City September 22, 2010 8:50 AM

Spotlight on the Western New York Women's Fund

Spotlight on the Western New York Women’s Fund
By Gwen Ito:

Listening to Brigid Doherty talk about her work is enough to inspire anyone to feel more hopeful. Doherty, whose enthusiasm and optimism seem boundless, is the executive director of the Western New York Women's Fund. Created in 1999 by the United Way of Buffalo & Erie County and the Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo, the Fund seeks to eradicate the barriers that keep girls and women from reaching their fullest potential. Today the Fund is a member of the Women's Funding Network and one of more than 135 Women's Funds throughout the world. In a little more than a decade, it has become a leading local advocate for issues ranging from affordable childcare to girls' education to combating teen pregnancy and family poverty.

According to Doherty, 30 percent of local families live in poverty, and in roughly two out of three of these families, women serve as the heads of the household. "Currently 17, 000 single mothers and 33,000 children are living in poverty," she explains. Her dream? A productive community where all women and girls are given the opportunity not just to survive, but to thrive.

The Western New York Women's Fund identifies key issues and groups that can achieve real progress. The next step is networking with potential collaborators. "We are not doing any programming," she points out. "We build relationships and spread the word." Indeed, by publicizing certain issues and connecting groups with funders, the Fund acts more as an "issues ambassador." Doherty spends much of her time out in the community, meeting and talking with people who might be willing to listen and help.

Womens-Fund-Buffalo-NY.jpg

One successful program that has benefited from the Fund's advocacy is Structures in Science at the Buffalo Museum of Science. Eighteen 5th and 6th grade girls from the Charles Drew Science Magnet School participated in a unique hands-on science program. Held during the summer, it was a collaboration involving the Buffalo Public Schools, University at Buffalo and Buffalo Museum of Science. Denise Luka, Principal for PS 59 Charles R. Drew Science Magnet School explained the program's main purpose: "Girls typically shy away from science, but this program gives them the opportunity to get excited about the opportunities in fields related to science and what the future holds." The students were inspired during a visit to UB's Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research. "We saw how the strings made the building shake like there was an earthquake," said eleven-year-old Cemone Winfrey. "And I learned to unplug electrical things during a storm because the electricity can start a fire."

Doherty attributes the Fund's success to the dedication and expertise of the talented women who comprise its board of directors. "We're pushing the rock up the hill, and there's lots of hands involved," she explains. Despite their different ages and backgrounds, the board members are united by the Fund's mission. Indeed, it's this common purpose that strengthens their bond and further energizes Doherty. "If we don't have each other's back, no one else will," she says. And while the board currently boasts an all-female lineup, Doherty anticipates bringing on male members in the future. "The main requirement is that you care about the issues that affect women and girls."

As a teen growing up in Buffalo, Brigid Doherty attended Nardin Academy, an all-girls high school where she learned to speak out and follow her heart. Her mother, a retired schoolteacher with the Buffalo Public School System, instilled in her a passion for giving back to the community. After graduating from Nardin, Doherty attended Boston College, where she majored in finance. From there she went to work on Wall Street, specializing in mergers and acquisitions. After a few years in New York, she resumed full-time study to earn her master's in business administration from Harvard University. Following a stint in education administration, she joined the Women's Fund in 2007 as executive director. Doherty sees many parallels between the relationship-building she did on Wall Street and the connections she makes with potential supporters of the Fund's mission. She draws on her background in finance and strategic investments to identify and organize priorities so she and her team can be as effective as possible in their advocacy initiatives. With Kate Foster of the UB Regional Institute, Doherty and the Fund developed Pathways to Progress, a comprehensive research report that highlights statistics about issues affecting girls and women in Western New York. Unveiled earlier this year, the report is not an end, but rather the start of an ongoing conversation with the community.

For Doherty, the work of the Western New York Women Fund's will be complete when each woman and girl living in Western New York has the resources to overcome any obstacle and realize her greatest potential. "I would be thrilled if I don't have a job in five years," she smiles.

To learn more about the Western New York Women's Fund, go to www.wnywomensfund.org.

Gwen Ito manages Marketing and Public Relations for Buffalo Seminary. This past July she, along with students and colleagues, had the privilege of attending "What She's Made Of," the signature fundraising event for the Western New York Women's Fund.
View image

Comments

Leave a comment

What are the measures of success for this fund? In a country where more women are enrolling in college than men, and more boys are dropping out of school before graduation than women, I wonder how much we are gaining by focusing just on one gender? It seems like the Director of the Fund has had every opportunity for education and professional success, probably more than the majority of men; yet she feels that there is still a major inequality in services or opportunity for women? At what point will there be equality? What does that look like and what are those success measures? Is success measured in the replacement of the patiarichal society with a matriarichal society? Is success measured with the success of women at the same time we see a marke increase in the failure of men? I think we would all be better served by focusing funds and programs on at-risk students of both genders, instead of perpetuating the stereotype that women are inherently disadvantaged and in need of special help to be on par with men.

Score: -1 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The only saving grace for men is women will need to pay their spouse 50% upon divorce when they eventually overtake men in wage earnings which is inevitable given college and graduate m/f ratios. And they'll also burden the extra stress as they overtake the working class. It actually isn't such a bad thing for the male in the next century, easier living.

That's why some many working, educated females are so unhappy and stay at home males are happy. I say let em have it.

But you are right, programs like this that are women-only are often short-sighted and a misallocation of funding given the facts.

Score: -5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The first two comments remind me of the lame argument "there is no more racism because we have a black president, governor, and mayor". As I said before, this only means at least half of us are not racist.
Opportunities for women today have improved but men still run the show. It will take generations for real equality because our society is so ingrained with the idea of male dominance. To play male victim is pathetic and goes against any reasonable look at the power structure and wealth in America today.

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Saying that half of the voters in this country are racist is beneath even you. Men still run the show? That's laughable.

Maybe you should get away from the keyboard for a bit, and take in what's going on in the real world.

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: -2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Easy Ben, I said at least half, I hope we are doing better than that.
In the "real world" men, especially white men do indeed run the show. Like I said just look at the wealth and power structure in America today, white guys everywhere you look. Woman and minorities are making inroads but in no way represent their percentage of the population.

replied to benfranklin
Score: 5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Now if you could just find someone to agree with you who actually votes.

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: -4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Your comment is unrelated to this story, simplistic, and makes no sense, is it somehow related to the tea party?

Probably true, but past and current inequality is no excuse for ignoring the trends. Is a decline in opportunity and education in young men somehow justified because a small minority, less than 1% as you are fond of saying, are in power?

Your comments make it evident that racism and gender inequalities will never be resolved in America. Less than half of America may be racists, but the other half need to perpetuate a feeling of inequality and injustice for some reason. What is the winning scenario for you? What does the end of racism and gender inequality look like to you?

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: -1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What's the number of female CEOs of fortune 500 companies? 10? 15? I don't think you're allowed to claim equality before there are more than 15, believe it or not.

replied to sho'nuff
Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I doubt gender and race inequalities will ever be fully resolved in America, there will always be those that cling to the past and their own feelings of superiority.

As for the "need to perpetuate a feeling of inequality and injustice for some reason", that reason is because there still is inequality and injustice.

You ask "what does the end of racism and inequality look like", I don't know, and I doubt I will see it in my lifetime but it is a goal we all should be working towards. Pretending it is not a problem only allows it to continue and demeans those that have been denied the opportunities that white men have long taken for granted.

replied to sho'nuff
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

i agree with blackrocklifer and i have never missed an election since i turned 18.

ceos? 89% male. congress? here's a great quote:

"Globally, the U.S. ranks 74th in percentage of women serving in parliaments or lower houses of Congress, sandwiched in between Turkmenistan and Albania (and ranking far below Bangladesh, Serbia, Eritrea, Afghanistan, Moldova, and Sudan, among others)."

http://timeplots.com/2010/03/25/women-in-congress/

clergy, college presidents? still overwhelmingly male. quick freaking out, guys. you look like hysterical, spoiled brats.

Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What is laughable is that you two are taking the "whoa is us" poor me (male)" position. You honestly don't think that gender discrimination still exists in this country? Have you actually looked at the % of women in executive management compared to men? What about the salary discrepancy?

I work in finance and the moment a women leaves the room the discussion turns to whether "she is hot (or not)" or is a raving $%#%$. It is rarely about her credentials or performance.

Further, study after study shows that if you fund a woman, she will actually use the money to feed, and provide for, her family. Fund a man, and you are less like to see the same results.

Why don't you take a second to read the Fund's "Pathway to Progress" study. It is groundbreaking, and you actually might learn something.

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment