City November 3, 2011 2:30 PM

The Plight of St. Matthew's

The Plight of St. Matthew’s

Alice Davis looks up at St. Matthew's Church across the street from her home with bittersweet emotions. She is a long-time resident of Moselle Street and was a parishioner before its closing in 1998. Davis has witnessed the building's fall from grace as it sits neglected and open to the elements. Although she is saddened by the ruinous state of the building, she still has hope.

St. Matthew's rises higher than anything in the neighborhood and remains as the crux of a once bustling church complex that takes up an entire city block. The church was completed in 1928 while the nunnery, rectory, and school where built between 1911 and 1923. Early parishioners worshipped in the basement until the necessary funds were raised to complete the current building. They saved what little they could afford to build a monument to their faith and their city.

The design for St. Matthew's is modeled after the Cathedral of Aachen in Aachen, Germany and built in the Romanesque style. Constructed with Ohio sandstone and retaining some of its original features, the building stands a reminder of when people truly cared and invested in architecture. Unfortunately, that mindset is completely absent today. A congregation purchased the building after the diocese had closed it but abandoned the property just six years later.

It was sold at City auction in 2006 for $3,500 and was listed unsuccessfully on eBay by the buyers for two years. The owners ultimately unloaded their burden on Frank Beard, a local resident.

matt1.pngBeard envisioned converting the complex into a community center, which would unite people in the grand space. He was unable to get the project off the ground however and has recently been stripping the building instead. It began with the radiators, but has now started stripping the copper flashing from the roof.

Davis was concerned as she watched and confronted Beard. He informed her that he had "received the go-ahead from Mayor Brown" to scrap the copper in hopes of funding the rehabilitation.

A quick check at City Hall shows that Beard had neither applied for nor received a permit to begin the work. The going rate of copper is currently $2.40/lb and about twenty pounds have been removed, adding up to less than fifty dollars in profit. The question remains, is a fifty dollar profit justifiable for what will likely result in the ultimate collapse of the building?

This isn't the first time the disrepair of St. Matthew's has been brought to light. David Torke of fixbuffalo has been documenting the building for years as well Charlotte Hsu of the Buffalo Story Project.

While Beard cannot be blamed for the condition of the property when he received it, he is completely responsible for any future damages resulting from the removal of the copper flashing.

Anyone who is concerned about the cultural heritage of the building should contact the Inspections Department at City Hall. The chief building inspector, Louis Petrucci, can be reached at 851-4936 or Gene Fronczak at 851-4046.

As of today there is no active housing court file for 1066 East Ferry. The future of St. Matthew's remains uncertain.

matt3.png

matt2.png
SM-2530.jpg^ Moselle Street facade where copper flashing has been removed from the lower portion

SM-2336.jpg^ East Ferry facade two days prior to the copper being stripped from above the rose window
Interior photos courtesy of David Torke, fixbuffalo
View image

Comments

Leave a comment

" has recently been stripping the building instead. It began with the radiators, but has now started stripping the copper flashing from the roof ... A quick check at City Hall shows that Beard had neither applied for nor received a permit to begin the work "


Now that city hall knows this guy is illegally stripping the building without a permit, what are they doing about him? Is he in housing court? Did the city insist he stop?

Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Is he connected with anyone in City Hall to even avoid court? Remember, the city is the WORST land lord.

replied to 300miles
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

As far as I know, no. This is why having an active and preservation-minded City Court Judge is so important. If you haven't already, you should really look into Gillian Brown for Housing Court Judge. http://fixbuffalo.blogspot.com/2011/09/gillian-brown-getting-into-housing.html

replied to Lego1981
Score: 4 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Guess they don't need to come all the way from Atlanta to rape and pillage our architecture......

Score: 7 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

beautiful opening photo.

imagine rome throwing away any of their european church masterpieces like they throw away churches in america. occupy oakland place!

Score: 2 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Are their any rotting churches in the suburbs?

Score: 1 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What does that mean?

replied to STEEL
Score: -3 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The city allows too much to rot away while in the burbs, fines, housing court and neighbor complaints are more common.

replied to pampiniform
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Ok, so where is that line of thought going then? I don't think that would really surprise anyone here, would it?

replied to Lego1981
Score: -5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is a sentence formulated with the intent of eliciting information. It is called a question. In this case the sentence is asking if there are chuches rotting in the suburbs.

replied to pampiniform
Score: 2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Ok then, I will reply likewise with a phrase that is formulated to attempt to supply information, or as it is sometimes known: a response. I don't think there are any rotting churches in the suburbs. Now, what are you getting at then?

replied to STEEL
Score: -4 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Steel, maybe he thought you were being sarcastic as I did. You can lay it on pretty thick.

replied to STEEL
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Many of the churches in the 'burbs are practically indistinguishable from barns or strip malls, and are hidden behind a sea of parking. If they started rotting, not many people would notice or care.

replied to STEEL
Score: 10 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Carl Paladino would care: he would buy them and turn them into RiteAid locations.

replied to DeanerPPX
Score: 1 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I get it that they don't build churches like that anymore. I like these older churches myself. But what point are you driving at here?

replied to DeanerPPX
Score: -3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Steel asked if there were any churches rotting in the suburbs. I'm sure there are several in the far rural areas as well as a few in the inner rings that will soon be joining their urban counterparts.

The question about where the building is located isn't as important as the quality of the buildings themselves. St Matthew's would be an equal loss if it were deteriorating in the heart of downtown, the middle of Lancaster, or an exoburb of Atlanta.

But if a generic cookie-cutter 1970s barn of a church sat unused and stripped for scrap metal at the corner of Moselle and Ferry, there wouldn't be a need to write an article about it.

There are plenty of buildings rotting in the suburbs. Right now, most of them are commercial structures instead of churches: Strip malls that were built before the bubble and remain empty as the day they were built, or have seen their tenants close-up shop without a replacement. Housing subdivisions that were abandoned partway through construction and sit as bare roads with utility pipes sticking out of the ground. Empty warehouses and office complexes that get passed from realtor to realtor without a tenant. They're not churches with handcrafted architectural features and decades of history behind them, they were built to be disposable and nobody cares if they fall apart.

replied to pampiniform
Score: 12 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So what does that have to do with this church then? Ok, there are things falling apart in the suburbs. That isn't relevant to this discussion. Why Steel brought the suburbs into this isn't clear unless he's going to launch into another anti - sprawl/anti - suburb diatribe.

replied to DeanerPPX
Score: -5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

We can argue all day about the challenges of preserving and reusing old church buildings but there is no defense for this desecration. This is simply criminal and should be treated a such. Removing the copper flashing on this building will result in irreparable damage to the integrity of both the interior and exterior structure. Flashing is second to only the roof itself as a crucial barrier to water infiltration and the resulting damage. The city need to step in immediately to stop this abuse or this one is a goner.

Score: 6 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Mike Puma - Brown is running for city court judge, not housing court judge.
Judge Carney has been doing an outstanding job as the successor to Judge Nowak in housing court. He has even been tougher on problem properties.

The Chief city court judge appoints who will be housing court judge.

Keep your reporting accurate.
BTW - Diane Wray has been involved in helping people with their properties for a long time. She will make an excellent city court judge.

Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thank you for the clarification

replied to peripatetic
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This church was built in the middle of an economic & population boom time. It's hardly a surprise that after the money and the people went away, it sits abandoned. To make matters worse, way too many Catholic churches attached schools and nunneries to themselves, so now there are entire blocks (like this one) devoted to long-gone uses.

Without handing a few million$ to an obscure singer, churches such as this have no future.

Score: -6 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Actually the use is not long gone. The metro population is bigger now than it was when this building was constructed. Even as population growth ended and church attendence declined WNY kept building more churches and excess infrastructure. The result is that we have traded the new stuff for the old. The result is that architectural, artistic and cultural treasures get left behind to rot. The unfortunate part of this is that in almost every case the new replacement is anything but a treasure of any kind.

replied to MrGreenJeans
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Steel, You left these churches behind yourself when you left the area. Did you think about that when you left? Now imagine you were someone trying to get out of the neighborhood in a hurry when it began its decline, what would you have done?

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Oh you mean people don't like to worship in bad neighborhoods?

replied to pampiniform
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Well, if this church is anything to go by (or for that matter a good number of inner city churches)then no, evidently they don't.

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That is sad because I am sure that is where Jesus would want them to be. Not that Jesus would ask them to build big fancy buildings but since the buildings are already there....

replied to pampiniform
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

don't forget about the obscure Grammy

Score: 0 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Unless your a Lesbian or a Buffalonian, Obscure is a good word. What a shame this is, stunning building, but par for course.

replied to truestar
Score: -4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Citing the obvious but, if the copper flashing has been removed, then the already compromised roof will only be accelerated and the moisture damage, evident in these photos, will lead to a total collapse of the plaster ceilings.

The end result will parallel the interior of the Central Terminal which is exactly what the owner of that building had done and, subsequently, walked away from any responsibility.

Score: 6 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I saw the stripping taking place. We should give incentives for congregations to move into these places of worship. or have a very transparent methodology of changing the zoning or policies of what they are allowed to be used for.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

$1 Quit Claims: Is this the same Burden Bearing Beard that owns 807 Delaware Ave.? And is he related to the 13 other Beards listed online as City of Buffalo property owners?

Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is a great building but we need to dis-associate it with “religion” as it is no longer a house of worship.

This is an excellent example of adaptive reuse, which has become a buzzword, with little to no meaning or comprehension from the many who like to toss the phrase around in a conversation.

A circa 1928 building is not exactly old in terms of buildings and it was certainly well constructed and will last for another 100-years if maintained and, as far as maintenance goes, when the hell was the last time the Diocese ever put any money into this structure; 1961?

A structure, just as this probably stood for 50-years with little to maintenance then suddenly, it becomes too expensive to maintain and we need to either walk away from it or call for the demolition contractor.

Today’s building materials, despite all of the naysayers is far superior in terms of withstanding the elements and if this structure were renovated, it would last for another 50-75 years with little to no maintenance.

I know location is everything but an organization, such as Habitat for Humanity, actually has offices not too far from here and this building would make for an excellent office for them with room to spare. I am not specifically citing this organization but using it as an example.

This location should be the anchor for the neighborhood and should still be standing long after the surrounding neighborhood is gone.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

the problem, of course, is the severe restrictions placed on vacant catholic churches by the diocese. there is no methodist or episcopalian counterpart to st. matthews or transfiguration because protestant denominations actually allow their churches to be reused.

as long as the diocese prohibits commercial reuse, just about all you can do with an old catholic church is be school, charity, or another church. and even then if they disapprove of your charity, tough luck. they've basically prohibited any use that makes the building financially viable again.

Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Unfortunately, this Church is located in one of the most decimated areas of the City. The old School behind it is still utilized (at least last I knew) was Viva La Casa.

This Church, like Transfiguration, St. Gerards,St. Anns etc; speaks to the truth (as some don't want to believe) that our ethnic neighborhoods of Polish/German/Italian/Irish have faded and/or gone. Those primarily Catholic neighborhoods have ceased. The Black community is more of a Baptist/Episcopalian/Gospel church going populace, and as anyone who drives in the East Side can note many storefront churches have taken the place of cathedrals.

The Catholic Diocese has allowed this willful destruction to take place by not allowing reuse per their rules, but this is a wider statement about the state of religion in the United States. I notice it when I go to my Catholic Church in Tonawanda here. The ranks are dwindling, and as many others my "belief" factor is more of an agnostic view rather than the "set" view of religion. I'm apt to go for my children's sake as they are educated in Catholic schools.

Churches are not the community centers they once were.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The Catholic Church is has made it's choice, and that choice was made by John Paul II. The institution has decided that it must be ideologically pure, and that all parishes toe the conservative line handed down from the Vatican. There is no room for dissent from the Vatican authority -- none whatsoever. And the church has clearly taken the line that if you don't like it, then leave.

The church would prefer to be smaller but more homogenous, and focused on Big Social Issues, like abortion and gay rights, rather than being a friend to the local community. The church as it existed 50 years ago is not the church that exists today.

Those who don't like this or approve are free to leave, which is exactly what has happened. And the church says good riddance to them, as they don't want anyone who doesn't agree with their rigid belief system.

There are many losers in this, and none more so than our local communities. The catholic institution (and that's all it really is, at heart), doesn't care a fig for the churches it built, and certainly does not care about the communities it helped to build. Nope -- the number one priority of the church is to stop gays from marrying and to stop any woman from having an abortion. The number two priority is making sure the flock toes the line.

replied to irishmedic716
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

In general, yes, Catholic parishes are under pressure to follow strict guidelines from the Vatican and do tend to be quite homogenous. But that is not ALWAYS the case.

My parent's parish (in downtown Atlanta) bucks that trend, and has done so for so long that it actually has the encouragement of the Archbishop to do so.

The pastor during the Civil War had the balls to DEMAND that General Sherman spare it and the neighboring churches from the burning of the City. As such, it remains the oldest structure in Atlanta.

Both Union and Confederate troops attended services together and were treated together in its makeshift hospital. A century before segregation ended, it was one of the only places in the south where blacks and whites mingled. At the beginning of the AIDS crisis, it reached out to gays and lesbians and has now passed its 20th year with an Archdiocesan-approved outreach at the gay pride festival (outreach, not conversion). At the center of the city's homeless outcamps, it provides food and shelter for the destitute and homeless. At any given service, the poorest of the poor stand next to quite wealthy suburbanites. Even the brotherhood forged when the churches were spared from burning stays strong when the three remaining churches (Catholic, Presbyterian and Methodist) celebrate TOGETHER for their Palm Sunday parade and service.

The Shrine's 150-year tradition of accepting and welcoming ALL gives it unique status. The parishioners are black, white, elderly, young, rich, poor, gay, straight, families, singles, and even several non-Catholics who attend simply for the welcoming atmosphere. As it is located in a non-residential government neighborhood of downtown, many regular parishioners travel up to 45 minute from the far exoburbs in all directions of the city.

Even the former Archbishop, who refused to allow women on the altar, acquiesced to its decidedly liberal diversity. Granted, if every Catholic church in America took some of the liberties that the Shrine does, our entire country would be excommunicated en masse by the Vatican.

But as strict as the hierarchy is in the Catholic church, there IS *some* wiggle room. We've even seen our own Bishop Kmiec overturn the will of the Pope when he decided to close St Adalberts, lol.

Perhaps the opportunity has passed, but if we have Bishops overruling the Pope and Catholic congregations being given Archdiocesan encouragement to march in gay pride parades... then there were many opportunities for the abandoned churches of Buffalo to open their doors to the changing demographics of the city instead of simply shutting down and moving to the suburbs. The neighborhood around St Matthews is depressed, not abandoned... there is no reason why these churches needed to close permanently rather than reach out to people of different race or economic backgrounds.

When the Bishop gave up on Corpus Christi, a non-diocesan order stepped in and is currently RESTORING the building. When the Bishop gave up on St Lukes, a non-diocesan order stepped in and is now providing outreach as a Mission of Mercy. When the Bishop gave up on St Adalberts, the parishioners themselves stepped in to fight to keep their church active and open.

There are many alternatives to a 'dead' and dismantled church. Sometimes those alternatives are conversion to non-religious use, or proper maintenance and mothballing, or transfer to other denominations. But one of the simplest choices that has consistently been overlooked is simply keeping the churches alive and adapting to new congregations.

The fact that such an obvious path was ignored is just as troubling as seeing the buildings themselves be dismantled.

replied to Rand503
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

irishmedic>"Catholic Diocese has allowed this willful destruction to take place by not allowing reuse per their rules, …"

That implies if not for the rules, you think this building would now be in use as something today. Really? Isn't that very unlikely?

Their building use rules (which yes are strange, although not as strange as saying a human rose from the dead) really don't forbid many uses. Just a few things aren't allowed - none of which sound viable for that building anyhow - considering costs, location, less expensive more energy efficient buildings being so plentiful, etc, etc.

Paul's mention of of Cleveland reminds me - on the web somewhere is an article from some media in Cleveland I saw last year that was very complimentary about how many successful re-uses the Buffalo Diocese has arranged for church buildings here. It said Cleveland should look to Buffalo for advice/ideas.
That's a very different perspective compared to some views around here full of insults toward Buffalo Diocese about this topic.

replied to irishmedic716
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Two things:

As a part of my photography project I took outside pictures of this Church, how did you get inside to take inside photos?

It's a shame that the current owner is stripping the building, given the price of copper or anything else that is within the building has little value compared to the general restoration/rehab goals of the owner. I believe that this structure along with many others can be reused in a different fashion than they once were. Who will do this? The community could make an attempt or the City could do something.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Check out Cleveland's plight: Cleveland Slavs mourn loss of Catholic churches

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/nationnow/2011/11/cleveland-slavs-mourn-loss-of-catholic-churches-.html

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Question: who has, since reading this article, contacted a member of city council? Explaining the reasons behind why the church is collapsing is good and all, but I think the general consensus is, we would like to see the building be re-used. Time to take initiative Buffalo Rising readers, if you haven't already.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment