Real Estate November 29, 2011 12:30 AM

Niagara @ the Front Lofts

Niagara @ the Front Lofts

A residential project designed to take advantage of unique Buffalo River views is moving forward.  Ellicott Development Group is working with architect Charles Gordon on reuse plans for 960 Busti Avenue to create approximately 23 residential units and some commercial space.  The development company purchased the site in April 2008 along with a nearby property at 1050 Niagara Street from Ciminelli Development.

The 67,900 sq.ft. Busti Avenue property was built in 1930.  It is the former home of Multiform Desiccants, now operating under the name Multisorb Technologies, manufacturer of absorbent products commonly found in pill bottles among other uses.  The company is now located on Harlem Road in West Seneca.

Figure 2.jpg"The site overlooks the Peace Bridge at the mouth of the Niagara River, truly a one of a kind location," says Charles Gordon, principal of Charles Gordon Architecture.

According to Gordon, what makes this challenging development so unique and yet so tricky is its spectacular and historic waterfront location.  Historic because the site is at the convergence of Niagara and Busti Avenue.  Busti was historically named Front Street that overlooked the Erie Canal on its way further down the coastline to terminate at Olmsted's Front Park (see last image below).

This great location presents a daunting challenge.  It must reconnect to the residential neighborhood to the east.  Just like elsewhere in Buffalo, city residential development turned away from rather than embraced the waterfront no matter how spectacular the setting.

The design for the project according to Gordon was "pretty easy and rather straightforward--adapt an industrial building into a mixed-use, largely residential building."

Site development has proven to be more difficult. 

The site design must establish a plausible and strong link to its surrounding neighborhood, and this link must extend across a still very busy, some say dividing, Niagara Street commercial/industrial corridor. 

figure 3.jpg"As the graphics show, the re-design of the building will re-image the exterior with very large window openings, add both recessed and projecting balconies, and will create a new penthouse apartment level," says Gordon.   "This new level will form a cornice to the building and will contain spectacular rooftop apartments which will also add a new distinctive waterfront landmark.  It will be iconic from land and water."

natflone.JPG

DSCN1047.JPGfigure 4.jpgWith respect to site development, the design incorporates an existing triangular park, resulting from rotated street geometries, into a new grand front door. These unique street geometries, so prevalent on the West Side, become even more pronounced as one nears the riverfront.  The end result is unusual and potentially very beneficial spaces.

"Adding the park to the site scheme helps to extend the building's front door back into its West Side neighborhood," says Gordon.

At its other edge--the west limit overlooking the river-- the design creates a drive up/drop-off overlook that, one can imagine, would be unrivalled anywhere in the region.

In addition, the site design is compatible with the planned future Peace Bridge plaza project as it is outside of the footprint the Public Bridge Authority has been eyeing for expansion. 

A construction start date has not been set.  Ellicott Development has just finished the lofts in the Baker Shoe complex downtown (photos coming later this week), is expanding the Bellasara project at Allen and Delaware, and has several other residential and commercial projects in various stages of development.

Get Connected:
Charles Gordon Architecture, 716.839.6119
Ellicott Development Group, 716.854.0060

Figure 5.jpg

DSCN1007.JPG

figure 1 11.28.11.jpg

 

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

This is quite an impressive design that would offer those crossing the Peace Bridge a more welcoming landscape. I hope this spurs a gradual transformation of this section of Niagara Street into a true boulevard.

Score: 8 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Besides cancer I bet those power lines are going to provide some extra warmth on cold winter nights and a soft buzz to put you to sleep.

Score: -20 ( 36 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I had the same thought-I hope anyone who seriously looks at living here looks into the ramifications being right under of the power source (and, not from a source engaged by Paladino).

Eh for the design as well. Why mess with a beautiful, simple structure like that? Put in some nice modern windows, spruce up the entrance and call it a day.

replied to longgone
Score: -14 ( 26 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

To their credit...at least they kept them in the drawings. Unlike development under the skyway where the massive bridge magically is removed....

replied to Travelrrr
Score: 6 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think this is great. I worked on Niagara St during the early/mid 90s while I was in college and I always thought how ignored the street is considering it's one of the first things people see when crossing the bridge.

On another note, I think it's time to Captcha-enable this site to prevent the script-kiddies from posting nonsense....

Score: 7 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm all for density but living in a cloud of diesel exhaust and next door to a huge substation seems a little risky. I wonder how long you'd have to be exposed to those hazards before they would impact ones health.

Too bad as the view from that place must be spectacular.

Score: -4 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What fumes? The wind blows off the lake all day every day. My bet is the air quality right along the river there would be better than a lot of other places.

Also, you're going to whine? In Buffalo? How do humans live in any big city anywhere on the planet then?

replied to The Kettle
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That same air pollution argument can be made against any big city residential project/ condo tower alongside a major thoroughfare but in other cities the roadway is even larger. Think residential projects along I-95 or 395 in northern Virginia, residential projects along the QEW in Toronto, etc. If anything the surrounding neighborhood could be a deal breaker but I think in time the reinvestment heading towards the river frmo the Elmwood Village, etc. will eventually push to the river and revitalize the area. The Busti, Niagara Street corridor screams highly visible residential, office, international trade related offices, light industry and I hope for the best with this project. I would need to know more about the transmission lines as well.

Score: 3 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Looks great! great to see something happening here...

Score: 7 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Looks good. Curious to know if anything is being done with the building to mitigate the roar from the highway below. I would imagine that it might be quite unbearable to sit out on those balconies for a length of time?

Imagine the number of incredible development sites along Niagara street if I-190 were no longer there...

Score: 6 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Niagara Street has so much potential of being developed into a mixed-use neighborhood, the bones are there. The views over the river I believe will be the main draw to the redevelopment of existing buildings and shovel ready properties on this escarpment. Maybe some day the push westward from the Elmwood Village witch is already happening on many avenues west of Richmond Ave. will meet up with the development of Niagara Street Escarpment.. I am happy to see this first step being taken, I hope and thing it will be a success.

Score: 9 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I like the design. More than anything I'd be concerned about the awful stench from the Black Rock Canal during the summer. As for the traffic noise, it's one of those things you stop noticing when you live with it for a while.

As nice as this looks I'll believe it when I see work being done. I believe EDC released rendering when they first bought th building three years ago and obviously nothing has been done.

On another positive note, I have noticed work being done on the Greystone the last month, including a crane raising materials to the roof.

Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

from looking at those wires I assumed they were data or telephone wires to canada? is this not the case? they dont seem to look anyhting like other transmission lines in the area

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

they are transmission wires. They used to carry 25 cycle electricity, which was still used in some buildings as recently as a decade ago or less for old equipment (elevators in the Statler before Bashar replaced a few, for example). Don't know what their current status/function is.

replied to jim1234664
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

seems like something even I could get behind demoolishing if the use no longer exists

replied to biniszkiewicz
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thanks, Bini -- I always wondered about that. Turns out that some 25 Hz. generation hung on in Canada for industrial customers that didn't want to convert their equipment. More info at the Wikipedia entry here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utility_frequency I wonder how extensively it's still used and how much experience the industry still has with that kind of power.

It's especially interesting to me as I had office space for a time in a building not far from this which was plagued with absolutely the worst electrical power flakiness I've ever seen -- to the point where electronic equipment was fried en masse. I wonder if it's related.

replied to biniszkiewicz
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yeah that blackrock stench problem has been an issue. I thought the City was addressing that coming from the sewage treatment plant? Has that issue been addressed? Its been a bit since I was there to give it any though or experience that loveliness. If not yet addressed its an embarrassment. How many years has it been with that stench wafting through the area?

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It still smells as of a few weeks ago.

replied to flyguy
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I guess I wasn't alone when I thought of this location last month. Paladino, you might as well construct a good bar destination with a large patio as well.

As for the wires and traffic, I think the views of Canada, the peace bridge, the end of lake Erie and beginning of niagara will help people get over it.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Is that a power substation? I thought maybe it was a scaffold to hold a new billboard for Carl Paladino's rants, after the Fairmont building collapses from neglect.

Score: 2 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think this is great news, and absolutely a step in the right direction towards shedding the image of Buffalo as a dying rust-belt city. Niagara Street is a gateway into downtown, and that particular area is the first thing visitors see when they approach via the Peace Bridge. That area needs life and light and a community presence. I am very excited about what lies ahead should this project be fulfilled. Please don't wait five years to make it a reality.

Score: 7 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I especially love the new floor atop the existing building. Nice work, Charlie Gordon.

Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Enjoy the breathtakingg views (and odors) of the Bird Island Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Score: -9 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Reuse! Niagara Ave & River! Old bricks & new glass, light & more light! These are a few of my favorite things.

Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I drive that section of the 190 and many times looked at that building and thought what a great place for apartments/condos.
Of course, I don't have the funds, but if I did would have moved on that project already.
As far as the 190 being right at it's base, for those of you who have been to the Brooklyn Promenade, think of how the BQE is hidden underneath the promenade. This made the idea of living there more desirable and lessened the noise and fumes from the autos. It also created a nice walkway for the residents of the area. This of course worked exceptionally well there as the views from the promenade are of downtown Manhattan.
I would love to see this area and those buildings that flank this one become desirable apartments upgrading the view of visitors from Canada and adding development and beauty along our river.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think this should bring life to this stretch of Niagara St and possibly attract more investment. These old industrial buildings are being recognized for the great space with outstanding views. We have a limited amount of frontage on the Niagara, we should encourage returning this prime real estate to a better use than the 190 and industry.

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

FOR ALL OF THOSE WHO ARE WORRIED ABOUT THE POWER LINES, THEY ARE DE-ENERGIZED. DOES ANYONE THINK ELLICOTT DEVELOPMENT WOULD INVEST IN A PROPERTY LIKE THIS WITHOUT VERIFYING THIS BEFORE HAND?

THIS PROJECT WILL REVITALIZE THIS ENTIRE NEIGHBORHOOD MUCH LIKE THE LARKEN BUILDING DID FOR THE AREA SURROUNDING IT.

STAY TUNED!

Score: 6 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Stay tuned, yes, for a decade or two (or more). Some of us may not be alive long enough to stay tuned for the duration. Eventually, though, I do believe this area will be gentrified for future generations to come.

replied to Greg Blakowski
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There are only so many consumers who are going to be interested in living in a condo like this, so I think the following is a fair question. Is this really the best place to put 26 of those finite consumers? Or would you rather a project like this be somewhere on Main Street near the city's best public transit corridor. Or on Hertel or Downtown, where it can complement significant development. Housing development in a region like Buffalo, which has little to no overall population growth, will always be one of trade-offs. I think it's important to ask ourselves, what project doesn't move forward because this one does? And, which would you rather have?

Score: -1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I would rather have this one over a new development in Hamburg

Score: 5 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Sure, but I'm not suggesting that they ought to build this in Hamburg either. Further, I'm not asking people to applaud the developer who is the lesser of two evils, I'm asking them to consider where they would like to see this sort of development ideally. There are only so many consumers, so is this the best place to put 26 of them? Or, would you rather locate them near existing transit infrastructure and existing, walkable retail districts?

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Except this idea that a new project in Buffalo most obviously be robbing life from another part of the city is a common meme when in fact that is not certain at all. Sure concentrating development for critical mass is important but too often we suggest that creating this new critical mass must be born by the neighborhoods of the city rather than the surrounding towns. There are many projects built in spread out places around the county that could have been built downtown instead but they never get the complaint you just proffered.

Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It would be great if this project competed with the suburbs and brought people back into the city, but I'm not sure that it will. I'm not sure that it won't either. Either way, there's still only so much demand to be satisfied, so it's worth having a discussion about where that demand would be satisfied best.

I also think you're neglecting the most important finite resource: time. Banks look at how many competing projects are being constructed when they decide to lend, so there are only going to be resources available at any given time for a certain number of developments. Is this the project you want built in the next year? Or, would you rather a downtown condo be built? These new residents could add demand in the next year to coffee shops and stores downtown or over here on Niagara. These are important questions and they merit attention from the planning department. I'm not saying that any of these things are a bad result, just different. Which one do city residents find most preferable?

However, I think your notion that urban districts in the same city aren't in competition with one another is flawed. I can think of lots of instances of one urban district displacing another. For instance, in Cleveland, the Warehouse District displaced the Flats as the premier urban nightlife destination. There wasn't enough demand for both. The same thing happened in Columbus; the Short North displaced the Brewery District as the nightlife area, and that's in a city with tremendous population growth. The basic story of urban decline is all about how growth can be parasitic. There can also be catastrophic failure when demand is substantially over-met everywhere. That's an essential part of the housing crisis. We have too many houses everywhere - too many suburban houses, too many condo projects, too many new retail developments. Luckily, Buffalo was essentially passed over by the housing bubble, but in places like Miami, there are vacant condo towers, vacant tract housing developments, and too much retail space too be filled all throughout the metro area. Even in a dense, tourist destination like South Beach, there are vacant storefronts and unused old hotels.

Hopefully, the gentrification of a place like Grant Avenue would displace demand from a suburban shopping center and not Elmwood Avenue, but we can't be too sure and it's worth analyzing and treading lightly when approving new development.

In a perfect world, developers piggy-back on one another. For instance, I'm sure that most developers want to be able to say there's a coffee shop down the street and great transit access nearby. Those externalities add great value to their development. However, sometimes the properties that are available for development aren't right next to existing amenities, so there can be a spatial mismatch.

This looks like a nice project and it's quite small, so it's not worth fighting against. I personally don't think this is in the best location to dovetail with a lot of the other positive development going on in Buffalo or Buffalo's transit infrastructure. With this in mind, I think it's worth talking about how we can work to entice development into the most ideal locations.

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think you will see that much of the new demand in the city is at the expense of suburban apartment complexes. There are many studies that show that younger generations along with older empty nesters are looking for intersting urban lifestyles. The tremendous success of the recent wave of new urban apartments in Buffalo is good evidence that this trend is taking hold in Buffalo too.

Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"much of the new demand in the city is at the expense of suburban apartment complexes"

That's a claim we hear, and no doubt some people move in each direction so anecdotes can be found each way. But if it's more than anecdotal and more people are moving from burbs to city than vice versa, then how to explain Buffalo's population lowering by 30,000 more residents than the non-Buffalo parts of Erie County did since 2000? I suppose death rate higher in city due to elderly, but there's quite a few births in some parts of the city too, and 30,000 is a pretty big amount, over 10%.
Doesn't that sound like on balance still a shifting from city to non-city, in addition to a similar number becoming expats from the county altogether?
(half expecting shooting of messenger…)

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm not sure what citywide population decline has to do with suburbanites moving to relatively small parts of Buffalo. Isn't it possible to have both going on at the same time? Lets say 100 people move to Cheektowaga from the East Side and 10 move the other direction downtown or to another "trendy" area. You have one part of town growing by ten amidst a net loss of 90.

Using citywide figures in an attempt to say city dvelopment only attract city residents is like saying Clarence and Wheatfield are not gaining population because the region as a whole is declining.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

arm>" to say city development only attract city residents"
Yes, that would be dumb but it clearly I've never written 'only'. That word gets added in by others sometimes.

arm>"Isn't it possible to have both going on at the same time?"

Not only possible but likely - more city-to-burb moves simultaneous with some burb-to-city moves which include some who end up choosing newly developed apts.

However that won't have to be consistent with Steel's snippet I quoted "much of the new demand in the city is at the expense of suburban apartment complexes".
Perhaps most burb-to-city moves might happen even if new places didn't exist.
There's plenty of possible reasons for moving to city (too many advantages of city living vs burb living to list, right? not to mention some people get hired to jobs with city residency reqts, among many other reasons, there's always been burb-to-city moves going all the way back).
So "at the expense of suburban apt complexes" as Steel contends could really be more at the expense of other not-as-new places in the city - some new places getting tenants who otherwise would rent existing apts. No way to know what portion. We can all guess different amounts).

How population could be relevant is if city was growing relative to burbs, a better case could be argued that some big trend has changed - although that's a separate discussion.

Anyhow, I'm not against allowing new apts in city including these on Niagara. I'd be against so-called economic development special favors from govt for them if it happens (as Paladino was given at times in past), but the apts themselves are fine. I think they'll succeed. Only questioning whether new apts mostly compete with apts in burbs or existing apts in city. Nothing wrong with allowing either kind of competition.

replied to The Kettle
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I've seen those studies too, but what people want and what they end up choosing are two different things. It's also been established that a lot of young people go through an 'urban phase' but ultimately move to the suburbs once they get married and have kids so they can take advantage of cheaper housing and better schools. Taxes, and the cheapness of greenfield development can also get in the way.

I also always wonder what those studies that say people want to lead an urban lifestyle really ask. For instance, do they specifically ask something along the lines of, "Are you willing to live in a smaller, more expensive apartment to be able to walk to shops and restaurants?" or "Are you willing to give up your car to afford living in an urban area." I have a book called the 'Urban Villagers' that talks about the West End of Boston before it was torn down for 'revitalization.' The author surveyed the residents, and reported that most loved the atmosphere and amenities of the neighborhood and wanted to keep living there, but most also wished they could find or build a detached house with a yard within the neighborhood. No one seemed to recognize that their personal housing preferences were in conflict with maintaining the density that allowed for the shops, restaurants, and social interactions that they also enjoyed. Of course, this was 40 years ago, so maybe now people better understand the personal trade-offs implicit in choosing to lead an urban lifestyle, but I"m never too sure.

Just so you know, I'm a very pro-urban person and I'm all for walkability and rediscovering and adapting older industrial cities. However, I also value skepticism and have little use for false hope. I'm not trying to disagree with you, but I think it's always useful to view an issue from both sides.

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The problem with your scenario is that nobody is being "put" anywhere. They will choose where they want to live based on their tastes, preferences, needs, etc.

The fact that this is on the waterfront may bring a whole new demographic to the city that was not possible in the past. Besides, we're talking 20-30 people so I don't think it will have any effect on population one way or another.

However, it will have a positive effect on perception which is very valuable in changing the image of how people think of the city proper. That in addition to many other similar projects will eventually draw people into the city and may affect population positively.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I wish I had your certainty about the future. I tend to be more certain that the future is uncertain.

Individual consumers will be choosing to live themselves in these condos. I agree with that. However, I think when we talk about how zoning, available development incentives (tax credits, abatements, etc), and infrastructure work together to impact which places are attractive and accessible to developers for development, the word 'put' is appropriate. Zoning laws, tax incentives, and infrastructure are the product of our elected officials and democratic process. So, in a sense, as a society and through these means, we've decided to 'put' people in one place or another. Through the same means, we could choose to 'put' people somewhere else. That's what I meant.

replied to brownteeth
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It is about time Buffalo developers discovered the Niagara River

Score: 6 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

RE: "Is this where we want condos built?"

A: Absolutely!

First, the waterfront is hugely appealing for buyers. This product cannot be produced on Main Street. The views to Canada are exceptional. Even the Peace Bridge, lit up at night, looks quite appealing. There is a market for places such as these distinct from downtown or anywhere else. But it's better for us to have this developed here than downtown for another reason:

The City of Buffalo suffers from the perception (prevailing in the minds of many a suburbanite) that the only exceptions to dire poverty in the city are very small pockets of downtown condos and the Elmwood Village. It benefits Buffalo greatly to have a highly prominent development such as this (and it is very highly prominent to anyone commuting on the 190 or coming into town from Canada) someplace other than the usual suspects (downtown and EV). The perception of the range of appealing locations within the city gets broadened.

And, like Mark Goldman's Calumet once upon a time, it can become an anchor toward wholesale change. D'Youville's been doing great things in the area. Much of the Peace Bridge residential area and Porter are appealing. This condo complex could help stretch the boundaries of the 'good' neighborhoods near the EV further past Richmond (and there has been gentrification already in this direction). With the river repositioned for higher end residences, gentrifying the void between it and Richmond becomes easier.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I have said this for years!!!

Now that waterfront village is nearly completely built and Pasquale#1 is completely built (ie the area to the west of the Niagara Expressway)...the area is still in high demand.

It is only a matter of time before developers started to target that wedge of land between Niagara Street and the Niagara Expressway.

I would expect more such developments:
-at the Niagara Street section nearest Buffalo State
-at the section of Niagara Street that runs along LaSalle Park, the Water Station, Squaw Island
-at the downtown portion.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

these spambots are totally out of control. Is there no way to block them or retaliate?

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Awesome project! More of this please. :)

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It is amazing & baffling that people would pay more than poverty prices to hear the constant roar of traffic on Da Truway, especially with its innovation of grooved concrete, which has upped the reach of auditory assault all the way to Richmond and beyond. I can hear the tire noise with my windows closed, over a mile away.

Noise and freezing winds (with decent views) are pretty cheap along Niagara in Riverside, for that matter. An apartment in an old factory with truck traffic as its main 'feature' sounds like a shaky investment.

Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It would be cool if the city could fix the sign for the _assach__ettes A_en_e P__n_ St_tio_ seen from the 190 North.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll