Real Estate March 26, 2012 12:00 AM

Construction Watch: Larkin District

Construction Watch: Larkin District

A 'town square' for the Larkin District is shaping up.  Construction is taking place on every corner of the Swan/Seneca/Emslie street intersection.  Larkin Development Group has three projects underway and recently completed two residential units at its Schaefer Building.

The circa-1930 Larkin Gas Station is under renovation.  Long hidden behind white panels, the refurbished brick building will house a café with seating both indoors and in the plaza.  New windows are in and the garage doors seen below will be removed.

 

IMG_4340.jpg

larkinsquarerender.jpgIMG_4338.jpgIMG_4342.jpgIMG_4339.jpgSurrounding the Larkin Filling Station is Larkin Square, a public gathering space.  A covered walkway connects to the adjacent Larkin U Building, newly renovated and fully leased by First Niagara.  The project also includes a picnic shelter, elevated platform, landscaping, dyed concrete, retail stalls, and tables and seating.  Planned events including movies, concerts, markets and festivals promise to draw nearby workers, residents and visitors. 

IMG_4336.jpgAt the northeast corner of Seneca and Emslie, the former Swan Lounge is being transformed into a mix of retail and residential space.  The formerly painted brick has been cleaned and new windows are going in.

schaeferlofts.bmpAcross the street, two, two-bedroom loft apartments have been finished in the third floor of the circa-1900 Schaeffer Building.  Office space on the building's first two levels was completed in 2010 and is occupied by Young + Wright Architectural.

IMG_4351.jpgExterior work is nearly complete at the Larkin Center of Commerce, the mammoth former warehouse at 701 Seneca Street.  Owners Jim Cornell, Peter Krog, and Gordon Reger and adding office tenants to the roster of light industrial and warehousing firms.  The 1.3 million sq.ft. building's exterior has been painted white and hundreds of windows have been replaced. 

All of the investment is changing the look of the neighborhood.  It builds upon a $1.5 million streetscape improvement project completed in 2010 that included new streets, sidewalks, bike lanes, curbs, landscaping, lighting, benches, bus shelters and crosswalks over a half-mile stretch of Seneca Street between Fillmore Avenue and Larkin Street. 

Larkin Development Group and others have plans for additional rehab and new building projects that will fill in and expand the Larkin District's boundaries.

Interior loft photos by Larkin Development Group

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

This is amazing. I am truly proud of the makeover happening here in this area. Can't wait to see what the summer brings in terms of entertainment and excitement.

Job very well done !!!

Score: 11 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Anyone ten years ago predicting this transformation of the Larkin District would have been declared a certified nut job.

Score: 16 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Ditto...

My compliments and thank you for proving that a distressed area can be brought back to life!

replied to rubagreta
Score: 9 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

amazing.

here's hoping that more investment flows to seneca street and in-fill development spreads back towards downtown.

Score: 11 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Although not there yet, a critical mass of commercial/residential activity in this area could eventually justify rail transit to the Larkin District. The location of the new square is a short walk down Swan from the rail right of way that heads out past Central Terminal and the airport (that walk takes you right past the remnant of the Larkin Administration building at Swan near Seymour).

A first phase of an airport line could connect the current line past the NFTA maintenance yard, a few blocks on streets through the Cobblestone District (first stop) and then existing right of way to a Larkin stop.

Score: 7 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Wow, that's what you're interested in? Give it 50 years maybe Buffalo will justify new rail growth.

replied to Jack
Score: -5 ( 17 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The temporary retail structures shown in the rendering above is exactly what the inner harbor could have as early as this summer. The added activity might be enough to attract the food trucks to set up shop on a regular basis too.

Score: 9 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

can't wait for the cafe to open.

Score: 5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Kudos to Howard Zemsky and his partners for having the vision to do this or for surrounding themselves with people who do. Imagine if all of Buffalo was led by people with that sort of vision.

The Larkin District has seen exceptional renovations of existing buildings. Surely the next step will be some creative infill on the vacant lots along Seneca and Swan.

Score: 10 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Not one critical comment on here--go figure.

Great project--historic, whimsical, creative, etc. I agree with Grad--cannot wait to see some quality infill up Seneca.

Score: 8 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Memo to BNMC: See above.

Score: 11 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

maybe that canopy does need solidity, perhaps easy made bleachers, or some kind of surface design. i like it.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Question: What is the elevated walkway with the pink, purple, and blue circles supposed to be used for? Kinda confused about it's use....

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It appears to be an elevated seating area - the rendering shows picnic tables sitting on top of the elevated platform.

replied to 5to81ALLDAY
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Also, all wooden structures need to be painted

Score: -5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is awesome! So nice to see this area get this kind of attention, I'm just floored.

Kinda miss the ol swan lounge though :/

Oh well, do I see another venue for free outdoor concerts!?

