City December 19, 2010 10:57 AM

Frack Action Buffalo Update

Frack Action Buffalo Update
By Maximilian C Quinn-Loeb:

Since I last wrote about Frack Action Buffalo a number of important things have taken place.  In that time the signatures that were collected sent the strong message to the Buffalo City Council that the people of Buffalo want a strong resolution to ban natural gas drilling the the City of Buffalo.  They do not want it watered down and the core meaning altered.  The ordinance has passed a critical vote in being moved to the City of Buffalo Law Department before going back to the City Council for a final vote.   We have stepped up efforts at organizing and raising awareness in areas south of Buffalo where drilling would be and is most prevalent.  Two protests have taken place garnering media and public attention to hydraulic fracturing and the City of Pittsburgh has approved a ban on natural gas drilling.  I also want to thank those that have commented, re-posted, and tweeted my previous piece.

Critics say a ban on natural gas drilling in the City of Buffalo is not necessary due to a lack of expectations from the Marcellus Shale formation beneath Buffalo. Despite this we at Frack Action Buffalo still find it very necessary.  The natural gas drilling industry claims drilling and exploration using the high volume hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling method was not economical until wholesale natural gas prices spiked in 2005 following Hurricane Katrina and Rita and the run up in commodity prices in 2008.  However, wholesale natural gas prices right now are at historic lows.  They have plummeted since 2008 and only now are drilling companies even considering limiting output.  It is possible at some point the drilling industry can create the argument that drilling in the City of Buffalo will make economic sense which would seriously threaten the health and way of life of our fair city.  There is also another large shale formation beneath the Marcellus Shale called the Utica Shale formation.

Buffalo also has a well documented history of making, for whatever reason, poor decisions.  While drilling may provide a tempting quick source of revenue for Buffalo, the health problems and long term harm to the land after a well is dry far outweigh any perceived benefits.  Three years ago the City of Dallas found itself in a somewhat similar situation (see here).  They faced a budget shortfall, to make it up they leased mineral rights to drilling companies.  This faced little discussion and was easily passed.  The leasing of mineral rights by the City of Dallas is expiring in 2011 and this time there is greater public awareness and discourse around the issue.  A zoning request by drilling company XTO has been put on hold to allow for environmental concerns to be raised.  As well as a number of other local concerns.  

Just because Dallas and Fort Worth were on the forefront of hydraulic fracturing does not mean they are a model to follow or were completely correct.  This is an opportunity for the people of Buffalo to ensure their local representatives are held accountable, not to corporate interests or misguided logic, but the residents of Buffalo.  It is imperative to inundate your city council and mayor's office to make your message heard.  And while I don't expect everyone to agree with this perspective I believe there are other facets of this issue one can agree with, such as the importance of being engaged in one's community, exercising your democratic rights, evening the playing field with corporations, and promoting public health and well being.  Feel free to disagree, challenge these opinions and viewpoints.  Frack Action meets every 2nd and 4th Sunday at noon at the Lafayette Presbyterian Church (875 Elmwood Ave, Buffalo, NY).  Check out FrackAction.com (be sure to sign the petition on the site) and our Facebook page.

Image: oecotextiles (Gasland, The Movie) "Director Josh Fox films Markham as he runs his kitchen faucet, holding a cigarette lighter up to the running water. After a few seconds, a ball of fire erupts out of the sink, almost enveloping Markham's head."
View image

Comments

Leave a comment

Dumbest thing ever.

Score: 4 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I was going to comment on this but you've pretty much nailed it already.

replied to RobH
Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Has anyone actually researched the city code to see if gas and mineral extraction is an aceeptable land use anywhere in the city? Or is this another knee jerk reaction to an environmental issue that has no impact on the city?

Or better yet, has another in a long line of single-cause, monlithically named, obstructionist organizations that will disappear (in this case Frack Action Buffalo) taken the time to reseach the issue? Did anyone show up at recent meetings for the Green Code to voice their opposition and suggest that mineral and gas extraction be uses not compatible within the new city code?

The fact that you would consider fracking as a legitimate operation that city would accept shows you're lack of common sense. I'll be the first to say the city has a history of poor decision making (most recently the tabling of a request to demo some crumbling grain silos that the city placed no value on but now that someone wants to demo, suddenly, through public pressure they care), but this one is flat out laughable.

The problems Buffalo has, be it the politicians of the continually stream of newly created, one-issue obstructions groups is that everyone is REACTIVE, not proactive. People only rear their stupidity when they disagree with one issue, it makes you look regressive and foolish and frankly, you lack credibility and appear self-serving. Keep acting like this and the city will continue to die. You have to get out in front of issues, not merely react to them.

Nice story in the Buffalo News today about BERC. Between that leadership and political system and the reactionary electorate, nothing will change in the city and the suburbs will always be more populous, safe, less corrupt, efficient, and democratic.

Score: 6 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You claim "the suburbs will always be more populous, safe, less corrupt, efficent, and democratic". Nothing to do with this article and not even correct. Buffalo is still more populous than any of the suburbs, many neighborhoods are as safe, corruption does not stop at the city line, efficient? where is your proof?, democratic? that's just silly.

Buffalo has many problems, most if not all are directly related to our concentration of poverty. That did not just happen by accident but was the result of the collaboration of suburban governments to contain that poverty within the city. It is easy to pick on Buffalo, much harder to accept responsibilty for our own part in allowing this region to develop into such separate and unequal communities.

replied to buffalofalling
Score: 4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

OMG! All those backyard wells in the city of Buffalo will be in danger of contamination.

Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is and example of politicians reacting on emotion and opinion with out actually looking at the science. If people actually did some research and sought guidence from geologists they would learn that there cannont be any Marcellus production in the city of Buffalo because the Marcellus is not present in the subsurface underneath the city. It is in outcrop at the surface in the Town of Hamburg along the lake shore.

Score: 4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Jimi hit the nail on the head, and to add to it...you have to go as far east as Steuben County before the Marcellus gets deep enough to where the pressure is great enough to be productive and thick enough to be horizontally drilled. This whole article is preposterous!

Want to know another shocker? Canada drills beneath Lake Erie.
http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/en/Business/OGSR/2ColumnSubPage/STEL02_167105.html

Wells that are drilled and hydrofracked using every chemical you've been told would devastate a water body, are safely used to unlock oil and gas beneath Lake Erie, right up to out border! And at much shallower depths. Try to see through the emotion and false hysteria.

replied to Jimi
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"It is possible at some point the drilling industry can create the argument that drilling in the City of Buffalo will make economic sense which would seriously threaten the health and way of life of our fair city."

Umm, no. It's pretty clear that you know little to nothing about Fracking. No one is going to drill in Buffalo, not now, not ever. The chance that any company could assemble enough contiguous mineral rights to make drilling possible is close to zero. Even if they could, the cost of doing so would make the project uneconomical at any price. There are MILLIONS of square miles of Marcellus shale that is not densely habitated. It's much easier and cheaper to drill elsewhere.

Secondly, contrary to what the media would have you believe, when done properly Fracking is very safe. Many of those who claim their ground water was contaminated by the process had contaminated groundwater before Fracking. There are THOUSANDS of abandoned Devonian gas wells drilled over the past one hundred years that have been abandoned and seeping gas for years. The residents just see giant dollar signs attached the large companies that are now producing in the region. Many if not most of these lawsuits are completely frivolous. No better than the crap Cellino & Barnes tries to pull.

Finally, totally bio-degradable Fracking solutions have been developed and will come into widespread if not exclusive use over the next few years. Yes, you will have to move on to the next "fad" thing to be against.

It is estimated that a minimum of $4 trillion dollars of gas will be recovered from Marcellus. As you point out, the Utica shale may contain significantly more gas. Who is violating the public safety more: Frack Action Buffalo, or those that seek to recover a valuable resource. I would argue Frack Action Buffalo. By stifling economic development you are condemning thousands of Buffalonians to continued poverty. I hope you think about that during this holiday season.

Score: 5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"It is possible at some point the drilling industry can create the argument that drilling in the City of Buffalo will make economic sense which would seriously threaten the health and way of life of our fair city."

Umm, no. It's pretty clear that you know little to nothing about Fracking. No one is going to drill in Buffalo, not now, not ever. The chance that any company could assemble enough contiguous mineral rights to make drilling possible is close to zero. Even if they could, the cost of doing so would make the project uneconomical at any price. There are MILLIONS of square miles of Marcellus shale that is not densely habitated. It's much easier and cheaper to drill elsewhere.

Secondly, contrary to what the media would have you believe, when done properly Fracking is very safe. Many of those who claim their ground water was contaminated by the process had contaminated groundwater before Fracking. There are THOUSANDS of abandoned Devonian gas wells drilled over the past one hundred years that have been abandoned and seeping gas for years. The residents just see giant dollar signs attached the large companies that are now producing in the region. Many if not most of these lawsuits are completely frivolous. No better than the crap Cellino & Barnes tries to pull.

Finally, totally bio-degradable Fracking solutions have been developed and will come into widespread if not exclusive use over the next few years. Yes, you will have to move on to the next "fad" thing to be against.

It is estimated that a minimum of $4 trillion dollars of gas will be recovered from Marcellus. As you point out, the Utica shale may contain significantly more gas. Who is violating the public safety more: Frack Action Buffalo, or those that seek to recover a valuable resource. I would argue Frack Action Buffalo. By stifling economic development you are condemning thousands of Buffalonians to continued poverty. I hope you think about that during this holiday season.

Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Not that I want to discount other attempts to get studies completed, but Obama has recently voiced his support for a study on the effects of gas drilling specifically in NY. I saw this in the NY Times article last week: http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2010/12/14/14greenwire-obama-admin-wants-study-but-backs-northeast-sh-25319.html

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

kevin c.- from http://hubpages.com/hub/How-Big-Is-The-Marcellus-Shale-and-Can-It-Help-Our-Crisis:

"The size of the Marcellus shale, in terms of the portion from which natural gas can be recovered, is approximately 95,000 square miles." If you're not going to take the time to check your facts people are going to dismiss your arguments and assertions.

- "when done properly fracking is very safe"....If fracking is very safe why did the gas industry spend time and money lobbying for, and getting, an exemption from the Safe Drinking Water Act ( granted in 2005, before this issue got "hot")? Why do they refuse to reveal the chemical make-up of their proprietary fracking fluids so that independent labs can conduct scientifically legitimate tests verifying their potential benignity/toxicity? Why should we trust the gas industry to do things properly when they haven't done so in the past? Why have "totally biodegradable solutions" even been developed when the solutions currently being poured into the ground are so very safe?

Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Looks like the hyperlink reference has been deleted.

replied to jhorn
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thanks for the comments, I can address a couple here and now, some I will refer to in an upcoming piece.

buffalofalling: Thank you for bringing to my attention the Buffalo GreenCode initiative, I honestly have not heard about it until your metion of it, this something I intend to follow very closely
http://www.buffalogreencode.com/

kevin.christner: I don't claim to be an expert or omniscient on hydraulic fracturing. I'm attempting to create a dialog and conversation on this, if my facts are mistaken people with more knowledge and understanding can correct them. I agree with you that drilling in the City of Buffalo is not likely. Our divergence is on the opinion of the necessity of enacting legislation to prevent drilling activities in the City of Buffalo. If I understand your perspective correctly you feel that small chance does not warrant legislation. Frack Action Buffalo and I do not want to take the chance however small. I have met people from the Southern Tier that are facing the negative effects of drilling, both vertical and horizontal, and find that compelling enough right now to prevent drilling activities in Buffalo.
I feel I need to better understand your perspective, if you believe drilling companies will not explore opportunities in the City of Buffalo, the concept of drilling in Buffalo should be a moot point for you, and would it not warrant such opposition?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll