College June 10, 2011 12:00 PM

Grisanti and Hoyt: Time for ECC to Consider Consolidation

Grisanti and Hoyt: Time for ECC to Consider Consolidation

The pressure is mounting on ECC officials to reconsider building a new $30 million facility on the North Campus and instead expand downtown.  Senator Mark Grisanti and Assemblyman Sam Hoyt wrote to ECC President Jack Quinn on Thursday urging the college to not only keep "health and science programming on or near the Buffalo Niagara Medical Campus" but also suggest that ECC consolidate it campuses.  While not advocating one central campus, the elected officials want to begin a discussion "about whether the current number of campuses is sustainable."

From the June 9 letter:

Given the current condition of the North Campus, which is in a state of disrepair and has not received any meaningful capital improvements since the 1960s, according to your account, I think now is the appropriate time to discuss whether it might be in the best interest of Erie Community College and its students to eliminate one of the suburban campuses. Rather than building a brand new facility, which does not address the problems of the existing building adjacent to it, ECC would be able to consolidate resources and focus them on something truly state of the art. We are not insensitive to the concerns about the cost of chargebacks to Erie County taxpayers, but we are confident that creating a world-class downtown ECC campus, with its proximity to the Buffalo Niagara Medical Campus, plus one auxiliary suburban campus will improve its competitiveness. 

Rather than continuing to have three campuses, at least one of which already requires substantial capital improvements to reach reasonable community college standards, we believe that the students of ECC would be much better served by two truly high quality campuses. A Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement (DGEIS) for the Erie Community College Facilities Master Plan prepared in 2004 by BHNT Architects and the Saratoga Associates at the request of the Erie County Department of Environment and Planning and the ECC Board of Trustees supports this idea. The research presented in the DGEIS suggests that the costs of maintaining three separate campuses far outweigh the benefits.

The letter concludes:

We strongly urge you and your board to reconsider your plans to build a major new building on the north campus but rather consider building it between your downtown campus and the Buffalo Niagara Medical Campus.

DSC_0387ec.JPGRocco Termini has floated a plan for ECC to anchor a redeveloped AM&As Department Store.  His idea was brushed aside by Quinn in a recent meeting according to several sources.  Donn Esmonde talks about the AM&As/ECC proposal in his column today.  Are Quinn and Collins listening?  They had been looking to Albany to fund half the cost of the new ECC North building.  Grisanti and Hoyt have better ideas.

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

anybody see don esmonde today? he calls for converting the old am&a's for ecc. sanity!

Score: 8 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Bookend to the medical corridor? Interesting!

Personally (which counts for nothing) I would think it would be better to put it as close as possible to UB. That would create opportunities to collaborate and share resources.

small example: ECC students can use the UB book store.

Better synergies would be privately developed student housing, shared dining options (private or hall).

AM&A's has by design and combination over the years large(r) floor plates. Perfect for some class a office space which has shown to be in demand.

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is what...the 4th or 5th 'plan' for am&a's by Rocco?

Here is just a take from a non-Buffalo fanboy.

The idea of merging ECC into two campuses and having the anchor downtown is a good idea in most respects. It really could become a great asset for the region.

But the fact still remains that a large % of the population does not live near this campus. No matter how you try and frame the issue, that is simply a fact. This is a regional issue and you need the entire region to come together.

Just a couple points....

1 - Having Esmonde as the voice is a horrible idea. The guy is a tool and makes stuff up as he goes. One, while Rocco is my favorite developer, he does not have the Midas touch as Donny claims. Again, Rocco suggesting using am&a's for ECC is not really about vision. It is about finding a pool of cash to rehab the building. See the first line in this post.

Donny also claims that using this project "uses taxpayer dollars to reverse sprawl, instead of feeding it." Which is ridiculous. First off, people did not move to Amherst or locate a business in Amherst because they had an ECC campus. They are also not going to move out of Amherst if ECC were to leave. To inject sprawl into the conversation only clouds the issue and create additional resentment from this 'bastards in the burbs'...which in turn leads to lines in the sand being drawn.

2 - There is nothing that is or will be World Class about ECC. Nothing against ECC but it is a community college. Community colleges are not supposed to be world class. They are supposed to serve the community. While people in Buffalo think ECC belongs to them...it doesn't. It belongs to Erie County. So again, the discussion needs to be focused on how closing the campus in Amherst and Building a top notch campus downtown would benefit Erie County.

3 - Do people in Buffalo really want Grisanti and Hoyt playing hardball with money...holding it up or trying to do so if they do not get their way? Again, that is just going to lead to more lines drawn in the sand. A fight that will cost both sides in the end.

3 - Lastly, what is the exit strategy for the Amherst campus. People can talk about pretty buildings downtown and the reversal of sprawl but that has never been mentioned in the discussion.

Has anyone actually thought trough what is going to happen with that MASSIVE plot of land? Do people really think it is going to sit empty. Do people really think Amherst is not going to do something with it?

That could easily be a 500+ home subdivision. It could be a MASSIVE office park. Just where do you think those companies and residents are going to come from?

Score: -5 ( 37 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

More than 25% of the region's population lives in the City of Buffalo. How can you say that a large concentration of the population does not live near this campus? The largest concentration of population anywhere in WNY lives near this campus. You can't say that about either of the other campuses or any other location. Couple that with by far the greatest automobile and public transit accessibility in the region and there is no location that makes more sense. The regional NFTA bus hub is right outside the downtown campus' door.

As far as an exit strategy for Amherst, there really should be no worries there. There would be plenty of demand for both redevelopment of the existing structures and/or use of the land as greenspace and athletic facilities. The present amherst campus could probably thrive under new use, without undergoing significant change or development.

replied to longgone
Score: 10 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

While 25% may live in Buffalo, 70% live outside of Buffalo. In addition to that, the population of Buffalo is mostly in the North and South...not near the DT campus and it is safe to speculate that South Buffalo residents are closer the OP campus than the DT campus.

In addition to this, while Buffalo holds 25% of the population of Erie County, Amherst, Cheektowaga, Clarence, Newsted and Alden...which are most likely to use the Amherst campus, account for 31% percent. Last time I checked 31% was greater than 25%.

@ LouisTully

If you care about Buffalo growing then YOU should care about what happens with it. Ignoring it or being indifferent on it is very shortsighted.

If an office complex is built, those companies are going to come from outside of Amherst. So while you filled up AM&As with students, several thousand workers left downtown to accomplish that.

If you build those cookie-cutter homes...which would be located in the best school district in the region, people are going to flock there. They may not come from Buffalo, but they may come from a town like Cheektowaga. Which in turn allows people to leave Buffalo for Cheektowaga. The net result is just bad.

But hey...I must be taking this off topic...

OOOOH PRETTY PICTURES. Buffalo - For Realz!

replied to townline
Score: -6 ( 26 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Umm, yeah, sure 70% live outside buffalo, but you were talking about proximity. That 70% lives across more than 1,200 square miles. Buffalo's population is concentrated on about 40 square miles. Just because the campus is located outside of the city, and lots of population is outside the city, does not mean that all of that population is located near that campus.

Buffalo is the transportation hub (public and auto) of the entire region. The access is far greater there for ALL of the population than anywhere in Amherst. If you're from someplace like Alden, you're going to be driving about a 1/2 hour to get to either campus. Or are you arguing that we need to maintain and expand a campus in Amherst so that a person from a place like alden can shave about 6 minutes off their commute?

replied to longgone
Score: 5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment


First off, I am not suggesting that the campus stay in Amherst. I am suggesting that voices and concerns outside of city residents need to be considered. Unlike most of the conversations on BRO, I am trying to have a conversation where both sides are presented. I like the idea of a DT campus but there are over 900k voices and each are going to have some form of a unique opinion.

To your point...
While Alden and Cheektowaga are a wash, North Amherst (Using North HS) is 11min v. 24min. Clarence (using Clarence HS) is 10min v. 25min. So it depends on where you are driving from.

With that said, is driving the only consideration? No. But it is a consideration. Other considerations are safety. Is a 18 year old girl walking to her car in the parking lot in Amherst safer than the same girl walking to her car in DT? Yes. That is a consideration as well. Same can be said for those who work and go to school. Does a 19 year old boy who has a job on Maple have an easier day with a commute to ECC North, compared to DT? Yes. But the same can be said for a kid who has a job on Elmwood and DT.

There simply is not a complete plan being provided. Grisanti and Hoyt & Co. are saying build here with no consideration to what happens there. If they were really interested in getting the project downtown, they would ALSO come up with a plan for the Amherst campus.

For example, how much would it cost to demo the entire North Campus? What if it was turned into a massive public park? Some kind of joint venture. The county covers the cost of the demo for the buildings and the TOA is responsible for the cost of the park construction? This could be sold to both sides as a win. We are talking about almost 130 acres after all.

replied to townline
Score: -1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If you're going to use that logic, then the south campus is most geographically equidistant from all points. We're talking about a county that extends from Grand Island to Sardinia and Akron to Farnham.

I think it's wise to keep smaller satellite campuses to handle the most basic of services available to outlaying students. But the main hub with full offerings should be located in a place that is most accessible to ALL, and closest to ammenities that benefit the entire system. That would be downtown.

Students who live in the outer areas are almost certainly going to be driving, whether it's to the north, south or downtown campus. But students who live in the city are less likely to have that option, so building up a campus core in a location that is less than central to public transit puts them at a further disadvantage.

This isn't a private school we're talking about, catering to students who have multiple options on what school to attend. It's a public community college that is the best, if not only, hope for those struggling their way up the social and educational ladder. Putting it out of reach for those most at risk means their education stops after high school, and that does NOT improve our area's chances for the future.

replied to longgone
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The percentages of Erie County residents who live in the city versus the suburbs is a distraction. Downtown is on average the most convenient and accessible location for both city residents and suburbanites. Ask someone in Gowanda if it's easier to get to the Amherst campus than it is to get to downtown Buffalo.

replied to longgone
Score: 5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Says the guy who lives in Buffalo. Objective right?

replied to chris_hawley
Score: -4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yes, says the guy who lives in Buffalo and is fully aware ECC's City Campus has access to three major highways, a light rail system, 35 NFTA bus routes, an intercity bus hub, and 32,730 parking spaces. How does ECC North compete?

replied to longgone
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Depends on where you are coming from guy. Additionally, it is not just about the drive. But hey, I will let you play with your pretty drawings and keep the dream alive. Have fun kid.

By the way...to answer your question..How many young people are leaving the Buffalo area because we lack a vibrant urban center and a culture of forward-thinking planning?

People are not leaving Buffalo because it is not vibrant enough. They are leaving because small minds run the show. If you think a trader joes is gonna make people migrate back to the city you really need to pull your head......

Buffalo is not vibrant because people left. Effect not cause.

Buffalo ZOMG For Realz!

replied to chris_hawley
Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

ECC North is 5 miles further than the City Campus from Gowanda. If you're driving 45 minutes whats an extra 5 minutes?

But for most classes people from Gowanda only need to take a 20 minute drive to OP.

replied to chris_hawley
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

25% of the regions population may live in the city, but just about 50% of the students in the city will be high school drop outs who won't qualify to attend ECC.

So if 25% of all area residents live in the city, and for arguments sake, we say 25% of all area high school students live in the city, then only 12.5% of those students will make it through high school, take away those who go to a four year school and we are left with only a small fraction of students who will benefit from a city campus.

replied to townline
Score: -4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If Amherst campus was disused or something along the lines of what you're alluding to, then who cares what Amherst does with it. Build the worlds largest self-sustaining scallop farmer. Build more cookie-cutter homes. Who cares.

BTW, you're bulletizing is fantastic.

replied to longgone
Score: 2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Smaller, faster, lighter?

Unfortunately, the County Executives ego is too large to allow anyone else have an idea that prevails. AM&A's is about a block and a half away. And whoever says there is no space to build around the downtown campus needs to take a walk to the east and south of the old post office.

Good call stepping up by Hoyt and Grisanti.

Score: 6 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Interesting that you say this is all about Collins and his ego.

I guess the ONLY people who should be involved in the conversation are:

Buffalo Residents
Politicians who have Buffalo in their district
Buffalo Developers
Buffalo Voices

Sorry I missed the message that the name changed to Buffalo City College. Your comment is nothing but empty calories.

If Hoyt and Grisanti are stepping up, why don't they reach out and collaborate with the other members of the local delegations that represent the majority of the county? That would be stepping up. What they are doing is hiding behind press releases and Buffalo blogs.

Serious question...do people really think they are just going to be able to force the issue? Do people really think they can just reshape the ERIE COUNTY community college without even trying to collaborate with the majority of ERIE COUNTY?

Again, this comes from someone who generally thinks this is a good idea. However, I am honestly trying to see if anyone has even the smallest desire to look at the big picture.

replied to LouisTully
Score: -6 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Longone> "I guess the ONLY people who should be involved in the conversation are: ...Buffalo Voices"

Right now those are the only people making their voices heard to influence the decision. Politicians representing people living in the area of ECC North are free and able to lobby on behalf of N Campus expansion. The students, the majority of which are supposedly against the city campus, are free to start an "Amherst or Bust" campaign but have yet to do so.

The lack of outrage over locating this facility downtown may be an indication that people in these parts have no problem with a centralized ECC.

replied to longgone
Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The political trend towards focusing on downtown is an excellent development! There is plenty of empty commercial space in the vicinity, ripe for rehab. (Not to mention some great residential stock to the east. I like Chris' idea about synergy between our government agencies, getting more for less from scarce resources during the Great Recession. We need consolidation into our downtown core. As "Joe the Planner" says in his blog, we are the poster child for the ills of urban sprawl: our metro population has essentially remained unchanged since the end of WWII. . .we haven't shrunk; we've just spread-out.


Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I work in Williamsville across from ECC and I swear to God if half the traffic around here was downtown it'd be 100% better than what it is now during most days. MAKE IT HAPPEN!

Score: 9 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Are you in one of the medical clinics or the pharmaceutical research company at Wehrle and Youngs?

replied to galaxyjay
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Since it takes 5+ years to get things done in WNY, we need to plan accordingly. In 5 years gasoline will be $5.50, you can bank on this and public transit will be vogue. We need to stop spending tax dollars on projects that need huge parking lots. We already have a subway system, lets use it. Everyone needs to contact Quinn and Collins about this issue. Use this until someone finds their personal emails:
public_feedback@erie.gov

Score: 6 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I remember when it was foretold that everyone would abandon their cars for mass transit when the price of gasoline hit $2.00 a gallon, and again at $3.00, and again at $4.00... some folks took the bus for awhile, but realized that it was too much trouble so they took their cars again.

Mass transit will never be in vogue in Buffalo because the alternative is a better solution.

replied to Magnum
Score: -3 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That means you've probably been driving since gas cost a nickel a gallon, and cars are too ingrained in your head for you to ever change. The past couple generations (including college kids who actually attend ECC) tend to think and act differently than that.

We need to be planning for the 2050s, not the 1950s.

replied to skybox
Score: 5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Gas hit $2.00 per gallon in 2004 or 2005. You may have been in middle school and not allowed to drive yet, so I'll give you a break if that seems like ancient history to you.

replied to DeanerPPX
Score: -2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I got my first license in '89 and gave up driving in '98. With a car wash at Delta Sonic, you could get gas for under a buck. I had to learn to drive again last year to take care of my 80-year-old parents, who still think anything west of Transit is the "bad side of town"...

So yeah. Ancient history. The youngest kids going to ECC today were born in '93 or so... They're more concerned with life in the 21st century.

replied to skybox
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Did you give up driving because the gas prices reached $1.00 a gallon in the 90s? I didn't think so.

replied to DeanerPPX
Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Buffalo has the 12th highest transit ridership in the United States, about the same as Portland, OR.

replied to skybox
Score: 4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You seem to have forgotten the part where $4,00 gas pretty much crushed the life out of the American auto industry because of its love affair with gas guzzling SUVs.

replied to skybox
Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Lack of design, quality, and understanding of the market killed the American auto industry. Gas price was just one nail in the coffin.

replied to STEEL
Score: -1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Bernice Radle and her dynamic group revealed 31.4% of households in the city already get by without cars and depend on public transit. Radle revealed Buffalo has the 6th highest proportion of car-free households in the United States, ahead of Chicago and San Francisco, so yes a central location for ECC accessible and convenient by all means of transportation is vital to preparing the workforce for the jobs of the future. Go Bernice!

replied to skybox
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The city/suburbs turf war has a long history and no shortage of long-term resentments. However, the basic fact here is that the region's most promising economic development generator is the Buffalo Niagara Medical Campus and it is located on the edge of Downtown Buffalo. Unlike UB and ECC, there will be no suburban BNMC. The first building of the second round of construction, the Global Vascular Institute, is close to finish. The multi-building nursing care facility and the parking ramp that are also part of the second round of construction are also well on their way to completion. The new building at 1001 Main St, at Main and High, is next on the construction timetable and yet another new building for Roswell, now at 75% of the required funding, is set for construction next year. There is a BRO post today about the commencement of the development of Ellicott Park. A technology charter school is moving from Tondawanda to a rehabbed St. Vincent's Orphanage on Ellicott St and UB, whose Amherst location is the mother-well of the city/suburb animus, is building its new medical school on the campus. In addition, other projects such as the continuation of existing underused or vacant building conversion to housing moves on and a new hotel is on the boards for the area. With all of this activity ongoing in the BNMC area, many ask why would ECC build an academic facility whose graduates will find work at BNMC so far from it. Most importantly from a student perspective, what effect will the distance have on internship opportunities. I don't think some internship at Windsong or some medical office building on the Clarence end of Sheridan Drive is going to suffice for these students when they know there will be a lot of competition for work at BNMC after graduation. I would like to hear from Collins, Quinn, etal about their take on the effect that a facility in Williamsville will have on the chances of those students getting internships. As for Rocco, he's a very smart guy. A lot of current BNMC staff live in his Downtown housing.

Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

How many ECC students are currently enrolled in a medical internship program as part of their studies?

replied to john.straubinger
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Instead of asking how many are CURRENTLY enrolled in a medical internship, maybe we should be asking how many SHOULD or COULD be with wise planning for the future.

replied to skybox
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Good question. How many ECC kids would be able to get an internship at some aspect of the BNMC? Remember, they are competing with kids at UB, Buffalo State, Canisius and a handful of other schools. All of which have higher academic requirements.

I am all for the idea of synergy. It is a great concept. But how is practical is it to expect that ECC students are going to even have the opportunity? Not saying anything either way...just asking a question.

replied to DeanerPPX
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Admittedly, the UB and Canisius kids will probably win out on a majority of the hands-on internships like nursing and patient care. But how many kids go to Canisius to major in Medical Transcription or Billing?

Obviously, no patient wants to have their blood drawn or prescription filled by someone who doesn't have the best training possible. But I also want to be sure that the person who keys my charts into the computer or sends out my billing statement wasn't half asleep while they were doing it because they just spent an hour and a half taking three buses to get to work.

replied to longgone
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I do not know how many people are in the Medical Assistant Program (MAP) at UB but a program does exist.

http://www.eoc.buffalo.edu/medical%20assistant%20program.html

At the end of the day internships require effort and resources on both sides. If you were a medical facility..would you want to work with someone who had a ceiling of the very position they are doing in their internship or would you want to work with someone who has a ceiling to eventually be a manager of that division. Which do you think produces a higher RIO?

replied to DeanerPPX
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

How many young people are leaving the Buffalo area because we lack a vibrant urban center and a culture of forward-thinking planning?

replied to skybox
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Good question, how many are leaving for those reasons compared to lack of jobs, opportunities, and the overall reputation of our city.

replied to chris_hawley
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If this goes through, I'd like to make sure that Rocco Termini doesn't profit from the transaction by renting back to Erie County because Erie County has already given him breaks on the AM&As building.

Also, when will Artvoice finally update the Steve Christie banner on the side of the AM&As building? That has been there for way too long.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I was thinking the same thing the other day whilst having coffee at the Coffee Roastery across the street. I'm sure they figure it's been 15 years of free advertising, so why take it down?

My guess is the contract on the billboard is an ancient relic.

replied to skybox
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Longgone deserves plaudits for raising very credible objections to the downtown consolidation. Many (especially in Amherst and Clarence) are unenthusiastic of the prospect of driving downtown for their studies.

That said, I hope Grisanti and Hoyt somehow manage to prevail in this. AM&As is a home run for ECC, imo. And it's hard to argue against putting medical science studies close to the medical campus.

The real key here is getting suburbanites past the threshold of adventuring into the urban core. For many who grew up outside the city, downtown represents a dangerous inhospitable no man's land. Luring them here for studies would change lots of opinions, although the prospect of a longer drive further from home and employment is a disincentive.

Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Demographics will guarantee downtown success. RCLCo recently completed a very credible national survey indicating a staggering 88% of Americans born in 1990 would prefer to live and work in urban centers, making this generation (the "Millennials") the most urban-centric since at least before World War II.

replied to biniszkiewicz
Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

For the courses that are now offered at both ECC/downtown and ECC/north, are more ECC students choosing to take them downtown?

replied to chris_hawley
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Bini>"hard to argue against putting medical science studies close to the medical campus"

'Hard to argue against' doesn't mean ECC/north is bad option either. Although downtown wouldn't be a bad location for ECC medical-related teaching if a cost effective site is available (skeptical AM&A isn't more costly, considering costs for rehab, purchase, possible need for parking garage, etc)... the internship-based criticisms of ECC/north sound weak in a few ways.

First, how major a role do internships often have in medical-related 2 year associate's degree studies? Probably much less than for 4-yr or graduate studies... and even for those, I'd wonder what % of students do internships.

Second, it isn't as though there's no possibilities of medical-lab-related internships near ECC/north. For examples,
Quest diagnostics labs right next door on Wehrle Drive,
a major hospital not far at Millard/suburban in Amherst,
also St Joe's hospital in Cheektowaga ,
and Catholic Health has a lab on Main St in Williamsville,
Also there's other labs around that area for dialysis, radiology, etc.

Google Maps shows quite a few results for: medical labs near ECC North
click here to see that

Lastly, even for ECC/north students who end up with internships at BNMC, would 50 minute travel by public transit between school & internship be a big problem? Students can study while on a bus or metro, no? Even between AM&A's and BNMC takes 10 mins, so the difference is 40 mins... for how many students who end up having BNMC internships?

Sounds to me that the must-be-downtown argument is more to do with symbolism or anti-suburb politics than real impact on students.
And isn't the proposed building at ECC/north intended for more than medical studies?
I'm not sure any building for ECC is the smartest use of state or county spending now anyway so if this controversy derails it, that could be for the best.

replied to biniszkiewicz
Score: -1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is not a Buffalo V. Suburbs issue, Jack Quinn & co. are trying to force a new facility at North Campus down the throats of Erie County taxpayers without looking at the bigger picture. Nationally more than 50% of people working in the medical field are educated at community colleges. They aren't your Doctors and Surgeons, but thay are the techs, nurses, orderlys, etc. so an ECC grad would have a very good chance to get into a position in the BNMC if they were associated with it and not isolated in Amherst.

Secondly, the majority of suburban households have access to at least one car...that's 95% of the suburban population with access to a car. 31% of residents in the City of Buffalo do not have access to personal autos and must rely heavily on public transportation. A bus ride to the Williamsville Campus is over an hour and a half, and if you have late classes forget about going home, barely any bus lines run late due to cuts and changes by the NFTA.

Essentially, weather it's a fact that is liked or not, Buffalo is the most accessible location in Western New York. Multiple highways lead to Downtown, it is already our regions transportation hub, and that is where the Buffalo-Niagara Medical Corridor is already located, so why would anyone in their right mind not take advantage of the already existing infrastructure, and facilities?

oh yea, did I mention that If ECC were to use the old AM&A's building that they would get a $7.5 Million tax break...more than the share they've been tasked to raise for the Amherst Project. Or they could use one of the many properties already owned by the county that were secured during the Giambra administration. What Are Amherst's advantages? We still haven't heard anything about WHY AMHERST?

Score: 2 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The big picture is 44% of the students go to the North Campus.

The big picture is the DT campus is the most expensive to operate.

The big picture is that the majority of ECC students do not want to go downtown.


The small picture is yours. You have proven to be someone who does not want to look at facts and thinks you can cry enough to get your own way. News flash kid...that is not going to work. ECC is a community college for the benefit of the entire county. Not just some uppity folks who want to play simcity with capital improvement projects. Not for people who refuse to accept they are in the minority on almost every metric and that means you do not get your own way.

replied to YoungCitizen
Score: -2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What's your evidence that the "majority of ECC students do not want to go to the city campus"?

replied to longgone
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"The big picture is 44% of the students go to the North Campus."

When I signed up for classes at ECC I took the classes at each campus that they were available. I wonder how many students don't "choose" their campus but take classes(or entire programs) at one or the other because that's where they're offered.

"The big picture is the DT campus is the most expensive to operate."

Does anyone know why this is -if it's true? Is it just the age/inefficiency of the building? If so, a new or renovated building would kinda leave this point moot.

"The big picture is that the majority of ECC students do not want to go downtown."

I'd love to see empirical evidence of this. To me that's like saying the majority of Buff State students or Chippewa clubbers don't want to go downtown just because they may be from the 'burbs. I've never seen a vibrant downtown that people don't want to go to -and that's what the Chip strip is on weekends and Buff State's Elmwood strip is 7 days a week. If we keep fighting putting things downtown we'll never have a vibrant downtown.

replied to longgone
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Isn't it true some courses/programs are still offered both at downtown and North? Somebody said so in comments here in some other article. Perhaps there's also overlap with some offerings at South.

If that's true, a way of getting objective evidence would be to compare how many students choose to register at each campus for offerings available at multiple campuses. For example, if courses downtown have a lot fewer registrees than the same offerings at North it would indicate more student interest out there. Or vice versa. Somebody's comment claimed that was the case - I don't have time to search for it now, and it's just someone's claim anyway. The Buffalo News or other media could analyze it if they have interest using freedom of information requests.

Something all should agree on is every ECC applicant every year should be asked on their application something like "If your preferred course of study was offered on all 3 campuses, which campus is your 1st choice? And 2nd choice?" That way, real student preferences could be publicly reported every year to provide info on which to consider ECC's long term plans.

I don't buy the implication from some that since some non-city young citizens go to Chippewa on weekends that proves most non-city ECC students would prefer courses be downtown. There's way too many variables to connect those dots (many students also going to suburban bars we never hear about, and some Chip places having 18+ admission being a big draw, and so on).

replied to needles
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Whatever,

Agreed with your post and just want to clarify a little on mine. There are many courses offered at all three or two of the three. Problem being, many entire *programs* are offered at one or the other. Some campuses offer more of the same courses, accommodating time/day slots much better.... hence, why I've gone to all three campuses; South and City because they were convenient for me and North because that's where my program was. It was quite the expenditure of time and mileage to go to ECC for a southtowner like myself. I was broke and without parents money to buy me reliable cars. It was difficult. Obviously, our bus system is not usually a reasonable option for South or North.

Also, what weighs on my thoughts about the campus preference survey is that when I first went to ECC I would have chosen City as my last choice, until I finally reluctantly went. I'd take City in a heartbeat today, now that I've gone to all three. It's too bad that many kids may initially be downtown-phobic due to ignorance -like my former self. This is only my experience but I think it's worth discussion.

Btw, I agree that the Chippewa reference is a stretch, just feeding on longgone's vitriolic baloney.

replied to whatever
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Needles, fair enough.

While closing North sounds politically dead because county leg wouldn't approve (neither would appointed trustee board), it would be smart for ECC to try to offer as many courses as feasible where student demand really exists. If that means more courses downtown, fine, or if it means less courses downtown so be it that way too.

If North is to exist for the long term as all indications are, eventually there will be new construction out there. If this project is killed, some other will happen sooner or later no matter how strongly some might demand consolidation at downtown.

About your point some students change preferences during their 2 years - that change can be either direction (pro-downtown as it did for you, possibly pro-suburban for others).

WGRZ says Quinn & trustees will soon formally reply to Hoyt's suggestion that they close down North or South.
http://www.wgrz.com/news/article/124583/13/Grisanti-and-Hoyt-ask-ECC-to-Consider-Consolidating-

replied to needles
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

-I think everyone but the leaders wants ECC medical building downtown and many dont want the ECC North Campus either.
-Suburbanites dont want the traffic and its to close to the NCCC Campus.

-Their not going to get state, federal or country monies to fix the north campus.

-I do not agree with the AM&As Complex of buildings. We are talking about a Medical Technologies building being retrofitted into an old department store...NOT GOOD...but it would be a good opportunity for student housing.

-There is a 12 block Campus bounded by the Post Office, the Public Library and Michigan...students need to be as close as possible to each other

Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Student will have no trouble driving in. First, they've been going to Chippewa since they were 18 :). Second, close to 50% of UB students live within 30 miles and drive in. If UB feels downtown is a good decision for their students, why doesn't ECC?

When UB Med moves downtown, the xtra parking at main street could expand the park-n-ride program to help minimize the trek.

Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I luv the idea of consolidating ECC Downtown, but not at AM&A's. I still want to see it transformed into a mix use building with a hotel, living space and first floor retail/restaurants. IF ECC did move in, I would still hope for a first (and second) floors to be with a retail mix. All I can picture in that massive space is 2 to 3 major retailers, one to two stories and a cafe/restaurant thrown in. People already work, live and visit downtown, it's time to get retail back!!!!

Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Part of what is missing by the proposed Amherst building \ campus are all the impromptu discussions or meetings that could happen and benefit the students. A BNMC researcher ends up talking to an ECC student at lunch at the Electric Tower. Maybe at Ulrich's for a drink afternoon drink. Ideas \ relationships \ business idea \ opportunity are born from the mix and swirl of different people and ideas. Students \ Faculty \ Bosses would immediately have things in common and a base to form deeper relationships. This is what makes the city a dynamic and exciting place for everyone. There isn't anything quantifiable about these kinds of things like what % of population reside within a distance to X campuses etc... but they are how good societies and business are built. Why are so many grand ideas \ businesses are formed on college campuses \ dorm rooms? IMO it is because in the Post WWII America they are the few places that people still mix and mingle ideas. I think the downtown campus \ building would be greatly beneficial to the students and region.

Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I like the point one person made above about many of these students have already been coming downtown to drink since they turned 18. As far as parking, it's much harder to find a spot on a Friday and Saturday nite than it is on any given weekday, Trust Me!!!! Have to find better excuses as to why ECC should'nt be consolidated downtown.

Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

just had to toss out the reminder that no other county in the state of ny has a community college with -three- campuses. the question of sustainability is valid.

seems like the only thing we enjoy more than our fits of martyrdom over high taxes are our fits of opposition to consolidating or merging anything.

Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The ECC north campus is lousy. Location, design, and overall condition of the buildings. I'm surprised they hadn't made any substantial improvements over the past couple of decades when you consider it's growth. It's a good thing they hadn't. If the campus did receive a ton of capital improvements over the years, shutting it would've been off the table completely. This creates a tremendous opportunity to invest in the original campus that sits on good bones already and is in close proximity to almost everything downtown.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

A health science building should be in an area's medical hub which in our case is the BNMC. Health science students at ECC are not competing for the same interships as those at UB. ECC trains techs, plebotomists, 2 year nurses etc. that require practical experience at our hospitals and labs. Many rotate at Roswell, BGH, WCHOB, SOCH. During rotations they are still required to do some didactic work at the school's campus. Much easier to go between ECC downtown and these hospitals. Moving the nursing program solely to ECC north makes NO sense.

Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Fast forward 10 years, when ECC has one campus in Buffalo and ECC North becomes a large modern office complex that becomes incredibly attractive to large companies that remained in the city. What if one of the major Buffalo employers decided to relocate to the old ECC campus, I bet there would be many from BRO calling foul because they failed to look that far into the future.

Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Its a great idea and there are many ways of looking at it. parking would certainly be the greatest consideration.

at first i liked the idea of having a sprawling campus. However lately i have been thinking that two 15 story buildings on division street would make a real impression.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Shut it down & sell all the property. Why should any County be in the education business? Chris Collins must want this entity to go away.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment