City February 14, 2011 9:55 AM

Repat seeks guidance, ideas and lessons learned on West Side for low carbon footprint home

Repat seeks guidance, ideas and lessons learned on West Side for low carbon footprint home
I'm Michael Weekes, Buffalo Rising Online contributor, and I want to build an exciting new home on the West Side, turning a vacant lot or two into a metaphor for a new sustainable life in Buffalo.
 
After researching designs from companies including Flatpak, EcoSteel, Kieren Timberlake, PowerHouse, Blu Homes, Bluesky homes, Method Homes and Kaufmann, it's time to find a site and work on the approval to execute a home that's good for the earth as well as the soul.
 
If you know of local individuals, organizations or agencies to help take this idea and make it a reality (for an individual) contact the author via Buffalo Rising.
 
All it takes is the courage to start - let's keep the momentum of Mass Ave Project, Five Points Bakery and others going... and continue to push sustainability toward a tipping point in Buffalo.
 
Let's give others reasons to come to WNY to learn how to make green living a reality - another center of excellence and opportunity for ye 'ol rustbelt... eh?
 
Open issues include: who is capable of building competitive green in WNY? What tax incentives or grants are available on the local, State or Fed level? Where is there land and who owns it/sells it? Who is passionate and visionary about green in Buffalo? What is a reasonable time line... is anyone else in the process of researching/building?
 
I choose to make my home in Buffalo.  How can Buffalo make it easier for me to do that seeing that there are few local green examples to learn from? What are the challenges that may lay ahead? Ultimately I would like to help lead the way for others to follow suit.
 
How can I align with the people and groups in Buffalo that may be able to smooth out the process so that I am not starting at ground zero? So others can take similar inventive designs and assemble them right here?
 
I am willing to break ground in May! If you can offer any guidance regarding locations, designs, insight, building codes, green suggestions, etc., please contact me.
 
View image

Comments

Leave a comment

Such a wonderful initiative. I really hope this comes together for you, it would be very exciting to see. Are you strictly looking at brown fields to build on or are you open to purchasing an unsalvageable/boarded up house for demolition, and then rebuild? (And don't attack me about tearing down! I'm talking about those houses on grant st. that are nothing architecturally special and barely standing anymore, not getting rid of beautiful old brick, etc, that has just fallen on hard times since its in typically undesirable neighborhood)

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

May I make a suggestion? A specialized builder would be nice, however, a good set of plans is better. There are currently available many places that have off the shelf plans that could be easily modified to blend in w/ Buffalo's neighborhoods.

Check out places like:
http://www.katrinacottages.com/plans/index.html

Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

While I think it's an admirable idea, BuffaloBeaux is on the right track, if you ask me.

I really think the most appropriate way to undertake a project like this in Buffalo is by renovating an existing home. There are already tons of vacant homes in the city, and it would be great to keep another out of the landfill. On top of that, I think showing people what can be done with the home they already have would resonate with more Buffalo residents.

For more info on this, you could try contacting PUSH (People United for Sustainable Housing). They do great things around the city. I toured their old renovated NetZero home a few months back and it was very impressive- solar hot water system, solar panel roof, geothermal, reflective roof, examploes of what can be done in updating insulation, etc..

For more information check out pushbuffalo.org (I am not personally affiliated with PUSH)

Score: 4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

agreed. If you REALLY want to be green, renovate a house-it requires less new material and preserves something from going to the landfill. Good catch Beaux.

replied to rpm40
Score: 0 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

1 nice infill project may inspire someone to take on a nearby rehab. both approaches seem to be needed.

replied to Travelrrr
Score: 10 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Agreed.

replied to sin|ill
Score: 7 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There is always the East Side, which has plenty of new space for interesting pre-fabs.

www.fabprefab.com is a great site/source on models that are currently available in the US (not every one is appropriate for a Northeast winter, however).

Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Some friends of mine are doing that here in Atlanta. Check it out on Facebook, it has it's own page. "Midtown Green House". May give you idea's and help. Good Luck...exciting project!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

All of the homes in the pictures above look like major contributor's to sprawl. They are not green they are greenfield killing spralwungalow's

Score: -10 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Michael, it looks as if you picked the wrong forum to advertise your plans. This blog is filled to the brim with immovable "save everything" types, so any ideas you have about building something new will quickly be shot down.

I think it's a great idea, and as a West Side resident and property investor, I think it would add something distinctive to any of the blighted blocks we're trying to rehab. Don't let anybody tell you that renovation is your only choice. Building a new structure does not mean you're contributing to sprawl, especially if it's on the WEST SIDE OF BUFFALO. Sally, you're a fu-king moron and have no idea what you're talking about.

Ignore all these folks, or this entire process will become depressing for you. You have a great idea...go with it!

Score: 5 ( 17 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Ha, you don't know Sally do you? Infill construction is great, utilizing green construction techniques is even better if you can afford the upfront costs.

replied to godismakebelieve
Score: 11 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That is pretty much a false statement - But carry on.

replied to godismakebelieve
Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Oh, except for the Sally part of course.

replied to STEEL
Score: 7 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree. There was actually no negativity on here until that comment.

The point is that if Mike is going for green, renovating a home would be the best idea. However, as Steel says, both options help the area.

replied to STEEL
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The author wrote "I want to build an exciting new home on the West Side" Your first comment seems to dissuade from building new and your second comment suggests a different neighborhood. How is that helpful?

replied to Travelrrr
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm an aspiring repat and this is exactly the kind of thing that thrills me and reaffirms I'm making the right decision by moving back to Buffalo.

Score: 5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I haven't seen it mentioned yet so here's a link to the Push NetZero House.

http://www.pushbuffalo.org/index.html?id=20100604115129

Definitely something you'd want to research if you haven't already.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

oops i see rpm40 mentioned it.

Worth repeating i guess :)

replied to JM
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I too am curious as to how receptive the city would be to building one these homes on the West Side (or anywhere for that matter). Eventually I would like to sell my house and possibly build a new home on an empty lot. I feel that's the only way I can afford all the amenities I want while living in the city.

I think I would either like to build something similar to the photos above or build a replica of a 1880's style home using all period style exterior finishes but have really modern energy efficient interior finishes. I'm not talking fake brick and generic watered down windows, doors, siding, etc, but modern made materials that look and feel identical to period materials.

I really think it will not be much more expensive to use those materials rather than vinyl siding & brick veneer. I want to prove that is can be affordable to build a home like that in the city using the right design so that future infill can follow suit.

Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I would discourage you from doing a replica old house. If you are going to build new then build contemporary. There are enough old houses waiting to be renovated. We don't need new replicas and:

"but modern made materials that look and feel identical to period materials." these don't really exist in great quantity if at all and are usually as expensive as the real thing.

Build contemporary and give the city its next great thing. Build with urbanism in mind and build with sustainability in mind and you can't go wrong. Also don't fool yourself. If you think you can't afford what you want in a renovation then I don't think you will do any better in a new build. Not at the same standard - that is for sure.

replied to brownteeth
Score: 5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What's a good example of a contemporary house style (other than the "cartoon historic" vinyl Victorian or McMansion styles)? It doesn't seem to me that modern architecture has ever really been embraced for single-family housing.

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

at least in price points available to most Buffalonians

replied to JSmith
Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Contemporary is whatever is happening now. This includes vinyl Victorians, log homes, pre-fab geodesic domes, creatively reused industrial/church buildings and New Urbanist historical houses. Whatever Michael Weekes builds will be contemporary because we cannot help but be contemporary.

replied to JSmith
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

True, but the photos that accompany the article seem to offer a refreshing indication of the direction that the author would like to go. I hope that's the case because vinyl Victorians belong on a scrap pile.

It's sad that so many in western New York frown upon modern design -- or equate it with the banality of something Carl Paladino would build -- because it doesn't blend into the existing streetscape. Frank Lloyd Wright's Darwin Martin House is radically different than its neighbors but the great design compliments the surroundings and enriches the visual experience.

replied to davvid
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I couldn't agree more with you.

Michael Weekes is an inspired person who seems uninterested in mediocrity. I wish more people had that spirit.

What's so great about contemporary culture is its ability to adsorb diversity and reconcile incongruity. I really see no reason why well preserved older houses can't exist beside new builds that fully embrace the possibilities of today.

Also, Mr. Weekes wants his home to be in part a statement about sustainable living. The "differentness" of the design is part of what will make that statement register with the public. An astute choice in architect will also, among other things, help his house get noticed outside of WNY. Personally, I hope that this house further demonstrates that neighborhoods like the West Side are uniquely prepared to meet the needs of contemporary urban dwellers.

replied to PaulBuffalo
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

ok!

replied to davvid
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There is a great new one on Bird. They are very rare in Buffalo mostly because very very very very few single family or even multifamily houses are ever built in Buffalo. Also there is an extremely conservative mind set among many in Buffalo especially residential developers with a knee jerk idea that you have to "blend" in without understanding exactly what that means.

http://www.buffalorising.com/2009/04/whoa-a-plastic-house-i-like.html

replied to JSmith
Score: 4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There are many products out there that give the look and feel of period materials. It sounds like you are basing your comment off of what you see at Home Depot.
As far as cost you are correct, brownteeth would spend an absolute fortune using these materials.

replied to STEEL
Score: -2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So, when something "suburban" is being built in the city we say that the urban fabric must be preserved at all costs because it just doesn't fit quite right. When something "modern" is built the urban fabric doesn't seem to matter that much. I guess I should go to UB for urban planning, then move to Chicago/San Franisco/NYC and subscribe to every architecture magazine I can find on the internet because I just don't get it what the difference is.

replied to STEEL
Score: -4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I am not sure what you are talking about. Good architecture has more to do with how a building relates to its neighbors than how it looks. Of course we want high quality materials and unfortunately our standards for quality in building in our society have fallen very low these days. Unfortjunately for the suburbs ( where most of the buildig has been done over tha last few decades) this means they are stuck with a lot of crappy buildings. We should fight crappy cheap buildings whereever they are proposed. But we should especially fight crappy cheap buildings in teh city where they threatend to replace a very high quality historic buildings. Replacing historic buildings with higher quality modern buildings is not the problem. Replacing high quality historic buildings with dreck is the problem. On top of that using suburban style site planning standards where the only criteria is how to store cars and drain water adds insult to injury. It is not that msyterious at all. There is no reason for us to continue degrading our urban and natural environments with crappy buildings. We need to raise our standards and stop letting crappy car oriented buildings of temproary cheap materials be foisted on us as it it is the only way to do things.

replied to Eisenbart
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Steel, did you have few when you wrote that?

replied to STEEL
Score: -2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I appreciate the feed back. To clarify, I’m not talking about trying to build some 4000 sq. ft. McMansion like the ones on Nottingham Terrace. I would like to build something no larger than 1200-1500 sq ft. If I build it small that would allow me to use higher end finish materials since there won’t be much quantities needed. I would like to build a 1 ½ story shotgun / cottage style home like the ones on little Summer street. I would like to also have a garage in back with a courtyard. I would use hardi-plank siding and real arched wood windows since I won’t need many.

The reason I would rather build new vs. rehab is that it would allow me to design the interior more efficiently using better materials for structure, heat, electrical, plumbing etc. After doing a couple rehabs I am tired of trying to fix crooked floors and walls and being limited in layout. I feel in most cases you are too limited when it comes to an existing structure. I want carte blanche with layout and design but I don’t want it to look out of place or fake on the exterior. Frankly I prefer older style architecture.

Ideally, I would like to build on an empty lot on the West side. I feel I could easily build a house like this for around $100k (plus property) if I only sub out the foundations, electrical, plumbing, HVAC, exterior wall framing, and drywall finishing. I could do everything else myself saving thousands. This is all a moot point because it’s just an idea at this point. I’m sure there are plenty of flaws in my plan but it’s a starting point and probably just a pipe dream :)

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I hope you can pull it off.

replied to brownteeth
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Me too, I'm probably just talking out of my a$$ but hopefully it is doable.

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Well, you did miracles with your current house and your equity should give you a boost. Find a lot where a single infill will make a big difference and where your smallish house proposal won't look out of place. Take not though. The foundations are often not removed from tear downs and often then just dump a lot of the debris into the basement hole and cover it with dirt.

replied to brownteeth
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Brownteeth I'm with you... I would like to build a small traditional style house in the city also. So many of those modern designs look out date within a few years and I like the way classic styles fit in with the neighborhood better. You might have a hard time finding a lot wide enough for a garage and driveway, but that would be my first choice also. I am also tired of working on my old house for the same reasons as you, the layout is limited and its too much work trying to make walls and floors look level. I just spent the past week trying to flatten out my kitchen floor just so I could lay a new one. I think your idea is very doable with higher end materials, especially on a small scale. Too bad we couldn't build next to each other and create a new neighborhood.

replied to brownteeth
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Are you high? Not much more than vinyl siding. If you went with something like Hardiebacker siding over vinyl siding (it looks so much better than vinyl dont get me wrong) you would spend 2 to 2 1/2 times more at least.
Most brick is "veneer", unless it is load bearing and a true brick wall which is multiple courses thick (about 8 to 12 inches thick). After framing a house, if you apply brick to the exterior it is a veneer, doing nothing but looking pretty. Therefore there is nothing wrong with using thin brick like Brick-it. That is a real brick but only 1/2 inch thick. Utilizing this is much easier and costeffective and can more easily be applied to an existing house that didnt have brick because you dont need to expand the foundation to support the wall like you would with full size brick. It is much lighter and can be supported by angle.
As far as windows go, you will be spending a boat load compared to typical vinyl clad windows.
Do a lot of research before attempting a project like this, it can be done but you will be spanding a lot more than your house would ever be worth.

replied to brownteeth
Score: -3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I am well aware of the price differences between vinyl and hardi-plank siding. I’m not planning on building a huge mansion so for the relatively small amount of siding I would need the price difference wouldn’t be astronomical. As for the brick veneer, let me rephrase. I am not opposed to the product but in my admittedly limited research, I haven’t seen a veneer that looks like true aged brick like the brick on my house now. Therefore I would rather use a single course of reclaimed brick that has that look if I were needed brick.

I think building a smaller house will allow me to use higher end materials since I won’t need much of any one thing, even wood windows. Picture a small 1 ½ story cottage style house, there’s not a whole lot of wall square footage to cover and I would probably only need around 12 windows total, only 3 of which would need to be arched. I just really like the idea of building a perfectly square, straight and level home that looks like it could be a restored 100 year old home. I also work in commercial construction and have connections on getting certain work done at a cheaper rate. I also plan on doing the majority of work myself. I’m sure for the average person who needs to hire a contractor for building a house like this, a $100k might not be doable but in my case I think that’s very doable budget.

The real challenge is finding the right lot that’s large enough to accommodate a small driveway without having to use two lots. I would want it to feel like this house was always there. At any rate this is just a primitive idea and I’m nowhere near even starting such a venture. I do have confidence that I could complete this project as I have already done two major rehabs completely on my own that many people either didn’t want to touch or said it couldn’t be done.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Order one of these:

http://www.tumbleweedhouses.com/

Or hire Kevin Connors.

Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If time permits, drive to the eclectic Shelburne Museum in Vermont to tour the 2001 Kalkin House.

http://shelburnemuseum.org/explore/buildings/galleries/kalkin-house/

For those that think this type of structure is cold in the winter months, the docents at the Shelburne will gladly set you straight.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Please don't make a house like that one on bird it is possibly the ugliest building in Buffalo. The examples you have in your starting picture are so much nicer, then the oddly angled square things. But I love old designs and you have to live in it!

Score: -5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

A creative way of building a house could be buy building a newly designed house with old materials. Perhaps green demo a house or take parts from already demoed homes, and use them in your own newly designed home.

Frank Lloyd Wright's house on Jewett doesn't match the other houses there, but it's done tastefully (of course). If it's done tastefully, which I have suspicion you will, it will be a well respected home.

Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

is the author's primary objective a low-carbon footprint or a cool, innovative, etc. space? if it's lcf i doubt any new build, cool or crappy, would match up with renovating an existing building. and if an lcf build is the primary criteria sally's sprawlungalow comment seems accurate enough; particularly in reference to the building in the upper right corner. they may all be aesthetically exciting sprawlungalows but that's a different conversation.

steel- what is your definition of a "crappy building"? if it includes poorly constructed most of frank lloyd wright's buildings would qualify.

Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I want a galvanized (or white enamel) metal roof, just like the NetZero House at 10 Winter Street. Asphalt shingles are trash.

Question about prefabs: Do our codes allow them? I can't recall seeing any prefabs around here. And how many hoops must one leap through, to build on a City-size lot ?

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll