City February 17, 2011 9:30 AM

The Ultimate Sullivan Must Have

The Ultimate Sullivan Must Have
A major new monograph has been released on the work of architectural genius Louis Sullivan. The book, titled The Complete Architecture of Adler & Sullivan, is just that - a complete document of all of Sullivan's over 250 building commissions, existing and demolished.  The book is Published by the Richard Nickel Committee with the University of Chicago Press. Its authorship is credited to a team consisting of Aaron Siskind, John Vinci, Ward Miller and Richard Nickel.  Many of the gorgeous photos in the book were taken by Nickel who died in a collapse of the Sullivan designed Chicago Stock Exchange while it was being demolished in 1972.  Nickel was in the building photographing and saving Sullivan ornamentation as he had done many times prior.  He was an early preservation activist motivated by his distress as Sullivan buildings began being demolished at an alarming rate in the 1950's. 

Today fewer than half of Sullivan's buildings remain. Nickel started this book in the 1950's but could never finish his work as he was increasingly distracted by the urgency of trying to save as many buildings as possible and document the buildings before they were gone. There was no real preservation movement and certainly little public interest in saving dirty old buildings at the time. Hence he and the people he gathered to his cause had very little success.

The book is very large weighing in at more than 8 pounds with over 470 pages and over 800 images. Along with the photos the book includes 108-page catalogue raisonne listing each of the 256 building commissions and projects, listing name, location, building size, cost and current status. Historic photographs and plans are also included where available and an essay on the building, with historic resources references and citations on each of the structures. In completing Nickel's book the associate authors sorted through tens of thousands of images. This is truly a spectacular book and a must have for any architecture fan.

Sullivan-Steel-NY-Buffalo-2.jpg

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

got this for xmas. very thorough.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If you come here with less of an architectural background (like me), Frank Lloyd Wright was for a time, one of Sullivan's draftsmen.

Sullivan's firm did more commercial work, Wright did residential work, and began to do more side work that caused a breach in the relationship (I'm sure others who know the real story are groaning at this simplistic characterization).

It's an interesting relationship that intertwines the history of our city, the Larkin company, Sullivan, Darwin Martin, Frank Lloyd Wright, and even the start of the Roycroft movement in East Aurora. This relationship may be obvious to some...not so to all.

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I have the Buffalo Architecture book just like that one which is also terrific.

I have been on a big Saarinen kick lately and that type of modern architecture never used to appeal to me. I thought it was interesting that yesterday's news covered Joanne Faletta (Kleinhans Music Hall) and IBM's Watson (Thomas J. Watson Research Center) which are both Saarinens.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What buildings or structures in Buffalo were designed by Adler and Sullivan and which are featured in this book?

Score: -3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The Guaranty Building.

OK Thank you.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Jack Randall, who played the pivotal role in the preservation of Buffalo's Guaranty Building, was a protoge of Richard Nickel, and wrote a tribute to him. We owe a debt to Richard and Jack.

Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

He came to Buffalo and took a job at UB in order to save the Guaranty. It would not exist today if he had not done that.

Hail to the so called obstructionists. Without them we would have a parking lot in place of one of the world's major architectural achievements.

replied to RaChaCha
Score: 4 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Indeed -- and agreed. By bringing Richard's all-out style and dedication to preservation here, Jack became Buffalo's Nickel :-)

replied to STEEL
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Steel we've been trying to teach you for years the difference between preservationists and obstructionists. When will you stop using the myth than one cannot tell greatness from just old, to suit your needs?

PS - The Guaranty Building was not torn down, stop thinking it was.

replied to STEEL
Score: -2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

STEEL will never know the difference between obstruction, preservation, restoration and masturbation. He thinks everything old should be saved, and everything that has even happened in Buffalo was due to some preservation coalition. Im still waiting for the list of Proactive projects that Preservationists have completed/started. How many jobs have they brought to the economy, how much money have "they" injected into the economy? They are all a joke besides BLACKROCKLIFER who has actually taken his "own" money and completed a restoration project. STEEL I'm still waiting buddy...............?

replied to bhorvath
Score: -7 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

And, Burch, what do YOU stand for? I am curious. Other than bashing Steele and others, I generally want to know what you care about and what drives you. Do you have interests?

replied to KangDangaLang
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Do you want to take me out on a date too?

replied to Travelrrr
Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You know what ill toss in my two cents of what I think of Buffalo's development future over the next 5 years. Connect a bridge from the foot of Main St to the outer harbor. Turn Main St back into two way traffic all the way from the foot of Main St to the 600 Block....AND MAKE IT TWO LANES IN EACH DIRECTION!!!!!!!Once you do this you will have thousands of people daily passing right past CanalSide which will draw private development. Take those old building right next to HSBC arena that are owned by the owner of Cobblestone, and turn them into lofts. Let HSBC relocate to the Webster block, then you would actually have a CDB!!! Once you start creating critical mass downtown you draw residents. Turn the Marine Drive Apartments into High end condos (I think their lease is up in the next couple years and they can be sold privately?). Once HSBC moves out of the tower tons of business will move into the tower because the rates will be so much cheaper. PS turn HSBC Atrium into a high end hotel. I heard when I worked for HSBC four years ago that they were going to sell it to a private developer to turn it into a hotel. Now that I have let have opened up to TRAVELRRR you have to take me out on a date, and im not talking anything cheap either. I want the Chop House's most expensive steak or the Hutchs! You owe me at least that much...............

replied to Travelrrr
Score: -1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thanks Burch-must be difficult to expose yourself like that and make yourself so vulnerable. In all honesty, lighten up dude....it takes so much energy to be that negative, and it's not good for the heart. If you don't like what Steel (aka Steele) has to say, move on. You should be able to refute positions making personal attacks-that just demonstrates a pretty immature, unsophisticated sort.

Oh, and I would take you to dinner but, frankly, you just aren't my type.

replied to KangDangaLang
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Im not against STEEL and I really dont have a lot of negativity either. I just loath the pro city homers like ARMCHAIR and STEEL who think that everything built before 1940 is good and everything after is bad. Along with the Suburbs being evil and they never pay for their share etc blah blah blah. Even though you guys might not believe this I 100% believe that Buffalo is the heart of WNY and without it most of the people in the suburbs would not be here. Buuuuut the city has big time issues, and filing lawsuits and being a huge pain in the @$$ like Tim Tielman does nothing to progress the city. And thats where I take aim at people like them. They say stop this, stop that, its bad, were killing our heritage! You know what our heritage was gone with the Saint Lawrence Seaway, and its not coming back. We have to do something now in the present to sustain a future, and stop looking to recreate the past.

replied to Travelrrr
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

PS do you have anything that says that he came here "just to save the Guaranty?"? And come on "one of the world's major architectural achievements." I would bet its not even in the top 100 world wide, maybe not even the top thousand?

replied to STEEL
Score: -6 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I know why he came to Buffalo because that is what he told me in his own words and if you want to deny that the Guaranty is not one of the world's greatest architectural achievements I can't stop you. The fact will remain that it IS one of the world's greatest architectural achievements and that if Randal did not move to Buffalo to obstruct its demolition it very likely would now be a parking lot or perhaps a parking lot with a Rite Aid.

replied to KangDangaLang
Score: 4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Or a great, new, architecturally awesome (if not thought so for another 100 years) building could have been put up in its place.

Steel, I appreciate your posts, they are usually pretty great - but as someone who is always portrayed as the basher, or troll, otherwise negative creep on this blog I want you to consider that your (and most others) stance that "if it was torn down there could only be a parking lot" is the true negative outlook on matters of this sort.

I am an optimist.

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Can you cite some examples of great buildings torn down in Buffalo - especially in the downtown core - that were replaced with other great buildings and not parking lots and/or Rite Aid type buildings?

Your belief - or optimism - that somehow another masterpiece will spring up after we knock one down reveals an amazing lack of awareness of the reality of the circumstances WNY has faced for 50 years. So really, it's not optimism, it's idiocy.

replied to bhorvath
Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I tried, but could only think of the Larkin building as truly a great city building that was torn down, and that isn't really in the city "core". Of course "great" is in the eye of the beholder.

The Hauptman Woodward came to mind - was something "great" on that parcel before?

My point only makes sense if you consider buildings like the HW, Avant or the new courthouse "great" and I'm sure there are none or very few examples of new architecture that any of you will consider "great" compared to your old sentimental favorites. But we'll all be dead in 100 years and those folks are the one's whose opinions will matter, not ours on whether they look great now.

replied to Eliot Spitzer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The Larkin building you reference is not built where the FLW Larkin HQ formerly stood. The current Zemsky LCO building is a remake of one of the Larkin warehouses. So, nothing good came from tearing down that masterpiece but we went ahead and did it anyway.

You come on this site and talk about how bad the Buffalo economy is and how and out-of-touch Buffalonians are with the real world of American economic power and growth and simultaneously tell us we shouldn't fear tearing down old masterpieces because new ones may sprout up in their place. You should pick a belief system and stick with it. Racing to contrarianism because you just generally like to disagree with BR authors makes you appear to be a schizophrenic.

replied to bhorvath
Score: -1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You appear to not understand my points of view, at all, but I understand playing amatuer psychiatrist helps you with your frustrations.

I said nothing regarding replacement of the Larkin Building, I only noted it was the first 'great' building to come to mind. What I said was: "could only think of the Larkin building as truly a great city building that was torn down, and that isn't really in the city "core"". I don't know what was built in it's place if anything. I agree nothing good came of tearing that structure down 60 or 65 years ago. I'm not sure why that matters though.

Regarding this: "You come on this site and talk about how bad the Buffalo economy is and how and out-of-touch Buffalonians are with the real world of American economic power and growth and simultaneously tell us we shouldn't fear tearing down old masterpieces because new ones may sprout up in their place. You should pick a belief system and stick with it." - do you even know what you meant by this statement? What masterpieces are being torn down at the moment that I endorse wrecking? If you stop trying to make people like me your model adversary instead of reading and thinking about my real words you might not say such profoundly strange and meaningless things as this last quote.

replied to Eliot Spitzer
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Also, your steadfast belief that nothing good can come from that type of redevelopment is another form of idiocy, one that basically keeps Buffalo stuck in the past. Only idiots would think that all cases of knock-down-build again are fated to be Rite Aides and parking lots.

replied to Eliot Spitzer
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

but, unfortunately, it is far too often the case; newbuilds in Buffalo tend to be crap. we have to up the bar.

replied to bhorvath
Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Or a great, new, architecturally awesome (if not thought so for another 100 years) building could have been put up in its place.

Steel, I appreciate your posts, they are usually pretty great - but as someone who is always portrayed as the basher, or troll, otherwise negative creep on this blog I want you to consider that your (and most others) stance that "if it was torn down there could only be a parking lot" is the true negative outlook on matters of this sort.

I am an optimist.

replied to STEEL
Score: -1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Interesting list - It includes Sullivan's St Louis building which is generally considered his practice building for the Guaranty. It also includes Mies' Lake Shore Drive apartments which bear a direct influence from the Guaranty building.

replied to KangDangaLang
Score: 5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You mean the Guaranty building didn't make Complex.com's top 50? How could the ultimate buyer's guide for men be so wrong?

So, if this building isn't on your radar screen of top 50, top 100, or top 1000, then it must not be a major architectural achievement? Good to know.

replied to KangDangaLang
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yeah actually your right.

replied to PaulBuffalo
Score: -3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So Steel, why don't you take a job in Buffalo to save out amazing architectural achievements? Why not put your money where your mouth is?

replied to STEEL
Score: -4 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

...........because none of them have money. All they have is BuffaloRising.com and a book on lawsuits. It would be totally different if they actually had financial backers and were putting their skills to work and not just sitting there bashing anything they dont like. If your not part of the solution you are part of the problem, and unfortunately the vast majority of preservationists are part of the problem and not the solution. Im still waiting to hear a financially suitable project for those old crusty grain silos.

replied to pampiniform
Score: -4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

While you mindlessly spew your ignorance, could you at least brush up on the difference between your and you're. Thanks, genius.

replied to KangDangaLang
Score: 5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Sorry didnt know I was writing a senior thesis. When I care enough to proofread what I write ill let you know.

replied to Eliot Spitzer
Score: -4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

When you make that mistake - and the others you make - as often as you make them, it's a sign of someone who can't think straight. Or someone who is a moron. Don't pawn it as 'oh i just don't care enough to proofread' when you comment on here non-stop.

Also, wtf is a senior thesis? Is that some prerequisite to the GED?

replied to KangDangaLang
Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

@Pampiniform:Unfortunately for your argument im sure steel does more for saving our architecture from Chicago than you do from Buffalo...

Score: 4 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So what is he doing from Chicago other than writing articles on BRO? At least I live here and pay taxes and patronize local businesses. What is he doing that helps Buffalo more than that?

replied to jim1234664
Score: -5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

.........We're waiting STEEL...or STEELE as TRAVELRRR called you.

replied to pampiniform
Score: -6 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Oh, you live here and don't break the law and risk jail by evading taxes? Wow, you are genuine local hero.

replied to pampiniform
Score: 4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

And the point you're making with that sarcastic response is?

replied to Eliot Spitzer
Score: -5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That in your attempt to belittle someone else's contributions you made a moronic claim that you should be applauded for involuntarily paying taxes. That's some kind of stupid.

Score: 5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Ok, then enlighten me, what contributions of his am I belittling (Speaking of belittling, I guess we should just overlook that "moronic" comment you just made there). How about you answer my question then? What is Steel doing to save our architecture other than posting on here? Do you not think paying taxes and supporting local businesses is more important for Buffalo than more talk?

replied to Eliot Spitzer
Score: -3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I don't know wtf Steel does or doesn't do. From what I know from this website, he writes articles and books and talks to a number of local activists about Buffalo development issues. Is that worth a lot? I have no idea. On the other hand, you've listed your resume as a) living here b) involuntarily paying taxes like everyone else not in jail and c) patronizing local businesses (which is really just living here restated). Is that worth more than Steel's writings? I have no goddamn idea but I do know it's a stupid effing question and one that you brought up.

So either agree or disagree with what the guy writes but please don't raise the ridiculously tired nonsense of 'oh steel why don't you move back here if you're so awesome and our buildings are so awesome wah wah wah.' Really, it's so tired and dumb. Spare us all.

Score: 4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment