Real Estate November 2, 2011 12:00 AM

Construction Watch: 1542 Main Street

Construction Watch: 1542 Main Street

Housing Opportunity Made Equal's (HOME) project at Main & Ferry Streets is coming into focus.  The long-vacant, architecturally significant building on the northwest corner is being restored and an adjoining structure is under construction.  The new addition has a brick exterior color that matches the historic corner building, not the beige brick depicted in the project rendering.  The two buildings will house the offices of the civil rights organization as well as ten units of energy-efficient barrier-free affordable housing.

In addition to providing new housing, the project marries architectural preservation with community development--changing the face of a prime Main Street intersection which acts as a gateway to both the Linwood-Oxford and Cold Springs neighborhoods.  It will also provide the first permanent home for the nationally housing agency.  Work started in March.

1542%20Main.jpg

 

IMG_1866.jpgThe first floor will provide 3,000 square feet of accessible office space for HOME, now located at 700 Main Street in the Theater District.  The increased visibility will enable HOME to serve more clients in need of fair housing services.

The second and third floors will provide ten units of barrier-free energy-efficient affordable housing for low income families.  Modest rents from the apartments will help HOME move toward the goal of self-sufficiency. 

Housing Opportunities Made Equal is a civil rights organization which, since 1963, has led the struggle for fair housing in the Buffalo-Niagara region.  HOME's mission is to ensure the people of Western New York an equal opportunity to live in the housing and communities of their choice through education, advocacy, the enforcement of fair housing laws and the creation of housing opportunities.

Charles Gordon in association with Conway & Company Architects designed the $2.9 million project.  Lampanelli Construction is the contractor. 

IMG_1868.jpg

IMG_1867.jpg

 

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

Great project on Main Street. I always looked at that building because it was unique looking, but also rundown. Love seeing that it's coming back to life.

Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Great, great infill for this corner. I am glad to see the re-use, and also that the new build works more symbiotically with the red-bricked corner building. Would love to see this style of infill codified in the Green Code-on corners all throughout the city. It will make for a great nexus of activity.

Didn't a portion of the facade crumble recently (as predicted by some on here)?

Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The rear wall (west) next to the new addition sank three inches as a result of the new construction, causing facade problems which have since been repaired.

replied to Travelrrr
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

From the pictures I saw it looked more like the sinking was caused by the removal of a structural support column

replied to biniszkiewicz
Score: 3 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yes.

You will note the first new window on the second floor has a rebuilt header peaking out adjacent to the scaffolding which was the result of the façade shifting and cracking.

At the floor level between this floor and the first is an existing beam that had the column removed causing a cantilever affect which was not able to hold the weight from the floors above. I would suspect the demolition crew didn’t realize what they were removing or the existing support had deteriorated.

Regardless, I am sure the crew is relieved that the damage was not catastrophic.

It has been my experience that the demolition crew are seldom supervised because it is considered "dummy work" but I have known load bearing walls to be removed because the foreman just waved a hand and said: remove all of this - well...guess what?

Sorry if I am being obnoxious; hazards of the trade as I walk into every building as if I am performing a building inspection.

replied to biniszkiewicz
Score: 4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Obnoxious? Nope -- I learned a lot from your comment, and wouldn't have noticed what you pointed out if you hadn't, well, pointed it out. Thank you!

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I know I'll probably get attacked for asking this, but with such a beautiful project, is anyone else curious to see what market rents they would get based on demand for new build city apartments. HOME is obviously entitled to market their apartments according to their organization's mission. But how is it less discriminatory on the face of it to allow a 'protected' class of low/no income renters over someone who's willing to pay $1000/month to live in a new build in this location. It's unfortunate that public subsidies (which I'm assuming were necessary for a project like this and if I'm wrong, I apologize) can't go toward allowing a developer to develop market rate properties.

Score: 8 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Plenty (most?) recent market rate apt and condo developments have gotten public subsides in various forms.

replied to Ozro
Score: 2 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The brick being used on the addition looks very red. I would have preferred the tan brick shown in the rendering. I always think that if you can't match something perfectly, it's better to go for an interesting contrast.

Anyways, I'm glad to see this project is moving forward and it still looks great overall. I'm also glad the original building still has it's great cornice!

Score: 4 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I was wondering about that, as well. Color me color-change curious. Bini, any insight--?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

don't know about the brick. I, too, thought the new building was to be stucco. Happy to see brick instead of Dryvit.

replied to RaChaCha
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Looking at the original rendering again, it does appear that the original material was to be stucco or Dryvit. I guess I saw brick where I wanted to see brick. In that case, I guess I'm happy they changed the material.

replied to biniszkiewicz
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Give yourself more credit. You thought you saw brick, because your mind couldn't comprehend the stupidity of removing the viable brick building that was there only to replace it with a DryVit building.

Hats off to whomever had the good sense to prevent that fiasco.

Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

MEGADITTOS

replied to biniszkiewicz
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Since this is a seperate building, or as the article says, an "adjoining structure," I'm digging the color of the brick rather than the beige brick (which actually looked more like stucco in the rendering). If this was meant to be an addition on the original buidling, then I would agree that contrasting colors would look better than close, but not quite the same, red brick. But I'm not getting that here. I see two red-brick buildings that stand side by side, and I think they look great.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"The long-vacant, architecturally significant building"

Maybe I missed something but how is this architecturally significant and how much public money is being pumped into this project? It seems we always get funding stats for other builds but nothing for this one?

Score: -2 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Mostly public money: $395,000 from the Urban Renewal Agency, $1.7 million from the NYS Housing Trust Fund.

NB- It's technically an addition to the historic corner property.

replied to KangDangaLang
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That may be true, but I guess I wasn't talking about the technicalities, just the aesthetics. It looks like a separate building, so the matching of the brick color doesn't seem, to me, to be so important.

replied to WCPerspective
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Another piece of the past saved and reused. It may not a significant building per say buy none the less, still impressive workmanship - just look at that cornice details, amazing. Glad to see they decided to brick the new addition instead of the dryvit shown in rendering. It would be nice to see if this restoration spills over to the old Elwaseem food market on the opposite corner and then the adjoining liquor store :)
One can only hope.

Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

keep tuned. Something is in the works.

replied to derby98
Score: 7 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The highly visible location of this building makes it significant.

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

BTW, to whomever deserves the photo credit on this article: your closeup shot of the cornice restoration work is GREAT. Thank you!

The deets shown in just that closeup photo alone make clear that this is a special building. What a great project this is.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thanks Rachacha.

replied to RaChaCha
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Sticking with the brick theme, another discovery: third floor of the corner building looks like it was added later -- window hoods different style + brick a different shade. You can see this especially well if you click the final pic in the article to see it full-size.

So if you're the architect for the addition, which brick shade do you try to match (or neither)--?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

not necessarily. some architects like to mix it up floor by floor. ever looked at tent city on main street up close? it's like three different buildings stacked on top of each other but it was designed that way.

replied to RaChaCha
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Kudos!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment