City February 7, 2011 2:30 PM

Bumpy Two Weeks for Peace Bridge Project

Bumpy Two Weeks for Peace Bridge Project

The Peace Bridge expansion controversy refuses to go away.  Several recent events added a few twists to the long-running drama playing out on the west side waterfront.  Tomorrow, the Buffalo Common Council will be considering a resolution urging the Buffalo and Fort Erie Public Bridge Authority (PBA) merge with the Niagara Falls Bridge Commission. 

On January 29, The Buffalo News reported that the federal government will not be contributing to the $300 million Peace Bridge plaza project.  It throws a giant monkey wrench into the PBA's wheels:

The absence of funding for the controversial plaza project will mean yet another delay in the oft-delayed expansion of the Peace Bridge, since the environmental impact statement needed for that project's approval is tied to the plaza's construction.

"Given the size of the project and the expected paucity of federal funds in out years, there are not any immediate plans to move forward with modifications to the bridge or structure" at the Buffalo-Fort Erie border crossing, an official at Customs and Border Protection said in an e-mail to the Bar-Code Border, a Canadian newsletter on trade and transportation.

A spokesman for the border agency, part of the Department of Homeland Security, confirmed that the quotes in the newsletter were accurate.

Funds are so tight, the federal officials said, that the government has no plans to fund any major construction along the border.

 

On Saturday there was hope that the U.S. Customs facilities on the Buffalo side of the bridge could be moved to Ft. Erie, eliminating the need to expand the plaza into the Columbus Park - Prospect Hill neighborhood.  No such luck according to a story the next day that threw doubt on any chance for a "shared border" program that would allow such a move.

ProspectHill.BMPA group of neighborhood residents, led by Kathleen Mecca, President of the Niagara Gateway Columbus Park Association, is asking the Peace Bridge Authority to address the lack of federal funding for their proposed expansion project.  They believe the PBS should "publicly withdraw the current project and let stand the 'No Build' option.  This will allow the community to shift from a 'disinvestment' practice to a 'reinvestment' opportunity."

They further ask that a dialogue between the City Council, Department of Inspections and the PBA commence to repair the blighted homes they own on Busti and other streets using the $25 million earmarked for neighborhood improvements post-expansion, and fix the mess they created on Busti rather than sit on the money.

As Governor Cuomo's Spending and Government Efficiency Commission (SAGE) meets to recommend ways to make government leaner and more cost effective, North District Council Member Joseph Golombek, Jr. and Niagara District Council Member David A. Rivera are seeking a merger of the Peace Bridge Authority and the Niagara Falls Bridge Commission. 

The Resolution cites:

"At times, the authorities that operate our local international bridges have been accused of ignoring or minimizing the effect of their planning and operations on the health, quality of life and property values of local residents, particularly those who live in close proximity to Buffalo's waterfront in areas such as Black Rock and the West Side."

And also:

"Having two separate authorities manage four bridges that are located within a few miles of one other is government inefficiency that should be addressed."

The SAGE commission will be making its recommendations on agency and authority reorganizations by May 1 and will be issuing a final report by June 1.  The City Council meets at 2 PM.

Liz home Garden Walk.jpgEntry Image: Nate Mroz' Buffalo Scenic Prints

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

These bridge authorities should be merged if for no other reason than to do strategic boarder crossing planning rather that competing with each other for business.

Score: 11 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Right - the major problem in this entire thing is that the PBA operates like a private business improving its bottom line, yet they have the autonomy and power of a public authority.

The ability of the PBA to make money is put before the good of the public and that is just plain wrong.

Why has there been no comprehensive study of all our regional border crossings that can define the role that each plays and what the future should hold for each bridge?

replied to STEEL
Score: 14 ( 18 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

which is a perfect illustration of the folly if not danger of "running government like a business."

replied to townline
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Fine with me if they delay this another 10-20 years

Score: 9 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

While the delay would mean the neighborhood as it stands would not be torn down, it does offer the PBA to continue to buy up properties and let them fall into disrepair resulting in the "broken-window" syndrome (See property on Busti) making their proposal potentially more effective in 10-20 years to those not looking closely. They should resolve their issues ASAP and look at some real, feasible solutions to the truck plaza i.e. build a 2nd bridge through Grand Island or something else

replied to The Boss
Score: 5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The primary regional crossing should be at Grand Island with the peace bridge relegated to local bridge status - with a focus of tying together Buffalo and Fort Erie into more of a single, binational metropolitan city.

replied to Mike Puma
Score: 5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

No dont put the bridge in this residential area because of diesel exhaust, put it in that residential area. Thats a great argument. Typical friggin NIMBY's

replied to townline
Score: 0 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The grand island corridor where the bridge would go is hardly populated - its hardly a residential area, its mostly undeveloped. You're talking about less than a dozen houses that would be directly impacted, with only a handful more that would be impacted by the noise and exhaust. Whereas in buffalo you are talking about 1000s that are going to be impacted by the project.

Yes - it would be great if no one is impacted, but the detrimental impact would be WAY less on Grand Island. Take a look at a google map of grand island. But I guess the welfare of 1000s of city residents pales in comparison to a few in Grand island.

Score: 7 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Why should the wefare of Buffalo residents have more importance, one person effected by pollution or their land taken is just as important and has the same rights as a hundred thousand effected

replied to townline
Score: -12 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So you would advocate that destroying an entire neighborhood with thousands of residents and subjecting thousands more in close proximity to the truck plaza to health impacts is equivalent to dislocating only a few households on largely undeveloped land - which would minimize the harmful health impacts of a community because hardly anyone would live even within 1/2 mile to the plaza on grand island?

Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think you will get your wish. This battle will rage forever.

replied to The Boss
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Now would be the perfect time for the Ambassador bridge group to step up and remind everyone of their private bridge proposal. (if they were ever serious about it)

Score: -4 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

No thanks, we held off Ambassadors attempt to turn our neighborhood into a for profit diesel truck plaza. The guys from Ambassador have a reputation for dirty dealing that makes the PBA seem like choir boys. The City of Buffalo waterfront is not the place for a truck plaza, not here in Black Rock or at the present Peace Bridge. Diesel truck plazas provide no benefit to the host community and should be relegated to unpopulated areas. Our waterfront will eventually be totally developed, the potential is limitless. In will take time but hopefully with a healthy mix of residential and small business we will see a continuous belt of attractive developement. Our riverfront is a rare and valuable asset that we can't afford to squander on an ugly and polluting truck depot.

replied to 300miles
Score: 8 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If someone knows how to drain that $25MM out from the PBA, that will save quite a bit of housing on Busti and the Episcipal facility just sitting there.

Hopefully, Higgins will blow the money on strippers as he mourns the loss of the $300MM pork barrel he was going to use to fatten his pockets and all the a%#holes who wanted to bulldoze the Columbus Park area.

Hey Higgins - just because S Bflo is more digusting and backward than Niagara Falls and Akron, Oh combined doesn;t mean you can take it out on the rest of the city!!

Score: -6 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Have you ever driven around Niagara Falls? Obviously you have not

Score: 0 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

yes i have south buffalo is an inbred cess pool

the vacancies in the Falls make is less dirty

Score: -6 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

And where do you live?

Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm impressed that everyone on here, myself included, agree on something for once.

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

We've only seen this article like 30 times before.

replied to pampiniform
Score: 0 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think most that comment here have a common interest in seeing the City of Buffalo prosper and succeed. We all have different ideas as to how that should happen but sometimes there are issues like this that are widely recognized as detrimental and counterproductive to the effort.

replied to pampiniform
Score: 5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yeah it's nice to see that for once.

Give it time though and you will see some bickering. Not that there is anything wrong with a healthy discussion, but it is nice to see people with differing views on other issues coming together to reject this one.

replied to pampiniform
Score: 4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So whats up with Higgins ... I remember when he first really burst on the scene with the whole "dismantle the skyway" thing and how it was large, obtrusive, and destroyed the view of the water. He dropped that platform kinda quick and now he's support a project like this?? What a smuck

Man o man.. talk about the next skyway. Imagine what our kids would think it 40 yrs. (probably the same thing we think when we see old pics. of downtown now)

Kill this project, its a joke if they were funded and could have done it; then they would have years ago. Its a joke around the country and its a joke here.

Move the trucks to a new bridge somewhere else and increase the buffer between the bridge and the neighborhood now. Stop holding the west side hostage.. seriously.

Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll