Real Estate November 23, 2011 12:05 AM

New Plans for 500 Seneca Retain Historic Corner

New Plans for 500 Seneca Retain Historic Corner

Savarino Companies and FFZ Holdings have spent the past year revising their plans for redeveloping a vacant industrial complex at 500 Seneca Street at the edge of the Larkin District.  The new proposal calls for saving the unique, brick portion of the complex at the corner of Seneca and Hamburg streets which originally was to be demolished. 

That change is sure to please the preservation community which urged the developer to retain all of the multiple building complex.  The brick buildings are the iconic sections of the former F.N. Burt Company plant, a manufacturer of small paper boxes.  It was constructed as a series of buildings between 1901 and 1927.

"The demolition of the oldest, and most historically significant, portion of the structure is no longer contemplated," reports Sam Savarino, CEO of Savarino Companies.  "That portion as well as the rest of the complex will be restored under SHPO [State Historic Preservation Office] guidelines and HTC's [Historic Preservation Tax Credits] are now being utilized."

DSC_0379b.JPG

500%20Seneca_Exterior_TitleBlock.jpgSavarino Companies is teaming with experienced investor, FFZ Holdings, LLC, to undertake the project.  Chaintreuil | Jensen | Stark is project architect.

The developers purchased the vacant structure from New Era Cap Co. in March 2010.  New Era moved out in 2004 when it consolidated its local manufacturing facilities at a plant in Derby. 

When the project was first unveiled, the iconic portion fronting Hamburg Street was pegged to be demolished.  Time and weather have taken a toll on the brick structures.  Savarino says the brick portions of complex have wood floors, beams, columns and roof decking that have not held up well compared to the newer, solid masonry construction of the buildings on the west end of the property.  

500%20Seneca_Interior_TitleBlock.jpgDSC_0382b.JPGShoring up and saving this section of the complex will be expensive and cannot economically be engineered to accommodate office space loads.  Instead, this area will be space that will be priced below market rates for non-traditional users.  Savarino envisions this space will be attractive for cultural organizations and start-up firms. 

The balance of the building will be transformed into a mixed-use development featuring over 180,000 square feet of Class A office space.  Offices will feature loft-style finishes, large exterior windows, balconies and expansive floorplates.  Plans call for a multi-story interior atrium area, a rooftop garden, on site fitness center and café, and adjacent tenant parking.

"Flex space" that features exterior truck-dock and freight elevator access is also planned.  This will provide tenants of 500 Seneca with direct access to low-cost, secure, and climate-controlled space for archive and document storage and/or equipment and supply storage and light assembly. 

Earlier plans for fourteen apartments on the sixth floor have been dropped.

A timeline for the conversion has not been set, though the buildings will be "buttoned-up" for the winter.  Savarino says there are "a lot of moving parts" including lining up New Market and historic tax credits and securing tenants.  He does have firms interested in taking space in the project and says the large floor plates, proximity to downtown and the I-190, and free parking will attract firms that may otherwise locate in the suburbs.

Get Connected: Julia Spitz, Savarino Cos, 716.332.5959
500SenecaSitePlan2.png500SenecaWestElev.png
View image

Comments

Leave a comment

This is great news for Buffalo and for the Hydraulics. Way to go, Sam!

Score: 12 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Tremendous. Amazing.

Now, find a way to re-use the Trico, which looks to be an almost identical twin.

Score: 7 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Great news....Sam worked with the Buffalo Preservation Board after the Board said they would not accept his proposal to demolish the oldest and most historic part of the complex...

Score: 8 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

excellent news!! i hope they follow through with this plan. one of the things that i found fascinating is how effective the reuse of old factories has been. such a tremendous legacy left behind by our local visionaries, not just the architectural jewels, but these old industrial buildings left for dead, find new life and continue to be an economic engine for our region. they were back then and they continue to be today. bravo to savarino and zemsky and all of our modern day visionaries with the pockets to bring them back to life. our lifeblood is still running through these factories.

Score: 7 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I know this is an all too common industrial building design which makes it also the most underappreciated as well but I love the total “build-for-function- and- not- aesthetically- pleasing” appeal of these buildings.

I have never been in this particular building but I suspect the reinforced concrete columns are octagon-design which is fluted at the ceiling level which is probably reinforced concrete as well.

Many of these building’s floors were over-layed with wood block, standing vertical, to help prevent employee fatigue as many were intended to be machine shops housing various types of machining equipment where employees would stand long hours performing whatever function required of their daily work routine.

The exterior design is reinforced concrete columns and beams where the actual brick has no load bearing function as this was intended to be a means of removing and/or replacing heavy equipment through this area and re-bricked when done.

Great design and I would love to see the older section incorporated into the renovation but it looks as if New Era had not used this section for years considering they only vacated in 2004.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Fantastic news. I'm interested to see what "non-traditional" tenants the space in the corner building attracts.

Saving this building illustrates the importance of having incentives like preservation tax credits on the books. In this case, they were the difference between revitalization and a vacant lot.

Score: 5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I was on-board with this whole thing until I saw they had *gasp* parking lots for cars in their design. For shame.

Score: -12 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yeah I can't understand why they don't just put a heli-pad on the roof and use helicopters to bring the workers in from the suburbs everyday.

replied to Jesse
Score: 8 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So parking lots in this section of town for suburban workers = OK.

Parking lots for suburban workers downtown = NOT OK.

Got it.


No wonder why Buffalo is the way it is.

replied to brownteeth
Score: -5 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I was being sarcastic in case anyone didn't figure that out.

I don't have a problem with the parking lots here. They're currently empty grass and gravel parcels of land so it will improve the look of the area. Their not tearing anything down to add the parking lots either so what is the issue?

Parking ramps are exponentially more expensive so that seems like a tremendous risk to take on before the building is even fully leased.

replied to longgone
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Parking RAMPS in the city are more appropiate. No successful city is over run with surface lots. We need to build over ours if we want a vibrant city again.

replied to longgone
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You have to admit that it's more than a little absurd that the amount of space dedicated to the passive storage of private vehicles is approximately twice as much as the amount of space where people actually work. That's not really a sustainable way to build a city.

replied to brownteeth
Score: 5 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It makes perfect sense. Cars are much larger than people and therefore require more space. It is sustainable through the utilization ramps vs. surface lots.

replied to JSmith
Score: 3 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"*gasp* parking lots for cars in their design"

Before we gasp too much, are we sure that's really for car parking? Let's hope the cars shown are just mistakes by the artist. That paved area might be for a lot of bike racks. Or stops for all-solar-powered public transit in case that's ever invented some day.

replied to Jesse
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The parking plan only shows about 20 parking spots on this particular building site. The majority of the parking lots are across the street. That allows plenty of opportunity for them to replace them with parking garages or new buildings later on.

Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Just as there is opportunity to replace the lots downtown with ramps. But the odds of it happening is slim. The reason is why go up when you have no room to go out. Both downtown and Hydraulics have no pressure to go up. At least natural pressure.

It is no secret, that to get quick leases: lots of parking

So if you do not have natural pressure...how about artificial incentives? The medical campus just built a 1,800 slot ramp for $34M or $18K a space. Why not offer incentives to projects like this in terms of tax credits on a $1spend to $1break for any project that builds parking for the entire complex in a ramp at a 5+ (spaces) per 1,000 (square feet) ratio. Meaning this project would need a 900 space ramp, which could easily fit on the lot on the other side of Seneca.

While that might be overkill...it does add some additional benefits to the city and developer.

1 - It gives a great park and ride location, with profit to the builder, for a future line.
2 - It provides parking for additional shovel ready sites within walking distance.
3 - It ensures that even though development is done at a slow pace..it is done right.

If Buffalo would have focused on something like this downtown over the last 40 years, there would be several ramps and more development IMO.

replied to 300miles
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Not a bad idea at all, but politically probably a tough sell as you are ultimately subsidizing parking. People like Steel and Traveler would stage OWS protests and Tim Teilman would chain himself to something and kill it before it could ever see sunlight. Good stuff though.

replied to longgone
Score: -3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Knock it off, Knock It Down. I like the idea. Don't be puttin' words in my mouth.

replied to Knock it down
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Only an idiot would have an issue with a parking ramp....especially if it replaced parking multiple surface lots.
Knocking down a building for a ground level parking lot is a different conversation. However, until there is a better solution, this is a necessary evil.

Wasn't there a conversation a while back where they COB wanted to build 5 large ramps at select locations in the downtown core? Wonder what happened to that...

But I do find it amusing that almost every project in this district has a nice new surface parking lot next to it. Hardly ever gets mentioned but funny none the less.


replied to Knock it down
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Sure, but there is a big difference between this type of project that is a built-to-the-curb building using already vacant land across the street for parking (which could easily become it's own development site down the road) compared with a building that is designed with it's own parking lot that takes up a big percentage of the building site - like a Walgreens.

The first case is relatively urban-friendly. The second case is not.

replied to longgone
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Great article and great news!! I was specifically hoping Savarino, in keeping all the structures, would use some of the square footage he didn't immediately need for some awesome multi-story interior space. I'm especially delighted to see that's part of the project.

But...I'd love it if someone could identify "the preservation community" -- thx.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I love it!

Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Wonderful news for Buffalo. I wish we had 20 more such warehouse buildings that could be redeveloped!

I also wish a developer would rebuild some of our historic building facades...rather than the contemporary / modern stuff they insist on building but doesnt fit in with the fabric of our city.

Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Not to be snarky -- because I agree with your first paragraph and don't disagree with your second -- but doesn't Buffalo have not only 20 more, but really more like *ten times twenty* more--?

replied to paulsobo
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Well maybe once the building is successful they will have more money to invest in the brick portion of the building opening it up for other uses.

Just because it isnt feasible now may not hold true in the future as the larkin district continues some of the best growth in Buffalo.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

We might have a bunch of similar buildings, unfortunately they aren't close to each other and some are in parts of town that are unlikely to see reinvestment in our lifetimes. Not really able to make a neighborhood out of that

Score: -2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

props to savarino for saving the entire complex. well done.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment