City March 15, 2012 12:00 AM

PBA's Busti Properties: Move 'em or They'll Remove 'em

PBA’s Busti Properties: Move ‘em or They’ll Remove ‘em

The Buffalo and Fort Erie Public Bridge Authority (PBA) is proceeding with longstanding plans to demolish seven PBA-owned vacant homes on Busti Avenue between Vermont Avenue and Rhode Island Street.  PBA wants the homes removed to expand the Peace Bridge Plaza.  But before the wreckers roll, the PBA is allowing interested parties the opportunity to acquire and relocate the houses free of charge.  Subject to paying all removal costs of course.  757, 765, 771, 777, 783, 791, and 793 Busti Avenue are all on the wrecking list and are being offered "as is."  771 Busti is the landmarked Wilkeson House, built in 1863 (entry image, right).

Parties interested in relocating any structure(s) are required to submit a written proposal to the Authority by 3:00 p.m., Thursday, April 26, 2012.  A $10,000 refundable performance deposit for each structure is required and would be refunded upon the removal of the house and cleanup of the parcel.  You also need to act quickly- homes must be removed by June 29, 2012.

"The PBA is pursuing plans to demolish an entire block of homes they intentionally allowed to rot for 17 years including a 1863 landmarked property," says Kathy Mecca, President of the Columbus Park Association.  "They've offered the public the opportunity to cart away any one of the homes at their own expense including the landmarked property which is protected under City preservation law.  But who's watching?"

"The PBA began purchasing private owner-occupied homes on Busti Avenue in 1995 as a real estate developer and not because there was any official project in place to use the land at that time," says Mecca.  "Therefore, with respect to the property and the deplorable standards in which the PBA has kept them, the Authority should be treated like anyone else who purchases property in the City of Buffalo and held to the same housing code standards."

"Instead, the City's Corporation Counsel ruled May 26, 2009 that as a 'state entity' the City has no jurisdiction enforcing housing codes over the PBA," says Mecca.  "In my opinion that ignoble decision makes the City just as culpable in bringing this crisis back to the forefront.  The PBA clearly for reasons unknown to the average citizen, is treated differently by the City than every other home owner in Buffalo simply because they are a 'state' entity."

IMG_3876.jpgEven with Sam Hoyt leading the PBA board, it is business as usual when it comes to the community, and Mecca feels betrayed. 

"This district's former State Assemblyman Sam Hoyt in 2009 denounced the actions of the PBA for violating the City's housing code and said 'exempting it from its responsibilities to this neighborhood is unacceptable' and condemned their arrogance as 'unaccountable authorities that act as though they are separate from the communities in which they operate."

"Now it seems Hoyt's loyalty to the constituents whom he represented for twenty years is just a faded memory," says Mecca.

Neighborhood residents aren't convinced the homes need to be removed to meet the PBA's plaza plans.  Plans they haven't seen. 

"The PBA is unencumbered in the execution of their own hidden agenda and unchallenged by any level of government," says Columbus Park resident Peter Joseph Certo.

Certo passed along the Authority's response from Director of Communications and Government Relations Matt Davison three months ago, to a request for a summary of plans for the bridge plaza expansion:

"Your plans request is not denied, it will just take time. U.S. CBP and GSA are still reviewing spatial considerations. Once their analysis is complete, we will be able to produce a baseline concept for widespread consumption."

Neighborhood leaders have asked for a public meeting to discuss their plans for all of the PBA-owned properties and the overall plaza project but have been put off.  Residents got wind of a meeting this Friday but were told by Davison via email, "what's scheduled is an unofficial gathering of a few select groups.  It is not a public meeting."  He did offer to sit down with neighbors "soon though and offer the same opportunity for dialog."

"In other words, 'Go to hell, good neighbors," says Certo.

"They just don't get that as a community we have never been stronger or more determined to put an end to all of this," says Mecca.  "The community is hungry to become healthier and stronger.  We have no appetite for the perpetual plans floated by a relic from the Twentieth Century who does not serve the current and future economic needs of the Buffalo Niagara region."

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

Wow, that is generous of the PBA. A whole month to figure out how and where to move a house. I'm sure there's a lot of people who have the means to come up with a complicated plan that fast, and just happen to have a lot somewhere else to put their house.
And 3 months to actually move the thing, which has to be a tremendously complicated undertaking. That has to be an almost impossible task. That seems to me that they are trying to absolve themselves of responsibility for tearing the houses down. They'll be able to say that they offered them for free, but that no one took them up on their offer.
Why such a short notice? It's not like they haven't been planning something like this plaza for years. They've owned these houses for years, and only now decide that have to do something with them? What kind of operation are they running there?
It's stuff like this that make me understand why we still don't even have the slightest clue if they're going to build a bridge in this town. If the PBA is hiding behind their authority as a state institution, then some of the politicians who are supposed to be our voice in Albany and Washington should be raising hell about this.

Score: 30 ( 32 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Exactly- on all points!

replied to pampiniform
Score: 12 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Right on all counts, very concise and accurate assessment.

replied to pampiniform
Score: 9 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

At first read I thought great, they're finally getting their act together, then I read further and am more disgusted at this offer rather than just demolishing them. This is more of a slap in the face.

The biggest hurdle is finding a lot to put these on. The irony is that I'd prefer the current lot they sit on with a view of the water.

replied to pampiniform
Score: 13 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Reminds of that old song Scarborough Fair. If you read the lyrics, you realize the woman is offering her lover her love only if he completes impossible tasks.

replied to pampiniform
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Disgusting arrogance. There should be no government agency that is unaccountable to the people.

Score: 16 ( 22 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Didn't they get the memo that no one in the country cares about a second span for the Peace Bridge? These guys are like that lone Japanese soldier in the Pacific who doesn't realize the war's been over for 40 years.

This whole truck plaza is like a diarrhea sandwich combined with the Trico demo.

Score: 9 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

At the VERY, VERY least, the PBA should take it upon itself to securely move and re-establish the Wilkeson House (well, they should actually relocate all the homes).

This is truly a slap in the face, and I agree with Pamp--such a half-assed offer.

Score: 7 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What the PBA should move are the TRUCKS!

The Peace Bridge wasn't intended for the type of commercial traffic these bullies are trying to shove down the throat of the crown jewel location of this City.

replied to Travelrrr
Score: 7 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Arrogance is much too nice of a word to describe the PBA.

Score: 6 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

memo to pba:

you're not getting a second bridge. terribly sorry.

signed,

the federal government

Score: 10 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Can we, finally, all agree that Sam Hoyt never gave a flying f@ck about anyone other than Sam Hoyt?

Score: 21 ( 25 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Shame on Sam Hoyt! None too surprisingly, he's taken another opportunity to further his career while selectively abandoning his *values* on historic preservation and the environment. What a phony. When he was appointed as Chair of the PBA (on the heels of all that sucking up to Cuomo during his campaign) he had a chance to make up for HIS Legislation that GAVE power of Eminent Domain to the Peace Bridge in the first place. Now, this recent tactic is like a "close parentheses" on a mission he helped advance 8 years ago. Back then, he seemed like a hero in restricting the distance of the Eminent Domain. In hindsight, I see the move as straight out of the playbook of the Screw-the-Public Bridge Authority.

If you want to see for yourself, look here:
http://nmgonline.org/oldsite/action_groups/tag/PBA_ED/Letter2.jpg
http://nmgonline.org/oldsite/action_groups/tag/PBA_ED/Letter3.jpg
and here:
http://nmgonline.org/oldsite/action_groups/tag/PBA_ED/Letter1.jpg

(Let's see how long before those pages get taken down. Not to worry, I downloaded them.)

Score: 7 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This past January, I stopped by 771 Busti just to take a quick look at the 1863 Italianate that I had been reading about on Buffalo Rising as well as Buffalo Spree.

I found an interesting, albeit sad, example that is larger than any other building of this type that I have personally seen. I was more disappointed to see that a circa 1980’s raised ranch had been built right next door but it was as boarded-up and as equally forgotten as 771 Busti so there was definitely no discrimination on the PBA’s part in regards to total neglect and total demolition.

Unfortunately, 771 Busti has been experiencing neglect long before PBA’s ownership with its conversion into apartments and the 1950’s picture window replacement; all of which can be corrected.

However, only the front and side “L” appear to be in reasonably good condition with the fascia and soffit (typically) suffering the extent of moisture damage but, on a positive note, the original corbels remain in place and surround almost the entire perimeter of the building which is nice to see as these architectural features are often removed for maintenance reasons.

A feature I found of interest is what looks like a traditional horse window but, from its location, must have been used to allow air to circulate under the stairwell. Also, the original outside root cellar entry has been completely filled-in which looks rather comical but I suppose only a few individuals would see the humor in that having been done.

The back section, alas, is destroyed; the roof has been compromised to the point of being potentially dangerous and is at that precarious point (like St Mary’s on the Hill bell tower) where it could remain intact for the next decade or collapse after the next snow storm which is where the City of Buffalo has probably ear-marked the building for condemnation.

Also, there is an odd second floor addition made of corrugated siding that does not seem to serve any purpose unless you’re a pigeon enthusiast.

If I were to win the lottery, I would consider the offer to purchase and relocate but I fear 771 Busti is slated for the landfill.

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yet another Hoyt on the waterfront appointment by Cuomo.

"Another big announcement concerned the board itself: Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo named Sam Hoyt to serve as interim chairman of Erie Canal Harbor Development Corp.'s board of directors."

Kind of a Dr Jekyll & Mr Hyde irony in this — or, is it?

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

can someone post hoyt's contact info here so that we can make our opposition known? he all but dropped off the radar since leaving office.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Grad 94, re: contact info for Sam Hoyt:
a) sam(at)samhoyt(dot)com might still work.
b) he's on facebook.
c) I'll bet you could reach him c/o his pal Andy Cuomo or PBA offices.

replied to grad94
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

v361- I think sam hoyt's middle name IS patronage. He has no qualifications whatsoever to serve on ECHDC's board, so should fit right in.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Call me a dreamer who is irrational if you like. But, back when all this started, I suggested that all these homes that were capable of surviving a move should have been moved en masse to an area near nicer neighborhoods where they would fit in.

One such area could have been where the Colvin Estates are now under construction. Or, where the former RR tracks run north of the Central Park community. Not to ignore or omit South Buffalo, there is plenty of land in many places.

Also as I have said before using this concept as infill on the East Side would be a tragic waste. I am very definitely not a fan of that urban practice. However, it might have been aa good idea (if they had to be scattered around the city)to utilize them as infill in architecturally significant neigborhoods where homes have been destroyed. If done correctly, they could appear as if they had always been there.

Pie in the sky? You bet! But it could have been done. I even considered making a charming cluster of historic homes as part of Canalside!

Dreams, dreams, dreams .....way, way, way out side the box!

At any rate

Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Pegger, you suggested this "back when this all started" in 1995? And what exacly is wrong with this neighborhood; the FIRST--and ONLY surviving--waterfront community in Buffalo, with an already magnificient mix of homes from 1860-1950, thriving and vibrant despite the ongoing deadly threat to its existence from an unchecked public authority and some general apathy and ignorance? If you want ideas on which other houses to scatter about, why don't you sign up for one of our guided tours this summer, we'd welcome the opportunity to educate you on our value.

replied to Pegger
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There is nothing wrong with the neighborhood and the current location is superb as is. But, all the machinations since '95 prove that it is an area under threat. Many of them need a lot of work due to all the factors that have changed so many times...first this, then that, etc.

Ideally, it should have been left alone and the ones that are in disrepair might mot have gotten that way.

I was thinking in terms of an alternative if they have to be torn down. All along the east side of the Upper Niagara, there are few neighborhoods with a great view. That is a reflection of our industrial past.

If I could make it so, I would wave my wand and deem the lots sacred and to be owned by private citizens in perpetuity with a clause stating that nothing be built to obstruct the views. But that ain't going to happen either.

replied to peterjoe
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Could somebody please tell me if the relocation proposal deadline has been extended? I am very interested in relocating 771 Busti to another location on the westside.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I would be doubtful. But, considering they're still standing, perhaps there is still a chance.

I'd get in touch with the Campaign For Greater Buffalo:

http://greaterbuffalo.blogs.com/

Or the cats that run this site:

http://savedontpave.org/

I wouldn't contact the PBA. That would be like talking to Dick Cheney about climate change.

Good luck. You'd be a badass in these parts if you could do it.

But of course, it shouldn't be moved at all because the PBA should be stopped dead.

replied to Danfitz86
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment