Real Estate April 30, 2011 9:25 AM

ECHDC To Issue A Request For Proposals For Donovan Block Site

ECHDC To Issue A Request For Proposals For Donovan Block Site

The long shuttered Donovan Building adjacent to former Buffalo Memorial Auditorium will likely be seeing a creative reuse. The Erie Canal Harbor Development Corporation will officially announce a Request for Proposals (RFP) on May 2nd with submissions due by June 30th.

ECHDC acquired the Donovan Building in 2008 and the future of the building seemed to be demolition to make the site read for the non-binding Pre-Development Agreement with Benderson Development. However, the ECHDC has decide that the best use for the building is adaptive reuse since they have invested about $7 million in remediation.

The Donovan Site is located at 125 Main Street and will be divided into three separate parcels, D1, D2 and D3. The RFP seeks development proposals for the D1 and D2 parcels. ECHDC is considering plans to develop the D3 parcel as public space. All proposals must be in accordance with the overall policies and design guidelines of the Canal Side Project, illustrated in the Modified General Project Plan. These guidelines are in place to "ensure that architectural elements celebrate and interpret the historical significance of the Erie Canal and its terminus."

donovan 2.JPGAll submissions will be reviewed by a selection committee which is designated by ECHDC. The design will be evaluated based on, "the quality of the development plan and its integration into the overall Canal Side Project, the amount of the purchase offer or lease payment, the ability of the developer to complete its proposal and the overall economic impact of the proposal." A final recommendation will be presented to the board in July.

ECHDC's non-discrimination and affirmative action policy will apply to the preferred developer, who will agree to use its best efforts to achieve: a) not less than 25 percent New York State certified Minority and Women-Owned Business Enterprise contractor or subcontractor participation during the development of the project, which includes the pre-construction, construction and operation-maintenance phases; and b) an overall goal of 30 percent minority and female workforce participation during construction.

Additionally, to further promote local hiring in the district, the preferred developer and tenants with more than 30 employees are encourage to use the NYS Department of Labor, the Buffalo and Erie County Workforce Investment Board and other local job placement centers. The identified workforce agency will be given at least ten days to refer appropriate city residents for employment consideration. They must also participate in workforce development workshops and send a representative to all job fairs by local workforce development agencies.

One thing is for sure, with an open proposal there are sure to be some interesting designs offered which may also inspire other future development Canal Side.

RFP document here.

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

Great news! A stable, centrally located structure that can be re-used appropriately. Close to many amenities, located on the waterfront, near the arena, etc. All good and reasonable reasons to stress rehabilitation instead of demolition.

Score: 7 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Who wants to take a bet that Benderson does NOT win out in a fully transparent, democratic process?

Score: 2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Does this mean the Lawyers took a pass on this building?

Score: -2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

About time?

Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What happened to the reskinning plan, ala The Avant, that was floated around in the development community in 2009?

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The law firm could still participate they would just have to submit a plan... The reskinning of the building would be done in part of the plan I would assume.

Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think we the people should redevelop it. Maybe get Tim Teilman involved right from the start.

I think it would be quite humorous to watch him sue himself to stop it later in the process...

Score: 4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Ha ha...quite funny indeed. He would need to put on his clown costume first, though.

replied to Monster
Score: -1 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Only if he wears his clown costume.

replied to Monster
Score: -3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Hopefully the changes that have been made to the canal side plan and already dedicated funds will attract some outside developers to the city... Just to get another developer investing in the city. The local developers are great, but the more development companies investing in the city the better.

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This building's only reuse should be upper floor condos, middle floor's business, and the bottom floor should be street side retail, or more business. But the only way that this project is going to be financially viable, is if Main St is turned back into two way traffic. No one is going to pay top dollar for an apartment/condo that they are unable to drive up to. Plus that train station area around the Donova is a huge eye sore, it looks cheap and outdated, more along the lines of something you would see in an outdated amusement park. Keep one rail line, or just get rid of it all together, and connect the outer harbor bridge to the foot of Main St, and then all of a sudden you have an actual CBO.

Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree on the rail stop. To a certain degree, the Aud station could be removed and replaced with a nicer Special Events station... One that has indoor waiting on cold winter days.

replied to BurchJP
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

While the rail station is certainly an unwelcome intrusion into the urban fabric, single tracking the route would create unwarranted operational impairments - including increased costs for dispatching particularly during times of high frequency.

Main Street is plenty wide to accommodate LRVs and autos without too much trouble. Further, no one drives up to a condo blg, they pull into parking garages. I wouldnt suggest needlessly solving problems that dont real exist.

replied to BurchJP
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

and to clarify; its the station's scale and design that are the intrusion, not the station itself.

replied to al labruna
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There should be a "central wharf station" and a special events station to be used for HSBC events.

I would be nice if that office building were redesigned to have retail on the ground floor. It is pretty dead around there with the HSBC plaza and Buffalo New building.

I'd say it is good for office space. In a highly trafficked area like that Lux Condo/Apts would have to be on higher floors.

Either way some ground floor retail would be nice... A drug store and a verizon store would easily do. nothing crazy.

replied to al labruna
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It amazes me that no one from ECHDC has included the Donovan building in the plans they released. I would expect them to have a short list of developers and / or uses for this building. Isn't it owned by the city or the state already? Why haven't they incorporated this into the master plan?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

maybe they want to diversify the developers? If they make it part of the master plan are they obligated to give the development to Benderson?

Hopefully we can get an outside developer in... It would be a great project for someone to dip their toe into the Buffalo market.

Hopefully HSBC can get sorted out so their will be more less unknown for developers to operate.

replied to Mike Duff
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Hi Chris, while it may seem interesting for an 'outside' developer to come in and develop the building (or any other part of the city), you have to also consider how an outside firm would be willing to invest in a situation where the local dominant cash-strong developer hesitates. They are certainly paying attention to such conditions. Say what you may about Benderson, but in reality who else can do it? No one else can deliver in a large scale scenario which has so much red tape and uncertainty. We can only speculate on what's really in the works, but it's obvious that after 10 years or so, that no outsiders are fighting to develop anything in Buffalo, including Channelside. There should be more appreciation for the local successful developers, as well as the new / smaller ones. They are very smart and would not invest in any development if they did not feel it would be beneficial to the community and their business (which go hand in hand, believe it or not). Just because a developer is from out of town, does not ensure success, and could result in quite the opposite.

Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Todays Events

Buffalo Rising Poll