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

hope this development heads over the bridge into the valley. peg overdorf has enticed several young families into purchasing homes in the valley and ward. this could become a very cool place to live.

Score: 4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Big props to First Niagara to continually want to make the area around their headquarters better. Buffalo needs to attract more corporations and even better more corporate headquarters.

Score: 5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is great...now PLEASE do not put a modern building in the area! Keep with the period and the density and the streetscape.

Use the Beltway to extend light rail to the Larkin District and Central Terminal. Dont waste the beautiful Larkin District with surface parking lots.

Oh and does anyone notices whats missing? Could it be trees and bushes.

Id love to see Sycamore lined with Sycamore trees, Oaks on Oak, Elms on Elm... wonderful flowering cherry and pear and crabapple in the fruit belt.

Last thing...open space is great for summer months but get the density and protected spaces for the winter months.

Score: -7 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

A great place for a public market...

Buffalo needs a public market like Rochester.

http://www.cityofrochester.gov/publicmarket/

Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Where are all the people that had such negative comments about saving Trico?
People this is what historic preservation is all about!
These buildings are all similar to Trico and look at what Zemsky has created...The Buffalo Niagara Medical Campus could do the same thing. All it takes is a vision, hard work and money...They already have the money.

Score: 2 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Exactly....now THEY are the armchair preservationists. It's so easy to applaud a project once it is completed.

Problem is, the haters have no vision.

replied to r-k-tekt
Score: 4 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Don't even compare the two. Larkin building consists of 60k sq ft floorplates. Trico #1 is 9 different buildings/additions. The floors don't even match up.

replied to r-k-tekt
Score: -2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The difference is that BNMC is not willing to take the risk, and has no vision for what a renovated Trico could look like. They want to put up more bland architecture, with no character like the Vascular Center and the Center of Excellence.

replied to saltecks
Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The role of the BNMC is to develop a world class medical institute in Buffalo. It is not be about forcing them to spend 180million to rehab a building. I think it is reprehensible to even suggest they should divert funds, which are earmarked to create an institution to improve the health and welfare of all living WNYers, towards saving a building. Its Too bad you don't appreciate the new med campus buildings or their promise. I'll bet if Calatrava had built his first building in Buffalo you probably would have said Yeech!

replied to hamp
Score: -1 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"improve the health and welfare of all living WNYers,"

Well, fostering a dense, walkable urban neighborhood where people can put down the cheeseburger and ride a bike would sure help in that regard. Amazing how rates for heart disease, high cholesterol, and diabetes have sky-rocketed as we move more and more towards a sedentary lifestyle of auto-centric Euclidean zoning. It's sort of incredible how much the built environment can affect public health.

On a side note, the BNMC purchased the building in 2006 knowing full well it had been listed on the National Register in 2001. Did they not think there would be some sort of community backlash if they were to advance demolition plans without concrete plans for the site's future use?

replied to saltecks
Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So what, its on the National register. So is the Barbershop where Elvis Presley had his hair cut before entering the army. There are 1.3 million buildings on the register. Being on the National register means only one thing. You can get Federal tax credits. That is why the original developer had the state submit it. He needed public funds to complete the project.It Does not mean the building is an architectural wonder. AFA why did they buy it. They wanted the other buildings and land that came with it. It was a package deal. And right now they don't own iT. Trico#1 is owned by Buffalo Brownfield. They are responsible for it's maintenance. BNMC is only the preferred developer.

replied to DTK2OD
Score: -1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'll let the professionals determine if a building is architecturally significant or not, thanks--NOT a group focused on building a world-class medical/research facility. And, that is the problem--that is not what has happened, or is happening.

replied to saltecks
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So who are the experts? I'm looking at BUFFALO ARCHITECTURE: A GUIDE (1981 MIT press) , essentially the bible of important Buffalo architecture. Not a word on this particular building. Same with CLASSIC BUFFALO, A heritage of Distinguished Architecture (1999 Canisius College Press) also crickets on this building. So apparently before 2001 there was not much enthusiasm for Trico#1.

replied to Travelrrr
Score: -1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Such a lack of enthusiasm that the "official list in the US for cultural and historic places" deems it significant? Oh yeah--THOSE experts.

replied to saltecks
Score: 0 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

They add to the list whatever an authorized state agency sends them. Not to bust your bubble or Do you thing the Secretary of the Interior takes a personal interest on what is added to the list. This member of the cabinet has far bigger fish to fry. How do you think 30,000 request a year are handled. I really don't want to disillusion you but there probably are a few senior personnel who give the requests a cursory review, then pass it to their GS-5 minions to record.

replied to Travelrrr
Score: -2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"I'm looking at BUFFALO ARCHITECTURE: A GUIDE (1981 MIT press) , essentially the bible of important Buffalo architecture. Not a word on this particular building."
Technically, that book does mention this building, when it lists Trico #2 and compares it to the other 2 Trico plants in Buffalo.

But regardless of how indirectly it's mentioned there, you don't honestly believe one guide book is going to include EVERY significant building in Buffalo. Do you?

I'm sure you would also realize that the book is over 30 years old, and that society's views of what is "historic" will obviously change over time. Yes?

replied to saltecks
Score: 0 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

First off I mentioned more than one book. To quote the book you are referencing... "The handsome brick and terra-cotta facade of plant#2 is NOT repeated in the other two buildings". If you want to read anything into it, it actually indirectly disses Plant #1, without mentioning it. AFA your last point, in general yes. In regard to this particlar building (with the exception of the Wayand building), I have some serious doubt.

replied to 300miles
Score: -1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"Does not mean the building is an architectural wonder."

No one ever said it was. There are four criteria that can potentially make a building/object/site eligible for the NR:

A. That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or

B. That are associated with the lives of significant persons in or past; or

C. That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or

D. That have yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory.

I'm assuming Trico fell under criterion A since day light factories play a significant role in telling the story of Buffalo's industrial heritage.

Even from an architectural standpoint though, the Trico's scale, massing, and relationship to its context would most likely not be replicated by new construction.

replied to saltecks
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You know your right.Probably Option A. Except that option a is satisfied by The original Medina Sandstone portion which was the Weyand Brewery cold storage building which Tri-Continental purchased and which BNMC had no intention of demolishing.

replied to DTK2OD
Score: -2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You know your right.Probably Option A. Except that option a is satisfied by The original Medina Sandstone portion which was the Weyand Brewery cold storage building which Tri-Continental purchased and which BNMC had no intention of demolishing.

replied to DTK2OD
Score: -2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You have a point that it may not be wise for BNMC to allocate any funds to this building. Emphasis on the word 'any.' By that I mean, they should probably not be allocating tens of millions (?) to tear the thing down, either. There are plenty of undeveloped plots on the campus. But alas, that's just my opinion.

replied to saltecks
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"The role of the BNMC is to develop a world class medical institute in Buffalo." Right you are. So, why purchase, and play "developer", with a property on the National Register if you have no business being a developer? Why not let a developer take care of that?

replied to saltecks
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

RE: Parking

There is already plenty of parking lots here (and free too). As someone who works in the district, this is EXACTLY why it is sucessful along with easy access to the 190. If you create another urban area that is difficult to get in and out with limited parking the model that Zemsky has created will fail. Drop the light rail utopia idea unless you're begging to ruin the wonderful progress that has been made. What has been created is a "best of both worlds"... easy access and ease for suburbanites and the benefits of a urban landscape. You can't argue that it is working.

Score: -1 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"If you create another urban area that is difficult to get in and out with limited parking the model that Zemsky has created will fail."

Hertel, Elmwood, Amherst, Grant, etc. etc. etc.???

replied to Darren Pogue
Score: 4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Bad comparison. Are there any huge corporations with thousands of employees on Elmwood, Hertel That all hit the streets simultaneously?

replied to DTK2OD
Score: -2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"Hertel, Elmwood, Amherst, Grant, etc. etc. etc.???"

DTK, what he wrote was "If you create another urban area that is difficult to get in and out with limited parking the model that Zemsky has created will fail."

The 'model' meaning a big dependence on corporate-type office use. Your comparison to Hertel, Elmwood, or Amherst St looks like it's about storefront retail/boutiques, galleries, pizza, bars, etc.
Different model.

replied to DTK2OD
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Since the article was focused more on the successful adaptive reuse of many of area's buildings, I figured that's what he meant by "the model that Zemsky has created." A thousand pardons m'lady.

replied to whatever
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Can we send these guys over to Main St. for fixing up when they're done with Larkin???

Score: 6 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Drank many a beer in the Swan Lounge while working in the Larkin Building in the early 70's. What a magnificent change this area is going thru!!!!

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I love the way this is shaping up. Combined with the Union Ship Canal and the renovated Outer Harbor, we are really getting some nice exposure to our waterfront and the surrounding areas.

And because they're being a good corporate citizen, First Niagara is the first bank I researched when my current bank let me know they'll be charging me $9.99/month for my formerly free checking account.

Being in touch with the community goes a long way to helping your business succeed. Kudos to Larkin Development and First Niagara.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Too bad the building next to the Swan Lounge was demolished several years ago. Not sure if there are any pictures out there of it. It would have added a little more density. Still this area is looking great.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Splendid! It’s irrefutable evidence of Buffalo’s rising.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This reminds me of NYC's Union Square-- I hope it becomes a cool place for Buffalonians to gather to "hang out" and I'm really impressed that something fresh and new is happening in Buffalo these days.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment