City August 11, 2011 1:20 AM

Green and Healthy Homes: Going Beyond Lead-Safe

Green and Healthy Homes: Going Beyond Lead-Safe
I wrote my first article about efforts to make homes lead safe shortly after I began writing for Buffalo Rising.  It's a crucial issue in community development, and some outstanding folks from my hometown were among the earliest voices raising it to statewide prominence.  Shortly after moving to Buffalo, I was delighted to cover the kickoff of the local Wipe Out Lead campaign, which took ongoing efforts here to a new level.  And last summer, my one-year update covered the welcome addition of Western New York AmeriCorps (now The Service Collaborative of Western New York) to the team.

Fast forwarding a year, I couldn't be more delighted to report that things are in the midst of a transition to an even more ambitious and comprehensive effort: the Green and Healthy Homes Initiative.  How did that come about?  Through a lot of hard work and excellent organization, to be sure.  But the big moment came late last year when Buffalo was named a Green and Healthy Homes Initiative (GHHI) pilot community by the White House, and received a grant of $2.1 Million through then-Attorney General Cuomo's office -- funding from a settlement of environmental violations.

According to the Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo,

GHHI focuses on whole-home interventions to address all the health and safety issues present.  The model braids dollars from across government agencies (local, state, federal) with corporate and philanthropic dollars so that we can address ALL the problems that our target homes have -- not just the lead paint.  In addition to lead, we're able to focus on weatherization, energy efficiency, reducing asthma triggers and providing green jobs training so that we have a competent workforce to carry out all these tasks.  We got off to a great start with these efforts thanks to a $2.1 million grant from the NYS AG's office in November, and with the GHHI designation have access to training, expertise and resources from outside our region to help us get the job done here.  It's a really exciting, common-sense approach that streamlines everything while producing even greater results -- and the Buffalo team is one of the GHHI communities leading the way because of our history of success with our lead poisoning prevention work.

A milestone in that work was celebrated last week at the Lt. Col. Matt Urban Human Services Center.  The first class proudly graduated (see entry image) from their pilot program in residential lead-hazard abatement, home repair and renovation, and environmental and green demolition contracting.  The program is targeted to unemployed city residents.  The Matt Urban Center ("Buffalo's best kept secret") always seems to have good stuff in the works, and it's hard to imagine a program more relevant and needed than this pilot program to give "green jobs" training to unemployed workers.  These are in-demand skills.

SundraRyce.JPGSundra Ryce, President and CEO of SLR Contracting & Service Company, Inc. delivered the commencement speech.

The program, according to the Community Foundation, which has jointly funded the program with the Erie County Department of Health, "is one of the first in the nation that braids public and private funds to train welfare-to-work program participants to make them eligible for jobs in lead hazard control, environmental contracting and green demolition."

"This program is a great example of what can be accomplished when public and private entities come together to invest in our community," said Marlies Wesolowski, Executive Director of the Matt Urban Center. "The results speak for themselves -- with this specialized training the program participants are in a stronger position to find meaningful employment, and through the course of their training they have directly improved the health and safety of homes in some of our most distressed neighborhoods."

As part of the program, participants received on-site skills training by assisting in removing lead hazards from eight homes in zip codes 14215 and 14217.  Several of these homes had previously been cited by the Health Department for lead paint hazards, but the homeowners were unable to do the work themselves.

While there are numerous job training programs in the City of Buffalo, none have lead hazard control as the primary focus, according to the Foundation and the Matt Urban Center.  "Given the deteriorated condition of much of the city's housing stock, current economic conditions and the prevalence of high unemployment, this initiative is critical to creating jobs and a sustainable workforce to address lead poisoning prevention through hazard reduction," said Wesolowski.

GraduateTahwanaRoberson.JPGAt last week's graduation ceremony, graduate Tahwana Roberson spoke about the experience and what it meant to her.  "I'm grateful for the opportunity to be in this program.  I feel like we made a difference in the community, and it gave me a real sense of accomplishment."

The Community Foundation has promised more information to come about the Green and Healthy Homes initiative -- so stay tuned.

Image credit: Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo (all)
View image

Comments

Leave a comment

Great stuff, rachacha - HOPE Center does a lot for our community. They have their HOPEFest benefit at Darcy McGee's on 8/27, and The Good Neighborhood has a preview planned. This article helps a lot, thanks!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thanks for the heads up -- and the reminder that the Matt Urban Center is also known as the Matt Urban HOPE Center.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Hurray, another special interest group with their own demands for government dollars! That's just what we need.

Score: -2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Hurray, another troll!THAT'S JUST WHAT WE NEED.

replied to Jesse
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Lead is a very serious health problem that mainly affects poor children. I have no problem with dollars being spent to address this very real threat. It is much cheaper to remediate the lead than to pay for the long term health costs associated with exposure. Lead lowers IQ, causes behavior problems, and affects the overall health of children with elevated levels. Don't see how you can claim advocates for poor children are just "another special interest group".

replied to Jesse
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

YES.

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You are correct, lead poisoning is a serious concern that affects poor children disproportionately due to a variety of reasons. This is an important subject for the readers of Buffalo Rising and those readers who are interested in renovating older homes.

Medical professionals are seeing a significant rise in the rate of lead poisoning in children and adults from all socio-economic backgrounds. The spike in lead levels is directly attributed to the age and condition of the residence in which the person lives.

According to an AMA brief from June 2006, there is nearly an 800:1 ratio of higher blood concentrations of lead for those who live in houses built prior to 1950 compared to those built after 1950. That ratio triples when comparing houses in cities vs rural and suburban houses, and it increases to 5000:1 when comparing houses built after 1979 (lead paint ban was 1977).

The general consensus is that lead needs to be removed from the residential environment, not just covered up with latex or enamel paint. There will most likely be a change in how lead is handled after many of the huge class action lawsuits make their way through the courts. This has the potential to significantly change the way older houses are remodeled, rented, and purchased.

The EPA is involved and will be introducing new guidelines for lead paint containment during painting and renovations. This will be similar to the regulations used for asbestos abatement. Going forward, a licensed and trained contractor may be required to remediate lead paint contamination in the interior and exterior of the home and the surrounding property. This could substantially increase the cost of home ownership for older properties and could potential limit the availability of rental properties to tenants with small children.


replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Good information Mike, I would add that lead problems can be minimized with good housekeeping and addressing the areas that are most likely to be problematic. Window jams and sills are usually an issue, especially the jam between the inside window and storm. Opening and closing the window makes the paint friable and the air movement can distribute the lead into the home. Also door jams and of course any wall or ceiling areas that are flaking or damaged. Another area that is often overlooked is the soil around the outside of the house, children should never be allowed to play there as decades of paint chips can concentrate lead in this area.
I have lived in and renovated older homes for my entire life, raised my children there yet never had a problem. A little common sense and keeping an eye on the kids can be quite effective at protecting them from this threat.

replied to Mike Duff
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Lead abatement goes well beyond good housekeeping. The guidance we are receiving is to have families leave houses with lead contamination if possible. Painting over old lead is not sufficient for the reasons you have stated, especially for exterior painting and for windows and doors that have several thick coats of paint. There are also issues associated with cracks in the paint, increased levels of mold in older houses especially with lathe and plaster walls, forced air heating systems (easily spreads microscopic lead particles throughout the house), and houses that have been vacant for some time.

The AMA is advocating for lead free homes for all section 8 rentals. That means that all lead has been removed from the home, not just painted over. This is similar to the defined provisions for asbestos and mold abatement; however enforcement is lacking at this time. We have seen a few familes who are looking for evidence to sue landlords and management companies for permanent life long mental and developmental harm to their children.

What do you think would happen to Buffalo's housing stock if landlords and home owners had to eliminate all lead from the house if there were children present?

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Mike, those are big concerns and questions, no doubt. May I ask, when you say "the guidance we are receiving..." -- who is we--?

Folks I know who are involved in this issue want every home made lead safe, yet aren't advocating for abandoning or bulldozing entire neighborhoods. I've got to believe there are effective solutions that don't require going that far.

Am genuinely interested, and I appreciate you weighing in!

replied to Mike Duff
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

No one is advocating for the demolition of entire neighborhoods; however they are calling for the complete removal of lead from the home via removal of plaster and paint, replacement of problematic windows and doors, air quality monitoring and dust containment during renovations, and complete cleaning of the house when completed.

The AMA and American Academy of Pediatrics have offered their own guidance and advice on how to address and mitigate lead exposure for children. I believe they are basing their guidance on HUD's recommendations for lead safe homes. Here is a link that covers the specific steps residential owners, multi-unit owners, and landlords should follow to eliminate the threat of lead in-home lead contamination.

http://lead-info.com/abatementguidelinesexamp.html

replied to RaChaCha
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Mike- I have had training in building liabilities including lead. Good housekeeping is a big part of the plan to minimize exposure. I am not talking about extreme cases of substandard housing with falling plaster, peeling paint, and so on but a more typical old house with a few areas of concern. Regular washing of floors, windowsills, and other areas where children can be exposed does indeed minimize the risk. There are also products avalable to encapsulate lead that are effective if the finish is is good condition.
I gotta disagree with your comment about plaster and lath, having worked on houses and buildings for many years it is almost always drywall that promotes the growth of mold. Plaster is much less able to absorb and hold water while drywall acts like a sponge, wicking up moisture and staying damp for long periods of time. Newer homes have more issues with air quality due to modern building materials, tighter envelopes, and lower quality craftsmanship. I think we are going to see more and more problems with mold and other issues as many of the newer homes age out.

As for your question, I think it would be a problem for most of WNY, not just the city if homes were required to be lead free. I also think it would be a mistake to over react and require such drastic measures. Lead is a serious problem but it can be managed. As with many health threats a little common sense can go a long way towards preventing problems.

replied to Mike Duff
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I am sorry if I downplayed the importance of good housekeeping and hygiene. This is an important component of controlling lead and arsenic exposure, as well as creating an environment that is friendlier to those who suffer from allergies, asthma, and other common ailments.

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Mike, thanks for weighing in on this -- good substantive discussion.

replied to Mike Duff
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If you'll follow the links to my first two articles, you'll see that the impacts of lead poisoning are devastating not just on children, but on entire communities. The affected children are much more likely to have educational and developmental problems -- damage that, once done, can't be reversed -- and much more likely to tangle with law enforcement and penal systems. Who pays those large costs? All of us.

And if you'll _read the article_ you'll see the program blends community philanthropy with public dollars, that the educational part gives people marketable, "green economy" job skills, and gets unemployed folks back to work.

This is a win all around.

replied to Jesse
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Great site, great discussion, I'm quite surprised at the lack of trolls (which can sometimes make things fun, if they are around in small numbers)

This is a great initiative. Unfortunately lead is a sticky problem that plagues older cities and is quite under recognized. I advocate a case-by-case approach. Eliminating lead is expensive. But, like asbestos, with proper mitigation strategies, can be safely overcome. This is the case because lead, like asbestos, only causes harm in the proper situation.

I was involved in an outreach program in Syracuse that involved social and medical professionals to proactively screen high risk children and treat the problem (which often did involve house cleaning / light maintenance). It is always easier/cheaper to build new, frankly eliminating lead completely would involve demolishing (as its just so much cheaper). Fingers can be rightfully pointed at litigation concerns. This is a great discussion, unfortunately I don't have anything productive to add, it's a difficult problem.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment