Regional November 5, 2011 9:40 AM

Rail Watch: Toronto Getting Sleek New Streetcar Fleet

Rail Watch: Toronto Getting Sleek New Streetcar Fleet

Toronto's familiar streetcars will soon be on their way out.  The fleet of Canadian Light Rail Vehicles is being replaced starting in 2013 by a sleeker, lower and modern light rail vehicle to be built by Bombardier.  The new LRVs will be phased-in with the intent of replacing the entire existing fleet of existing streetcars.

From BlogTO:

There's exciting news from the TTC today, as the new design for Toronto's streetcars has been revealed. Along with a new rendering of the vehicle in action on Queen Street, the Commission has posted a series of interior shots to its Meet Your New Ride website. To say that the new cars will be an update on the current fleet would be an understatement. Given that the original design of the Canadian Light Rail Vehicle (CLRV) dates all the way back to the late 1970s, the change is even more remarkable than what we witnessed with the introduction of the Toronto Rocket subways earlier this year.

2011114-Accessible-Doorway.jpgThe total cost of the replacement project is approximately $1 billion.  204 new rail cars will replace the 247 existing streetcars that were built between 1977 and 1989 and are coming to the end of their economic lives.  The new, accessible, modern, and much longer vehicles will dramatically improve service and customer comfort according to the TTC.

 

TTC_LRV_WEB_TopCar_102811.jpgToronto's eleven streetcar routes encompass 304.6 kilometers and carry approximately 285,000 people per day.  The busiest streetcar routes operate as frequently as every two minutes.  The new higher capacity 30 metre light rail vehicles will replace existing 15 metre streetcars, rush hour service will change from every two or three minutes to every four or five minutes. This will help reduce bunching of streetcars, and will also allow the priority traffic signals for the streetcars to work better than they currently do.

2011530-CLRV_4059_Glamour_Shot.jpgHat Tip to Alan Bedenko

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

Can we buy their old ones?

Mayyyybe build an Elmwood line, museum district to chippewa and then turn right into Main Street and follow the line down...

Score: 6 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Well, they're probably being replaced because their required rehab costs are unreasonable.

replied to Greg
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

it would be way cool to have those funky old cars here.

replied to Greg
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Greg,

We had one. Along with a Broadway Line, Main Street Line, Delaware Line, South Park Line, Seneca Line, etc; We had high speed trains between Buffalo & Niagara Falls, as well as commuter rail lines encircling the city (NYC Belt Line) and (Erie Lackawanna Belt Line). We had tie-ins for commuter trains to go onward to Toronto. The IRC (International Railway Corp) had streetcar lines in Niagara Falls including the old Gorge route and even cemetery cars for Elmlawn Cemetery in Tonawanda.

It would make sense, but I personally believed the NFTA enjoys the stranglehold it has on WNY.

Only if we had someone with foresight, a commuter train along the current CSX line operated only by Amtrak 4 times daily from Downtown Buffalo to Downtown Niagara Falls would benefit our economy as we could have a switch-over with VIA Rail/ GO Transit in Niagara Falls, ONT and have instant access to St. Catherines/Hamilton/Toronto and Canadians vice versa.

Score: 8 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There was a commuter rail line from Orchard Park to downtown.
Those tracks are still in place thru Lackawanna and South Buffalo. By the way what happened to the British Rail bus they were testing (years ago) thru the Southtowns using those same tracks?

replied to irishmedic716
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I thought Toronto's street cars were really nice when I was there a few months ago, I'm surprised they're replacing the entire fleet. I rode a whole bunch of them and I didn't notice any neglect or anything. Everything seemed clean, didn't notice anything broken like I see all the time on NFTA buses and rail.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The first priority of the NFTA should be an overhaul of their embarrassing website to make it user-friendly. I can't imagine any potential tourist thinking about using public transportation in Buffalo after checking out a website that doesn't include a complete route/system map.

http://metro.nfta.com/Routes/Maps.aspx

Score: 6 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Part of what I liked about the current streetcars was the fact that they were old and harkened back to an older period in the city's history. I'll miss them.

Though, I understand entirely why they have to replace them. Toronto is still growing and it needs a more modern trolley system to keep up with a booming population and ready itself for a future where cars are no longer the primary source of transport for the majority of people. Not to mention, if Toronto wants the Olympics, this is the first thing that will need to update in order for the IOC to even consider looking at them.

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The thing that Buffalonians should get out the of article is the last sentence of the article. Priority traffic signals for buses is something that can speed up public transit and is something that can be done.

With the exception of a connection to UB North rail will not be the answer. Reliable efficient bus service is the way to go.

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

ugh articles about toronto depress me. Why? Because its obvious that Torontonians can actually get their sh&t together to make cheap, environmentally friendly, and efficient transport throughout their city. Stop rubbing it in our faces.

Occupy NFTA in the mean time.

Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Not always. Toronto is busy removing well-used bicycle lanes on important downtown corridors.

replied to P2bbuffalonian
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That's because the Toronto suburbanites elected Jabba the Rob Ford Hut to be their mayor. Between killing Transit City, and proposing something along the lines of Disneyland/Mall for their Waterfront, he's not getting re-elected.

I guess Rob Ford is like King Collins, but at least Rob Ford wants to build Downtown.

replied to JSmith
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The cool thing is how low to the ground the car floor is - you don't have a real steep climb to get in. The wheels are tucked under the seats. If we did this in Buffalo, then the stations above ground would be smaller as the wheelchair ramp would be much shorter. However, it would be costly to raise the tracks (or lower the platform) underground to align with a lower floor.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Here's an article about Rochester's lost streetcar system that will make transit aficionados weep:
http://heckeranddecker.wordpress.com/2011/10/25/the-streetcar-city/

In 1929 there were trains running from Rochester to Buffalo every half hour! The streetcars in Rochester ran every 5 minutes at peak hours. Unimaginable today.


Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

A key thing to remember about Toronto's transit system is that it is based on MORE than just sleek new rolling stock and visual appeal. It doesn't survive JUST because T.O. is a larger municipality with a bigger population. It is successful NOT ONLY because it serves a wider range of destinations with greater efficiency.

The key to Toronto's transit is that it incorporates an actual NETWORK of modes, lines and systems. It is relatively seamless to get from St Catharines to Toronto to Oshawa and ALL over the metro area on VIA Rail, GO Trains, TTC subways, Scarborough Light Rail, streetcars, trolley buses and street buses. There are connections to Pearson, the Harbor, downtown, outlying suburbs, and urban neighborhoods.

Contrary to popular belief, Buffalo has quite a respectable transit system compared to most other small-to-midsize cities in the US. I've lived in several cities, and NFTA by FAR tops Pittsburgh's PAT, Atlanta's MARTA and Miami's MetroDade.

But we still lack many of the key strategies to take it to the next level... Getting from the Airport to downtown is anything but user-friendly by bus, and connections to Amtrak are difficult. Our single-line subway basically operates as as high-speed redundancy of the #8 bus, rather than spine-and-spoke system it was once envisioned as being. Routes are excellent for getting around the city, but less than convenient for attracting commuters from the suburbs. Even connections to the suburbs via express NFTA routes often involve a complicated transfer system between downtown bus nodes and the inter-urban bus terminal.

It can take months or years of experience for a regular user to figure it all out. I can imagine that visitors (especially to the Niagara Falls bus terminal) are somewhere between confused and terrified on how to get around. We don't sign things very well, and the NFTA's website and bus maps use archaic diagrams that look like they were put together by a 1st year graphic arts student. Even when you do get within a block of where you're going, chances are that the bus dropped you off at the back door to your destination and you have to hope and guess that you are walking in the right direction to complete your journey.

Expanding and diversifying NFTA's service is definitely a priority, but it is all for naught if they don't streamline their existing services and make it a little more user friendly, both for everyday users AND occasional visitors.

Right now, NFTA is a somewhat acceptible backup to driving around in a car... not an equally convenient alternative, as the TTC/GO/VIA system is is Toronto.

Score: 12 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Comment of the week, IMHO.

replied to DeanerPPX
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Equally convenient alternative? It's a good system, but I suspect there must be a reason Torontonians joke that TTC stands for "Take The Car".

But maybe those are the same sort of people who call the Buffalo Metro Rail the "Train to Nowhere".

replied to DeanerPPX
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Even in places like NYC, DC, and SF which have excellent transit systems, there are still people who would rather slit their wrists than 'belittle' themselves by using public transportation.

I often chuckle at people who cry about the so-called horrors of taking a bus... yet still find the time to bitch and whine about rising gas and insurance prices, or the heart-wrenching ordeals they had to go through at the mechanic, rental agency, DMV or traffic court.

Until somebody invents a free and energy-neutral transporter system like on Star Trek, there are always going to be people who complain about getting around in ANY kind of vehicle. There are always going to be auto drivers who look down on public transit as nothing but government subsidy for poor people who don't have anything better to do with their time than wait around at a bus stop. (Amusingly, those same people also get looked down upon by other drivers who own a bigger SUV or a newer hybrid)

The TTC isn't perfect, and neither is the NFTA. But they are BOTH a hell of a lot better than what many other cities have. The people who think they're a joke will never be satisfied. And the people who appreciate them will continue to use them even through service cutbacks. But neither is a valid reason to give up on what we already have, or continue to improve them one small step at a time.

replied to JSmith
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I imagine for someone living in suburban Toronto, the transit system is never going to be as convenient as a private automobile. The same goes for Buffalo. Mass transit isn't for suburbanites and it never will be. The suburbs simply have too many destination and origination points and not enough people going to or coming from any of those places. I also question the logic of needing multiple forms of transportation to make a transit system work. I'd focus less on the vehicles and more on the programming.

As a visitor to Buffalo, I've had very good experiences with the NFTA. The trains were timely and frequent. The NFTA is also integrated into Google Maps, which made planning bus trips simple. I've also flown into Buffalo on a few occasions, and I had absolutely no trouble getting to downtown from the Airport. I did not wait long and the ride was quick (both the express and the local), and it was considerably cheaper than the $25+ that I would have needed to shell out for a cab.

Lastly, say what you will about hub and spoke systems, they are the most efficient systems. The passenger ends up going further, but the vehicles do not, which saves on drivers, gas, and infrastructure.

replied to DeanerPPX
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thanks WCP, for reminding us how great Toronto has it and we can't even get our one line expanded beyond the city line or even off Main Street. NFTA is more concerned about the Airport traffic than it's bus and rail riders. I'm tired of waiting on bus's that break down or not show up at all, rude customer service operators, a system that shuts down at midnight. Ready for a car and tell NFTA to kiss my .....

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Occupy NFTA!

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment