Real Estate November 10, 2010 12:01 AM

Statler Day of Reckoning Approaches - Invest Now or Pay for Demo Later

Statler Day of Reckoning Approaches - Invest Now or Pay for Demo Later

State and local elected officials have a decision to make.  Invest $5 million to stabilize the venerable Statler building or come up three times that amount (or more) to demolish the building.  Would-be developers Mark Croce and James Eagan have plans for the property but can't go it alone.  They want to see the building redeveloped but are reportedly looking for state and city help to stabilize the building. 

The Statler's clock is ticking.  Croce and Eagan submitted the only bid to purchase the property in August.  Their due diligence period expires on Monday.  The developers have not unveiled their plans for the 750,000 sq.ft. property.  Considering the building's size, redevelopment will most likely occur incrementally and involve a mix of uses.  Their plan is a non-starter without a commitment from the state and city to help stabilize the building including repairs to the building's façade and roof work.

DSC_0164c.JPGIf Croce and Eagan allow their purchase agreement to expire, it is likely the bankruptcy court trustee will seek to abandon the property.  It will become the City's problem.  So here's the choice: $5 million as a down-payment to keep the iconic landmark in place and on the tax rolls or $15 million to demolish the building. 

Frequent BRO contributor RaChaCha says there are a lot of parallels to a situation in Rochester back in the 1980's: Paul Snyder had started a Hyatt Hotel project, and the full skeleton was up when he pulled out.  The skeleton stood on the skyline for a couple of years as a humiliating symbol of municipal FAIL, weathering to the point where there was concern it might become unsafe.  Major community stakeholders had to come together -- government, business leaders, foundation heads -- to put together a rescue package for the project, which is now one of two major downtown hotels directly linked to the convention center.

It seems clear that the Statler is past being a traditional redevelopment project led by an individual developer (aka Hotel Lafayette, Webb Building, Granite Works, Larkin District, etc.) and the community will have to step up to the plate in a broader, collaborative effort the way it has with other major preservation/redevelopment projects of regional significance -- such as ECC City Campus, Richardson, Roycroft, Darwin Martin House, the Central Terminal, the Olmsted Parks, Genesee Gateway, etc.

We know where the local preservation community stands.  Preservation Buffalo Niagara has invited elected officials and others to the building this morning to detail why the building must be saved and ideas on how to make it happen.  We'll soon find out where the Mayor, state economic development officials and others stand. 

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

In the meantime, invite the artist Cristo to wrap the building in saffron fabric. The result would do wonders for tourism in Buffalo.

Score: 4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Glad I got to go to a few events the past few years at the Statler so I can remember what it was like. The Terrace Room was incredible. It ain't gonna happen because: Buffalo and NYS waste enormous amounts of money on all the wrong projects, there is all the wrong leadership in all the wrong places, and it isn't until it's gone that anyone realizes what we've lost. Sayonara Statler.

Score: -2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Why aren't other developers joining in to save this building???? If I had the money, I would!!! This would have to be a mixed-use building.

Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

WCP>"$15 million to demolish the building."

I'm not saying it's wrong, but just curious what's the reference for the $15M estimate? The article above currently doesn't cite any source for that. Shouldn't it?

A few months ago when arguing for a lower tax assessment, the court-appointed trustees said demo would cost $4M ($3M demo plus $1M for debris salvage). What motivation would they have to estimate $11M too low for demo cost when they were trying to lower the building's assessed value?

Now recently Esmonde and BR are saying a $15M figure for demo without saying where it came from.
But on Aug 21...
http://www.buffalonews.com/incoming/article31193.ece
"... the attorney estimated that the building likely faces another $8 million in remediation costs, $3 million for demolition and $1 million for salvage of debris, based on estimates from the decommissioned Dulski and Donovan office buildings and the War Memorial Auditorium. ..."

Score: 5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Looks like a likely truth is somewhere in between.

Here is a similar building that was demolished in 2004 that is similar in size and style to Buffalo's Statler.

http://buildingsofdetroit.com/places/statler

"The demolition cost about $7 million on top of the clean-up costs that went into it in the years before."

Based on this I'd say 7 million is a good starting point for estimating what it would cost to demolish our Statler. Although I would think higher borrowing costs and lower salvage material prices today would push this figure higher.

replied to whatever
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thank you, whatever,for advocating truth in reporting.

Tear it down now. It is arguably Buffalo's ugliest building and is beyond repair. Doing do would provide a prime development site. Like it or not, we are stuck with the existing convention center for the foreseeable future. The Statler site would provide a plausible opportunity for development and expansion of a far more suitable convention center with a new hotel.

Score: -10 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

so how's that banal, hopey, changey, blank, walled federal courthouse working out for ya?

replied to Urban Commitment
Score: -3 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

We need to do whatever we can to save this building. They simply don't make buildings like this anymore and we are lucky to have it.

Score: 5 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I recently stayed at the Book Cadillac in Detroit, a building with, arguably, a more troubled history than that of the Statler, but with a comparable level of historical and geographic significance: www.bookcadillacwestin.com/historical. At $200MM+ for renovations, one might say it was more of a doomed building than the Statler is.

To my surprise, the hotel was booked all weekend-weddings, young professionals holding cocktail parties, etc. In fact, it is just about the ONLY thing doing in downtown. I questioned a few people as to why they thought there was so much activity, and they responded that it had to do with young people holding wanting to be part of a downtown renaissance and that they were also responding to the stateliness/historical significance of the building.

The Statler can provide this to Buffalo. Let's not lose this opportunity.

Score: 8 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

NYS would ruin it. Somehow.

replied to Travelrrr
Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment


Just going to throw this out there...

When Croce purchased the building, there was another developer named My Dynasty who also showed interest.

My Dynasty is backed by LA developer Elena Mabel Albarracin and was at the time negotiating with Cleveland developer John Ferchill, who also previously showed interest.

While not a local team, Albarracin has the coin that Croce and Eagan wish they had and Ferchill has actually completed a similar project to the Statler in the Book Cadillac Hotel in Detroit.


Here is a BRO story on it:

http://www.buffalorising.com/2009/10/tatler-westin-book-cadillac-may-share-more-than-architectural-reference.html

My question is why not look at this other team FIRST before looking to demo the project or put public money into the project. Makes sense to me...

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The Buffalo News article on this story states that Croce and Eagan have not submitted formal, detailed plans as requested by the city government nor have they submitted a formal request at all to the Empire State Development Corporation. I would assume the government's concern is that they don't want to throw $5 million at the building with no plan, only to have the developers' ideas not work out and wind up back in bankruptcy. This would mean that the goverment would have spent $5 million on the plan AND still possibly be on the hook for $15 million in demolition. (For the record, I would prefer the government took the gamble on saving the building).

Seems to me that Croce and Eagan need to throw together the more detailed plan that City Hall is requesting. The News made it sound like they're definitely open to the idea so long as a more detailed, viable plan is presented.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll