City November 28, 2011 8:57 AM

Preservation Ready: [Not So] Fairfield Library

Preservation Ready: [Not So] Fairfield Library
November's addition to the 'Preservation Ready' list of buildings that must be saved is the beautiful and delicately detailed (former) Fairfield Library, located at 1659 Amherst Street at the corner of Fairfield Avenue North Buffalo. The building was designed by William Sydney Wicks (half of the talented and prolific Green and Wicks architecture team which filled so much of Buffalo with great buildings) for the Unitarian Universalist Church. It was built in 1897 and was also occupied later by another congregation before being taken over by the City of Buffalo for a branch Library in the 1920s.  Reportedly, it was the 2nd busiest neighborhood library when it was closed in 2005.  The year prior to the closure it had received a paint job alleged to be in the $20,000 range. Closure meant that the still existing building could be taken off the government books as if it was no longer there.  That paint job is likely the last meaningful investment the building has received.

Buffalo Rising highlighted the dire plight of this building back in 2008 and again back in 2009. Today, nearing the end of 2011, the building apparently remains in limbo, still vacant with no known plan for reuse. There are reports of severe water damage in various parts of the building. From my own observations of the exterior, most damage seems to be confined to a 1961 addition. The addition was designed with some effort to harmonize with the original building using matching shingle siding and arched windows.  However, it is bulky and out of place with its flat roof, stumpy height, and poor proportions.  It would not bad so bad if this piece was removed in any future plan.  But there appears to be no plan. In the 2008 story, I made comparisons to White's Livery building which had recently collapsed due to decades of neglect after repeated complaints from neighbors. 

Steel-porch-north.jpg 

Many of the buildings on our list of must saves are difficult to reuse, highly degraded structures that are located within declining neighborhoods making them extremely challenging economically.  This one on the other hand is still in relatively good condition and sits between the prosperous Central Park and Parkside neighborhoods.  It is surrounded by well tended, high value homes whose residents often kick in their own time and money to maintain the library's grounds and make sure the building remains secure.  

Why is it still vacant and why is it being neglected?  

It is bad enough that so many absentee property owners throughout the city steal value from adjacent property though systematic neglect of their properties.  But it is downright absurd that the residents of the city should suffer this from their own government.  This building must be saved.  If the easy ones like this building can't be saved, what hope is there for the difficult ones?  The City of Buffalo really needs to step up to the plate on this one.

For more information on this building, see the November issue of Buffalo Spree and the always amazing Buffalo as an Architectural Museum. Painting For Preservation also held one of its increasingly popular events at the building last August.  Contact them if you would like to get involved in their efforts to highlight the importance of Buffalo's endangered buildings.  We also invite you to join our rag tag group of preservation minded people on our Face Book page. This is a very active page with a quickly growing membership.

steel-dentals-Bufalo-NY.jpg

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

The City of Buffalo is a horrible landlord to its empty buildings. When buildings are turned over to them, whether they are libraries, schhols fire stations etc. the utilities are shut off and they are abandoned. Furthermore the Real estate Dept makes no effoprt to market the buldings. Perhaps someone should sue the city such as the Preservation Coalition did with the Psych Center. The City should be held to at least the same standards as private owners.

Secondly, the Preservation Board nominated Fairfield Library as a local landmark about 3 years ago. The Parkside Community association asked that it be withdrawn as there was a developer who would refuse to take the building if it were landmarked. Unfortunately the Board agreed...a crock of s**t.
The nomination has since been resubmitted and will go to the Common Council soon.

You are right, this should be an easy one. An undeniable landmark as to architecture, architect, culture and neighborhood. If this one can't be saved, what can.

Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Great that Fairfield is up for Local Landmark status again, National Register would not be hard either. I still don't see why PCA can't get something rolling on this one...

I spoke to someone at the Real Estate Department in City Hall about the pricing of the building. He said that they were just recently given requested funding to put up For Sale signs, that was in August. Now Fairfield and North Park branch on Hertel and Delaware have signs.

In the draft Buffalo Preservation Plan that has been circulating, there is a specific call out for a "property manager," probably the City Hall Preservation Board Staff, who should promote and market the purchase and reuse of city-owned historic buildings - with rehab assistance by the State and Federal tax credits. Let's hope that position is created and filled...

More information about Fairfield Library, its closing, and previously proposed projects here: http://paintingforpreservation.blogspot.com/2011/08/painting-for-preservation-another.html.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Whats the asking price?? I used to live in that neighborhood..walk by on a rainy day and you will see how bad the damage is..it literally STREAMS out of the hole (picture above). I could only imagine whats growing inside those walls (aside from asbestos)

I've heard in prior posts/articles that the asking price is insane..still the case??

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Price based on appraisal. Last number thrown around was $50,000 or less.

replied to Buffalo All Star
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

[multiple names not allowed]

Score: -2 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This building is really gorgeous and I cannot imagine why its having trouble selling. I would think someone would want to make this a residence or a commercial office/retail.

I remember when it was tossed out as a location for a Presidential Library for Cleveland or McKinley but I think those are better located at the Richardson. Yet another example how we have the Teddy Roosevelt Museum and how they could play a role in facilitating a McKinley Museum...yet they dont. Buffalo is filled with examples of dead dreams and people not working together.

Its funny the citizens seem to have great capacity to work together planting trees etc but the leaders and institutions dont...this more than anything is why Buffalo struggles and fails.

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

In NYS, we are asked to pay the taxes for a government that says it does everything for the people. Yet time and again the government doesnt accomplish SH*T and its the people at the grass roots level where the great leaps forward come.

oh the sadness and misfortune of Buffalos many jewelled assets. Its painful to watch.

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

there's just one little inconvenient truth messing up your pretty little picture: museums do not pay for themselves. otherwise they'd be on every street corner like pizzerias and taverns. that, and not "people not working together" is why the presidential libraries haven't materialized.

staff, collections, exhibits, lectures, and buildings are cost centers and even $12 admission, like the albright charges, ain't gonna keep the doors open.

so who do you nominate to underwrite these new museums? the erie county taxpayer? the public library, which, unlike the wanna-be presidential museums, already has substantial and nationally recognized collections, is way ahead of you in line and deservedly so.

replied to paulsobo
Score: 5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There are several parties interested in purchasing the property for redevelopment and have tried. The city hasn't come up with a reasonable price, their thinking that its worth more than it is. Pressure should be placed on the city to auction the building with no reserve, better to see it sold for less than end up being demo'd for neglect.

Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The city really needs to stay out of real estate. If it knew anything about it, we would'nt have as many empty, falling down buildings OWNED by them. Sell for cheap to someone who will actually DO something to these buildings instead of holding out for greed and watching the city fall apart while doing so. It's pretty damn sad that we only have about 2-3 well known developers in this city and everyone else (those without connections at city hall) are treated like yesterdays' trash if they try to fix something, clean up something in this city by being charged to death, taxed till broke, issued permits for things you'd never thought you needed a permit for and THIS is why are not a growing city.

Score: 5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

as f'ed up as the city's real estate office is, it still functions under rules designed to protect the public's interest. city owned properties must be sold for 'fair market value,' which (supposedly) prevents officials from handing off valuable real estate to their cronies for pennies on the dollar, undermining nearby property values, and cheating the treasury.

the problem, of course, is that market value is what someone is willing to pay. so if a buyer offers only $50K or $1, for that matter, for fairfield, then that is evidently the market value, and all the comps and arbitrary price tags don't make it otherwise.

replied to Lego1981
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I am a little confused with this one...I'm not a real estate genius but please; can someone determine market value for me on a $50-$75k building that in my opinion needs $150-$200k in work?

Are we not talking statler style with a negative value? Why hasn't it been auctioned..to reiterate above are they just gonna hold it until it falls in on itself?

replied to grad94
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Steel, I think the 1887 date of construction is wrong. The building does not show up on this 1894 atlas:

http://www.erie.gov/atlases/buff_94/vol_1/html/city_atlas_1_9.html

Judging by the Greek Revival style elements and location, id say this was probably built around the turn of the century. Possibly Pan-Am Expo influenced.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I will check with the scholars on that. I could not, however, find a date on that map.

replied to The Kettle
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Oops you are right - 1897 is the correct date of construction!

replied to The Kettle
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What about the closed library at the corner of Delaware @ Hertel? Another one that my end up being knocked down from neglect.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Why can't this get rezoned to residential? I think this could become a beautiful house that can act as an entrance to the Vernon Triangle.

Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It doesn't need a change of zoning to be used as residential. You can build a house in a commercial zone, but you can't build an office or store or factory in a residential zone.

Generally speaking, single family residential is the most restrictive zoning. Then each zoning beyond that allows everything in the zones before it plus some others. So a zoning of doubles (R2) allows everything in R1 (single family) plus doubles. R3 allows everything in R1 & R2, plus apartment buildings. C1 allows all those, plus specified commercial, etc, etc., all the way up to M3 (heavy industrial with outside storage and noise) If you want to build a loft next to an oil refinery you can do it, but you can't build an oil refinery in the middle of a residential zone.

One advantage of keeping this commercially zoned is that some professional could live and work here. A lawyer or architect could have a commercial office, and a house in the same building. An artist could live there and also have a public gallery, etc.

replied to Greg
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This will all change with the Green Code anyway (which will allow for a wider range of uses in just about every zoning category). I think in the draft land use plan this is still zoned as "civic". I'm not sure what that will imply (the zoning regulations themselves have not yet been written).

replied to biniszkiewicz
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think this building would make a beautiful library. It's a shame there is no talk of ever reopening the closed branches. Libraries fill a critical need in our civilized society.

Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree it should be a library.

The closing of the libraries, supposedly for substantial cost-savings, was basically a sham on the uninformed public.

The scant million of dollars that would have been required out of the County’s budget, which was nearing $1 billion at that time, was a pittance. Cost to the taxpayers (with $100,000 homes) would have been a monthly average equal to the price of a small box of popcorn at the movie theater.

Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment