Regional May 19, 2011 8:50 AM

Preservation and Development Combine in Toronto

Preservation and Development Combine in Toronto

There are several examples of church reuses in Buffalo, like Babeville and the Bryant Parish Condos, but there still remains a multitude of beautiful churches prime for repurposing. Oftentimes since these buildings were constructed for a single purpose, they pose a challenge for potential developers.

Our neighbors to the north in Toronto have accepted the challenge and the latest is the Bellefair Kew Beach Residences. When the project is completed in 2012, it will be home to twenty-three condos and six townhouses which range in price from $359,000 to about $1.1 million.  Ninety percent of the units have already sold. There will be retail on the first floor in order to better incorporate the project to the rest of the street and enliven the area.

church 3.pngThe design respects the historic building, while also finding a practical reuse. Admittedly, it would have been much easier to demolish the church and build new, but the father and son duo of Reserve Properties wanted to preserve the main structure and walls at a cost of $1 million. Keeping the original structure creates an interesting streetscape and respects the past while looking toward the future.

While the market for higher-priced units in Buffalo market is much smaller, it doesn't mean a similar project cannot work here. For example, think of this applied to St. Mary's on the Hill on Niagara Street, which is partially demolished. Having a two or three story residential structure rise from the remaining ruins of the once beautiful church preserves the remaining beauty while also giving new life to the site.

st. mary's.png

Entry Image and side view: Reserve Properties

St. Mary's on the Hill: David Torke of fixbuffalo 

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

Wow, that's really cool.

Score: 5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It is cool. Unsure if I would view this as preservation or something more along the lines of creative recycling? If this type of conversion were done to the Guaranty Bldg, Darwin Martin House, St. Pauls Episcopal would it be "preservation"? or would it be outrageous in the mind of a preservation person who cares about the use, interpretation, facade (which would have been greatly altered as in the case here, albeit interesting). In this example things like the church windows have been sacrificed so alot of the "history" and character in the building has been lost. To some extent I liken something like this to the horror movie Jeepers Creepers where the creature inhabits the skin of someone else...lol. I think this is a cool concept as shown here, just dont see it as preservation, more like creative recycling.

Buffalo needs more people and money and less blight and people who dont care in order to make projects like this happen on a large scale to transform the city.

Score: 5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Perhaps conservation would have been a better term. In response to your suggestion about the Martin House and other buildings I can only direct you to Eugene Viollet-Le-Duc. He was a French restoration architect who restored Notre Dame among other churches. However his view on "preservation" is that a buildings is never truly complete, so he added his own design elements along with the restoration in order to reinterpret and update the buildings.

While some may argue this was completely out of line, his modifications and additions are now often seen as important as the original building he worked on. Would that same idea work here or now? I highly doubt it for the buildings that you have mentioned, but for less prominent or crumbling buildings, this idea applied to them could give them new life and use.

replied to flyguy
Score: 5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I understand your point. However, in the case of churches, the large interior space has few uses in modern life. To give these buildings a life beyond a large communal space, the interior has to be altered to some degree. Unfortunately, the interior of a church is often more elaborate and compelling than the building's exterior. It's a difficult trade-off - save the exterior by destroying the interior. The alternative is to find some use that makes use of the space as it is - but how many community centers, art galleries or concert venues can a medium-sized city like Buffalo support? Additionally, Buffalo has so many churches to be preserved.

Of course, in the case of St. Mary's on the Hill, there's no longer any interior to preserve.

replied to flyguy
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Retaining the shell of a building, developers were able to create a pedestrian-friendly structure without using well-known architects? Many on BRO would say that it's just impossible.

The transformation of the former Donovan could learn a lot from this wonderful kindergarten example.

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Looks cool, but calling it preservation is a disservice. Do we know if the developer basically gutted and demoed the building or if it was more akin to St. Mary's? In school we would've called this a facadectomy, and I wouldn't consider saving facades while demoing the rest of a structurally sound building to be preservation.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

two weeks ago there was an article in the homes section of the Times where a couple build a home using the ruins of an old castle in scotland. It looked amazing and I thought of St. Mary's.

The distillery district in TO is also using the shell of buildings to be the base of large glass towers.

It is a great idea! Hopefully it can be saved before it futher deteriorates.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think it is a great reuse and we should definitely look at projects like this as a model for our city. Preservation is great but do we want the city looking like 1950 again or do we want to be a city of the future and build upon our history with a mix of old and new.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

And to think, this was accomplished by Canadians.

Score: -3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

LOL: "preservation in Toronto". Contradiction in terms. So when does the 60 story glass condo tower go up at this site?

Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

google image search shows they are knocking huge holes in the first and second floor walls where there are currently items of historical interest.

This is create recycling of something that would otherwise sit and rot, conservation & preservation and are 2 terms that dont really apply

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is in the Beaches in Toronto, nobody is going to church anymore outside of a few older areas and the Little Italy area. So many churches lose parishioners and find it tougher to stay open or maintain large buildings. Many old churches around the city have been turned into lofts. This is the first one I can think of however that has modified the actual shape of the structure so drastically.

To sonyactivision, preservation in Toronto has come a long way. Most buildings over 75 years old are protected by the city however developers can fight the city at the provincial level to try and get around building restrictions.

Saying that however the city does seem to back proposals that retain the outer shell of older structures if they are restored, at that point the sky is the limit. I can think of three new 50+ floor condo towers that have been proposed just this week.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment