Buffalo Bank Transfer Day
Comments
Leave a commentEvans Bank actually pays YOU 2% on your checking account. They advertise right here on this site. A great LOCAL bank that does ALOT for this area. Check them out, no ATM fees either.
This is the thing the occupy movement got right and most people were talking about when it all started. Even I said the same things a couple weeks back. Good on them for finding a real solution to their issues. I hope they open their own credit unions and do they best they can. Everyone is free to put there money where they want.
Hi Jimbuffalo,
This is definitely part of a strategy to open new credit union accounts! But it's not just in the interest of credit union employees; it's in the interest of everyone in our community. That's because ALL of the profits of credit unions stay here in WNY and the credit union reinvests those profits into expansion. That means it can hire more people, which my credit union Buffalo Metro is doing right now! Plus, credit unions members can help the credit union decide how to reinvest profits; this gives our community a lot more control over our own money.
On the other hand, most banks are publicly traded. That means they are "owned " by Wall St investors, who gain most of the bank's profits. Whatever is left over for reinvestment is at the discretion of the shareholders--not the customers. That's how a bank like HSBC can up and leave, laying off thousands. The same could happen with any local bank. Remember Marine Midland? That was a local bank that sold out to multinational HSBC, and now a decade or so later HSBC is moving on. The same thing could happen with First Niagara someday!
worthless logic and waste of time. here's why.
Been with M&T since '99 and can't be happier with their level of community support and sponsorship. I dare you to try and find a cultural attraction that hasn't benefited in some way from M&T.
When it came to a Mortgage it was First Niagara. Another great local bank. I think your push to divest from wall street and locally is in its idea good but we have two great banks that put a lot back into their communities.
In Buffalo this Bank Transfer Day should have also supported M&T and First Niagara, and arguably even other "non-locals" like HSBC. These banks employee huge numbers of local residents and have also donated money for grants and sponsorships all over the metro for decades. There's no reason why these banks should be vilified, or in any way imply that they do less for the community than a Credit Union does. In fact they probably do much more.
And the continual anti-capitalist mindset of most of these protesters is why I could never directly support them. Being anti-corruption should not be considered the same thing as anti-capitalist.
and where is some of the money coming from that pays for these employees and grants and sponsorships?
it's coming from the bailout money.
the banks are being vilified because they took part in this derivatives fiasco which has now contributed to the coming defaults of nations in Europe and possibly here in the US.
by taking the bailout money the banks are acting in an 'anti-capitalist' way in that their business model no longer works due to selling crap financial instruments. in a real capitalist market they would go belly up but because they are involved with the buying of US Treasuries as Primary Dealers the US gov't is propping them up.
privatizing profits but socializing losses on the backs of the taxpayers thru the bailouts is not capitalism. putting the current and future generations into debt slavery is not a prudent form of capitalism.
that's why there are people taking action and moving their money to credit unions that didn't take part in the derivatives scam. it's rewarding good behavior and punishing bad behavior.
one of issues the Occupy folks are looking for is accountability for these crimes by the bankers.
Regarding money for employees, sponsorships and grants coming from bailout money, let's consider the facts. The Top 50 banks were pretty much forced to accept TARP by the Obama administration because of either a belief that having everyone in would reduce the stigma on those with largest need (most charitable interpretation) or to create the future opportunity to demonize all of the banks as bailout recipients (as is happening now).
HSBC never received TARP funds (as a British bank, U.S. regulators didn't have as much leverage to force them to take it). M&T and First Niagara didn't need TARP, but were forced to take $600 million and $184 million, respectively. Both repaid the amounts in full with interest fairly quickly after repayment was legally allowed.
Regarding the "derivatives fiasco," it actually has nothing to do with the current sovereign debt crisis in Europe. The sovereign debt crisis is about Greece, over the past 50 years spending more on social programs than it had and finally hitting the point where their national credit card is maxed out. Because Europe has a common economic system, this is problematic for the whole. It's kind of analogous to what would happen to the value of state and local government debt in the U.S. if, say, Louisiana (Greece) were to threaten default. The unthinkable (a U.S. State defaulting) occurring, would cast a cloud over even more prosperous states. And call attention to larger states with shaky finances like Illinois (Italy) that are uncomfortably similar to more stable large states (like New York and California). So, logically, the Federal Reserve (European Central Bank) would think about some type of loan package and, in order to preserve their own access to capital, larger states like New York (France) and Texas (Germany) might be willing to participate. This will essentially put New York and Texas taxpayers on the hook for Louisiana debt - which will annoy them but be manageable. That may tempt Illinois to think about defaulting as well, expecting another New York and Texas bailout. But New York and Texas can't manage a bailout of that size (at least without a revolt of their own taxpayers), so eventually the whole thing will fall apart -- but not before several months or years of up and down drama -- which is what we are seeing in the capital markets now.
Derivatives (or even "asset backed securities," short sales, or credit default swaps) are not the problem. They are merely financial products that can broadly distribute losses and allow risk positions to be managed. Blaming derivatives confuses root cause with effect. Derivatives can distribute the effect, but the problem is the root cause. And root causes are almost always simple. In the current U.S. crisis, the root cause was people, encouraged by a government policy to promote universal home ownership, borrowing more than they could afford to borrow to purchase homes with "no money down."
papa,
some facts for you
HSBC received money, not from TARP, but from payouts from AIG, which was bailed out with taxpayer money.
HSBC Holdings PLC is one of at least two dozen U.S. and foreign banks that received about $50 billion in derivative payments from American International Group since the U.S. government started bailing out the insurer last year, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal, citing confidential documents and sources.
when does it stop?
You are right, but you didn't take your logic far enough. The banks took money that the government handed out. We need to hold the government accountable more than the banks.
Loonitick-
It didn't take the local "occupiers" very long to accept a bail-out from government sympathizers, aka the Common Council, did it?
Funny how they rally against organizations taking hand-outs but accept one when offered!
On principle alone, they needed to decline the offer and paid the fee like the rest of us schleps who have to pay fees. Instead, when it benefitted THEIR cause, the bullhorns fell silent.
Shame on them. They sold out for 500.00.
nice try Jim. the fee was 'waived', no money came out of the taxpayers pockets to pay for it. big difference between that and a few Trillion dollars to prop up the banks which, yet again, is on the back of the taxpayers.
Sarah Bishop>"Moving your money out of big Wall Street banks to small community banks and credit unions..."
Is Buffalo First's goal in this activism to cause layoffs of some of the many well-paid WNYers who work in the national HQ's here of the "big Wall Street banks" known as M&T Bank and First Niagara Bank (both publicly traded on "Wall Street" and both in the biggest 50 banks)?
What a nice attitude toward your neighbors that would be.
Sarah>"...when you transfer your assets and advocate for others to do the same,"
As an in kind response, should employees of M&T and FN banks and their friends/families now start a similar boycott vs. businesses who've affiliated with Buffalo First? Oh, that would be different because…. why?
If there really were layoffs because of this movement (which I doubt), would there not be a corresponding increase in employment among locally-owned institutions that so many people moved their money into? I suspect employment would actually rise, because 100 small businesses do not have the economies of scale that 1 giant business can leverage to reduce their labor costs.
js, well if it caused no reductions in their HQs, then that would mean the goal of impacting those companies didn't succeed.
I agree with you that kind of success isn't likely at all - it's more of a feel-good activism - but if their wildest hopes came true and massive #s of people across the U.S. really acted on the request and did what Buffalo First and the Occupy movement is suggesting (keep in mind they aren't only suggesting Buffalo people do this), then it would have to harm the bank co's in question.
Otherwise, what's the point? They're trying to harm the big bank co's, right?
As to your suspicion that the end result would be more jobs due to less efficiency (more employees needed per $ on deposit)… I think not in the case of present day Buffalo/WNY, because if I'm not mistaken we have a disproportionately high percent of bank headquarters here. Both M&T and FN have many banking customers in other metros and states which creates bank HQ jobs here (not to mention other major banking presence here as some other comments mentioned - HSBC still, BoA, Citi, etc.)
Another factor is a good portion of the many 100s of WNY jobs at M&T, First Niagara, HSBC, and Citi's back office here are high quality - many $50K+ easily. (I'm not sure about BoA.)
I wonder how many jobs at small credit unions are of that level?
Credit Unions just don't have the positive benefit to the overall community that large local banks provide. They don't employ as many people and they don't invest as much in local projects.
i'm not sure that's true. unlike banks, i think credit unions are actually prohibited from investing outside their member or geographic base. maybe someone more knowledgeable can chime in.
If you really want to make a statement, burn your money. If people started burning their money the world would be a warmer place.
give it a few years, the fiat toilet paper known as the US dollar would make a great fire starter.
Excellent idea! I can help you burn the money. Send it to me, and I promise you won't have to go through the arduous effort of disposing of your cash.
shows you how old that chain letter is, Exxon and Mobil have merged into one company so it's no longer 'Exxon or Mobile'.
the price of gas is a result of the futures contracts traded by the floor traders of the NY Merc Exchange based on supply and demand and threats to supply, etc.
From what I hear over 1,000 people moved their money out of their accounts into local credit unions. The total transaction value was reportedly $843.23 as many had negative balances to begin with, but still good job.
Considering the Occupy Wall Street mantra of supporting "Main Street" over "Wall Street," its interesting to think about what literally is on "Main Street" in Buffalo.
At Fountain Plaza we have the Key Bank Tower (also home to a Merrill Lynch office), the Bank of America building, and M&T Center. As we move farther South on Main, we see M&T Plaza and across the street from that the Main Place Tower, home to a regional headquarters for JP Morgan Chase. A little farther south, we see One HSBC Center (home to thousands of HSBC employees that do things unrelated to retail branch banking). Then Main Street ends at First Niagara Center (which is actually headquartered a few blocks off Main St, but seemed worthy of mention anyway).
Thousands of Western New Yorkers, with good jobs on Main Street at the so-called "Wall Street Banks"
You can tell which banks actually want personal checking accounts and which ones don't - those who actually provide interest-bearing checking accounts for regular-sized accounts!
Evans Bank and Bank of Holland are the two I've found that actually appear to WANT personal checking accounts.
Getting out of Bank of America is a no-brainer. Key doesn't offer anything in particular. M&T the same, if you don't care about having a silly Bills check card.
Leave a comment
Sponsor
Recent Comments
Sponsor
Interested in advertising on BuffaloRising?
E-mail John C. Powell
or call John at 716.602.0200





According to your "move the money" links, transferring assets into First Niagara Financial Group or M+T is not encouraged.
I'm not exactly sure when making a profit became such a vile thing in this country, but aren't FNFG and M+T "local"? Isn't it through their profits that they invest in our community, underwrite the arts, support non-profits?
I suppose occupiers in Hartford or Pittsburgh or Philadelphia or Baltimore where FNFG and M+T have acquired smaller banks will actively target them the way this Buffalo version of the campaign is targeting others.
So, could the transfer of assets from, say HSBC or Bank of America - or FNFG/M+T, for that matter - contribute to local job loss? Isn't it possible that my "act" might jeopardize the livelihood for one of our neighbors who work at these institutions?
Hmmm....reading ahead, the local leader and board member of Buffalo First is employed by a local credit union. Is this just part of a strategy to open new accounts? No conflict of interest there.....
Do I have to return that free toaster if I move my savings account?
So many unanswered questions...but the premise seems flawed. I think I'll pass.
Now off to Elmwood/Bidwell to get some organic, locally grown arugula before the season ends...
I'll pass.
I bought a toaster and a bank came with it...