Follow Occupy Buffalo
Comments
Leave a commentThe likes of Michael Moore and Kanye West are now literally voicing the same opinions as homeless people, unemployed middle class folks, and members of various unions for public service workers.
So what are these two filthy rich 1 percenters doing to help, other than opening up their big mouths and getting free publicity.
Hey Michael, while your making millions on your movies, the guy selling popcorn at the theater is making 8 bucks an hour. What are you going to do about it, you big phony.
whatever money Micheal Moore makes on his movies re-invests in the next film and cause to get the word out against corporate greed, arrogance and political curruption. I do not know him but my guess is he does not live a movie star life
Moore does not put his money where his mouth is. he owns lots of stocks in companies that he went after in his movies.
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/11/3/150518.shtml
it's great that he brings attention to these issues but if he is to be taken seriously he should walk the walk.
The author of that blog post or whatever is obviously being disingenuous. I don't think Michael Moore is the best thing since sliced bread, but obviously he isn't managing the investments of his foundation and whatever financial corp. managing the holdings of the foundation obviously would have the money split across hundreds or thousands of companies, likely based solely on a criteria such as their inclusion in the S&P 500 or being a U.S. large-cap company. Just figured I'd explain that in case you weren't familiar how financials or mutual funds work. That article is pretty blatant propaganda and not very good propaganda at that.
M Moore could set guidelines for the managers to invest in alt energy etf's, socially responsible funds, green funds, etc.
My point is that I can all but guarantee that back in 2005 or whenever this "broke" (a tax return was filed) Moore had nothing to do with running the investments for the foundation. It's not some egregious hypocrisy like the blogger suggests, that Moore deliberately and thoughtfully targeted the likes of Halliburton as companies he wanted to invest in.
Anyone who cant see whats going on must be "DUMB" or a Republican. This started with the war that kept the eye of the public not in touch with the deregulations for corporations IE: ENRON, ETC. (FRIEND OF G.BUSH who gave Enron to do what it did. Haliburton corp. former CEO 6 MO. PRIOR TO WAR WAS Dick Chenney.Who not only was rewarded most of the war contracts but also moved it's headquarters to DUBAI for tax reasons. All those oilwells in the middle east are maintained by the Haliburton corp. why do you think the Republicans are upset to leave Iraq, they will have no one there to protect these oil wells. I could go on about the budget, the dwindling pay scale, lack of jobs, companies telling people that if they are unemployed do not apply. THIS IS NO LONGER A DEMOCRACY, GET IT. IT IS RUN BY THE WERALTHY MORE SO THAN EVER. WAKE UP. A nd by the way, I am not suffering and have retired at 52 but I am part of these people and will back them up.
Markus, come on now. At least get your timeline correct. Enron began its scandalous ways under Clinton, and only came to light at the very beginning of the Bush presidency. To somehow tie this to the wars is naive at best.
Which doesn't negate the fact that Enron's crook owners are REPUKES and were very involved with the criminal bush* regime and were supported and protected by the bush* regime.
* selected, never elected
@Markus - I hope your retirement portfolio doesn't include the large cap stocks for companies that OWS is protesting against.
Michael Moore's foundations are set-up with the express intent of protecting his assets from the IRS. He has a foundation that receives all royalties from his films and articles. He has another that owns his house and possessions, and a third that he uses to manage the fees he receives for appearing on TV or doing lectures. All of these foundations keep his reported income low, and all shelter his multimillion dollars in assets from the IRS. On top of that, he and his wife manage the foundations, including investment decisions that are executed through a private brokerage. He is a hypocrite and a tax cheat.
It's not going to "collapse the system". The street lights aren't going to suddenly stop working. It is already raising the level of conversation, and the most obvious injustices will be the first to go:
- Repealing the Bush tax cuts
- End the incredible expense/WASTE of war. It is cheaper to give jobs to soldiers coming home to do things like fix roads and bridges, then to occupy foreign land.
- Eventually, the affordable health care plan will become single payer
- Invest in the education instead of putting kids in debt for the rest of their lives
- Make the banks a crucial part of the system instead of letting them work it.
- And a lot more
In short - DO THE RIGHT THING
Who is putting kids in debt for the rest of their lives? Last time I checked, student could choose their major and their school. Why not protest the education establishment? Why does government need to step in for peoples bad choices? Come on...
Hey dude in the photo with the messy beard and mustache and two fingers in the air - that is NOT how you go about getting a job.
How dare you suggest it is one's own responsibility to find a job? The government, or wall street, or Bush, or somebody has to provide me with a job. It is a human right. Just like using somebody else's skills and time for free healthcare is my right.
Healthcare IS a RIGHT!!!
Get the Insurance Industry OUT of HealthCare!
The only thing we should have is SINGLE PAYER like every other country in the world!!!
end the Federal Reserve and Fractional Reserve Banking.
establish public banks that put profits back into their respective communities.
bring back the Glass-Steagall act.
ban all financial derivatives.
use the state chartered Bank of North Dakota as a model, North Dakota has no budget problems, it's running a surplus.
a better world is possible.
Out of all the Occupy groups, I think Buffalo's chose the most attractive location. I wouldn't mind camping out in Niagara Square for a couple days, just for the view!
But on an effectiveness note, I'm glad they're taking the message to some of the corporate leaches (like BoA) and not just City Hall. Buffalo certainly has its fair share of government caving in to the specific interests of corporations, at the expense of the city as a whole.
I don't mind the city giving perks to companies like F'N who are trying to be good citizens, but we've all suffered because of situations like BassPro and HSBC where residents and job seekers have to pay bill for extortion-like tactics.
But across the country they are only targeting the corporations, instead of the governments (both local and federal) who have a lot more to do with the problems we face than a company making money, which is its purpose.
Corporations are pulling the strings. The government is just doing their bidding. Especially the federal government, they spend so much time raising money instead of talking to their constituents and reading legislation. The government is corrupt. This is about taking our democracy back.
I'd have to say that Duluth Minnesota's group is tied with Buffalo's in the "nice location" category. Both their tent city and "designated protest area" have views of Lake Superior, and the Inner harbor.
Much smaller than Buffalo's though. We were up there last week and stopped by their occupation... never saw more than 15-20 people at most, but they're out there and committed.
Great to see this grass roots effort for change. We have allowed corporate America, Wall St, and the other powerful interests to hijack our democracy for far too long. The right has attempted to minimize and discredit this movement but they are as usual dishonest and again on the wrong side of history. The policies of the past 30 years have decimated the middle class and transferred our nations wealth to the top while ignoring the needs of average Americans. The people have finally realized the "class war" has been going on for decades and average people have been the ones under attack. I hope this resonates with our tone deaf leadership and results in real reform.
The middle class hasn't exactly been kind to the poor, either. I suppose the 'haves' have always scrambled over the backs of the 'have nots' to better themselves, but we're more than a century past the realization that it just isn't acceptable to sacrifice one group of people for others to get ahead... yet it continues.
I find it interesting that the movement has caught on so deeply in Buffalo. Our city is comparatively homogenous economically, compared to other places I've lived where there are drastic examples of extreme wealth living next to extreme poverty. (not that Buffalo doesn't have it's share of both ends of the spectrum... but Bflo seems to have a wider range of 'average folks', while places like LA, Miami and NY have both billionaires and starving families in larger proportions)
Our corporate climate, however, is more heavily skewed. Small businesses are struggling while the city and state bend over backwards for the few corporate giants who call all the shots. Even mid-sized companies like restaurant chains have a better ear with government than start-ups (as we've seen with the food truck debate).
"The right"? The past "thirty years"? C'mon 'lifer, open your eyes.
How about that disaster of a president LBJ and his new society? Let's incent people NOT to work!
If you think "the left" is not equally responsible for the current state of affairs, you need to smoe something else. If you don't think Dodd and Frank and all those other "men of the people" were not architects of the sub-prime fiasco, you're just not paying attention. If you don't think Obama and Gore and all those others "fighting for the middle class" don't lay down for the lobbyist dollar, you're simply and plainly naive.
Don't fall into this right vs. left, MSNBC vs. FOX BS. Each side takes turns sharing in the spoils.
Blaming the "right" for everything. If this is truly about the "99%", I'm sure there are just as many righties as lefties. If not, then I guess it should be the "49%".
I think that groups of people banding together to acheive a goal is great, but I have to say that this "Occupy XXXX" stuff can be a little frustrating because a good majority of the people protesting don't know a thing about what they're talking about. I'm not saying you need to in detail the ins-and-outs of the securities markets, but don't protest outside M&T and FN about it, when these two companies didn't get in that mess. And Buffalo is not the place to protest "the 1%". Frankly, Buffalo could use a few more "1%-ers" to bring some money here.
Bottom line: The ability to protest is what makes this country great, but people jumping on the bandwagon to protest something they don't really understand is what makes this country ignorant.
I couldn't agree more with what you said. I like the idea of OWS, and I think it will force the 1% and some politicians to consider changes, but it has turned into sloppy protesting.
A General note not related to mmmmmm's comment:
As far as Kanye and Michael Moore voicing for the movement, HA! 216 members of congress belong to the ultra-wealthy 1% just like Kanye and Moore, guess what? They are your voice too! How has that worked out?
All and all I think it is important that it is happening and I am glad it is, I just think it has no direction.
Let's see if their "movement" survives February....
And who is going to pay for the clean up of Niagara Square? MY tax dollars?
You want a better world? Stop expecting handouts.
What a bunch of ninnies America has become. Polarized and jealous of what the other guy has.
Man, I'd love to hang out in Niagara Square and wax philosophical...but I get out of bed each day and go to work. I've been downsized 4 times in the past 20 years by those MF corporate bastards, so don't tell me about inequality and unfairness, you wusses. Don't like it? Start your own corporation and donate your profits to this bowel movement of an "occupation".
Kanye West and Michael Moore. Gimme a break. Captivating people of all backgounds? Uhm sure. What hypocrites. Seriously. My FATHER came to this country with nothing. Zero. How many of these "occupiers" are first generation Americans? I bet very few. Show me the demographics...
Three years into this flimsy Obama regime and the best we can do is blame republicans and Bush? Get over it already.
Had any jihadist cowards blow up any skyscrapers lately? Those were MY friends in that building who died, you naive twerps.
Yeah. Let's just stand out in the rain and protest that life is unfair and sucks and hope you get more free government handouts paid for by a shrinking polulation of people who actually suffer the indignity of working. God help us.
Who forced you to live large and rack up debt diguised as student loans? Now you want the government to give you a free pass because you wanted to live large? What about others who worked their way through school, or who worked at unfulfilling and extra jobs to help their kids get degrees without debt? Is the government gonna bail them out for their sacrifice?
What about "your fellow Americans" who live within their budget and did not fall victim to the allure of a subprime mortgage trap. Is the "government" going to bail them out, too?
What crap.
Try taking some responsibility for your own life and let's see how you like that February wind in Niagara Square, you selfish lazy wussy phonies.
Dang. You A. have no idea what the protests are about, apparently, and B. need some serious psychological counseling. I mean seriously. Unless you just needed to rant, in which case I'm glad it happened before you went and gave yourself a stroke.
jag please inform me as to what the protests are about
Why on earth would you look to me? Educate yourself. Read this article; read the website it links to. I have nothing to do with the protests. Reading my opinion of it wouldn't be any more worthwhile than listening to Fox News' opinion of it.
Thanks, jag, for your concern. Yes, the fingers started ranting. Blood Pressure usually around 110/70 so I'm not too worried.
You are correct...I don't understand the "movement" and I figured my POV might attract the ire of many BRO readers, but felt the need to put it out there just the same.
If you protest everything, you protest nothing.
I'm not protesting anything, currently. The Occupy movement has a website with a list of demands/goals, I'm sure. Check it out if you seek clarity.
"If you protest everything you protest nothing" - I don't find that the movement is protesting "everything," but it's obvious that a lot of people are pissed off and they're all coming out. It's similar to the Tea Party, if only in that one respect. I find that your rant against everything is quite unhelpful, just as you find the protest about everything to be unhelpful. But am quite glad you got it all off your chest at once! Kudos on that - definitely hope it helps cool the blood boiling.
'Stop expecting handouts'
tell that to the bankers who got this country/the world into the financial mess it's in.
Sure did. And auto companies, too.
But the sainted one Obama and his cronies in the Fed printed the money and bew out the deficit. Now the secret supergroup is readying to print more.
and did anyone listen to you when you and 90% of the people in this country said they shouldn't be bailed out?
No.
that's why there are protesters occupying cities and towns across the country.
You do know that bush*s tax cuts for the extremely wealthy are the reason for the huge deficits, don't you?
And his wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which were all based on HIS lies, make up the rest...
If not, that explains your ignorance showcased here...
Jim, I just want to comment about "your tax dollars" cleaning up Niagara Square. Please tune into the news more often. There was a great piece a few weeks ago about the NYC protesters who volunteered to clean up one of the parks they were occupying because the parks crew couldn't access the space. I don't doubt the same thing has and will continue to happen....
You don't make yourself sound too intelligent with that. Sounds like YOU have a sense of entitlement YOURSELF.
help me out, jimbuffalo & those who upvoted him.
i get that you've been laid off and downsized and persevered through genuine misery. maybe you lost your house. maybe your marriage broke up. maybe your 401k evaporated like the morning fog in tucson. hardship has been your story and buffalo's story for the last 3 decades. sometimes i think this entire city is recovering from post-traumatic stress syndrome. so i get it and i salute you for your determination and self-sufficiency. you have a right to be proud and i don't have any intention of taking that away from you.
what i don't get is this: the inescapable implication of your post is that we'd all be better off if we were all worse off (like you). usually suffering makes people determined to spare others, not punish them.
like, what parent who buries a child argues that more parents need to lose their children? what person who suffers through cancer treatment denounces those who don't have cancer (yet, knock on wood) as wusses, twerps, and worse?
i'm sorry, but this part I just don't get.
Grad:
He is just ranting about people taking personal responsibility. He points out several issues and takes exception with them, sounds like free speech to me. You then jump to assumptions that he got laid off, divorced, or went bankrupt. WTF?
He's telling people to get off their lazy asses and get to work. I mean look around half the time people stare into their iphones and post things to Facebook all day long, does this help our economy?
Then the cancer analagy. Are you for real? You should learn to respect someone else's opinion and agree to disagree rather than personal character assassination.
the comparison with cancer was based on the fact that, like being downsized, it is something that is beyond your control, it often occurs in epidemic numbers, and it is a -very- serious situation for individuals and their families.
in case you don't know, -maybe- means that it is hypothetical whether something happened or not. would you like this version better? "maybe after you lost your job 4 times, you inherited a fortune from a distant relative and retired to the bahamas." unlikely, huh? from the anger in jimbuffalo's post, it is clear that he had hard times, not easy ones.
again, it was appreciation for jimbuffalo's story that made me decide to write, not a desire to silence him. i think he has a right be proud. the only way i could have said that even louder was to hit the ALL CAPs keys. his post made me think and offer in return what i didn't understand about it. that is called dialogue, not censorship.
I'm glad Buffalo Rising is finally covering this exciting and inspiring movement. I kind of wish Occupy Buffalo didn't feel the need to riff off of Carl Paladino's campaign slogan, though!
mmmmm...Buffalo: Have you talked to the people down at Niagara Square? The ones I talked to were quite articulate about their concerns and complaints. And I don't believe they have been actively protesting against M&T or FN (beyond reminding people that those banks are publicly-traded corporations that are not ultimately accountable to their communities). There have been protests aimed at Chase and Bank of America here.
I agree with you that everyone should educate themselves about the issues and not simply jump on the bandwagon. From what I saw and heard at Niagara Square, there was a lot of informed conversation and education going on there.
That's great then if the people in Buffalo are doing it the right way. It's just getting old seeing some idiot ranting and raving on CNN or any other network about how ALL banks are evil, and ALL rich people are greedy. Come on now.
I love protests as much as the next guy, but the real power brokers don't work on Wall St. or head up GM, IBM, Archer-Daniels. The few people who really pull all of the strings are largely hidden from the public view. Mostly the Bilderberg group, and they're all sitting back, feet on the desk laughing at these protests.
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. As history shows, this fight was going to happen eventually. It was just a matter of when.
What fight? There's one group. They're not grabbing CEO's out of their offices and hanging them. So I think they're stuck on just laughing.
it's a fight.
“There’s class warfare, all right,” Mr. Buffett said, “but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.”
quote from Warren Buffett.
There is a GREAT bank that advertises on this website AND they pay YOU 3% on you checking account! What a deal, check out Evans Bank, they're great.
is anyone talking about corporate dollars in politics. In a time when we need campain reform and term limits a republican congress voted to open the door to even more coprorate dollars and secrecy in campain donations and lobbying. LIMIT THE LOBBYISTS IMPACT ON POLITICS AND SET TERM LIMITS FOR ALL GOVERNMENT POSITIONS. This will take care of a lot of issues.
I do believe in the bottom line ethics of this protest, but whatever happened to hard work getting where you need to go. Maybe I am idealistic, but I chose to take out loans, I chose to go party while I could have worked/internship/TA to reduce my loans and I chose to pursue a career that is not well paid.
The system might be flawed, but individual's decisions might be flawed as well.
2 little odd things:
1) The DOW is up almost 1000 points since occupy Buffalo.
2) As I was passing the protest, I saw someone typing on a typewriter.
This anecdotal stuff doesn't really help. The DOW goes up and down and it affects most of us very little. So you saw a guy using a typewriter. That probably doesn't mean anything. We need to look at trends if we want to figure out where the real outrage is. People like to point out that there will always be poor, unlucky, unemployable, ill, weak people. But the real issue that is unique to our lifetime is huge income inequality and stagnate wages for workers. This is not normal or acceptable. This has been taking shape over the past 30 years and it is basically turning the American dream into a myth.
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/10/income-inequality-is-not-a-myth/247389/
Not sure if anyone's questioned this, but has Occupy Buffalo obtained permission from the NFL to use the Buffalo Bills logo as their advertising mascot? Have to believe someone in the Niagara Square food tent's going to be getting a corporate call on that one real soon.
Something is wrong with how the "system" values employees and certain career paths versus others. Its not to say some are not more valuable or risky than others but I really think the focus has become an extremely greedy one focused solely on the top and the shareholders return on investment, overlooking the employees and the human capital as positive things but rather as expendable liabilities or drains on more and more profit. How much is enough? Its apparent over the last few decades that profit expectations are becoming unsustainable and ridiculous at the expense of most and the communities those people live in. If I had one hope it would be that business schools started stressing social and community responsibility and ethics rather than money is the be all end all and employees are just replaceable drags on the bottom line, placing all priorities at the top decision making level where money rains and reigns torrentially. What happened to loyalty? I hear of customer loyalty but dont get alot of sense of corporate loyalty to an area really. Small business and locally based business tends to be far more loyal than some large conglomerate raking in more and more dollars. Ultimately the pay structure and pay priorities need to change. An across the board recognition that a business like a machine is only as good as the SUM OF ITS PARTS and all those parts deserve to be valued and supported is crucial. How is it that the CEO's 5 minute pee break is 10,000 times more valuable than the janitor who keeps the facility clean and presentable for a client? Not to say there shouldnt be a pay ladder based on experience and education but perhaps the top needs to be reigned in and down and the bottom and middle needs to gain value. If everyone was of the opinion that no worker was worth more than 10 times the value of the least paid worker then everyone would be able to move up together and dollars could be more equitably be distributed among workers, their families, and their neighborhoods, helping rebuild and put some hope in people's future rather than this entitled class elitist BS glass ceiling we now experience where a few hoard money and the rest get to pick up what extra has fallen out of the top dogs overstuffed pockets. In many ways our system is run by little greedy me me me children who want what everyone else has, its like the kid who goes to Thanksgiving dinner with his family and decides he wants 3/4 of the turkey for himself, leaving 1/4 for the rest of the family. Obviously the kid cant eat it all so he throws it out while everyone else starves. Thats alot like our current situation really. If you are pulling in 10 Million a year you are living significantly above the minimum amount of funds necessary to support basic life necessities and yet the guy who makes 20K annually is pretty damn near the breaking point and yet is expected to accept higher insurance premiums, work til later in life to retire, etc. with only a few examples of upward mobility leaving much sense of hope that hard work will truly pay off in the end here on earth. All in the name of making shareholders more money? At what expense? We need a socially responsible system, not the complete downfall of it.
This story is a great example of what the 99% have a problem with. Right wingers like to believe that this is just out of work lazy people protesting. That is not the case. It is about time people started calling attention to how our system is being warped to feed money into the pockets of a few and if it takes some out of work people to get the ball rolling I applaud them:
See this story:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-sox-bacardi-20111027,0,7705637.story
Again, bashing right wingers in the same post as saying the "99%" makes no sense. You can't claim to represent nearly the entire population, and at the same time acknowledge that around half the population isn't in agreement.
The 99% are basically those who are worth less than $1 Million.
"The 99% are basically those who are worth less than $1 Million."
I wonder if Occupy Niagara Square is for or against corporate welfare locally mostly from 99% to some of the 1% here.
If it's worthwhile for ONS to complain last week about Buffalo/city having some $ in an account with lowest bidder JP Morgan, clearly they believe symbolism & principle are important.
How about the principle of public NY state grant much from the 99% offered to 1% Croce for his boutique upscale fancy new hotel project on Franklin?
Or half a million city taxpayer $ (mostly from 99% city residents) to 1% Savarino for his Livery private property? Shouldn't he have paid that or found wealthy friends to donate or partner with him?
Or corp welfare to 1% Paladino, 1% Avant, etc. for $1M+ condos and their 1% residents, or IDA gifts to restaurants anywhere if they're owned by 1%ers, ...and many others, not just to 1%ers in the city but public handouts to 1%ers in suburbs too which are equally bad ideas.
[latter proactively mentioned for steel -sigh- and I guess should repeat I favor ending mortgage tax deductions asap, and I don't favor closing the EPA, ...and I'm not outraged selectively or otherwise ...enough random disclaimers? let's see]
If OccupyNS isn't opposing on principle state & local forced wealth transfers from the 99% to the 1% the same way they've protested some other things, then I'll be confused about their mission.
That's an interesting point. I would bet that there are some who support Occupy and Croce and that you could easily find many more contradictions like that. Most people who participate or support the protests are probably pulled in by the broad themes. I don't know much about Occupy Buffalo but because Occupy Wall Street is generally leaderless it accepts all levels of sophistication. I have read that they are planning to hold a national convention in Philadelphia so that will probably introduce some hierarchy and focus to the effort.
But it is interesting to see how fluid and wildly inconsistent politics can be. My parents describe themselves as Conservative Democrats which has always confused me because the family has benefited from MANY liberal public policies. They are conservative on values but liberal on specifics. I think that Republicans are usually better at exploiting this confusion.
Listen to right wing radio and you will hear near constant complaining about the Occupy protests. This makes me think that right wingers are not on board with what they are saying. You could also throw in the fact that much of the Tea Party hysteria was funded by big money such as the Koch Brs.
I'd say 45% of the country would consider the protesters 'misguided'. Sure, spend two months protesting, but I'll bet some kid going to ECC (or any other school) will see a better return on their investment of time.
Jobs going to lower wage countries are at the root of our economic woes. If these people take some comfort in calling that greed, fine. Making yourself personally more competitive in the world marketplace is the only solution, and that, is hard work.
By the way Steel, I saw your work on Allen. All three 'artists' on display have created interesting work. The one calendar (not sure if your's or someone else) is an affordable gift with 12 nice pictures of Buffalo.
When the Tea Party carried weapons to rallies they were called patriots by the right. When they carried pictures of Obama as Hitler, as a Witch Doctor, and as the Devil, that was "free speech". When they repeatedly made blatantly racist statements that was just a few "bad apples".
Now we have a true grass roots movement not funded by the Koch brothers or supported by the Fox opinion channel and they are called un-american, dirty hippies, or other derogatory names. I think the right and their wealthy enablers are quite afraid of this movement. They realize Americans have had enough of the greed, dishonesty, and extortion that has come to define our system.
Finally, those that claim the right is not more responsible for our problems are either naive or purely partisan. It is the right that has and continues to advocate for the wealthy. It is the right that has and continues to advocate for tax cuts for the wealthy. It is the right that has and continues to advocate for deregulation. It is the right that has and continues to disregard the rights and needs of the 99%.
I'd take a gun-toting tea bagger over a sign waving occupier any time. One wants less, one wants more. We're a country able to support less, not more. More effort is needed, not whining.
The divide will get wider, because those doing the things they need to do, do them. Those that don't, don't. The occupiers will go the way of the BP oil spill, and they will be worse off each week, each month, each year.
Way to miss the point entirely.
It's about the treatment these GENUINE "grass roots" PEACEFUL & UNARMED OWS people are given versus the RACIST, BIGOTED, HATEFUL ARMED "Astroturfed" Teabaggers (their self-given original name).
5 Teabaggers show up and it makes national news for MONTHS - while THOUSANDS of OWS people rally, and they are IGNORED for months at first, then dismissed and ridiculed, and now the LEO PIGS are literally FIGHTING them.
Interesting 2-way exchanges at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGL-Ex1CD1c
...maybe at least a little common ground between OWS and TP views.
If no time for whole thing, there's good exchanges around minutes 12 to 14
I had a discussion with my parents about this. While certainly not the 1%, they pretty much typify being "part of the problem if you're not part of the solution".
After they got done complaining about all the deadbeats and whiners, I reminded them of exactly what they said during the protests in Egypt that "sooner or later, that's going to happen over here".
Well, it's happening over here. We may not (exactly) have dictators and repressive overlords, but we sure as hell know that there's something not quite right about the way things are going down. There might not be a precise plan on what would be better, but nothing's going to change if everything stays the same.
There's still a lot to be seen about what happens in the middle east, Just as there's no way to know whether Occupy will be crushed, ignored, or prompt a change for the good (or the bad). Isn't the first of the 12 steps "recognize that you have a problem"? There will be a lot more action to come, but I think this whole movement is simply America's way of recognizing that we do indeed have a problem.
It's about time the people of this country took a stand for something. The Federal Reserve and IMF (International Monetary Fund) have been stealing from the people for decades (See The Rockefeller Family or Henry Kissinger) and they are not about to stop. The Federal Reserve is a private institution which in fact has no ties to the federal government as well as the IMF and it needs to be abolished for permanent change. The Corporations should not be able to influence government and should not be allowed to donate funds to campaigns. It's a bought system and needs to change because it highly favors big businesses who are NOT adding jobs in the USA, they are adding jobs in China, India & Mexico. Tax breaks need to stopped and should be taxed at a higher percentage for companies who do not create jobs in the USA.
Keep fighting the good fight!
from www.dailypaul.com
"The Primary Owners of the Federal Reserve Bank Are:
1. Rothschild's of London and Berlin
2. Lazard Brothers of Paris
3. Israel Moses Seaf of Italy
4. Kuhn, Loeb & Co. of Germany and New York
5. Warburg & Company of Hamburg, Germany
6. Lehman Brothers of New York
7. Goldman, Sachs of New York
8. Rockefeller Brothers of New York
All the primary owners are branches of European establishments. Foreigners control the United States Money supply. They literally own exclusive rights to the dollar and simply enter dollars into their banks books to make money which they then lend back to us at a profit. For them money does not grow on trees, it is simply a data entry into their account. Clearly the private ownership of the U.S. Dollar is by far The Greatest Crime of the Century. The owners of this bank have been responsible for instigating all the major wars and depressions in the last 100 years. They own the bank, they own the dollar and they own all the major media channels, the military industrial complex and most politicians, judges and cops.
I'm 50/50..I've worked for everyting I've had in my life throughout my teens and college...(Extremly hard in college) and have nobody to thank but myself, but conversely I don't think it should be as difficult as it was. I pay nearly 45% of my income towards health care and student loans..and housing...I am not in a high paying industry and I realize that I will never be a millionare..but really?? Is this it??
And at the opposite side of the spectrum, I realize it is completly unaffordable to subsize others way of life and personal choices..and irresponsbile as well. I get really frusturated when I read articles about these occupiers in larger cities makin very little doing insignficant jobs...(if they're employed at all)and I just can't help to think that..like hey you're a barista in NYC...ya you make 30k a year..that sucks...why don't you move to Buffalo or Pittsburgh, Cleveland, or Florida instead of living in NYC or Chicago and LA. You could rent a crappy studio (the same one you're living in how with 6 of your friends) make the same amount of moneny and buy a house anywhere in any of the places listed above you want. I, as a hard working individual am not here to subsdize your lifestyle...even if I don't like how the sytem works.
I don't know....form a party...back a candiate...do something..if there has been anything that has been proved in the last couple of years its that the government is not going to fix the world for you. You have to go out and fix it for yourself. I fear that if these "occupiers" don't organize in the very near future..they'll become a nuisance and drift into irrevalance.
Organize or die...change the world or move on.
The next debt to crash the economy will be student loan debt now surpasses total credit card debt in the United States. While you hear horror stories about credit card debt and loan morgages all the time there is very little discussion on the epidemic of student loan debt because these debts get deferments. The western civiliation way of doing things seems like is coming to need a change in way we think or do things.
I am the 53% .... Since when, did Americans citizens deserve something for doing nothing? If you have a job and dont like how much you make, find another job or work harder for a possible promotion, educate yourself in your field, make "you" more attractive...someone will notice. You cant complain or blame someone else for your shortfalls. As far as corporations go, if a CEO make $5 or $5 million how does that effect you or me? It doesnt, never has and never will. Who are we to say how much a CEO could earn? ...So you blame banks? The same banks that were forced to loan money to people by our federal government? To people that could never pay back what they owe. Why are you not standing outside of the White House?
I grew up in Buffalo, worked since I was 16. When I was 20 I was hired to do deliveries for a local company. I started at the bottom $7 hour. I worked hard, came on time, rarley called off, and I was promoted to the service department. I eventually became service manager for $11hour. I was underpaid and I knew it but I never complained. I did all of this while going to ITT for my AOS in electronics. Eventually I started my own service company and today I have 5 employees. I will continue to grow & hire, and have even through this recession. Should I stop growing and remain just a small company? Should I fear that one day I will punished for my success? Should I fear that one day the FED will dictate what I pay my employees? Why are we blaming another persons success for our failures?
Great straw man argument. If anyone had issue with entrepreneurship or people earning money, you would have a case. Do people seriously thing the majority of protesters are socialists or something? No one takes issue with people working hard and making more money from it. People take issue with the political and social norm - big business and CEOs (no matter how badly they run their company into the ground) being given the seat at the table, the earmark, the bailout, the golden parachute, etc. that everyday Americans don't even get a whiff of. People aren't asking for a handout - they're asking that the handouts stop.
It does seem a lot of the protesters are socialists, if not a majority. I don't see what about his argument makes it a straw man. I think he's articulating what most of us see quite well. Get off your ass and do something about any trouble you find yourself in.
Wow. So basically you don't know what a socialist is, or anything about the protesters, or both.
"Why are we blaming another persons success for our failures?"
Right, that's exactly what the protesters are doing. Not. The entire tirade is fighting a straw man at best or nonsensical at worst. I gave him the benefit of the doubt.
"Get off your ass and do something about any trouble you find yourself in."
What on earth do you call protesting through freezing nights and getting your ass beaten by cops? You don't have to agree with the world-wide protests, but being oblivious to the effort they're putting in to try and bring about change is just dumb.
Jag -Are you kidding me, the protester have no consistant message. Every message I heard was about people wanting something for nothing, this is a socialist protest. A protest on capatilism, what made America what it is. The greatest country on the face of the earth. This is an Obama funded movement, created only to get him reelected, research it. Then add a few pissed off college kids and a few bums with no solid message to sit in parks all night. Great! The tea party is 80 million strong imagine us in the street? Maybe 200,000 people throughout the whole country of 333 million. Then add the leftest media to cover ever story to make it seem like its bigger than it is. Great time to protest too, Fall???
Awesome, CMC. Best comment so far. A truly amazing collection of nutjob talking points and paranoia. I'm sure the liberal media and socialists and homeless people that make up this small (by your math) protest really are out to destroy capitalism and, of course, are funded by Obama! I hear he's a muslim! You're so smart to have figured out the master plan. Shh, don't say it out loud though, the communists, or nazis, or socialist, or whatever, are listening!
Jag...wake up its been proven just not reported....the former acorn my friend....simply linked straight to the white house. Your a funny guy with no point a view. Its a shame I wasted my time commenting to an idiot. Maybe obama can redistribute you a life....never know?
Did it ever occur to you that I may be BIG BUSINESS one day. You are very mislead and need to get up get out and get something. What should we redistribute to you? Maybe a point a view thats worth speaking about. OCCUPY a jobs fair.
What in heavens name are you talking about? I don't need a job, or any koolaid. Thanks though. Cheers.
You are ignoring the ways that you have benefited from family, community or the fabric of society. Someone else on this thread said that they have no one to thank but themselves for their success. This is a totally unbelievable statement. Even if that was true, why would we want that to be our normal in America? Why would we want to make upward mobility less likely? It makes absolutely no sense to me.
I totally agree. I love Ron Paul. He's the most idealistic person I've ever known. He's basically lying to everyone though. Most of the things he says go like this:
1. Cut funding
2. ??? Allow free market to do it's thing ???
3. Problem solved
He doesn't mention two crucial things. One is that step 2. may take a very long time. The other is that for 2 to happen effectively, we have to equalize any unfair and corruption-driven advantages that others have gained in a crooked system over two hundred years. Once highly paid yuppies get busted for illegally claiming "expenses" as tax free money and corporations get busted for gambling with pension funds at the same rate that people get busted for stealing a piece of bread or robbing a grocery store, then we'll have a truly fair environment for the free market to do its thing. In the meantime, Ron Paul is selling pipe dreams. Awesome pipe dreams, but ultimately dreams without good plans to back them up.
Well, what is the free market? Doesn't it require informed consent among customers?
For example, there is a petition currently to have the FDA require food manufacturers to identify products containing genetically modified organisms, so customers who prefer to avoid them can do so.
Some would say there should be no such government regulation on businesses.
Others would say that a market is not "free" if businesses are allowed to not label (or even mislabel) products and leave it all up to "caveat emptor".
Some would argue that a truly free market requires, perhaps paradoxically, strong public regulation of businesses.
Davvid - Im ignoring what? I benefited from my own hardwork with only the help of my family. Soceity? Buffalo is the third poorest city in America, be real, the things I seen growning up could have easily steered me wrong. I prospered, I worked hard, I showed up to work and school everyday. Nobody owns me nothing and I dont expect a thing....... I dont completly understand what you mean about upward mobility...please explain?
We all benefit from living in American society. Even in Buffalo we have a community that provides support and protections as we work, raise kids, go to school etc. Along the way we all get something for nothing and there is no way of keeping track of it. In fact, society is the only reason why you can expect hard work to get you anywhere.
You would have a point IF THERE WERE JOBS FOR EVERYONE WHO SOUGHT ONE!!!
You know - there are 20 or more people for every job that is out there!!! All the while the wealthy and corporations are sitting on TRILLIONS of dollars!!! Ane couple this with the fact that the wealthy are doing NOTHING with their wealth but trading on the stock market BY JUST MOVING MONEY AROUND instead of investing in new plants or things to produce JOBS!!!
Stop blaming the job seekers for their current unemployed status!!!
The bigger government gets, the more crony capitalism there will be. I don't get why people aren't protesting Obama. Such a double standard.
This large grassroots effort is quickly being taken over by special interests including most of the major labor unions. These unions are not interested in changes to the government, in fact they are some of the largest contributors to campaign funds and lobbying efforts. The AFT, NEA, Teamsters, CWA, SEIU, CSEA, and other local and national unions are doing their best to steer the momentum from Occupy Wall Street towards the empowerment of the Working Families Party. This is similar to the Conservative Party hijacking the Tea Party Movement.
Take a moment to look at the signs from the early days of the Tea Party movement, and compare them to many of the signs from the early days of the Occupy Wall Street movement. Many are almost identical in their condemnation of large corporations and their influence on government through their donations. It is just looking at things from a different political perspective but with the same mission and end goal in relation to the discontent in Washington.
Like the Tea Party, OWS is starting to lose focus with hundreds of small factions forming and fighting over which agenda is the most important. The local GA meetings are ripe with dissension and turmoil as leaders argue to have their voice and agenda heard over the others. I fear that what will be left in a few weeks is a core group that is being funded by special interests (labor unions and a few wealthy sympathizers) who want to use OWS as their bullhorn and the most passionate protesters will carry out their political agenda going forward. Unfortunately, this will result in the creation of a splinter political party that weakens the Democratic Party, but gives a new voice to Washington and local governments.
Follow the money trail and you'll see where the OWS movement is heading and why they don't want to upset the apple cart in Washington.
Eliot Some points to consider:
Total outstanding student loan debt recently topped $1 trillion (e.g. see link [time.com]).
Student loan debt now exceeds household credit card debt (see link [www.good.is]).
It isn't possible to escape student loans via bankruptcy - they will follow you your whole life, no matter what. This puts them in a class by themselves.
Obviously, the current system is badly broken.
The problem is that the federal student loans, while genuinely useful to some, have been exploited pretty much to death by the for-profit colleges. Those do powerful marketing and have pretty much established the idea that everyone should go to college, no matter what. It's the same with diamond jewelry: somehow a semi-rare rock is elevated to cult status, and every woman in the U.S. feels that getting a big one on a golden ring is cool and shit. The colleges merely took a good marketing lesson from DeBeers and applied it to a different market. The outcome is pretty much the same. Couples get into debt for shiny rocks. Students get into debt for college education that can be very well useless to them. I guess Nothing new here.
The thing that gets me about this whole 99% thing, is if 99% didn’t like there banks, they could all withdrawal all their money and set up their own credit unions or even charter their own bank. But what they seem to be demanding is they want all the services the bank provides, plus they want those big interest rates, plus loans at 4%. There demanding they make money on their investment while damning the way to do it. People don’t seem to recall the days of 18% interest rates home mortgages. Point being if 99% though this they could easily change the banking industry in a matter of days.
If you talk about income inequality there again, the 99% could buy local, buy from small business and guess what peoples income would go up. But the 99% wanted cheaper goods, they wanted to toss them out and buy the next latest and greatest iPhone. So its not that the leading American’s aren’t producing the kind of wealth they use to, it’s that the far east has felt hat improvement of there quality of life, were the American quality isn’t going nearly as fast.
Point being if this were the 99% they could change all this stuff without much effort.
The top 10% of earners include those who make 50K per year....Did you know that?
That is interesting, because according to the US Census Bureau, in 2005, nearly 16% of households had incomes of over $100,000.
What is your source for the datum that an income of $50,000 puts someone in the top 10% of the income distribution?
He doesn't have a source. he's just repeating something he heard someone say, without checking facts.
Local a**holes made national news today. Did everyone catch this column in the NY Times about the lack of compassion on display at Steven J. Baum, P.C.'s office Halloween party last year? I guess the firm is a local "foreclosure mill" and photos show a poverty themed Halloween party with employees mocking those who are being foreclosed upon.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/29/opinion/what-the-costumes-reveal.html?_r=4
"A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Ghandi
i was down at niagara square on saturday night : they need our support. " the system is fixed " thats just one of the things heard.... and it is fixed !!! wake up, a corporation on wall street can steal billions (they did) and no body went to prison ????? wake up people. this occupy movement is going to get bigger and bigger and winter will only strengthen the resolve ; history !!!!!
Leave a comment
Sponsor
Recent Comments
Sponsor
Interested in advertising on BuffaloRising?
E-mail John C. Powell
or call John at 716.602.0200




I support the protesters but I don't support their mission.
I agree with the protesters that they will eventually be successful at collapsing the system. What will that actually mean to our individual lives? What does collapsing the system include and how long should we be prepared to endure until whatever new system is ready to take its place?
Will it be a hardship like living during the October surprise without roads, heat, and power? Or, will it simply be a minor inconvenience and something new that people interested in politics can read about?
I'm not hearing protestors say they want the system to collapse. Most people are talking about corporate influence in government and income inequality.
I've heard it directly from more than one protester.
Those are called anarchists. It's safe to say that's not a sizable chunk of the "99%."
This doesn't mean its the most common thread. Do you think that the unions and clergy who participated in NYC want the system to "collapse"?
at the rate it's going the system doesn't need any help collapsing.
I think they are asking for a system that is less likely to collapse (again)
Haha, wish I could double thumbs-up you for that, Steel!