City August 12, 2011 2:54 PM

The Flaying of St. John

The Flaying of St. John
A few months ago I wrote about St. John of God Church in Chicago (see here).  The closed and vacant church has been sold to another congregation in the Chicago suburbs and is currently being strip mined for reassembly several miles from the site it was designed for.  The interior of this church and all of its substructure will be sent to the dump.  The interior of another closed Chicago church will be assembled behind the facade of this church.  This Chicago scenario is disturbingly similar to the proposal for St. Gerard's in Buffalo, which Catholic Church leaders are planning to send to suburban Atlanta. 

Many have praised this move to the south as a perfect solution to an intractable problem.  People in Buffalo seemingly have no use for this important part of their cultural heritage and people in Atlanta desperately want to pretend they have a long standing cultural heritage.  This has been described by the pro move people as a win win situation.  Buffalo divests itself of a future eyesore and the building is put back to use. The only two scenarios presented so far make the Atlanta move seem logical, either in Buffalo the building rots for decades or in Atlanta it is put back to use and "saved". Except, the building is not really saved.    

St. Johns is a good view into Buffalo's sad future if the St. Gerard's scheme is carried out. One of best architectural writers and observers anywhere, Lynn Becker,  has penned the story included here in full by his  permission.  Lynn has written extensively on Architecture in Chicago.  His work can be found in several publications as well as his own blog called Architecture Chicago Plus in which the following story on St. John appeared.  His blog is worth reading even for those not in Chicago.  Becker's story on St. John is deeply moving and poetic.  The accompanying photos are beautiful and disturbing at the same time.  Read this story and take in the future reality of "saving"  St. Gerard's by sending it to a suburban parking lot near Atlanta.

The Flaying of St. John by Lynn Becker

121e31e1e1e1Unknown.jpeg

The distant view, through Sherman Park, is a glimpse of something weird, almost Gaudian.

As you get to the edge of the park, at 52nd street, you come upon the immensity of it.

22e111212Unknown.jpeg

The story of St. John of God church is one repeated throughout the changing neighborhoods of every city. A great house of worship built to serve an influx of immigrants - in this  case, Polish.  Designed by Henry J. Schlacks, whose Renaissance facade was described by the AIA Guide to Chicago as a masterpiece, St. John of God was completed in 1920.  By 1922, 2,400 families called it their parish.  Then, as the story always goes, those families begin to disperse as white flight claims the neighborhood.  Membership plummets, and, in 1992, the church is closed, a grand edifice sealed for an uncertain future.  In time, after few can even remember when the building was active, it's demolished. 

A piece of architecture that defined the lives of tens of thousands of people vanishes into thin air.

3232342323Unknown.jpeg

Except St. John of God doesn't.  To be sure, the building will soon be forgotten history.  It's carved limestone, however, lives on.  Carefully, it was peeled away, to be re-assembled on a new church for St. Raphael the Archangel in Old Mill Creek, Illinois, near the Wisconsin border.

For now, a single automobile tire rests incongruously in the foyer.  Rubble is everywhere, even framing the great altar.

42232342423Unknown.jpeg

Mosaics disintegrate like pixels fading to white.

52342322424.jpeg

The destruction of St. John of God, and so many others like it, is testament to a society where everything is disposable. With their massive scale, solidity, and classical grandeur, structures like St. John look like they were built to endure forever.  Now, stripped down to raw brick, it looks like a monument from some not-quite-placeable ancient civilization.

62424224.jpeg

All of Schlack's Renaissance finish and  detailing scraped away, St. John now appears timeless, its architectural style malleable and mysterious.  The ruined entrance looks like it could be some ancient shrine in the Holy Land.

72ww42222r.jpeg

The stripped pillars of the bell towers resemble Mayan columns.

8345224234.jpeg

This is the afterimage, lingering in the eye for a millisecond before disappearing forever.  But in that brief time, it brands itself into your consciousness.  Is this what's beneath our dreams?  Is this a ruin, or is this the essence?  Too real, too primal, not to have us gild it in polished finish?

999wrw9r9.jpeg

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

If this is how a building is 'saved', I hate to think what the definition of 'lost' is.

I keep going over the comment that people make when they justify relocation, that a church is 'more than just a building, it's a sacred space that should keep fulfilling its original function'. I would use the same argument to say that the structure is more than just a place of worship, it's an integral part of its environment, through its history, presence and beauty. These buildings serve a dual role, one from the worshipers inside, and one from even the most casual passerby on the outside. Neither role should hijack the importance of the other.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Agreed, those are some horrifying images. I am still (from an earlier thread) wondering what is the status of St. Gerard's "preservation by relocation", to which the Council was opposed?

Thanks for keeping this issue fresh, Steel. The other dynamic not referenced here is the fact that the church needs to downsize (and close parishes) in response to not only changing demographics, but because it has failed so, so many people...who, have in response, turned their backs on the Church. Nonetheless, these institutions benefitted from a century of parishoners and tax payers who supported their endeavors.

In return, they should stay committed to the communities which built, and supported, them....as challenged as they may be.

replied to DeanerPPX
Score: 3 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'll be attending a discussion (in Atlanta) this Monday evening given by the people from the Norcross parish. I'll try to report back from the relocation side of the debate (if they don't throw me out for causing a 'scene')


Monday, August 15th 7pm-10pm
Cathedral of Christ the King
Peachtree Rd & Peachtree Way (near Wesley)

For more info:
http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/event.php?eid=259606104055704

To RSVP: (again, this is in Atlanta, not Buffalo)
https://s07.123signup.com/​servlet/SignUpMember?PG=15​33195182300&P=153319519114​22090300&Info

replied to Travelrrr
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Regarding St Gerard's, the movedbygrace.com website has been down for a while. Is this a positive sign?

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Powerful article and pix, Steel!

Score: 0 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

the problem is the word 'moving.' we've all moved, right? put the sofa in the van, take it out at the new place, haul it into the living room, job done. and if you don't want your sofa any more, you give it to someone who does. what's wrong with that?

as your pictures show, this isn't an act of 'moving' at all. it is strip-mining and organ-harvesting, pure and simple. i'm all for organ donation but only when the patient is actually dead. we're not dead and our neighborhoods shouldn't be treated as though they are.

Score: 6 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Horrible! But neglect, water, snow, ice and gravity produce the same results. How can we save our churches so they avoid either fate?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

by keeping a roof on and the water out until a better day.

replied to Buffalogni
Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That's a shame there. That was a beautiful altar in that church. Wonder if it was too heavy to move.
Ok, so if you want to save St Gerard's, how about coming up with a plan rather than just complaining about it? You know, find the money to save the place, put together a group, find a use for the building. Put your money where your mouth is. Or is it just going to be another BRO gum flapping session?

Score: 0 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The pictures remind me of Europe during and after World War II. The shame is in that this destruction is not the result of a horrible war but is a symptom of our society's twisted values. We are quick to abandon our heritage and squander our resources yet waste millions on projects of dubious value such as the useless extension of route 219 or the endless subsidies to sprawl. We hear the same argument of cost, almost always exaggerated and inflated to justify the demolition or relocation. These buildings belong to the community, not the latest speculator or profiteer. Our cities are not simply a pool of architectural wealth to be drawn upon by the highest bidder. They are a reflection of the generations of citizens that put their heart and soul into leaving us a legacy of beauty and quality.

Score: 4 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Really great comment.

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If there was a use for these buildings in their own cities, why did nobody step up to the plate and purchase them? HMMMM?

Score: -2 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Historic structures should not be treated as disposable or picked up like toys and moved to a new location. They are rooted in place and belong to the community, however challenged that community may be. A structure that has survived a century or more should be given a reprieve of at least 20, 30, or even 50 years. We need to look at developement in the long term, just as the builders of these places did. All neighborhoods and cities go through cycles of decline and renewal, we are just here for a relatively short time and should do all we can to leave this place better for those that follow.

replied to rustbeltcity
Score: 4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Atlanta is increasingly being referred to as "Detroit of the South". Blow for blow, they're making the same mistakes the Motor City did over the past 50-100 years.

It's not entirely science fiction to picture a future 50-100 years from now when weather, water scarcity, energy needs, gas prices, politics, lifestyle preferences, and the world economy will leave Norcross an abandoned ghost town as Buffalo thrives once again. (Admittedly, it could go either way, but who would have predicted the current situation back in 1911?)

What do we do if immigration from Latin America and the return to the urban lifestyle once again make Buffalo more capable of sustaining this church than Atlanta? Move it back?

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: 7 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Exactly, a little history goes a long way towards understanding the present and the future. Our society has the attention span of a gnat and an arrogance in ignoring our responsibility to future generations.

replied to DeanerPPX
Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There is a house at 190 Dearborn St at Amherst that once had the finest interior in Black Rock. I did some work for the old lady that sold it in the mid 1980's. She had been an excellent steward of the property and the house was stunning. The large Victorian was trimmed in exotic woods inlaid with brass and mother of pearl. The Dining Room had inlaid paneling covering the walls and ceiling, much like a castle or estate in Europe. I have worked on many old houses in Buffalo yet I had never seen anything of this quality and grandeur.

The new owner bought the house for 26K, sold the woodwork for 25K, then bastardized the house in a very amateur modernization. After a few years he moved on and the now nondescript property passed through a series of absentee owners. Today the house sits vacant, boarded, and headed for demolition. My point is that like this church, our homes and buildings are assets of the community and we need to protect those assets from exploitation. "Property rights" should include the rights of neighbors and the community in protecting their own investment from those with only short term profit in mind.

Score: 4 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

nice way to kill a guy's weekend

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The house is still salvageable, the interior is mainly gutted but the original staircase is intact and I believe some of the woodwork upstairs has survived. The exterior is covered in siding but a few years ago one side was exposed and revealed a detailed clapboard and shingle design. The house is large, about 4000 sq ft and was always a single family. The house is located adjacent to but not in the new Market Square Historic District. As far as I know the house is presently owned by Hopeful Holdings LLC, a local property rental corporation. Not sure of their plans but this property could be a great opportunity for the right owner.

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

For all the folks who keep asking "what else are we going to do with them", I'd ask you to step away from the fact that it's a church for a second.

Central Terminal sat empty for 30 years. Now china is building the newest high-speed rail system in the world. What would we do if Guangzhou offered to buy NYCT and relocate it?

The population of Buffalo has been declining for half a century. What would we do if the city found it more economically feasible to move city government into a smaller building, and sold City Hall to a boomtown like Phoenix or Houston?

HSBC might pull their offices out of Buffalo, leaving a glut of office space. What if Apple wanted to buy the Guarantee or the Dunn to add a little charm to their new office complex in Cupertino?

Hundreds of homes sit empty on the east side, what if they all got bulldozed into a giant empty field and the building materials recycled for new developments in Lancaster?

We still haven't exactly found a use for the Richardson Complex, and its repair costs will add up considerably over the next several years. Move it? Sell it? Tear it down?

50 years ago, the only idea we could come up with for the Erie Canal was to fill it in and put an expressway over it. Now it's one of the city's best and brightest visions for the future.

People have been calling for demolition of the grain elevators and replacement of the Peace Bridge. Add a few lights and they aren't so bad, now are they?

Yes, these churches are/were sacred spaces. But they're just as sacred -in a non-religious sense- to the neighborhood community as they are to God and their congregations. Possibly moreso, since those congregations have all but abandoned them. Losing them, whether by demolition or relocation, doesn't offer any more dignity than leaving them empty until they can find another use. Being religious buildings, they take on a certain emotional connotation that both amplifies their significance AND hinders their future prospects. Their own history complicates their future, which is unfortunate.

Score: 3 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Some of my ancestors were murdered by Puritans for being Quakers, so it's no surprise that I don't agree that ostentatious temples to 'God', built with the pennies of dirt-poor immigrants, are an "important part of (my) cultural heritage". If you want to count the oppression and murder of non-conformists by zealots or Rome's rape of the poor as "heritage", maybe so - but that's a sad, sad heritage, no? These buildings, almost all unoriginal, unimaginative COPIES of European Catholic churches, were slapped-up to accomodate people who no longer exist - and there's no reason to believe that those buildings 'belong' to anyone but the builders. They aren't City Halls, or Public Parks, or Public Anything - they belong, from first to last, to those who paid to build them - no different than a birdbath I might build in my yard.

This whining about "our heritage!" is misguided. You want to save such places? Offer to buy the useless things, or find a more worthy cause. Giant Catholic churches are symbols of oppression, theft, abuse, and greed. God does not need such things.

Score: -6 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Once again, GreenJeans is right. That whole Sistine Chapel thing *IS* a piece of crap - What a total rip-off of Roman judicial architecture! The Mayans practiced human sacrifice and the Khmer were constantly at war with the Burmese so there is no heritage in Chichen Itza or Angkor Wat.

Also, I'm Caucasian and can barely afford my rent, so there's really no point in saving the Darwin Martin house or anything related to the Underground Railroad.

replied to MrGreenJeans
Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Glorifying the murderers of history, as you want to do, is crap, yes. Your stupid attempt to make this local by adding Darwin Martin's house (for which his wife and children had no love) ,is almost as funny as your love of concrete storage silos.

replied to DeanerPPX
Score: -1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm probably the last person to advocate for organized religion of any kind, but to sweep all of Christianity into the dustbin of hate is asenine. You'd have the Capitol and entire Smithsonian torn down because the first third of our history tolerated slavery. There is always some bad mixed in with the good, and vice versa. (the Coliseum, Gettysburg, Auschwitz... they're all HORRIBLE places, but it would be a crime against humanity to see them disappear - but we're talking about a few parish churches here)

Mrs. Martin hated the house, that is probably the LEAST scandalous tidbit of the property's history. But it's still a national treasure, and one that this city can be proud to show off today. And yes, not long ago there was some other jerk who thought it would be a good idea to tear that down too.

replied to MrGreenJeans
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

well said, greenjeans.

replied to MrGreenJeans
Score: -2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Well said indeed. We should only remember the sunshine, rainbows, and whatever aspects of history Mr Greenjeans values. Grain elevators, churches, war monuments, cemeteries and any structure remotely tied to an unpleasant memory needs to be bulldozed immediately.

replied to biniszkiewicz
Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The difference between this travesty and what ought to happen to St Gerards is that the Georgia congregation wants the whole building rather than just the shell. St Gerards is one of the more elegant churches built here and does not deserve to lay and rot. Although it may violate some sensibilties, one should visit St Matthews on East Ferry or Transfiguration on Sycamore to see perfect examples of neglect. You can see the hole in Transfiguration's roof from several blocks away if you go to the Broadway Market. Other abandoned churches, such as Our Lady of Lourdes on Main and St Francis de Sales on Humboldt Parkway, are teetering on the edge. Both have been stripped of their interiors. We can lament all we want about Buffalo's lost history, but if a move is necessary to perserve a treasure, then so be it.

Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Not really. To move a building like this in pieces (as opposed to lifting it in whole and rolling it to a new location) you basically strip off its surfaces and trash the rest. My understanding is that some of the interior of St. Gerards will be reused but not all. I read for instance that the Murals will not be saved.

replied to Delawarian
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

St Matt, Transfig, Lourdes, St Francis... when they closed their doors they were abandonded in all senses of the word, nobody ever bothered to look back. As we saw with Lourdes, there wasn't even much of an attempt put into keeping plywood over the windows. Transfig's roof hole didn't appear overnight.

But St Gerard and Adalberts are still viable for long-term hibernation. They still have a chance.

Okay, there isn't enough money to heat and staff and clean these buildings on a daily basis. I get that. But jeez, at least send somebody in once a year to check the place over. Nobody's asking the Diocese to polish the doorknobs once a week, but at least invest $50 in a tarp or a piece of plywood when you see a leak sprouting. Cover the windows BEFORE vandals have a chance to use them as target practice. You can't ignore a leaky roof for 15 years and then act all surprised when it caves in.

Even Mary Magdalene checked back at the grave 3 days later to be sure the body had been properly wrapped for burial, and she WASN'T expecting him to come back to life...

Score: 5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Magnificent photos; equally magnificent building.

The topic of these vacant churches and their potential demolition is an interesting discussion. Is it an issue that raises concern for reasons of religion, architecture, or urban revitalization? I suppose to play devil's advocate, why should there be such a great concern in a culture where the role of religion is quickly diminishing?

The interior of this church looks incredible. Makes me think of Stanislaus or one of those other incredible east side churches meeting the same fate.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Heartbreaking.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I assume the adjacent school is still being used?

photos I took a few months ago: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Gerard%27s_Roman_Catholic_Church

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yes, the school and the former convent is being used by Gerard Place. The provide wonderful services to neighborhood residents. http://www.gerardplace.org/ Gerard Place isn't operated by the diocese; I believe women religious started it. They are doing for the neighborhood exactly what the church (as an entity, not an empty building)should be doing.

replied to Fortunate4now
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Mr. Greenjeans is somewhat brutal in his honesty but he does make a valid point or two; what do you do with so many abandoned buildings?

However, his term of “slapped-up” certainly does not apply to any of these unique buildings considering that many remain structurally sound even after decades of neglect and pilfering of stained glass and ornamental woodwork.

Our Lady of Lourdes on Main Street is a perfect example with only the Medina Sandstone construction being the remaining redeeming feature of this savagely-raped building.

Not to change the topic by introducing Our Lady of Lourdes but what exemplifies this building as a real tragedy is that it is in a fairly good location; situated on Main Street close enough to City Honors to be used as an auxiliary institute of learning and not too far from the medical corridor to be used as a medical office.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What is the reaction of the local community in Chicago to the demolition and relocation of the St John of God church? Is this move been met with similar apathy and inactivity?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

pretty much so

replied to Mike Duff
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment