College March 12, 2011 12:01 AM

ECC Moving Forward with North Campus Expansion

ECC Moving Forward with North Campus Expansion

County Executive Chris Collins and Erie Community College (ECC) President Jack Quinn are moving forward to build a new Center of Excellence on the ECC north campus.  The campus was built in 1960, and this will be the first major expansion it has seen since then, with the exception of a child care center.

Ten years ago, north campus had 4,884 students.  Today, there are nearly 2,000 more students with no new building space.  This new Center of Excellence at north campus made it onto the Buffalo Niagara Partnership's 2011 Regional Agenda.

ecc3.jpgThe new academic building will be approximately 100,000 square feet.  New York State is contributing 50-percent of the total project cost, which is estimated to be about $30 million.  Erie County will contribute $7.5 million in capital funds for the building.  A selection committee chose Kideney Architects to design the structure through a competitive process.

Erie County Executive Chris Collins said, "Erie County is losing many of its community college students from the north towns to Niagara County Community College and other neighboring community colleges.  This shift in student population is costing the county millions of dollars a year as we have to reimburse the outside counties for the education of our community college students. To retain our students and attract students from outside communities we have to improve the programs and facilities at ECC.  This new building will help us do just that."

"I would like to thank County Executive Chris Collins for being so supportive of the college and this project," said ECC President Jack Quinn.  "This kind of partnership is invaluable to ECC, and without a doubt will enrich the college experience for our students.  With everyone working together- the college, Erie County, and our supportive Western New York State Legislative Delegation, we can and will get this project done.  The new building will be a much needed boost not only to the North Campus, but to the entire college community." 

Raymond Bednarski, Kideney Vice President said, "The Kideney Architects/IKM team is delighted to be selected to design this important facility for ECC. We recognize the impact this facility will have on the students of ECC and what it represents to both the College and Erie County as a whole. We're thankful for the opportunity to continue our relationship with ECC, and look forward to an exciting and successful project." 

Downtown leaders were hoping to bring the college expansion to the downtown campus to complement the hundreds of millions of dollars UB is investing in the Medical Campus.

Get Connected: Erie County Dept. of Environment and Planning, 716.858.8390

eccrendering.jpg

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

This is such a short sighted move. It is amazing that leadership in WNY still does not get it.

Score: 17 ( 27 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Am I having deja vous? Is it the 1970s again?

Score: 13 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Erie County competing against Niagara County is pretty lame too.

Score: 12 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Chris "I've got the bigger podium" Collins strikes again!

Score: 7 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Kewl. Let's also build the largest state university out in the middle of nowhere. Oh wait...

Score: 10 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Giambra had the right idea. Save money by consolidating downtown.

I don't buy the argument that ECC is losing students to Niagara because of ECC's poor buildings.

When Collins has the chance, he likes to favor the suburbs. Doesn't seem to get the idea that the region's heart is in the city.

Score: 11 ( 17 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If it ain't downtown it's crap!

Score: 4 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

To those administrators whose downtown safety concerns have led them to this development, "Good Luck" with your students getting those Medical Campus internships.

Score: 7 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Why is ECC building a new building on the North Campus site? I thought there was an idea to consolidate DOWNTOWN?? I suppose the Collins administration does not get it. The Downtown core will prop up the rest of the Buffalo Metro Area.

I guess we are in the same scenario when U.B. did not expand downtown also?? I suppose we have come full circle.

Score: 8 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Oh, Collins gets it; he gets that he needs to do what he can, where he can to institutionalize growth in the 'burbs and compete with the city.

What moron would put a community college campus in the suburbs as opposed to downtown, where students can have access to other students, culture and, yes, internships? Someone whose ego is more important than the students.

replied to Joshua
Score: 8 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

ECC is a commuter college, most people that go there have regular jobs. This isn't like BSC and UB where students have free time to mingle and spend hanging out at coffee shops.

If they did build it downtown everyone on here would complain about all the parking it takes up.

replied to Travelrrr
Score: 0 ( 22 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think downtown would be a better idea, but I think its worth pointing out that its ERIE COUNTY Community College and not Buffalo Community College. Plus the above commenter is right this is a local commuter college, and not a college that people move here to go to.

replied to Travelrrr
Score: 6 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The square cars are a nice touch!

Score: 15 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Those are shipping containers. The project also doubles as an intermodal freight facility.
:D

replied to cooper71
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm surprised by this one, I thought the push to put it back in the city was pretty much agreed upon. Dose anyone know what the cost difference was between the two locations was?

Score: 4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

They MUST build ECC in the city. We've lost so much of downtown to the 'burbs already. I bet rich Clarence residents like Chris Collins want to protect the status quo of suburban growth at the high cost of losing Buffalo. I think it is horrible that we have to pander to the whims of the suburbs.

Score: 5 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

With all of these comments saying they should be building in the city.... where exactly is there space? Sure, building in the city sounds like a wonderful idea, but where is there 100,000 square feet to expand the downtown campus?

And parking is a mess after 9AM at both campuses, but downtown would just be that much worse.

Score: -9 ( 21 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You are kidding right?

replied to nickinthebox
Score: -2 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

How about instead of a smartass comment and down votes someone actually answers the question? There's acres of land at ECC North that aren't being used for anything. Most of the students that attend ECC go to either the North or South Campuses as it is.

I go to North and I have one class at City. I loathe going to my City Campus class for many reasons. I hate parking downtown. My class is never well attended. It feels like a glorified high school.

Someone mentioned in an earlier post that ECC is a commuter school, and for a majority of the enrollment, I would say that's true. The school doesn't have an identity in the city. Ask 100 people who walk around downtown what the old post office is, if 51 or more said it was the ECC City Campus, I would be amazed.

Is there space within a decent walking distance of the current building that can accommodate for the 100K square feet? If there is, then awesome, it should be looked at. From my limited knowledge, the area is pretty locked down with buildings and surface parking. Or maybe we can convert the Statler to the ECC City Campus?

replied to STEEL
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"It feels like a glorified high school."

And you think ECC North or South doesn't feel like a glorified high school? Or how about just high school, don't know how glorified anyone thinks ECC is.

replied to nickinthebox
Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I can't speak for South Campus, but I can tell you that there are parts of North that feel like an actual college setting. The update they did in the dental wing is very nice.

Much of the North building feels old. It looks like a high school, but there's a big difference on how activities and classes are handled at North versus City. It might have more to do with the programs offered at North (engineering, law enforcement, dental, etc) but it feels more professional than downtown. This probably has to do with the space and the types of facilities these programs need, which in its current state, City wouldn't be able to accommodate.

But then there are enough people on their thrones in areas outside the city who want to cram more students into a converted warehouse in the middle of the city, just for the sake of saying its being done. ECC needs to market itself as a cost efficient alternative to attending a 4 year program. New facilities at its largest attended campus (almost 45%) will surely help.

replied to LouisTully
Score: 5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You said there was not enough room downtown for this building. With all the vacant space how in your right mind could you ever say that with a straight face? Get real. You are just making up dumb reasons to throw tax money down the toilet.

replied to nickinthebox
Score: -1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Ok, so then tell me where the space is. 100K square feet for the school all by itself. Near the old post office so that you don't have to uproot all of the resources out of that building. Any 'expansion' in the city would split the city campus into two different areas, essentially creating a fourth campus. Or am I wrong?

replied to STEEL
Score: -3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You're wrong.

replied to nickinthebox
Score: -1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So then where would it go?

replied to LouisTully
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There are empty lots all around ECC city. Are you really serious? just 3 blocks away the old AM&A building is empty. The Statler is empty- it is less than the walking distance from one end of the south campus to the other walking. Tishman building is emty on Lafayette Square. Half of Main Place Tower is empty. much of HSBC is due to be empty.

You are either just being a silly troll or you have no knowledge of Buffalo at all.

replied to nickinthebox
Score: -1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Statler - The cost of asbestos removal would eat most of that $30 million before even making the building suitable for an education setting. Also, its too far from the current campus, creating a City North and a City South. While your statement on how large the South campus is, its highly improbable that one would ever have to walk from the two farthest points on that campus. If the Statler were involved, it'd be very likely. And that was measuring point to point, nevermind all of the lights and car traffic.

AM&As - isn't Rocco doing this rehab? I can't find any articles since November of 2009. His price tag for rehab was $70 million.

Main Place - not as empty as you think. Just because you see walls up where stores used to be doesn't mean there isn't activity going on behind them. And in the two towers, the website says there's 10 floors scattered that have empty office space with nowhere near 100K sq ft.

Tishman and HSBC..... now those two would work, possibly. But both are huge buildings and would likely require a purchase of the whole building. Why would the County pay to lease property when there are acres of land at two other campuses that they already own? Its not as if this is just office space that can be uprooted and moved without any issue.

And either way, property is half the issue. Why should a student be forced to go to another campus to take classes? It is very uncommon for anyone going to ECC for a two year program to have to attend more than one campus. I do just because the timing worked better for me. North Campus already has a big majority of the student population and classrooms are packed as it is.

replied to STEEL
Score: -1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You are right there is just no place downtown for anything. My God!

replied to nickinthebox
Score: -3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Would Main Place Mall be close enough for you?

replied to nickinthebox
Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

short-sighted idiocy.

Score: 4 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This thread proves that talk of regionalism by many of the BRO frequent flyers is bullsh!t. You don't believe in regional growth, you believe in city over suburbs. The fact that the majority of the population live near this commuter campus doesn't factor into the argument, because you are pro-city and anti-suburb. So many of you can't see the big picture because you are blinded by your own agendas and ideology. It is a shame that you can't see the positive in this just because of the chosen location and your long held victim mentality. This is one of the things that is holding the City of Buffalo back from developing and growing. The same argument holds true for those who are still bitter about Geico, UB, Yahoo, Citi, and the like. Let's build the city based on the city's merits and strengths instead of getting your nose out of joint every time something is built outside the city line.

We shouldn't feel threatened by the suburbs and we shouldn't be fighting for breadcrumbs while other regions in the US are expanding rapidly. Let's look at the big picture for once instead of reverting to the woe is me mentality that is pervasive in Buffalonians, like Steel, Sin|ill, Travelrr, and others.

Score: 7 ( 25 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Bobbycat> "So many of you can't see the big picture because you are blinded by your own agendas and ideology."

Pot calling the kettle black. As I have said before, everybody formulates their opinion based on their own agendas and ideology. Stop pretending you are somehow above this.

Bobbycat> "You don't believe in regional growth, you believe in city over suburbs."

Again your attempt to simplify this issue as city vs suburb doesn't hold water. Based on typical suburban reactions to large scale development on other issues, many would likely appreciate clustering these uses downtown for increased efficiency and controlled growth in their neighborhood.

Some may want to see a central campus to decrease vehicle miles traveled throughout the region. Residents in OP and Williamsville who would appreciate not increasing traffic in their neighborhood would not consider a city campus "anti-suburb" at all.

replied to bobbycat
Score: -1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Chris Collins continues to hold WNY back with his total lack of vision and disregard for the future of our region. His narrow view and lack of political courage prevents him from doing the right thing for the people of Erie County. His legacy will be of protecting his wealthy suburban supporters while ignoring the city and the older first ring suburbs. He continues to squander every opportunity to lay the foundation for a better future and it will likely take years to repair the damage done by his administration.

Score: 1 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Don't vote for him, and the election will decide if you are right or wrong.

replied to Blackrocklifer
Score: -3 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Here we have one opinion from a far left leaning democrat that sounds a lot like the opinions that far right leaning conservatives voice about Barack Obama.

replied to Blackrocklifer
Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Make no mistake: this is more of playing the politics of division, which the Collins camp masters. D vs. R, faction vs. faction, city vs. suburbs. Collins has told people point-blank that his suburban base doesn't care about the city -- so what does he have to lose by doing this--?

Check out the great writing on this issue in this week's Artvoice: http://artvoice.com/issues/v10n10/cars_and_college_students

Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Great source. Fair, balanced just like Fox News. Is the great writing on the issue or in it?

replied to RaChaCha
Score: -4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

RaChaCha>"playing the politics of division, which the Collins camp masters. D vs. R, faction vs. faction, city vs. suburbs"

Huh? And the attitude from yourself isn't also divisively "city vs. suburbs"? Seriously?

Are you really saying adding one new ECC building in an long-developed inner-ring burb such as Amherst is 'city vs. suburbs' divisiveness from Collins (& the legislature majority whose approval is needed)...
... but for yourself and others to demand that the building must be put in the city isn't 'city vs. suburbs' divisiveness? Seriously?

That's a nice balanced interpretation of city vs. suburbs - lol!

RaChaCha>"Collins has told people point-blank that his suburban base doesn't care about the city"

I'm skeptical that the above claim isn't a sharp twisting of Collins' words. His proposed budgets have supported a lot of county spending in the city. Also, he personally has directed that his business interests invest significant money in the city, and he's donated large portions of his salary to non-profit groups in the city.

No, he isn't pro-city in the sense of also having to be anti-burbs the way some of you sound.

Rach, can you provide a reliable source that directly quotes Collins saying what you wrote, and let us know who he used those words to?

If you can do that in a credible way, my skepticism will be mistaken.
If not, then the claim will sound dishonest.

replied to RaChaCha
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It is not our fault that the repuklicans have their collective heads shoved so far up their greedy elitist a$$es that they can't see the light of day long enough to know what most people in America are screaming for.

replied to whatever
Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Peter>"repuklicans have their collective heads shoved so far up their greedy elitist a$$es that they can't see the light of day long enough to know what most people in America are screaming for"


I don't know how that rant about national political parties replies to my comment.

But after choosing Dem control of the House of Representatives in 06 and 08, most American voters in Nov 2010 decided against that - taking Nancy Pelosi's gavel away. Voters also had a very strong shift from Dem to Repuklican for control of quite a few governorships and state leg houses (including Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan - all of whom have Repuklican govs and state leg now if I'm not mistaken).

So if Repukes can't see what most Americans are screaming for as you say, don't Dems look even more out of touch?

replied to Peter_Parkdale
Score: -1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The number of students/demand for space justify the expansion. Fortunatley for Erie County, Chris Collins is in charge and none of you are.

Score: 0 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Interesting. The county claims to not have money for the arts and social services yet they can fund a major public project like this. So much for "fiscal conservatism."

Score: 2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Arm>"The county claims to not have money for the arts and social services"

When did the county govt say it doesn't have $ for social services?
Almost all of the county's social service spending is mandated by NYS and has continued to grow fast while Collins has been county exec. Although he's said NYS should reduce mandates, by law there always has to be 'enough' county $ for mandated soc services. That's the main reason our sales tax went up to 8.75% under Giambra and stayed there under Collins, one of the higher sales tax rates anywhere in the U.S.

I'm not thrilled with Collins or the county legislators (of both parties) ever using general county funds for ECC at all (why can't tuition payments fund ECC?), but this building is still a much better use than giving $ to theater groups and artists - neither of which should ever receive any taxpayer funds ever, regardless of deficit or surplus.

Arm>"So much for "fiscal conservatism." "

Descriptions like 'fiscal conservative' are relative comparisons, not absolutes.

Collins isn't as fiscally conservative as I'd want a county exec to be. I'd want non-mandated spending cut even further than he's ever proposed.

However, compared to Giambra, and compared to most other leading county pols such as Maria Whyte, Lynn Marinelli, etc., I think Collins is relatively fiscally conservative.

replied to Armchair MBA
Score: -2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Imagine choosing education over arts as a fiscal priority. Damn republicans...

replied to Armchair MBA
Score: 1 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Monster: I am, again, terrified that you represent this city in business development and/or in any other capacity. Your Tea Party, condescending and, frankly, ignorant views are a little too much to take.

replied to Monster
Score: -7 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Than have your mom change your diaper and move away.

replied to Travelrrr
Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

if you think your county tax bill is too low, then by all means back this plan and vote for collins, because expanding 3 campuses instead of consolidating them is an excellent way to expand our tax burden.

Score: 0 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment


For those of you who wonder why UB is in Amherst. Read this thread.

In the face of all kinds of aruguments suggesting it makes sense to focus our resources downtown, you will see that there are some folks that just don't believe it or that will not go out of their way to support downtown.

There were many voices raised in oppostion to UB Amherst, in the 1960's. But it just didn't matter. Politics and selfishness won out.

And now we see how it happens. On a much smaller scale, but analogous.

Score: -1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

$5.7 MILLION is a lot of maintain 3 seperate campuses..then again so is 41 different towns and villages and more school districts than I can count.

Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

People in WNY like to complain about high taxes and wasteful government. They don't really want to actually fix the problem.

replied to Buffalo All Star
Score: 6 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The fact that he uses his mantra of running the county like a business and then pulls crap like this just proves this guy is a slime ball.

He trumps economies of scale except for when the answer is concentrating those benefits in the city. The land that ECC North and South is on is hight value high priced land. Sell that off, and consolidate downtown towards that east of the CBD. There is more than enough land. Those concerned with parking 5.7m would build a prett nice ramp JUST for ECC. I'd like to see the bill just for mowing these huge worthless lawns at both the surburban campuses.

I would love to ride to work with Chris Collins, watch the contempt on his face grows as he has to ride to his DT office. It is city vs. suburbs, because his policies are anti-urban.

For those who say oh the kids don't want to drive far. That argument would require all three campuses offering every course which is just simply not the case. My brother lived in Hamburg and had to drive to Amherst for all his classes. Also if an extra 15min. in your car keeps you from higher education, you probably weren't going to make it any way.

I will not be voting for Chris Collins again the guy is living in the 1980's

Score: -1 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This will permanently kill the push to consolidate the ECC campus downtown. Once this $30 million expenditure is made, the debate is over. We're stuck with a three-campus system, with the smallest of the three located downtown, for the next fifty years.

Score: 4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I take your position too Chris. University campuses in the downtown core are great economic drivers and the downtown would greatly benefit from consolidating the ECC campus there.

I will use York University as a great example. Great university in northern Toronto but is less accessible and is considered quite a hike for those who need to connect with other professionals. University of Toronto, Ryerson, George Brown campuses located downtown contribute to diverse economic activity, reducing cheap residential vacancies and making streets more vibrant. Suburban campuses are not the way forward. Investing in the city is.

replied to chris_hawley
Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The cost/consolidation argument isn't rational. In order for your fantasy down town campus to accomodate the current enrollment, it will require a massive expansion that will be larger and much more costly that this project.

Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You did not read the story did you

Score: -2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Defintely did. My comment was directed at the argument posed by some of the commenters, not the article itself.

replied to STEEL
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It really is a shame that they could not have given the main city campus idea another vote. (speculating)

It looked like a far more courageous vision then the tic tac toe stagnation, but then again that is college life.

Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Stupid! Ignorant! What have they learned, nothing!

Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I don't see any good reason why all buildings of the _county's_ community college should have to be in the city downtown as Joel Giambra proposed. Having some of ECC be downtown and some of it be in the burbs is a good mix for the long term.

ECC North is in a well-developed, well-populated area, with good access by car and public transit. Adding this building wouldn't be "sprawl" as it's wrongly implied by the Artvoice article linked by RaChaCha.

Score: -4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

We need all the help we can get downtown and this goes against that. We need young students who are going to spend the day in coffee shops and stores along Main Street. This will never happen if they are just commuting to a suburban campus that is already congested with cars. Instead, we should be promoting developments along our light rail system and encouraging students to spend their days downtown whenever possible. This is what Buffalo needs and this is what Erie County needs.

replied to whatever
Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Peter>"We need young students who are going to spend the day in coffee shops and stores along Main Street."

True regionalism should acknowledge that owners and employees of coffee shops and stores in well-developed, well-populated Amherst near ECC North are residents of Erie County and NY State every bit as much as are owners and employees of coffee shops and stores in the city near downtown.

replied to Peter_Parkdale
Score: -6 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

ECC North is served by one single bus line and no highways. ECC south is served by 0 bus lines. On top of that Erie County is poor with a shrinking poor population. It could save 6 million a year by consolidating. That alone is reason enough to build down town. Then you can give more reasons.

1.The county could sell off the huge land parcels in the suburbs for a profit.
2. The consolidated campus would be easier to use. Students would nat have to travel long distances between campuses.
3. The consolidated City campus would be more vibrant because of its high student and faculty population.
4. The consolidated campus would add more vibrancy to downtown which would translate into a more attractive downtown which would translate to a city which is more attractive which would translate into a place that can more easlit attract business from outside the region.
5. There would be less need for cars on teh road
6. There would be less emphasis on expensive sprawl style development
7. The colleges would be at a more central loaction.


But remember the big reason is that it would be cheaper by $6 mill a year. Thta alone should be reason enough for a consolidated campus

replied to whatever
Score: 4 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Though I support your comment, where did the $6 mil number come from?

replied to STEEL
Score: -2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It was a study done during the Giambra admin

replied to LouisTully
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

@STEEL - "It could save 6 million a year by consolidating. That alone is reason enough to build down town. Then you can give more reasons"

That six million dollars a year could be saved by closing the downtown campuses and relocating programs to one suburban campus or the other. Be careful what you wish for.

STEEL > "1.The county could sell off the huge land parcels in the suburbs for a profit."

- The same could be true for the city properties. I would doubt too many on Buffalo Rising would welcome that much empty space available in Williamsville as it could attract private businesses away from the city.

STEEL > "2. The consolidated campus would be easier to use. Students would nat have to travel long distances between campuses."

- The same would be true of any consolidated campus.

STEEL > "3. The consolidated City campus would be more vibrant because of its high student and faculty population."

- I believe that is pure conjecture. The area around the City Campus would be more vibrant right now due to the current high student and faculty populations. That is not the case today, as ECC City is as much a commuter campus as ECC North and ECC South.

STEEL > "4. The consolidated campus would add more vibrancy to downtown which would translate into a more attractive downtown which would translate to a city which is more attractive which would translate into a place that can more easlit attract business from outside the region."

- This is pure conjecture, again. You are extrapolating on dreams and projecting your wishes for the city. Past and current history of ECC City Campus do not support your theory.

STEEL> "5. There would be less need for cars on teh road"

- More conjecture and wishful thinking.

STEEL> "6. There would be less emphasis on expensive sprawl style development"

- More conjecture and opinion on your part. Expensive sprawl style development is compared to what? Expensive industrial conversions? Expensive demolition of buildings and disconnect of city streets?

STEEL> "7. The colleges would be at a more central loaction."

- Central to whom? The majority of students who attend ECC come from the suburbs, per the 2003 student demographic study sponsored by Erie County. Only 30 something percent of students enrolled in the City Campus live in the City of Buffalo, if memory serves.


STEEL> "But remember the big reason is that it would be cheaper by $6 mill a year. Thta alone should be reason enough for a consolidated campus."

That campuses could just as easily be consolidated in the suburbs as in the city. With many suburban parents not wanting their daughters and sons in the city at night, I am speculating that the suburbs would probably win out if that decision had to be made.

replied to STEEL
Score: 1 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You are right we should move everthing to the suburbs and then the sububan parents don't need to be afraid.

replied to Mike Duff
Score: -2 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Dude. Mike Duff gave a point-by-point critique of a position you laid out, largely consisting of facts that logically obtain from points you made. You may or may not like them, but they deserve an intelligent response. Instead, you give a self-serving caricature of his position. What gives?

I've been sitting on the sidelines watching your comments for a couple of years now, STEEL, and I have to say, your argmentative style is deeply hypocritical. You demand logic and evidence of anyone who disagrees with you unless they themselves make logical and evidential arguments that are threatening to you--at which point you resort to straw-man arguments (look that up, please) and ad-hominem attacks (oh, that too).

This is particularly infuriating to me because I agree with much of what you say, but you are doing no favors to (y)our position with your defensive snarling. Get serious about making sense, or get off the Internet.

replied to STEEL
Score: 3 ( 17 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

And I did yes the whole thing should be moved to the suburbs- but when does that stop. When are the suburban parents going to stop bein afraid? Not until everything is taken out of the city and given its own giant parking lot. Can't wait for that to happen!

It is not a silly response to a silly premis. The fact is that Metro Buffalo gets steadily poor and smaller as it spreads thinner and thinner should make people alamed - but its fine as long as we can pretend that teh city is the big bad boogy man and the cource of all problems in WNY. A smart policy is to concentrate resources in the place it can make the most impact. the County is not only not conentrating resources in the the place that can make the biggest impact - it is not concentrating resources at all. The studies show a 5.7 Million savings each year with a concentrated city campus. On top of taht adding thousands of peopel to teh city streets WOULD add vibrancy to the city streets - this is not conjecture it is fact. More people on the streets makes streets more attractive. This is fact not conjecture. But suburban parents are afraid! Don't want Jonny going into that terrible city.

replied to MOLYBDENUM
Score: 2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I have to take offense to your criticism of "But suburban parents are afraid! Don't want Jonny going into that terrible city."

Your sarcasm comes in strong and heavy. I love my hometown of Angola, just about as much as I love the city of Buffalo. Maybe a little less. Living here all my life, it has afforded me great education, 3 beaches within walking distance, and some of the prettiest streets to drive down. But that's not really important.

Sure my parents had some reservations about the city and probably moved away in the early 70's because they saw the decline coming as well as the change in neighborhoods. I think my dad's main reason was to get away from his family, he thought they were crazy, haha.

Buffalo is NOT the center of Erie county. The county is huge and benefits from separate county campuses. I was fortunate to be able to take some courses at ECC South during the summer during my college career. It would have sucked to drive out to the city or the north campus, like some of my friends have done. Buffalo has the University of Buffalo. That's your college, and you have SUNY Buffalo (Buff State) Canisius College, as well as D-Youville.

ECC is supposed to serve all of Erie County, not just the city of Buffalo. It's selfish of you guys to want consolidation.

replied to STEEL
Score: -2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I did not bring up the scared suburban parents another commenter did. I am just responding to that as being a ridiculous reason for spending almost 6 Million tax payer dollars a year to keep 3 campuses.

Your reason for convenience is quite compelling except that if you move far away from things by choice to and teh result is that you have to travel long distances to get to those things then you should not expect the tax payers to spend extra money to bring the things back closer to you. How much more redundant infrastructure can WNY afford in an effort to make things easy for those who want to move to the far fringes? It makes no sense in a shrinking metro to spread minimal resources so thin.

replied to afraccica
Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I did not bring up the scared suburban parents another commenter did. I am just responding to that as being a ridiculous reason for spending almost 6 Million tax payer dollars a year to keep 3 campuses.

Your reason for convenience is quite compelling except that if you move far away from things by choice to and teh result is that you have to travel long distances to get to those things then you should not expect the tax payers to spend extra money to bring the things back closer to you. How much more redundant infrastructure can WNY afford in an effort to make things easy for those who want to move to the far fringes? It makes no sense in a shrinking metro to spread minimal resources so thin.

replied to afraccica
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I take Steel's silence as agreement.

I don't disagree with the irrationality of suburbanites fears, but that doesn't make them any less real.

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This news ruined my weekend. I can't believe we are still making dumb mistakes like building in suburban swamps. ECC would have been a great addition to the rapidly expanding Medical Corridor or the Larkin Hydraulics District or even in the Central Business District. Isn't it bad enough that Medaille and D'Youville have expanded to the suburbs? When will it end, when there is nothing left downtown?

I am really sick of being held hostage by elitist rich suburbanites like Chris Collins and his posse of greedy friends. I bet if we dig deep enough we will find some connection between the land purchase, the architect, and Chris Collins.

Score: 4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The architect is actually Chris Collins brother in-law, and the land is owned by his sister. This reeks, lets get viral....

replied to Peter_Parkdale
Score: -1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Smart move. Yes, it would be better downtown, but can you imagine the problems? Can't tear that building down, it's Historic! No more parking, we have enough! Hate the design! It's not to the curb and no retail @ ground level! Then lets not forget the lawsuits that would start. No, downtown is not a very friendly place in the real word.

Score: -7 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Should your name really be AmherstTom? Your comments reflect so many comments heard on this site, but every point you made is lame and too weak to support this project. Not a very friendly place in the real world. I don't even know how to respond to such a dumb comment.

replied to Buffalotom
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

But you did. See grain elevater story. Lawsuit!

replied to LouisTully
Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

His comment is more accurate than anything I have seen you post.

replied to LouisTully
Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

My issue with the project is it looks entirely too urban for the geography. I mean this would work fine in the city with it postmodern cubism design, but this is the suburbs. Boring it up a little and don't construct the buildings so close together, it would be faster to walk than drive to get between them.

Score: -1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Through all the BS Joel Giambra put us all through. The ONLY thing most of aggreed on was his vision for ONE ECC Campus-DOWNTOWN. Why nobody is pushing for that is beyond belief. A central one downtown makes more sense to me than having it out in the middle of nowhere. If you don't have a car, your screwed.

Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

@STEEL - "ECC North is served by one single bus line and no highways."

There are 5 bus routes that service ECC North throughout the day. 47, 48, 49, 67, and 66A. Two or three connect directly to the metro rail station and at least four a day are dedicated routes to ECC North.

ECC North is 1.4 miles from the end of the Kensington Expressway, 2.0 miles from the Main Street exit of the 290, and 2.0 miles from the Depew entrance to the Thruway.

ECC North is also bike friendly.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Plus they have an inter-campus shuttle.

replied to Mike Duff
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

hmmmm. ecc needs to expand. with permanently high gas prices and a shrinking tax base, further investment really needs to be at the centrally located core where we already have strong public transportation and a range of nearby housing options.

and now hsbc tower is teetering on the brink of vacancy. do i sense a possible two-birds-one-stone situation?

Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Not a whole hell of a lot of public transportation available in the south towns. We are fortunate that ECC has a South campus, since, the one bus that does come down here drives near the South Campus.

replied to grad94
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm glad we don't have a regional planning board to create transportation corridors and nodes of excellence. No need to create create synergies and critical masses.

Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I have blogged on various sites, mainly the BuffNews and WNYMedia (until I got tired of the high school insults) for about 10 years using the name "BobbyCat" - which is a nickname I was tagged with in 1st grade.

Recently I was told that some other person started calling himself "BobbyCat" on Buffalo Rising so I stopped in to investigate. This is my first post.

Hey buddy, what's the deal ? I have blogged thousands of words with my nickname and I although I have no trademark on it, it IS my name, and I resent you just taking it. Just so you know, I have probably developed more enemies than friends, so stealing that name might gain you some notoriety but not many friends.

I just thought I would let others know that the "BobbyCat" on BF is a fraud, but for whatever reasons, for whatever gain, I cannot fathom. I see that you're not a very good writer, so I hope you find your own name and stop embarrassing me.

Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Having just graduated from ECC north in May 2010 I feel I can clear a few things up.

1.) Yes ECC is losing students to NCCC, several of my friends are currently at NCCC, the main reason, NCCC is slightly newer, 1 building-no walking between buildings in the winter and has more to offer students (i.e. dorms, pool, bowling alley, better library). Everything is on 1 campus, if I didn’t live 10 min away from North, I would have gone to NCCC. It isn’t any nicer but offers more. I never felt like I was at a college at north and thus went to Geneseo to experience college, my friends went to NCCC because it looks and feels like a college.

2.) The buildings are disgusting, they are seldom cleaned (I watched a dead hornet decompose on the windowsill in my general physc class over 16 weeks, never cleaned once). Ceiling tiles are missing in many areas of the buildings, so are some floor tiles. The rooms are overcrowded; my Calc II class frequently had 2 or 3 students sitting on the floor or heater to take a test-not conductive in a higher level math class. Only the biology and new organic chem labs are cleaned frequently, the water runs rust orange in the general chem labs (they are fixing that though).

3.) ECC city is considered a joke, even by other ECC students. It’s a very nice building architecturally but the actual facilities are limited and the classes are easy. It also only has the same redundant classes that north and south have as well. If you want to save city then perhaps some of the specialty degrees like respiratory therapy and EMT should be moved there, otherwise there is no reason for anyone to ever go there. Make a reason for people to go to city (dorms or something).

4.) ECC north has a lot of empty space and parking isn’t too bad as is, they don’t have to waste money buying land downtown when north is the most crowded campus. Most of the campus is empty or seldom used athletic fields. It is already on a bus route as well so mass transit isn’t an issue. Its fairly accessible, it’s not far from the 290 or Kensington. Moving it to the city would make it less accessible to the predominantly suburban crowd who goes there and enrolment would drop.

Point being North desperately needs to be modernized, the facility is horribly outdated and limited (sorry no one uses chalk boards anymore in a college, north still does, the ones here at Geneseo are decorative). I could not get out of that school fast enough and transferred to Geneseo even though I didn’t have to. A new shinny building will also help reduce the stigma of ECC being glorified high school. ECC is a wonderful asset (my grades there got me into D’Youville pharmacy school, its not a bad school-no really its not) and is over looked frequently due to its non college feel and subpar condition.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll