City January 14, 2011 10:38 AM

102 Johnson Park New Beginnings?

102 Johnson Park New Beginnings?
By Mark Williams:

As we begin a New Year filled with the usual promises of weight-loss, exercise routines, new careers or whatever goals we all set for ourselves; it is prudent that we remain focused on old, unfinished business as well.

If not already obvious from the attached photograph, I am referring to 102 Johnson Park.

Unfortunately, and much to my own dismay, the very mention of this property seems to provoke a form of electronic Treats' Syndrome and if we possessed audible links to our readers there would be a cacophony of shrieks-of-anguish, gnashing-of-teeth and frenzied double-clicking on to the next, less tiresome, editorial.

Yes, I am beating the proverbial dead horse to death. However, perhaps if someone had played the role of the protagonist over White's Livery Stable we would not be looking at a pile of rubble and listening to promises of a rebuilt facsimile of a building that is more than fifty-percent demolished due to greed and deferred maintenance.

I know there are many other examples throughout the City of Buffalo and the list is endless. I happened to mention on an Artvoice blog two-years ago that the bell tower of St Mary's on the Hill appeared precarious at best and could remain standing for another decade or collapse within a few days. Ironically, the bell tower collapsed a week later.

94 Northampton is a classic example of a Victorian Stick where David Torke of Fix Buffalo was able to secure vintage photographs of the house taken in 1906 and the building was truly exquisite. Unfortunately, the building is dangerously close to imploding into its own first floor and should be turned over to Michael Gainer of Buffalo Reuse for deconstruction before it is too late to reclaim any of the architectural salvage that may be worth saving.

16 Harwood Place, which is known as Lyth Cottage, in reference to the clay tile manufacturing company that once occupied the site and supplied the material for building this unique home is yet another example. This petite building has been granted a slight reprieve as a previous attempt to renovate entailed basic roof repairs. Unfortunately, for reasons that I do not know, the project was never completed.

Harwood Place is a dead-end street that runs perpendicular to Jefferson Avenue and there are three other homes directly across the street from Lyth Cottage. One is a classic mission-style bungalow that was probably purchased from the Sears & Roebuck Company back at the turn of the last century.

I did have the opportunity to present this building to Habitat for Humanity as a potential candidate for rehabilitation but the organization was deterred by the Masten Districts  building codes requiring exterior renovations to be architecturally correct to the original specifications.

However, it is Johnson Park that remains one of the most intact 19th Century neighborhoods within the City of Buffalo and the loss of even one such building as 102 Johnson Park would tear a hole into the fabric of this neighborhood unlike any other.

It is paradoxical that a city, which requires a permit to install a new hot water tank, cannot enforce basic housing code violations.

This lack of logic screams our beginning editorial cliché: "What is wrong with this picture?"


super-new-Johnson.jpg

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

No matter the number of posts, the issue is, and will remain, return on investment. It doesn't help when you point to the Livery Building, and claim it's disrepair was somehow caused by 'greed'.

When an investor buys a building that he can't get his money out of, it's not greed, it's what most of us refer to as a mistake.

I'm not issuing the standard 'if you like the building you buy it' line, but a slight variation. If you like the building so much, tell us the price, estimated rehab cost, and projected cash flow of future rents. Until then, to use your phrase, the horse is dead. Make those numbers work, and your horse, not through miracle, but the market at work, will come back to life.

Score: 3 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If its not greed, then its ignorance. But a "mistake" is too simple a word to use for this situation. It implies that he has put forth some kind of effort to remedy the situation, and that his efforts were futile. Mr Dobucki has a known record of letting his properties rot and fall into disrepair.. talk to some of the long-time residents of Cottage St and they can fill you in. The city should remove this property from his posession, and sell it for its assessed value (not the inflated price he seems to think is appropriate) to someone with the means to rehab it in a way that respects the house and its neighborhood. Charles Dobucki is a disgrace.

replied to benfranklin
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Mr. Williams, you ARE beating a dead horse.

If I were the owner of the property on Johnson Park, I would have sued you for harassment long ago.

You have written a multitude of articles on how these property owners are nothing but greedy scumbags who care nothing for Buffalo and whose sole purpose in life is to make all of the neighborhood residents miserable. We get it. Now stop.

Like Ben Franklin said, spend your energy writing a detailed plan on how to SOLVE the problem, instead of publicly humiliating individuals who you have probably never met or spoken to. There is always more than one side to any story...

Score: -1 ( 19 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

agreed. unless you have a solution, enough is enough of these articles. yes it is a terrible shame, and nobody likes to see beautiful old buildings go to waste, and i'm sur if everyone reading BRO had deep pockets, we'd all buy 5 each and that would be that, but clearly your spitting out the same issue again and again on this blog have not accomplished whatever you hoped them to, otherwise we wouldn't be reading about your plight with 102 Johnson Park for the umpteenth time. Please redirect your energy into something a bit more productive, or as godismakebelieve brings up you may end up in over your head with slander issues.

replied to godismakebelieve
Score: -1 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I would have thought, if there was any ONE residential building that the resident’s of Buffalo would have rallied behind, it would have been 102 Johnson Park – Apparently, from the multitude of negative responses, I am wrong.

Trust me when I say and with all due respect, to the relatively few individuals who applaud this effort, this is the final editorial from me.

Incidentally, I have never referred to the owner as a “scumbag” but many of the bloggers have so please check your own journalism research.

replied to godismakebelieve
Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

16 Harwood could serve a great purpose as infill in other parts of the city. Who wants to help move it?

Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

How much would that cost?

replied to Fortunate4now
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

How much would that cost?

replied to Fortunate4now
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

after the extensive public & private investment that has benefited jefferson avenue in recent years, it is an act of very bad faith to treat it like a corpse from which we should harvest the organs.

replied to Fortunate4now
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

16 Harwood could serve a great purpose as infill in other parts of the city. Who wants to help move it?

Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Back when I did the Vacant housing maps, I recall Harwood to be a very lonely road. I think there were only 3 houses on the street. It has good proximity to Main Street, but clearly other constraints will prevent this structure from being saved.

Perhaps making it a park and using the house as a little rentable place for gatherings.

Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Keep beating the horse. The beauty of a format like BRO is that we don't have to give up on a story as fast as traditional media.

Score: 4 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Keep beating the horse. The beauty of a format like BRO is that we don't have to give up on a story as fast as traditional media.

Score: 3 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Look, I live in the city (west side) and I'm also a property owner. I know as well as anybody how much of a negative impact even one abandoned home can have on an entire block and, by association, an entire group of neighbors.

I'm just trying to point out that there are thousands of properties that fit this description in the city of Buffalo, and Mr. Williams has written multiple articles focusing on this one house. Multiple articles that reach thousands of people every single day. If the owner of 102 Johnson Park is indeed as Mr, Williams paints him -- ignorant, incompetent, stubborn, greedy, etc -- then he deserves to answer for it. But there are thousands of owners in this city who are as bad if not worse, and singling out this one property in such a vocal and widely publicized forum (FOUR separate times) smacks of a personal grudge, and immediately creates suspicion as to the writer's motives.

I want these matters tended to as well, and I'm doing my part to help the city out, by living here and being a responsible owner. However, as an objective bystander, who has had some experience being on both sides of this argument, it's starting to sound like a witch hunt.

Basta!

Score: 4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Look, I live in the city (west side) and I'm also a property owner. I know as well as anybody how much of a negative impact even one abandoned home can have on an entire block and, by association, an entire group of neighbors.

I'm just trying to point out that there are thousands of properties that fit this description in the city of Buffalo, and Mr. Williams has written multiple articles focusing on this one house. Multiple articles that reach thousands of people every single day. If the owner of 102 Johnson Park is indeed as Mr, Williams paints him -- ignorant, incompetent, stubborn, greedy, etc -- then he deserves to answer for it. But there are thousands of owners in this city who are as bad if not worse, and singling out this one property in such a vocal and widely publicized forum (FOUR separate times) smacks of a personal grudge, and immediately creates suspicion as to the writer's motives.

I want these matters tended to as well, and I'm doing my part to help the city out, by living here and being a responsible owner. However, as an objective bystander, who has had some experience being on both sides of this argument, it's starting to sound like a witch hunt.

Basta!

Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

whats with all the double posts? PC users I'm sure.

Mr Williams- I don't care if you do have a personal grudge against this guy. In my opinion, that would probably mean you know more about him than the rest of us. In fact, after reading your first piece on this guy, everyone should have a personal grudge against him. This is a one-of-a-kind neighborhood and you are doing your part to draw as much attention to it as possible. Don't listen to the haters on this site. They are ignorant. If you want to call him out every day, by all means go for it. In fact, you should start a series on people like him, and call out a different property owner every day, or every week. I bet the response would be huge. As much as these people complain about your articles, they seem to generate quite a number of comments (unlike those 'fashion maniac' pieces- can BRO please ditch those finally?)

Keep on him Mr Williams!

Score: 2 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

yes, please lose the 'fashion maniac' pieces!

Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Seems that if people don't like the topic, then just feel free not to read the story. As for me, I'm for beating the dead horse.

Score: 4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree-keep the columns coming...on this house, and those of other negligent owners. And, if there IS a lawsuit, it should be against the property owner, whose actions negatively impact the property values of all the neighbors'. Remember: we live in a community where one's actions (or inactions in this case) have an impact on others.

Score: 5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

FYI

102 just showed up on Trulia- http://www.trulia.com/property/1040431776-102-Johnson-Park-Buffalo-NY-14201

275k

No pictures of the interior, showings begin on "Mat 1" according to the listing. Channeling my inner Lenny Brisco I've deduced that they meant to say May 1st.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment