Accelerating Upstate: The Next Step
Comments
Leave a commentWhy would we do a sister cities program to connect to Downstate cities? Why would we tie our industries with the downstate economy? If I do recall it was us who avoided recession, and it was their industries who failed.
I'm not saying its been perfect up here, but in order to thrive as a state, we need to has a diversified economy, not one reliant on New York City
All of these items are very important however the education/workforce development #3 is key. The new economy of the united states is based on skills that many do not have. The regional winners will be determined based on the talent pools that they cultivate. New York City recognized that they science and engineering talent pool was low compared to Silicon Valley and Boston. This hindered the deveopment of small tech companies in new york city. So they had science and enginnering schools compete to build a campus on city owned land. The inital results on the bidding process were very impressive. With multinational collaboration between worldclass universities.
It is this type of forward thinking that will help transform the region for the next century. UB2020 is great, but it will take further comittment and ivestment to cultivate and attract the type of talent that will grow the economy and built a sustainable future.
@ travelrrr - do you actually read the articles or just look at pictures? This has little to nothing to do with the regional councils, and by the looks of it, THE VERY FIRST THEME hits exactly on what you are whining about - enhancing the environment for business. I don't see anything about free money or hand-outs. You whine about helping entrepreneurs, look at theme 4. Stop looking at pictures and read the article.
where do you hear whining? I was commending their work/plan, but was also pointing out that business development activities, as they were, have not worked over the past 50 years as they have mostly been top-down. Boston, Silicon Valley,etc. have all thrived in the early stage business environment due to a robust free market, innovation, etc. Less government intervention on that level is more.
Not sure why you are so defensive.
the "massachusetts miracle" (or, more accurately, the rt. 128 miracle) had mostly to do with scoring increased defense contracts. so much for the free market and less government intervention.
Right-that was likely the instigator/catalyst, which is now largely privately led.
There's also this coverage of Accelerate Upstate in Artvoice:
http://artvoice.com/issues/v10n32/news_feature
So far the theme descriptions sound like a lot of cliches & platitudes we've heard before many times. At least they didn't use the word synergy.
I'll hold back on serious praise or critique until they announce anything more specific, but for now I agree with travelrrr's first comment above. Very well said. If they let me vote on here, I'd even +1 it !
This was a cynical "what's in it for me?" session on how to direct tax money into pockets. "HOW CAN I MAKE MONEY OFFA THIS REGION??" is the only subject at hand. Now watch Rocco's minions give me a bunch of thumbs down.
Mr. Green, It is hard to criticize how Rocco has invested his handouts. He did not invent the concept of government subsidy, he only uses what is offered. You can do it too.
So much crap to cut through, but I'll focus on just one aspect which is my specialty -- angel investing and venture capital at No. 4.
First, there is almost no angel investment money or VC money in WNY. It's virtually dead. So there is no point is trying to match our startups with any local money because there simply isn't any, despite what boosters claim.
Second, there is very little mentoring from experienced serial entrepreneurs. Again, there are very few serial entrepreneurs in Buffalo and few are qualified to mentor startups. UB, however, has a pretty good business accelerator, and there is at least one private one that I am aware of. Still, it's simply not enough.
Third, no chamber of commerce can match up startups with investment money, certainly none in the WNY region. In order to match up with any serious investors, they will have look outside the region, and I seriously doubt they have the contacts to do that.
However, there ARE indeed things that can be done to obtain investment money, but none of them are easy. It's hard work. and it's hard for everyone -- the total amount of private equity available for funding startups nationwide has plunged from about $100 billion a few years ago to just $20 billion today. Startups and SMEs everywhere have a tough time raising money.
Until this issue is addressed, nothing will come of it. (And no, it has nothing to do with lowering taxes).
Leave a comment
Sponsor
Recent Comments
Sponsor
Interested in advertising on BuffaloRising?
E-mail John C. Powell
or call John at 716.602.0200




It is great that discussions and planning sessions are taking root. Fortifying infrastructure, building deeper alliances with Canada, creating tax incentives, etc. is exactly where these efforts should be focused.
However, as we have seen over the past 50 years, top-down/government and agency-led business/economic development plans fail-they are inefficient, bloated and often corrupt. Business development, like every other movement in and around WNY, needs to be started from the ground-up. Let the market and entrepreneurs function...and they will deliver.
These councils can be most effective if they simply work to create a more business-friendly environment (lower taxes, incentives, infrastructure support, etc.) Stay out of the rest.
(PS-nice two see the picture of two upstanding business leaders seated together).
All of them are seated together & hoping to see how to get more free, public money to "accelerate" itself into their pockets, with Rocco at the head of the pack. His performance at the recent convention was disgusting; it was nothing but "the City needs to give ME this and this and this so I can sell more apartments". Greedy tools should give to themselves.
how can they be upstanding when they're sitting?