", my comment was 100% accurate, as all those that know me can confirm.

replied to BrianWhite
Score: 0 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I don't Give a frack.

Score: -6 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Buffalo State is a NY State institution. Fracking is up to now, illegal in New York State. Kudos, Buff State students, for demanding that your institution comply with the spirit of the law.

Score: 0 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Fracking is never safe, its the huge natural gas companies that would like you believe that there are safe ways frack.

Score: -1 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

the oklahoma geological survey reports that fracking is associated with an increased risk of earthquakes:

http://www.ogs.ou.edu/pubsscanned/openfile/OF1_2011.pdf

Score: 4 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I wonder what formation Energy Mark plans to get gas from for the Buff State and UB campuses. The Marcellus is exposed at the surface south of the city. A 4300 foot deep well drilled at Bethlehem Steel did not encounter the Utica Shale, either(another target). I guess they are looking at the Medina sandstone which is less than 1000 feet below the surface at Buff State. But whatever their thinking, the Buffalo City Council boldly banned that deadly practice of FRACKING within the city limits. Thank God for our city leadership!

Score: 4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

First of all Fracking has in no way been proven safe by any accounts. Sure they have been doing it for years but the areas in which they have these wells have produced a lot of evidence against these companies that their practices damage overall public health and can/have infected the ground water. The EPA is doing a study and while they haven't come to any conclusions yet, they have warned the people to not drink, bathe, or clean anything with their tap water. If there was nothing to worry about, why would the EPA tell people to avoid their tap water at all costs?

Secondly, just because Natural Gas may be "greener" than oil and coal on combustion does not take into account any of the other parts of this practice. Their will have to be several thousand truck trips back and forth between these wells to retrieve and deliver the waste water and the gas itself. Once used the waste water has no where to be stored and there is no known way to make the waste water pure again.

When will people realize that pushing tons of danger chemicals into our planet is so obviously dangerous and unhealthy to the Earth and all living things?

And to whoever asked, the gas is coming from Pennsylvania.

Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'd take nuclear energy over fracking or any fossil fuel any day. How many nuclear disasters have we had in the past decade, compare that to the number of fossil fuel disasters and the magnitude of impact.

Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

For all of you currently buying any natural gas from sources like National Fuel, NYSEG and RG&E, you are and have been receiving natual gas from the wells in PA for years. In fact NFG is one of the most prolific drillers. The pipeline that has been servicing the Buffalo area for years is where the natural gas will be supplied from for UB. The natural gas coming out of the pipes to the schools is exactly the same as they have been receiving, the only change is who they are paying. There is no way to separate the gas by the method of its drilling, a molecule is a molecule.
For those of you that think you are not receiving the benefits from the Marcellus Shale fracked gas you are mistaken. With the supply of natural gas flooding the market it has driven down the price. That lower price helps electicity generators to sell their electricity cheaper into the NY market so electricity users are benefiting from the fracked gas. Manufacturing in the area can make their goods a little cheaper and compete in the market place against goods from China. The federal government reports that 46% of the natural gas in the US is coming from unconventional drilling. While NY may not want those wells drilled here there are plenty of other states that are grabbing the money.
Its sad that a small company in NY is being criticized for wanting to make money, I guess the people in Buffalo would rather a large corporation like Hess and NFR get the contracts and take the money out of NY.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Domestic energy, purported clean energy . . . sounds good, but . . . what will the verdict be in 10, 20 or 30 years???

Already who knows what the legacy will be for nuclear energy (not even factoring in destructive weather factors) with waste products shipped to storage areas in western mountains. The vessels probably won't last 30 years and certainly not for the thousands of years required.

Count me in for the protest on April 19 at BSC!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment