Regional December 6, 2010 12:01 AM

Bills Bonds Idea Receives Some Praise, Some Laughs

Bills Bonds Idea Receives Some Praise, Some Laughs

The Sabres may be getting a new owner, but the future of the Buffalo Bills in WNY remains in doubt.  Early last week, a community-based financial plan intended to help keep the Bills in Buffalo spread across Western New York.  Recently, the idea has spread beyond Buffalo with reports from sports business publications and popular Wall Street blogs.  While some readers poked fun at the idea, nobody poked holes in it.  Opinions expressed from the reporters/bloggers were mostly positive and some complimentary.  One even called it "brilliant."

The idea, proposed by Stevens Brady a 25-year-old investment banker and lifelong Bills fan, involves fans loaning money to the next owner of the Buffalo Bills by purchasing low-interest bonds called Bills Bonds.  These bonds would help a new owner cover the purchase of Bills franchise (which Forbes estimates to be near $800 million) and would ease the often onerous interest payments owners face when borrowing money to buy a franchise. 

The idea, tweaks the Green Bay Packers community ownership model to comply with the current bylaws of the National Football League, which prevent public ownership.  In 1923, with the Green Bay Packers on the brink of bankruptcy, fans bought the team by purchasing shares of Packers stock. NFL Bylaws now prevent Bills fans from replicating this idea, but with a twist, Bills fans could still use the concept. 

Bills_Bonds_Structure_Chart.jpgThe twist -- instead of buying the team, Bills fans could provide a "loan" to a new ownership group that is committed to keep the Bills in Buffalo. Proceeds from that loan, or more specifically bonds (a loan chopped into many pieces and sold to the public), would be used by the new ownership group to help pay the expected $800 million price tag the team would demand on the open market. The Bills new ownership would then pay the bondholders back over time plus interest with cash flows generated by the team.

The reason a new ownership group would be interested in Bills Bonds rather than loans from banks or other financial institutions is that fans may be willing to accept a below-market rate of interest.  New ownership will likely borrow hundreds of millions of dollars in order to help cover the purchase price of the Bills.  If provided by a bank or financial institution, these loans would be accompanied by burdensome interest rates that could quickly erode the Bills profitability.  However, if fans provided financing at a lower rate by purchasing Bills Bonds, the interest savings could go a long way in helping to keep the Bills viable in Western New York.

Below is a collection of the thoughts and reactions from around the web:

Business Insider -- 25-Year-Old Investment Banker Devises Unusual Plan To Save The Buffalo Bills

"Unfortunately, there's nothing preventing the NFL from altering its rules and simply rejecting the idea out of hand.  They shouldn't though. The bonds would not give fans traditional ownership rights -- like picking a board of directors or voting on league rules -- but it would tie the franchise more closely to the city and its fans. It allows fans a way to show direct support for struggling franchises, without forcing cities to makes horrible tax concessions or funnel millions of dollars into boondoggle stadium projects.

We'd love to see this idea replace the traditional financial arrangements that cripple municipal budgets or deprive loyal fans of their beloved teams."
By Dashiell Bennett


The Sports Economist -- Fan Finance

"This has the potential to exploit a loophole in the NFL's policy against community ownership. The public has an equity interest in the Packers and this keeps the team wedded to its Wisconsin location. Debt finance by the public could achieve something similar."

"This might be fantasy, but it might just keep a team in its hometown when it might otherwise move. Moreover, this form of subsidy is completely voluntary: the fans who want the team in Buffalo subsidize the team through accepting lower interest payments than in the market, not the general taxpayer, and not the out-of-town visitor who has no interest in the team or sport but gets hit with a hotel or rental car tax."
By Skip Sauer


 Reader Comments on Dealbreaker  -- Bills Bonds: Great Idea Or Greatest Idea?

 "We tried that sh#t with Lebronds - it didn't work."
Commenter pretending to be Dan Gilbert, Owner of the Cleveland Cavaliers

"Oh, I forgot to add...each investor gets a collector's edition Trent Edwards bobblehead doll."
Commenter pretending to be Steve Brady

"Why not? It's been working for the Fed so far."
Commenter named James Grant

Sports Business Daily (subscription required) -- Banker Suggests Fans Buy Bills Bonds To Keep NFL Team In Buffalo

For more information and current updates on Bills Bonds, visit www.BillsBonds.com and follow the idea on Facebook at .  A full presentation on Bills Bonds can be downloaded from the website.

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

Sounds good, but wouldn't NYS be willing to offer a low-interest loan if that was in fact the difference between the Bills staying or leaving? If the Bills do move, I'd imagine it will be because the prospective buyer feels s/he can make a boatload more money somewhere else, not because s/he can't secure a favorable loan.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

past performance is no guarantee of future results...

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I know we are not serious about this, but the NFL is a cash making machine. The broadcasting rights give every team a very large base to work off of.

I think what we should be talking about is the bond for a new stadium. If a new stadium is built, they will stay, if not they will leave. The point is the stadium will not be privately funded.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I like the plan because it offers a way out for the county and keeps the govt out of a market they have no business spending tax dollars on. If a buyer were to come in and want to buy the team they could feasibly ask the community to purchase bonds and if they sell enough the team can stay if not the team moves, i could see a buyer offering this package to several communities and then picking the most beneficial for them. the crutch of the plan is that is voluntary. However..... if that old hack that owns the bills dies this month his family would be except form estate taxes, saving them about 400 million on just this team alone, (estate taxes are set to go back to pre bush tax levels if congress doesn't act)... sooo billls fans, if you really want your team to stay i think you know what you have to do.... obviously i am joking and i commend Wilson for sticking with buffalo (i don't think he is a old hack.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Interesting idea.

How about this one:

Although the NFL arbitrarily limits the numbers of owners a team could have - couldnt one of those owners be owned by multiple owners? A holding corporation could "own" the Bills, and issuing stock to the public at large (and limiting the number any one shareholder could hold) and create a defacto fan owned team.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

First, every NFL owner owns the team by way of some intermediary entity to limit their liability, which you describe as a "holding company." For example, the Bills are an asset owned by Buffalo Bills, Inc. which was incorporated in 1974 with Ralph Wilson, Jr. as Chairman and majority stockholder.

Second, one of the NFL rules is that NFL owners will act in good faith to comply with the intent of the rules. By merely creating a degree of separation between the owner and entity legally owning the Buffalo Bills, the owner would not be acting in good faith.

replied to al labruna
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

In order for it to really benefit the purchaser, you'd probably need a minimum of 100 million dollars. That's 10,000 WNY'ers kicking in 10,000 a piece.

I'm all for different thinking on the issue, but I'm not sure it's realistic that kind of money could be raised. These people would need to be offered first crack at season tickets, or other incentives to sweeten the deal.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Isn't keeping the Bills in Buffalo enough of an incentive? I can see why you may worry that not enough money would be raised, but remember, far more than 10,000 people will donate to this cause. Bills fans are everywhere, not just in Buffalo. There's all of Buffalo's Suburbs, the entire city of Rochester and their suburbs, Syracuse and their suburbs etc. not to mention all the Buffalo ex-pats (like Steve himself) who do not live in Buffalo but are still die hard Bills fans.

This plan really could work and we need to take it seriously. It's imperative that we keep the Bills in Buffalo!

replied to benfranklin
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think this is an interesting concept worth further examination.

However, what would stop the new owners from taking the team out of WNY? They could move the team and just mail all of their loan checks back to WNY. That would be a kick in the pants, unless of course the loan included terms mandating that the team be kept in WNY. Regardless, the new owners could refinance at any time, pay back the loan in full, and then move the team.

Also, if 100,000 people each loan an average of $1,000 that's only $100 million. While significant, it's only a fraction of what would be needed to purchase the team, though I understand that there are a number of private and corporate interests with the financial means necessary to boost the overall loan amount significantly.

Again, I think it's definitely worth exploring to find out what opportunities and limitations may exist.

Somebody above mentioned that a new stadium might keep the Bills in WNY. The stadium is already publicly owned by Erie County taxpayers and leased to the Bills, so obviously there is no issue regarding public ownership of NFL stadiums. It may be possible for a publicly owned company comprised of fan sharehlders to come up with the revenue necessary to build a new stadium. Bills fans would own the stadium and lease it to the Bills. Controlling the terms of the lease and making them favorable to the Bills' ownership could provide significant leverage, as well.


Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It is almost 2011, lease is up in 2012. Why no discussion on the Bills lease situation?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment