City July 21, 2011 12:30 PM

Beginning of the bike spine... we're getting there.

Beginning of the bike spine... we’re getting there.
As the road construction project along Porter continues, cyclists have been wondering about the lack of bike lanes (from Niagara to LaSalle Park). The completed stretch from Niagara Street to the waterfront is barren of bike lanes, which is unfortunate, although Seyed Ghasemi (Dept. of Public Works) tells me that the wide sidewalk (top photo) that runs along the North side of Porter is to be shared by cyclists and pedestrians. Apparently that sidewalk will be painted with bike symbols to make cyclists aware that it's OK to ride along the path. From the Peace Bridge to LaSalle Park it looks as if cyclists will have to fend for themselves back on the street or on narrow sidewalks (that are illegal to bike on) as cars enter and exit from the 190. It would be nice to get some effective crosswalks added at these intersections, as well as additional traffic calming measures and overall safer bike conditions.

The plan for Porter from Niagara to Symphony Circle (bottom photo - Phase 2) will have bike lanes on either side of the street. This was a major inclusion that was incorporated by the Department of Public Works with support from Rivera's office as well as cyclist advocates such as Justin Booth from Green Options Buffalo. One day, Porter could be one of the best cycling routes in the city, since it connects to the Richmond Avenue bike lanes that connect Allentown with the Olmsted parkways. Porter also connects to the bike trail that runs along the Black Rock Channel - the same route that leads from the entrance of LaSalle to the trail behind the Waterfront Village and on to Erie Basin Marina, the Inner Harbor, etc.

Justin Booth tells me that there is a Department of Public Works plan to add bike lanes on Elmwood Avenue that will connect Buffalo State College to new lanes on Forest that will then lead to Richmond. Due to that narrow section of Richmond (between Forest and Bidwell), cyclists will have to settle with road sharrow markers until they reach the bike lanes at Bidwell. Of course, at Porter cyclists will be able to navigate safely to the Peace Bridge, and there are talks regarding best routes to deliver cyclists downtown (such as Niagara Street). The bike trails on the Canadian side include trails along the Niagara River as well as Rails to Trails along the lake that take riders all the way to Port Colborne and beyond.

Now let's get some bike lanes on Main Street, Michigan, Delavan (between Main Street and Delaware)... and where else?
 
View image

Comments

Leave a comment

Those kinds of shared paths are not always the most safe. It would be nicer if there was a median divider or something to separate bicycle riders and pedestrians. Besides the increased conflicts with pedestrians, sidewalk riding greatly increases the risk of conflicts with cars at intersections. And this stretch of Porter has some significant ones, including the on-ramps for I-190 and the Peace Bridge.

You're right that this completes an important piece of the rudimentary bike lane network. The River Walk trail will connect to Porter and then to Richmond.

There are a lot of streets like Colvin and Starin that are easily wide enough to stripe a bicycle lane.

I would like to see "road diets" for some four-lane streets, as was done with Hertel years ago (except this time add bicycle lanes). Streets like Niagara and Delaware could easily go from four-lanes to two lanes and a shared center turn lane without causing any congestion problems (often these reconfigurations reduce congestion). I know this is planned for Niagara someday; I hope it happens soon.

I am glad the Department of Public Works is starting to move on adding bicycle lanes to more streets. We are way behind other cities on this sort of thing, but little by little we are making incremental improvements.

Score: 5 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Road diets are certainly a possibility. This was in the Chicago Jounrnal a couple weeks ago.

http://www.chicagojournal.com/News/06-08-2011/Chicago%27s_first_protected_bike_lanes_being_installed_on_Kinzie

This would most certainly work on Main and possibly Delaware. You could move pay meters if you wanted to off the sidewalk as well in this scenario.

replied to JSmith
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There are a few point to add here.

When school is in session this stretch from Lasalle Park to York St becomes very busy and an entire lanes become bus parking spaces. No complaints really.

Two cars can drive side by side but there is really no room for cyclists. This becomes especially apparent when cyclists is riding on the wrong side of the road against traffic. The person in the car in the right lane either has to come to a complete stop of swerve slightly into the left lane and hope the person driving in the left lane is paying attention and swerves as well. The curb is too sharp for the cyclist to ride up onto the sidewalk when this happens.

The most common problems here are students jay walking, cyclists completely disobeying the rules of the road, people turning over double yellow lines, and people running yellow lights because the lights aren't synched very well. These all seems harmless enough offenses but when its busy here it causes a lot of back ups. Especially between Fargo and Prospect. If you are unlucky it can take up to 10-15 minutes to drive from Lasalle Park to Symphony Circle on a bad day while other times a few minutes.

The one and only thing I liked about the old Peace Bridge expansion plans was that it funneled traffic onto Niagara St. Niagara St has a great view of downtown all up and down the section up to Porter. I really feel that basic street improvements on Niagara on this stretch would help a lot. What I don't understand is why everything has to be two lanes. It always seems to be better with a single lane, cyclists lane, and a parking lane with the parking lane turning into a turning lane at the street crossovers. 4 lanes and 2 parking lanes, does it really need to be so wide? But what the hell do I know about traffic engineering.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Nobody should be riding a bicycle against traffic. That's very unsafe and illegal.

A lot of your concerns seem like they would be alleviated if there were fewer cars driving on this stretch of Porter. Adding infrastructure that encourages people to ride a bicycle instead will help with that. Think how much space a bicycle takes up compared to a car, and you can easily see how congestion can be lessened by encouraging people to make more trips by bicycle rather than car.

replied to Eisenbart
Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Are bicycle riders required to stop at all traffic signals and obey posted signs (stop, yield, pedestrian)?

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yes, unless posted otherwise (some cities explicitly allow cyclists to go in either direction on certain one-way streets, for example).

replied to bobbycat
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

By the way, car drivers are required to stop at all traffic signals and obey posted signs as well.

I just I'd point that out since obviously a whole lot of people need a reminder judging by the number of cars I see run red lights every single day.

replied to bobbycat
Score: 2 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

yes, just like a car. Problem is that BOTH the bicyclists and motorists don't know the laws, or refuse to follow them.

The big problem is that right now, there are just not enough bicycle accommodations on Buffalo's roads - which really creates a culture among cyclists that they're on their own for both safety and to be able to have a smooth commute.

However, as Buffalo develops a more sophisticated bike circulation network, I would definitely support stronger enforcement of cycling traffic laws.

replied to bobbycat
Score: 4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I would support stronger enforcement of *traffic laws*, period. If there is to be any discrimination based on the type of vehicle, it should recognize that heavier and faster vehicles have a greater potential to cause damage.

I look forward to a day where a traffic light turns red and you don't have to be sure to wait for that one last car to zip under it.

replied to townline
Score: 2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

We definitely need more enforcement of the general traffic laws. Not more than 15 minutes ago there was a cyclist who blew through the stop sign that I was stopped at. Had I been stepped on the gas a moment earlier he would have been hit. I don't see many cyclists stopping where they don't feel they have to stop. They may run a stop sign or stop light because they don't see any cars coming their way. This is a very unsafe and dangerous habit for cyclists.

Drivers of cars need to follow all the traffic laws or face a ticket. The same needs to be said for bicyclists. I know it is a pain to stop and restart every couple hundred feet, but not doing so could cost someone their life or livelihood.

replied to JSmith
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Take a look at some of the bicycle infrastructure shown in this video:

http://www.streetfilms.org/mba-bicycling/

I'd love to see some of this kind of stuff in Buffalo, but I guess you have to walk before you run. Traditional bike lanes will give more and more people the confidence to ride their bikes in the city, and that will lead to the creation of more sophisticated infrastructure like protected lanes, bike boxes and signals, etc.

Notice what the mayor of Portland said about their gradual evolution:

"In 1993, we weren't the bicycling capital of America. Seventeen years later for the equivalent cost of a single mile of freeway, we now have a bike infrastructure. We had about 2,500 bicycle trips every day across the bridges of the Willamette River. Since then we've invested in our infrastructure. Today our daily bike count is now 17,000, from 2,500 to 17,000, and for every mile of improvement we make on the bikeways we are always surprised at how exponential growth is in terms of ridership. If you get a certain level of basic bike connectivity, that means it'll turn out riders."

Buffalo is just at the beginnings of building "basic bike connectivity", but the lanes discussed in this article are a great step forward. I think it really helps to connect bike lanes and create a continuous network of bike lanes so people feel confident having their own space to reach their destination.

Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Seneca St from Bailey to the city line! We need the repave and this would be the opportunity to do it. We also desperately need bike racks along Seneca in front of the businesses along the strip!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think you could also argue that we need some real businesses along Seneca Street too.

replied to caseysmigelski
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You're absolutely right. I wish they'd do the street at Seneca and Caz like they did at Seneca and Emslie.

Reclaim St Johns parking, it was originally part of the Olmsted Park. The lot across the street where Seneca pet was needs to be demo'd. I think a Great Circle would be an awesome entrance to the Olmsted Park.

Seneca isn't as bad as people think, there are many very cool stores like the Paper Back Trading Post, Sheas Hardware/Bike Repair, 88 Video, and did I mention it's right next to an Olmsted Park?

Sorry for going off topic

replied to pampiniform
Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There are an estimated 1,202 bicyclist that are commuters representing 1.10% of the population, according to the League of American Bicyclists.

Why do we subsidize so much money for all this infrastructure for such a small percentage of the overall population. Seems like a colossal misallocation of resources

Score: -5 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Commuters are not the only bicyclists out there. I don't commute to work, but, during the nicer months, I will bike many of my errands around town. It's an alternative to driving that is healthier (for me, and the environment). Also, by developing a safer biking infrastructure, it may encourage more people to bike.

Also, children alike bike around their neighborhoods/the city, or even to school. Making them safer seems to be a good enough goal for me.

replied to Good Point
Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Besides JAramini's point about the commuter number significantly undercounting total bicycle trips, road improvements like bicycle lanes also improve safety for all users. Watch the video I posted above - in NYC, adding protected bicycle lanes caused a decrease in injuries to ALL users, including drivers of cars. Speeding has been decreased, and accidents are fewer and less severe, and traffic is moving more smoothly as well.

And "so much money", "all this infrastructure", and "colossal misallocation of resources"? Did you miss the part where Portland build out its entire network of bicycle infrastructure (the best in the country) for less than the cost of a single mile of urban freeway?

replied to Good Point
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It's a "chicken and an egg" problem: With no multi-modal accommodations, the only mode used will be the one provided for.

"If you build it, they will come" is the axiom here.

replied to Good Point
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Please add bike lanes on Elmwood Ave. between Forest and the city line at Kenmore. It is heavily trafficked by bicyclists yet very unsafe.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Use the NFTA bike racks. Not only does it expand horizoins (bike + bus = you can get anywhere!), but seeing a bicycle out there like that on the front, creates a strong visual pro-biking message. The challenge is making sure you get a bus with a rack. . .there are still many without. The NFTA phone attendant is supposed to tell you which bus has a rack, and when and where.

Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Have you tried calling the number and asking whether the next bus has a rack? I hadn't thought of that - I didn't think they would have that information.

That's the big problem - until 100% of the buses have racks, there will be minimal usage. Nobody wants to take a bus out to Amherst and discover they can't get back home with their bike.

I encourage everyone to email info@nfta.com and make their wishes known about bike racks on all buses. Show them there is real demand for this, and why it won't work until all of the buses are equipped.

replied to KeepItSimple
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

We need to get Niagara St., from Downtown to Ontario marked (At least) in order to connect downtown with Porter - Symphony, as well as Riverside Park (An Olmstead Park).

The plan that reduced Niagara to 1 lane each way, with a turning lane smooths traffic, and enhances the beauty of the street. Plus, it adds accommodations for more cyclists, which will further alleviate traffic.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'll throw out a crazy one, how about Delaware from NT to downtown. Then you could go off into a lot of directions into all kinds of areas.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment