City October 15, 2010 1:18 PM

Walgreens Eyes Gates Circle

Walgreens Eyes Gates Circle

It appears as if Benderson has entered into an agreement with Kaleida that would see the sale of high-profile property located on historic Gates Circle. That plot of land (see red numbers) is where a two-storey building is being considered that would be of mixed-design, housing a Walgreens on the first floor, offices on the second, and parking in the rear. Apparently, the zoning would have to be changed from residential to commercial if the plan was to move forward, although other reports state that the buildings are already zoned commercial. Walgreens tried for another parcel back in '06 between Gates Circle and Delavan and was shot down at the time.

50 Gates Circle is owned by Gates Circle Development Corporation.  According to neighborhood residents, Benderson is also looking to buy 40 Gates Circle and a building housing an AFLAC office at 54 Gates Circle. 

I spoke to Councilman Mike LoCurto regarding the plan, and he told me that the news had just been conveyed to the surrounding block clubs. "Benderson has not filed anything yet," he told me. "It's going to be an uphill battle given the historic nature of the circle. Any rezoning would need Zoning Board and Planning Board approval. I've heard rumors of this project for a couple of months, then late Tuesday afternoon Benderson called and set up a meeting for yesterday morning. That's when I reached out to the block clubs and the reaction was largely negative... more like, "No way in hell."

The parcel in question would require purchase of additional properties fronting the circle, along with the Kaleida-owned parking lot.

Thumbnail image for IMG_8604.jpg

Thumbnail image for IMG_8605.jpg

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

In a city chock full of shovel ready sites why do these developers insist on demolishing usable buildings? A Walgreens has no place on Gates Circle, what is next a Walgreens on Niagara Square? Find a more suitable location.

Score: 20 ( 28 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

x2 for inappropriate use at that location.

replied to Blackrocklifer
Score: 8 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

X3

replied to mp1
Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

if this happens - I'm leaving Buffalo forever

wonder how much loCurto got paid to keep all of this s&%$ quiet and how much he is getting paid to see the plans thru..m

Score: -9 ( 17 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If you all read the artical, you would be actually happy to hear it's a MIXED USE with parking in the REAR of the planned two story building!!!! It's not planned to be the typical Walgreens we see all over this region. It would be URBAN FRIENDLY!!! ....READ FIRST then comment.

Score: 3 ( 23 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It is not the building that is being criticized but the location, Gates Circle deserves better than a chain drugstore. We can't keep repeating past mistakes.

replied to Lego1981
Score: 3 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

read the article twice before posting

- the only thing in the city bigger than our drug stores is the parking lots they require
- attract people who shop at that pricepoint (yay)

- look at the way dollar general ruins section of elmwood south of elmwood, or delaware and north, or the cvs at amherst and delaware, or the cvs downtown, or the priceright on elmwood...

i could keep going on but anyone with a head on their shoulders understands these places glorify poverty, erode neighborhoods (by shifting profits out of the area) and require copies amounts of urban landscape that is almost always nicer than it was before they get there

replied to Lego1981
Score: 5 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

slobadan>"attract people who shop at that pricepoint (yay)"

What does that mean?

slobadan>"or the cvs at amherst and delaware, or the cvs downtown, or the priceright on elmwood..."

I've been to both PriceRite locations in Buffalo, and they're both fine, clean, good security, seem well managed. I've never seen any problems happening at either, or at either Walgreens in Buffalo, or any CVS here.

What exactly are you complaining about? Are you saying the only stores allowed in Buffalo should be upscale expensive kinds at one extreme and corner deli's at the other? Nothing in between?

Score: 4 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

And what would become of the existing Walgreens at Delaware & North?
As well as the Rite Aid @ Delaware & Delevan?
Make no mistake, the idea is to put Rite Aid out of business.

Score: 6 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If done well, this could be a real improvement for that corner and that side of Delaware. I am of course skeptical that it would be done well. There is a stretch of retail on Delaware from Delavan to the Circle and why not continue it with quality mixed use development? But then again, how many quality mixed-use neighborhood development projects have happened in Buffalo?

Score: 7 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Having a location-appropriate drug store on Gates Circle doesn't bother me so much. But I find it incredibly hard to believe that Walgreens and Benderson would actually come up with a location-appropriate design. But until a rendering is shown there's no way to say one way or another. At least they're including offices on a second floor. Still, we're talking about Benderson and Walgreens...

Score: 5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If this site were unoccupied or already been destroyed, then it wouldn't be an issue. But I agree that with Rite Aid so close... this is just chain war-fare and in the end either this or the Rite Aid will be closed in 3 years, boarded up and vacant... What was the price? Three structures on this site and probably 2 or 3 others that were destroyed for the Rite Aid building. If walgreens wants to build a new building, fine there are plenty of open parcels on Main Street just a couple blocks away for them.

Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

We have a Rite Aid and CVS two doors away from each other Downtown at Lafayette Sqaure. Been that way for YEARS..and both are STILL OPEN!!

Score: 5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Nothing says Olmstead quite like a Walgreens! Further more, if this developer wants to have a pissing match with Rite Aid, then build it on Delavan! or better yet, buy the Rite Aid, Close it, and build a new one there... Don't be ridiculous...

Score: 0 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree. If this development replaces a parking lot and can be done in an urban design and pay homage to the historic neighborhood, I am not as opposed. But, if this is simply about tearing down homes and plunking down a suburban, cookie-cutter Walgreens, I say take it somewhere else Benderson.

In general, Benderson's work has done nothing for the beautification of Buffalo--stay in strip malls and the 'burbs.

Score: 5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

FYI- Mike would never ever do that Slo. It was going to be condominiums but they didnt have the funding for that. The Walgreens pitch was first heard about 2 days ago. 2nd- Mike generally will always side with what residents want, and there is no support at this time. Don't talk about stuff you don't know.

Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Rite Aid will not close, but they will demolish (and probably a couple houses too) and rebuild with twice as much parking. This is totally unacceptable. Make that 2 story building, 15+ story mixed use and a Walgreens might be acceptable.

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Most of these comments absent a few have no idea about real estate development. I am not a fan of Benderson developments by any means, but if you look at the Walgreens on North and the new one that was built in Williamsville, they are accommodating to design standards when demanded. National tenants - drugstores included - always try to build their prototypical store unless there is pressure and authority to be creative and think outside of the box.

Before shooting down a project at least let a schematic plan be developed to show their intent. Look what happened at the opposite end of Gates Circle..now you have a vacant site waiting to be developed, but due to lawsuits the project is basically dead. Typical Buffalo.

Score: 1 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

i thought it was on hold to see what decisions were made for the hospital after it shifts to the medical campus.

replied to urbanboarder
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It's on hold because there were no takers.

replied to sin|ill
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If you think the Walgreens on north actually accommodates to anything then we are on 2 different playing fields.... What actually historic building was demolished on that site to make way so that they could win our hearts with a nice fakey historic Walgreens.

http://wnyheritagepress.org/photos_week_2006/delaware_north/root_650_delaware.jpg

Walgreens can come and be all fakey historic if they like... but we shouldn't demolish anything of value for them because in the larger scheme of things, they are short term tenants of this city. And just like Faheys, Eckerds, Howard Johnson and other chain stores, they will be gone at some point and what they leave behind is worthless and what they took away can never be rebuilt.

replied to urbanboarder
Score: 7 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

i think that was demolished for a howard johnsons. muuuuuuuuch better.

replied to Sean Brodfuehrer
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Then the Howard Johnson's was demolished for the Walgreens. Let's just keep the parking lot as isor wait for a 15 story proposal. After all that site is 'lawsuit ready'

replied to sin|ill
Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The Root House was destroyed by fire in 1935. The family chose not to rebuild due to decreased fortunes during the Depression.

replied to sin|ill
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Well for one, there is a brick retaining wall around the perimeter of the site along with landscaping which screens their front yard. There is no pylon, instead a two foot high monument sign that is externally lit.

It is a travesty that building was demolished, but was it for Walgreens? What was the condition of it prior to demolition? Actually, drugstores sign 20 year minimum leases, and Walgreens is the leader in the industry right now, and I highly doubt they are folding any time soon. I agree that neither the developer or tenant have a good reputation of real estate development..i.e. vacant Walgreens on Delaware Ave.in Kenmore for the new store at Kenmore and Delaware Ave.

replied to Sean Brodfuehrer
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That Walgreens at North is an abominations so I am not sure what you are talking about

replied to urbanboarder
Score: 1 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If you think the ratty HoJo's it replaced was better you are delusional.

replied to STEEL
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

great spot...a historic take on it will be nice...

Score: -2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'll tell ya.

If they play your cards right and Wallgreens really wants to go there you can get them to do something that fits the look and field of the area.

It doesn't have to be all or nothing.

Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Maybe they can move into the ground floor of the condo tower... Walgreens isn't the enemy. The idea that we should just let them demolish 3 buildings, 2 of which appear original to the circle. In order to build a building that 'might' last 20 or 25 years is stupid. It's a waste of building materials, energy, history and our city.

In New Orleans you can go to a Walgreens in the middle of the French Quarter... It's in a great old building. And when Walgreens leaves, New Orleans still has it's history and architecture intact. For the next business. win - win. Maybe a long term lease with Walgreens will help get the condo tower off the ground.

Score: 4 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Just say no to Walgreens, Rite Aid and any other corporate franchise which wants to steal from our city. They take the profits back to corporate headquarters where they are sliced and diced for over paid executives and corporate hacks, expensive nationwide advertising, nationwide construction,
tax shelters, loopholes, perks and other black holes of corporate theft. And what does Buffalo get in return ???
Another ugly eyesore, part-time minimum wage jobs with no benefits and the under-cutting of whatever independent pharmacies are left. It's time to lock the door on these corporate raiders and open it up to local pharmacists who live in the community and will reinvest the profits in Buffalo. If we don't patronize these raptors, they will pull up stakes and tell Benderson and Carl Paladino to find other tenants.

Score: -2 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Not the best comparison, but there is a CVS on DuPont Circle in DC.

Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

A totally and completely inappropriate comparison. Dupont Circle in Washington still is an architectural enclosure of a fine little park that can be easily gotten to on foot and enjoyed. Gates Circle is a pitiful traffic round-about with no distinction anymore whatsoever.

replied to krm1993
Score: -1 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I would like to point out that Benderson (and other local developers) has gutted Delaware in North Buffalo from Great Arrow to the city line. Not one new commercial building actually fits in with the neighborhood, few accommodate local foot traffic, all are suburban in style, and there is no history of a mixed use building in the area that I am aware of that they have done before.

Even without the demolition of existing historic structures (which is an erosion that the neighborhood shouldn't stand for), I don't have any reason to believe that Benderson is capable of doing something classy and "urban" to fit into the neighborhood context.

Score: 5 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If you look at the history of the stretch of Delaware in North Buffalo that is now a major shopping region, (BTW the only one within the city limits) you will see that it was never "URBAN" the shopping centers replaced places such as the vacant Bell Aircraft plant, a lumber yeard, and the former Frontier Linen Supply facilities. It was not exactly millionaires row before the only slice of prosperity within the city reared it's ugly head.

replied to mp1
Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Only partially true. Although the large shopping plazas were built on previously industrial space, there are also many urban-style commercial buildings fronting Delaware in North Buffalo. The YMCA, Kelly's Korner, the building that used to house Spiral Scratch Records, the building next to that one, Frank's Sunny Italy, Gallagher Printing (slated to be demolished for a suburban-style medical clinic), Scime's, Holiday House, Gordon's, Olivers, Nye Park Dry Cleaners, City Creatures Animal Hospital... even the Basil (nee Tunmore) used car dealership and the Carquest Auto Parts store are relatively urban-form buildings.

There used to be quite a few more but as mp1 pointed out, these urban, often mixed-use, buildings have become increasingly rare as Benderson and other strip plaza developers have demolished them. Some were built on top of old car dealership lots, but not all of them.

replied to Sally
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

yo bobarrel i agree with everything u just said and im gonna let u finish but i just have to say making this an office building that just happens to have a drugstore in it instead of the other way around would be one of the best ideas of all time. of all time!

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There is a Walgreens at 650 Delaware (and North) 1.4 miles from this spot. A spot riddled with traffic idiots because no one knows how to navigate a traffic circle. Add the hospital and Hutch's traffic and you've gone and gotten yourself a class A Cluster F'.

This idea is redonkulous!!! How do you people sleep at night?

Score: -1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Don't worry, the traffic is going to drop dramatically once the hospital closes next year. Great historic circle my ass. Vacant hospital, empty condo lot, gas station, liquor store and a few surface parking lots, sheeesh!

replied to TheRicker
Score: 3 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Personally, i would rather see a CVS locate there seeing how there is already a Walgreens couple blocks away at North St. There are not any CVS in that area from what I can think of there is one on Main right by Lafayette Square that is tiny and one on Elmwood/Amherst St.

Score: -4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

OK so now that we know who has ruined our great city, it is time to let our representatives know that we don't want them doing business with the BORG anymore. And every time a contract comes up before the City Council or the Erie County legislature or zoning permits or building permits we yell and scream enough so that it becomes politically untenable to
give these creeps any more land to drench with concrete and asphalt. And every time you buy something, think about where your money is going and what will be done with it. The people of Western New York have the power to change the shape of things around them and if they choose to they will put the BORG out of business and allow their friends and neighbors to do things in an independent way, one that we can all be proud of and our children will want to stay and prosper with.

Score: -4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

this represents a potentially long-term degradation of gates circle. as blackrocklifer said, why do we have to keep giving up existing buildings in a city with more vacant land that any place except detroit?

if they're bound and determined to build there, buffalo has to show some self-respect and backbone and demand a building that is better than what we're giving up. it should be two full stories, built to the sidewalk, with a front center entrance. in other words, a sturdy brick storefront building like the ones that line our most successful business districts. and has high reuse potential once walgreens moves on.

Score: 5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Perhaps I'm in the minority view here, but Gates Circle isn't much to write home about. The intersection of Delaware and Delevan, mere steps north of Gates Circle, is already one of the most "degraded" in the city (gas station, gas station, Rite Aid/liquor store, cemetary). Urbanism!

Having said that, is it just me or does "2 story mixed-use Walgreens/office space" = fake 2nd story strip mall with parking in front and a Walgreens "drive-thru"? If I believed a word of this article, I might be in interested in learning more about the way the proposed concept would fit into the space. But, since I think Benderson's "proposal" is nothing more than a bullshit appeasal before they fulfill their weird demolition fetish and shoehorn a strip mall into a location where it doesn't belong, I'm against it.

Score: 6 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

How's that hopey, changey Gates Circle Tower workin' out fer ya?

Just as much "progress" as the Richardson complex re-use. Nice Halloween lighting though. Draws attention to the significance of that architectural masterwork.

And so it goes.

Score: -8 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Unrelated: Take the "Arc de Triomphe" entrance to Forest Lawn, put it in the middle of Gates Circle (with the fountain below) and have the top be an observation deck looking down Delaware, Lafayette & Chapin Pkwy.

Likewise, take the "Birds In Flight" from Bidwell, and put it in the center of Soldiers Circle. Let ivy over run it.

Score: -2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Wow you locals really amaze me. Even with an urban friendly design, you STILLL protest it. Wow, and you still complain that NOTHING IS EVER DONE, well, wake the F' UP and see YOU protest EVERYTHING and that is why most areas of this city is just rotting away because YOU protest any kind of development from happening.....Maby you should move to the country side if you like things to stay the same. Most cities PROGRESS!!!!!!

Score: -4 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Building another Walgreens doesn't fall under the definition of "doing something". It's not progress to bring a business into an area of the city that doesn't need it, when in fact that area already is served BY THE EXACT SAME STORE ALREADY. Do you live or work in this neighborhood? I do. I've never once thought to myself "wow, I wish there was a drug store somewhere in between the Walgreens on Delaware and North and the Rite Aid on Delaware and West Delevan." Nor have I ever lamented that fact with my neighbors. We talk about the amenities (both retail and services) that we would actually enjoy having nearby. Another drug store has never made the list.

Just out of sheer curiosity, has anyone mentioned what is wrong with the buildings being eyed for demolition? As I walk past them every single day, and have been to a doctor recently whose office is inside the office building, I have never noticed them to be in any state of disrepair, certainly not in need of demolition.

replied to Lego1981
Score: 2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Then they wonder why places like Verizon, Geico and Yahoo will not even consider Buffalo for new facilities.

replied to Lego1981
Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Try working 20 hours a week for minimum wage at Walgreens and see how that affects your lifestyle or your views of "PROGRESS." With the enormous loot rolling in from the prescription drug bill and the big mark-up on most drugs plus the usual high price of everything else in Walgreens, they could easily afford to pay their help five or ten times what they do now and for a 40 hour week of work along with benefits. The greedy vampires want to keep the people of Buffalo as serfs in their corporate kingdom. Surely we can do better than that.

Score: -3 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Are you seriously saying a drug store could (or should) pay it's help $70-80 dollars an hour? Time to put your crack pipe down bud.

replied to bobarrel
Score: 3 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I just can't believe that this is the best idea that Benderson can come up with? What's next a Total Tan right next to the Walgreen's? Besides, how many of this guy's properties are vacant around town already? It would take you 3 days to count them. This is the last thing we need on that circle.

Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Sally, would you work at Walgreen's for minimum wage, no benefits and less than 30 hours a week ? The bottom line is that if a company like Walgreens profits a million dollars a month from the citizens of Buffalo and only 10 percent of that money is going to wages, that leaves 90 percent for the corporation mother ship to do with whatever it wants including
paying its CEO ten million a year plus, its executive officers
super high salaries, perks, national advertising, national building, offshore tax shelters, loopholes, etc none of which finds its way into Buffalo. Such a deal !!! And if you multiply that by all of the other rip off corporate franchises which have covered Buffalo like a swarm of locusts, you can see why our citizens are sliding backward into a downward spiral of decreasing income and standard of living. If on the other hand you had a couple of UB grad
pharmacists who opened an independent drug store which sold drugs and greeting cards, the profits would stay in the community in the form of higher wages and reinvestment. It is much better for the community to have 333 workers make an average of 30 K a year than to have one CEO who lives in Arkansas make 10 million. Those 333 workers will spend and pay taxes on their income in the community while that CEO will buy a condo in Cancun and hide most of the rest from the IRS. Which makes more sense ?

Score: 0 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Walgreen's, which generates 67.4 billion in annual revenues, pays its CEO $1.7M last year (not "10 million a year plus").

Also, about 23% of their total revenue goes to selling, general and administrative costs which is largely driven by compensation (ie paying workers for all of Walgreen's Inc) not the 10% you pulled from the air.

Now feel free to go back to making up numbers to prove your "point"

replied to bobarrel
Score: 6 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Cardiff I used the hypothetical "if" in reference to the 10 percent. And 10 million is the average which a corporate CEO
makes in the US. If as you say 23% is taken with "selling, general and administrative cost" that leaves 77% or 51.9
billion going for what ??? Buying food, clothing, homes and cars in Buffalo ? Why should the people of WNY subsidize a
corporate dinosaur ? or a whole herd of them ???

Score: -7 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

hypothetical is bobarrel speak for pulled out of my arse.

replied to bobarrel
Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Walgreen's is total trash. Hasn't anyone been through Kenmore recently to see the eyesore they left us in the middle of our village? Ugh... Have they ever made a nice looking building? They are the absolute worst. Tell them to take their $hitty ugly buildings out to OP or where ever the hell else...

Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I remember that! There was the controversy of them tearing down houses on Girard, a funeral home and the house that Potter Real Estate was in. What a joke!

replied to The CK
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

No disrespect to Potter Real Estate, but evidently a lot of people like having that big Walgreens there and consider it useful. It draws a lot of customers every day. It's difficult to believe none are from nearby in Kenmore.

By the way, that Kenmore neighborhood with the Walgreens was recently named one of the Top 10 in the whole U.S. - the same award Elmwood Village won a couple years before that.
Maybe that corner some call an eye sore doesn't look bad to the national experts who decide that award which you guys said is important when EV won it.

replied to The CK
Score: -1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think they would have won that award whether or not walgreens built a new building because of the design standards and effort the village has put into place with the new construction on Delaware because of the problems that came up over the proposed Walgreens.

They fought to make sure the next new development was done in the likeness of what the village was and should be. If anything the walgreens distracts from the quaint, walkable community that the award is given for. But because the village learned from their mistake and took actions to make sure it didn't happen again, is probably more the reason they won the award, not cause some walgreens tore down a nice old building for their cookie cutter store.

As they said when they gave EV the award. They don't award places that are perfect or do everything right, they award places that fight the good fight and learn from their mistakes to make their community better. The walgreens in Kenmore is a black eye, but they learned and moved on and were rewarded for it instead of giving up like so much of the city has done.

replied to whatever
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The CK and Delawarian are talking about the Walgreens on Delaware & Girard that has been vacant for several years after Walgreens built two new locations on Delaware at Kenmore and at Sheridan and abandoned this one. It is an eyesore and it is a waste and a shame that perfectly good houses and commercial buildings were demolished for an unattractive cinderblock box that now sits vacant and worthless.

replied to whatever
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

CK & delawarian, my mistake about which Walgreens you meant.

But I don't know if the vacant one on Delaware/Gerard is more unattractive than most buildings near it. It's ordinary. At least it's built to the sidewalk as some people demand.

If there was great demand for previous buildings that housed a realtor and funeral home, wouldn't somebody have purchased, used, and not sold them?

Isn't there a vacant former car dealer building a little north of it? Is that unattractive too, or just ordinary?

Maybe some day a new occupant will use the former Walgreens. JS saying it's "worthless" sounds premature. We'll see. Or if anybody wants to demolish it to build something else, I won't complain.

Store buildings come and go. Its emptiness now seems a fair trade-off for Walgreens now having a better store at Delaware & Sheridan, as well as one in the award-winning neighborhood near Kenmore Ave.

replied to JSmith
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

God I hope this doesn't happen. There is a Walgreens about a mile away on North and there is a disgusting, disgusting Rite Aid at Delavan/Delaware. I'd rather look at what's there.

Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thank you JSmith, I speak of the one on Girard and Delaware that will sit vacant eternally until some righteous corporation with big bucks demolishes it for another pre-fab cookie cutter design in the same vein. Awesome, right?

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

My mantra is "It's about the building, not the business."

When I moved to this neighborhood there were 4 drugstores within six blocks of our house. Delevan and Delaware, Elmwood and Breckenridge, Delevan, and Potomac. No one complained there were too many drugstores. Now there is one. Rite Aid and Wegmans put the 4 locally owned drugstores out of business.

Two of the three buildings on the Gates Circle properties are nice old buildings, the middle building is ugly (but with a facade improvement could look good).

I can imagine a good looking, three story, mixed use building, with discreet signage as an improvement. The front of the building should be divided so that when Walgreen's moves away it can be easily reused by several smaller businesses.

That said, I have never seen a new Walgreen's or a building by Benderson that looks like it belongs anywhere except places I don't like - like Niagara Falls Blvd. The discarded concepts for Bass Pro, etc. indicate just how bad Benderson's concepts of urban buildings are.

The problem with the ugly and unusable building Walgreen's vacated in Kenmore was not that it was a Walgreen's but that the aesthetic and functional designs are as bad as it gets.

Score: 5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Is there any public meeting or hearing for this project, anyone knows?
Thanks.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Buffalo people should thank God for Benderson, they have helped create 1000s of jobs in the local economy. Typical Buffalo, lets hate the people who bring us the most prosperity. no wonder there no Fortune 500 co here.

Score: -2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

thousands?

replied to LesterCzepnakski
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Oh thank you, thank you mighty Benderson, Ciminelli and Paladino !!! You have given our city oh so many minimum wage part time jobs and so many cinder block masterpieces that our new name shall be Buffalo, Lego fiefdom of serfs & slaves. We worship at your altar of big money real estate development
whose head honchos don't give a damn what they tear down or what they build so long as they get mucho dineros and tax breaks. We get goose bumps of pure joy every time we see the
mausoleum grey of another Rite Aid or the Santa Fe desert red of Walgreens because we know that it means a chance to buy overpriced drugs and cheap Chinese apple sauce at the exorbitant prices we love and demand. We praise you for taking our drug dollars and giving us such a warm and imaginative environment within which to raise our young wanna- leave-Buffalo-forever kids because we know that they will be better off working in mainland China than here. Oh, and please let some of your billions of corporate loot trickle down in time for Halloween so that we can buy that Chinese candy corn at the bargain price of 10 dollars a pound.

Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If you're against great properties left to rot on the east side, and claim 'that wouldn't happen in a wealthier neighborhood', isn't protecting a 'nicer' neighborhood from a drugstore the same thing?

If it's good enough for anywhere else on Delaware, put it up. Any other thought just plays into an old stereotype that some of us are more equal than others. Come on progressives, let's be consistent.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Ben, c'mon, you know it's NOT the SAME thing. Maybe for you
every drugstore is the SAME, but for people who are not deaf, dumb and blind there is a DIFFERENCE. Look at the exterior, look at the interior, look at the size of the parking lot, look who is behind the counter and how much they are making. Did you ever do business with a pharmacist who was not an employee of Walgreens or Rite Aid, or buy from a clerk who was not making minimum wage and had a real stake in whether you were satisfied ? Do you think you are doing your fellow citizens a favor by shoveling dollars into a corporate franchise which rakes in 67.4 billion dollars a year and because of all that loot can ruin every other corner in the city with one of their cinderblock elephant houses and bribe all the politicians to give them tax breaks ??? Buffalo needs independent local businesses run by independent local citizens who will reinvest their profits back into the area.

Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm all in favor of supporting local businesses. An independent pharamacist isn't going to compete with Rite Aid, etc. An independent pharmacist could offer home delivery, consultation, in cooperation with local doctors. Older patients, home bound, how do you get them prescriptions?

These stores are dinosaurs, which are fighting for the 'net-present-value-of-all-the-prescriptions-within-x-square-miles'. When somebody figures out how to use technology to deliver the service in a new and interesting way, they will go away. Remember all the video stores?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Walgreen's best architectural contribution is North/Delaware and that only happened because of the area. Think about the building no one wants to allow to be built at Delaware and Virginia. The Rite Aid at Delavan is disgusting. The parking lot is a mess and there is absolutely no curb appeal or respect to its location across from a Buffalo marvel - Forest Lawn. The North Walgreens is pretty much just as disgusting.

Is there really a market for another drug store within walking distance of so many others? Furthermore, what is the traffic impact? If you live near a circle or travel to work down Delaware, you would know many, many people have serious problems navigating traffic circles. Rush hour sees traffic at Delavan/Delaware backed up into the circle, blocking traffic from Lafayette and causing mayhem. This will only make things worse. Poor decision.

Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If as you say there is no market for another drug store, then you will not have to worry about aded traffic. After all no market for a store could not possibly cause that same store to be a traffic generator.

replied to LouisTully
Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Bendersons headquarters is in Sarasota FL.

http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20100405/ARTICLE/4051009

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Interesting how in Florida they are praised but in their hometown they are constantly derided. Is it any wonder that they moved their top executives and legal HQ to Florida. WNY'er attitude pretty much drove them away to a place where they were welcomed with open arms.

Very similar to the story of Tom Golisano and Bob Rich Jr

replied to chetroia
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Tragic example of how far Buffalo has fallen. But cheesy drugstore boxes aren't forever. At some point in time I'd hope that the Walgreens would be demolished for something much more respectful to the site and to the Olmsted Plan.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll