Kunstler on Beef-on-Weck, City Court Building, and Preservation
Comments
Leave a commentI do occasionally lose some sleep over buildings like City Court and the Convention Center.
They seem to be right at the cusp of being a really bad idea, or being a salvageable monument to future generations on how NOT to build a building... but then I realize, at the time they were being designed, people probably thought the exact same thing about all the treasures we are working so hard to save today.
I shudder at the thought of 50 years from now, turning into a demolitionist to get rid of these eyesores, while my grandkids are pleading their hearts out to save them from the wrecking ball. If fate has a cruelly ironic hand, either myself of my children will be living in grain elevator condominiums as we debate it all...
kunstler had a few other minor factual errors, too. amongst other things, he confused niagara square and fountain plaza.
i'm a kunstler fan but what is up with his grating theme song? makes me hate opening his podcasts. david byrne's 'nothing but flowers' predates kunstler's long emergency stuff by 15 years and would be a way better theme song.
http://www.ted.com/talks/david_byrne_sings_nothing_but_flowers.html?c=161996
I like the theme song, though I agree that "(Nothing But) Flowers" describes the "long emergency" long before most people were talking about it. But even if Duncan and Jim wanted it as the podcast theme song, I bet the royalty cost would be out of their budget.
He's trying to sell his books with a vaudeville routine. It's amusing enough, but the substance wears thinner and thinner.
Kunstler may have a wry sense of humor, but his topic is as serious as a heart attack, and he is trying to wake people up to the mountain of work that we will all need to do to address the massive changes that are coming.
You can only describe the substance as being thin if you have your head in the sand
[Please refrain from posting under multiple screen names] Kunstler is obviously envious of others who opine on current events, predominantly those who have struck a more optimistic chord, whether you agree or disagree, seems to have found him wondering how so many people could ignore or reject his vitriolic dribble while rallying behind someone who at least poses palatable / viable alternatives. No-one likes a self involved know it all. Maybe he was picked on in Middle School and High School , if so......he should get over it.
What sense does it make to approach "any" problem by deriding all those whose views fall outside the scope of his own narrow mind. What is the benefit of his tunnel visioned road trips but to criticize all that he sees. People, architecture, infrastructure all fall victim to your personal inferiority complex.
Personally, I have little confidence in government, have never been inclined to blindly follow political prophets, movements, or cynics, am not overweight, I do not manufacture or use Meth, nor do I carp at the inevitable cycles of life. Spring has always followed Winter and if that ceases to be the case some will find a way to flourish and even if not, what kudos will those of his ilk get from screaming (Munch like)... I TOLD YOU SO. If he believes that "we become what we think about" what on earth has he become or better yet what has he spent his life thinking about?
Leave a comment
Sponsor
Recent Comments
Sponsor
Interested in advertising on BuffaloRising?
E-mail John C. Powell
or call John at 716.602.0200




Well, he had buffet beef on weck - probably not exactly the best representative of that humble sandwich.
I knew Kunstler would ruffle some feathers among the preservationists and I was apparently right, judging by what I heard about the chatter after his talk.
Preservationists and urbanists are usually allies for now. There will be a bit of a schism when and if preservation organizations start to campaign to enshrine the aging McDonalds and Walmarts of the country, simply because they've gotten old enough to be "historic".
I consider myself a preservationist, but one who wants to preserve older buildings not because they are old, but because they are 100x the quality of almost anything built today, in terms of craftsmanship and in terms of urban design.