City October 28, 2010 1:37 PM

No Fracking Way!

No Fracking Way!
There's an important message that needs to be sent to the DEC by the people of Buffalo. To those who would stand to make the big bucks while causing environmental turmoil, and putting people's health at risk, the message is, "This is NOT acceptable." Join protesters after work today (4pm) at 270 Michigan Avenue (corner of Seneca Street) to demand that the DEC not endorse the practice of deep well hydrofracking.

Not only does hydrofracking involve mixing millions of gallons of water with over 500 different chemicals that endanger our drinking water, it has also recently been reported (UB News, October 25) that, "University at Buffalo researchers have now found that that process -- called hydraulic fracturing or "fracking" -- also causes uranium that is naturally trapped inside Marcellus shale to be released, raising additional environmental concerns."

If that's not enough to cause the DEC to pause to think about these implications...  especially now that these uranium findings are scheduled to be presented at the annual meeting of the Geological Society of America in Denver on November 2nd, then I don't know what is.

Photo: Cornell students protesting hydrofracking - Cornell Chronicle Online
View image

Comments

Leave a comment

This is a huge, huge crisis facing NY, PA, OH, and WV. PA has permitted it, and they are quickly seeing the environmental detriment of this, largely unregulated, process. There has been a contamination at almost every drilling site! I encourage Buffalo residents to log on to the growing tide to ban fracking until more conclusive studies are done. Here is a good resource: www.un-naturalgas.org

Score: 0 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

going to the rally?

replied to Travelrrr
Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

*GASP*

Not environmental CONCERNS!

Yeah, keep those po' folks down in Belmont and Wellsville po'. We don't need to be giving them ANY opportunity to make some cash.

Let's just keep letting PA make all the bucks. Maybe our border towns can pick up a few tourists or something.

Score: -3 ( 19 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Dear Jesse,

If you don't believe in environmental concerns, maybe you should talk to the homeowners whose water supplies are now flamable because of fracking.

Furthermore, the profits by property owners aren't making them rich, last time I checked.

Lastly, I'd be glad to modify your plumbing for you so that your gas and water are delivered via one line, just in case you were interested in how this might feel.

replied to Jesse
Score: 8 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

going to the rally?

replied to BuffaloByChoice
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Very poorly written article (even by BR standards) that is based 100% upon emotion and politics and zero percent on thoughtful consideration or investigation of the facts.

Score: 8 ( 26 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So now concern for groundwater contamination is political? So which party, exactly, likes methane in their water?

...unless we're basing your statement off of the B.S. logic used by the G.O.P., whereby they're aloud to exploit personal property in any way they see fit, even if it negatively impacts many other people around them.

The aforesaid considered, I want to buy the lot next store to yours and use it to dispose of all of Buffalo's used motor oil. What do you think of such a proposal based on libertarian logic?

replied to Sally
Score: 6 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There is a huge difference between one well being contaminated and a million wells being contaminated. This poorly written post makes zero effort to put the issue into perspective. It is obvious that we cannot guarantee a process where not one single well is contaminated nor should we. The pros and cons must be weighed and a cost benefit analysis be made. What is the greater damage to society a few contaminated wells or a few people that freeze to death because of a lack of natural gas for their furnace - or gas that is kept in short supply making the price unaffordable to grandma on the East side so she freezes. You show me a sad story of someone whose well has been contaminated and i can show you an off setting story of someone who froze to death because they could not afford to buy the gas to heat their home.

This sorry post make no attempt to put the issue into any perspective whatsoever. If BR still had enough business to make paper copies this one would not be fit to line a bird cage.

replied to BuffaloByChoice
Score: 2 ( 22 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If you think that allowing hydrofracting in the Marcellus Shale deposits of NY will have any sort of noticeable impact on the price of natural gas to a home on the East Side of Buffalo than I'm afraid you're the one lacking perspective.

replied to Sally
Score: 6 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Sally>" You show me a sad story of someone whose well has been contaminated and i can show you an off setting story of someone who froze to death because they could not afford to buy the gas to heat their home."

Hilarious. Simply hilariou. What a laughable distortion of the issue to suggest we have to choose between unnecessarily permanently polluting our land and water vs letting E side grannies freeze.

Talk about speaking "based 100% upon emotion and politics and zero percent on thoughtful consideration or investigation of the facts."

replied to Sally
Score: -3 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

...and Hitler started out annexing only a little bit of land and killing only a few Jews...

replied to Sally
Score: -8 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Two references to Hitler in one day... what are the odds of that happening?

replied to MartinInTX
Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

hitler? huh?!

replied to MartinInTX
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Misspelling: allowed

Disclaimer against the petty...just in case.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

In the 144th Assembly District candidates debate last night, Brian Biggie came out strongly pro-fracking. And in no uncertain terms — even saying what a great thing it’s been for Pennsylvania!

Biggie also said at the debate that he was recently married, and wants to have a “big” family (no, I’m not making that up). So let’s let him get busy with that instead of sending him to Albany to represent us — he’ll be much happier, and so will we. (But those southern tier folks won’t get to impress their visitors with flaming tap water tricks, like their cross-border cousins in PA).

Score: -1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

going to the rally?

replied to RaChaCha
Score: 0 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Was hoping to, but couldn't make it. You--?

replied to gail42
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Is heating a house in Buffalo the mirror image of driving a Hummer, regarding fuel consumption? Pretty much.

Wait, now I'll hear about how all the BRO folks heat their homes with fuel cells or something.

Score: -1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

BHorvath:

But it's not like people that drive Hummers are opting not to heat their homes...or even live in smaller homes requiring less heating.

The best we can do is to be prudent with our resources so we don't have to go fracking in search of more fuel. Try a high efficiency furnace or tankless water heaters. Just because we're using gas to heat our homes doesn't mean we need 4000 sq ft of living space heated with all the windows open during a February blizzard.

Catch my drift? Pun very much intended, because I'm corny with my jokes.

replied to bhorvath
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

going to the rally?

replied to BuffaloByChoice
Score: -4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Halliburton was given a loophole, by previous CEO of Halliburton, and then Vice President Cheney. Halliburton holds the patent on the fracking procedure and manufactures the solution used in the process…. Enough said…fracking will continue no matter what the cost to our ground water, health or our environment. They have the money to buy anyone they need to get this into NYS. It sucks.

Just look at what is happening in PA. We are next. Read this article from Vanityfair. It is criminal what corporate america gets away with. It is easy for them to pay a fine they have the money to.

http://www.vanityfair.com/business/features/2010/06/fracking-in-pennsylvania-201006

Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It's also easy to say how bad big utilities are, turn up the furnace in your Mom's basement then plug in your laptop to recharge your batteries and go online to BR to bitch about it all.

replied to Allentwnguy
Score: -2 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You sure have a bug up your butt.

What does that have to do with anything I said? I don't own a laptop, my parents heat with wood totally and I wasn't bitching just stating fact.

I have done the research and decided that I am against it. It is too new of a practice that doesn't have a good track record where they drill wells. What disturbs me is the fracking solution and how to get it back up and out of the ground. The solution just doesn't disappear. Each well uses about 5 million gallons of water and 25,000 gallons of chemicals.

That's the scariest but there was also the explosion in PA in May. 1,435 documented cases of methane contamination of home drinking water and roads that are destroyed by the heavy trucks needed to bring water and remove wastewater. This is a young industry and there is no guarantee when they frack a well, each is a different situation. They are also still in the research and development stage on how to treat the wastewater from he well.

Clean water is much more essential than natural gas.

replied to Sally
Score: 0 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Your parents heat with smoke belching wood and your complaining about gas drilling? It's clear that your familiy is contributing far more damage to the environment on a per house basis than any gas drilling. You are the epitome of a liberal (live as I say not as I do) hypocrite.

replied to Allentwnguy
Score: 1 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Sorry but I don't live in that house. My ultra right wing republican father does. I’ve talked to him but it is his land, his house and he is going to do what he wants. He also hates tree huggers. You seem to make way too many assumptions. Ask for the facts before you call someone hypocrite. This thread is over.

replied to Sally
Score: -3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You sound like Pontious Pilot

replied to Allentwnguy
Score: 0 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

going to the rally?

replied to Allentwnguy
Score: -7 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It is one thing to look for new resources and energy supplies it is another to contaminate a water supply of people who have nothing to gain by someone else fracking under their properties. "In October 2009, state regulators (in Pennsylvania) finally acknowledged that a major contamination of the aquifer had occurred" This isn't just 1, 5 or 20 wells, but an entire aquifer. That is a big deal if it is leaching harmful materials into the only source of fresh water for a community.

But hey drill away and worry about the consequences later. Instead of actually trying to find a better, less potentially disastrous method of capturing the Natural Gas. No one is against the use of natural gas, it is relatively clean burning and efficient form of heating homes... but that doesn't mean we should get it at any cost.

Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Anyone who thinks this potentially could be a good idea should watch the HBO documentary on this subject of fracking called "Gasland". It won an award at Sundance music festival and is very good. more can be found out at http://gaslandthemovie.com/

Fresh clean water is a very valuable resource and the process alone renders millions of gallons of water useless after the process is complete, not to mention the effect on surrounding water. Also anyone who thinks a company the drills for hazardous
gasses using hazardous chemicals should be exempt from clean water act guidelines is a damn fool.

Score: 5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Even if you were correct and a million gallons of water were contaminates that amount is miniscule in comparison to how much water we consume every day. A big number does not appear quite so big when put into context.

Every day in the United States alone we consume $407.5 Billion that's Billion with a B gallons of water. That is 148 Trillion Gallons of water per year. To sacrifec a million gallons is trivial in the big picture of things ( and that is if your data is even remotely accurate, which I highly doubt it is)


Link to source: http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/earthhowmuch.html

replied to 7sims
Score: 3 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Nice "context". There is a big difference between using water in a natural cycle and permanently contaminating it. Much of those billions of gallons of water used find their way back into aquifers while the goodie laden fracking fluid is currently untreatable toxic waste.

Speaking of toxic waste, I wonder if the pro fracking types would be interested in renting out their homes, backyards, or swimming pools to the drillers for storage of spent fracking fluid.

Those of you claiming to be speaking from a position of "careful investigation of the facts" wouldn't have a problem harboring a substance that they have "carefully investigated" to be harmless, right? After all the talk of risks of exposure to proven harmful chemicals is just a failure to "to put the issue into any perspective whatsoever."

replied to Sally
Score: 0 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

the water we consume gets recycled and reused like most water.
the water used in the fracking process can never be recycled and never reused it is gone forever. if u don't even know about this why do you fight everyone.

replied to Sally
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

if you really support fracking, then be prepared to sacrifice whatever clean, drinkable water or aquifer runs under your property.

or it this another form of nimbyism? the marcellus shale isn't under my backyard so what do i care? just gimme the gas.

Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

oh, and sorry, gail42, couldn't go to the rally. day job and all.

replied to grad94
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

My bad, should of noticed the time the unemployed hipsters picked.

replied to grad94
Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It's 'should have' not 'should of,' I guess you're job doesn't require the ability to use the English language proficiently.

Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That the best ya got? Or just pissy cause you could not give me more than one thumbs down? [and do you know what the Cardiff Giant actually is and in what country?]

replied to Cardiff Giant
Score: -4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Gail42: I couldn't make it to the rally. Sorry! Had work, then had to come home and take care of the pets. I have a young pitbull I adopted not long ago who is good in his crate for about 8 hours max, otherwise accidents may be possible.

I do most of my activism from my email...signing petitions and sending politicians emails, etc. My last actual rally was in 2005 when I went to the Save Darfur rally in DC. Wish I had more to speak of, honestly.

Sally: I absolutely want to get fuel to the poor, but would like to see other drilling techniques pioneered that aren't as disastrous. I also would really like to see more sane energy policy. Wind produces energy, and so does water. Neither of those require us to be so destructive. We should put up more wind turbines along the shore of Lake Erie and in inland areas (we even have the industrial know-how to make them ourselves). We should produce more hydro facilities on the Niagara River (the whole northeast benefits from our existing ones). Also, concerning the energy I'm wasting with my laptop right now: I pay more per killowatt hour to get it from a provider that uses only small hydro and wind power. I don't feel as guilty, as a result.

P.S. I also wrote "next store" instead of "next door". Jeez...I need to type slower! It's funny how that can happen if you're not careful.

Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Ridiculous. People just like to protest as a form of entertainment, without regard to the actual facts at hand.

Fracking of gas wells has been going on in New York State since the 1950s, including right here in Erie County. This has been done to THOUSANDS of wells in the state. Where are all the contaminated water wells?

The Marcellus Shale is thousands of feet deep. Water wells are hundreds of feet deep. Water flows down, not up. Besides, they have to remove the fracking fluid in order to produce the gas, it does not get left behind underground.

These concerns defy logic and reason.

Score: 2 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

drilling for gas and fracking for gas are two wildly different procedures. father baker drilled for gas under our lady of victory property and got lucky. it helped pay for his charities and no ground water got contaminated. there's a marker about it:

http://www.waymarking.com/waymarks/WM1TFB

drilling just puts a hole in the ground so you can capture what is released. fracking pumps a nasty stew of toxic chemicals into the ground where they sit around leaching into aquifers and wells. big difference.

replied to RobH
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Check you facts. There is no leaching that travels upwards. There is a thing called gravity. The freaking fracking occurs well below the aquifers. Therefore if any leaching were to take place it would travel down even further.

replied to grad94
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Just ask this scientician:

"Uh..."

He would tell you that substances underground never get pushed to the surface.

replied to Andreas
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

this bird drank the water in PA.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hsILeDgSTM

Score: 0 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

These old people might die because it cost too much to heat their homes.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/consumer_affairs/article5245961.ece

replied to buffloonitick
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There are ways to mitigate the cost of heating one's home aside from increasing the supply of natural gas on the market. Weatherization programs, tax credits to incentivize the installation of efficient furnaces, etc. Making natural gas cheaper only reinforces the underlying inefficiencies at play.
It's kind of like when gas was $1.00/gallon we had a lot SUV's that got 15-20 mpg as compared to when gas was $3.00-$4.00/gallon we began seeing a lot more people transition to smaller more fuel efficient cars.

replied to Sally
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Wow, that large crowd of 8 protesters looks highly educated and qualified in the field of hydrofracting. Are these the same people that brought us global warming and the o-zone layer? Buffalobychoice...it's nice to see that at least one of the potential protesters is actually employed.

Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

RobH: One of my points is that Gas has been getting into the water wells of some residents near fracking sites. As you know, gas flows up, not down...so this is completely possible. The contamination that likely takes place with the actual fracking chemicals probably takes place when they're forced under high pressure into the well. When the shale cracks open to expose the gas, who's to say it's not cracking irregularly to allow those chemicals more horizontal travel than expected? Have you ever tried to crack a piece of thinner stone tile by hand? How did you imagine it cracking, and how did it actually crack? I think the latter makes my case. Lastly, didn't they say that two things make Fracking prolific today: increased cost of other gas sources and new techniques for the fuels removal?

Castle18: Plenty of liberals and progressives are employed. I think the point you make has more to do with College Students than the unemployed. College students may have part time jobs, but probably not a career yet.

replied to castle18
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

NOW THAT'S FUNNY !!! :-)They only look that way because they just got done working the drive thru.

replied to castle18
Score: 0 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Not to sound non-PC but this all seems like some sort of black conspiracy thing.

Score: -3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

While fracking may have had its beginning in the 1950's what they did then and what they are doing now are two way different things. Back then they didn't have the chemicals they are using now, chemicals that the manufacturers won’t disclose...ZetaFlow, one fracking fluid, contains methanol and two undisclosed "proprietary" compounds...Weatherford’s (the manufacturer of this fluid) Material Safety Data Sheet on this chemical cocktail warned that ZetaFlow can be an "immediate" and "chronic" health hazard. Prolonged exposure can cause kidney and liver damage, irritate lung tissue, decrease blood pressure, and result in dizziness and vomiting.

This is not the same fluid they were fracking with in the 50’s. And while the fluid is not supposed to stay in the ground does ALL of it come back up? And it is only safe to ground water if the wellbore is properly sealed and doesn’t leak. That is what happened in Dimock PA, the well had leaks. Now there is major contamination of the aquifer. It may defy logic but it has happened. And more than a few times.

Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Oh, and on a side note…Halliburton just admitted (late Thursday night 10/29/10) that they skipped doing a critical test on the final formulation of cement used to seal the BP oil well that blew out. They were BP’s cement contractor. They did a test on one mix but not on the one eventually used. They (both) knew weeks in advance of the explosion that the cement mixture was unstable but still completed the work.

Halliburton – maker of fracking solution – non-disclosed propriety chemical compounds – 25,000 gallons per well – yeah I trust them!

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

http://www.energyindepth.org/in-depth/frac-in-depth/

and

http://www.energyindepth.org/frac-fluid.pdf

This site also discredit's some pretty outrageous claims made by Gasland. Although on a larger scale, fracturing the Marcellus is the same procedure used to frac thousands of wells in NYS.
http://www.dec.ny.gov/cfmx/extapps/GasOil/search/wells/index.cfm
Query wells in Chautauqua County, and see the hundreds of well in each township. 95% of which were hydrofractured, and show me one land owner complaining of bad water. Its a proven safe technology, that NYS regulates HEAVILY. Read between the lines, and question everything. You'll find the truth lies between both sides of the debate, as with many other problems we face.

Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I own property in the southern tier that sits square in the heart of the marcellus shale formation. The property is riddled with springs that range from an elevation of 1720' to 2020' above sea level. The water is pure and unadultered as it has been for thousands of years. These springs feed the small streams that in turn feed the larger creeks and eventually the Alleghany River and Mississippi River.

To claim fracking is somehow a local matter or a landowners choice is just short sighted. These aqufiers are crucial to more than just the immediate area and are part of a very complex and wide reaching ecosystem. We need to start looking at the big picture and recognize the consequences of our actions. We have only occupied WNY for about 200 years and have managed to spoil the air, water, and in some cases even the very soil. Lets not make the same mistake in the remaining rural areas that have escaped exploitation and the resulting damage.

Score: 6 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

>Although on a larger scale, fracturing the Marcellus is the same procedure used to frac thousands of wells in NYS.

Larger scale? Yeah, like an A-bomb compared to a cap gun. We are now talking about long-distance horizontal hydrofracking on a scale so grand, we don't have rigs enough in the North East. . .in areas of PA, where fracking is going full steam, the motels are packed with folks with Oklahoma, Texas and Calgaray accents.

This sounds like the arguments I used to hear during Love Canal days.

OK, let's do this then. Both sides should agree to remove the hydraulic fracturing exemptions from the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, Superfund, and a host of other federal environmental rules. (Including criminal penalties for willfulness, and attorney fees.) If it is safe, the industry has nothing to fear from the rules. If it is dangerous, we need protection. The Clean Energy Jobs and Oil Company Accountability Act of 2010, currently pending before the Senate, would eliminate the drilling industry’s 2005 exemption from the Drinking Water Safety Act and would require producing companies to disclose the chemicals used in their drilling activities. That’s a start.

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That sounds way too informed, reasonable, and fair, no place for such nonsense in this debate. :)

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

>. And while the fluid is not supposed to stay in the ground does ALL of it come back up?

Good point, Allentwnguy, and talk about making lemonade out of lemons, recent gas industry spokespeople are bragging that most of the water *does* stay underground "after all"! (I guess, meaning that there is less contaminated water to truck away and treat on the surface.) That is supposed to be good news, but it doesn't sound good to me. (Like Hooker Chemical saying that the Love Canal project is a success because they were able to bury it all?)

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The energy services in PA and surrounding areas are new to the ways of 'Fracturing' therefore these environmentalist attacks should not be placed on fracking itself, but the local procedures. I have worked in PA, NY and WV fracking with one of the largest energy service companies in the world and now I work in LA and TX, in the Haynesville Shale. Problems down here have all but vanished due to HSE policies (health, safety and environment). Please, I request that you do your research instead jumping on a bandwagon of hatred for something you do not understand. Fracking has opened up new and improved ways for us, as Americans, to harness our own resources to use ourselves, instead of looking elsewhere, such as the Middle East. BTW, Popular Mechanics named Fracking No.4 of the Top 10 Tech Concepts You Need To Know for 2011, which means there is no way to win this war unless you make over $36 billion a yr... Good Luck

Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thanks. Glad to have the issue cleared up by someone with no vested interest. Like a person who works for a fracking company.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

'VESTED INTEREST'? does that also include someone who is a partner in the first GREEN business in my area? Such as Biodiesel?

Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll