City August 17, 2010 8:24 AM

The Architecture Tour of the Summer

The Architecture Tour of the Summer
By Steven Dietz:

The Delaware Neighborhood Tour of Homes has sold out!

The residential architecture of Buffalo enjoys national attention, and yet we locals take for granted the beauty and taste that fills our avenues and streets. We bustle down Delaware Avenue in our cars and think we know the houses and their styles. But do we really know much beyond their majestic surfaces, or anything of the joy and suffering they've sheltered for a century or more?

Not unless we stop to savor these houses with their strong personalities and shifting moods. Most of us only imagine entering these homes and leaping into their histories--how they were built, and for whom, and with what values. This Saturday you can more than imagine; you are invited to reflect on eleven beautiful homes from Buffalo's late 19th to early 20th century in The Delaware Neighborhood Tour of Homes. Of the many fine tours of Buffalo architecture this summer, I think this one will leave the finest signature of an exceptional period in Buffalo's domestic architecture. In fact, I invite you personally to come inside the homes of Delaware Avenue and Oakland Place, including the home where I live with the spirits of 116 summers past since this home was built, the foundation dug out and laid by hand. I have tales from three centuries--the 19th, 20th, and 21st--of eccentric or successful or simply famous people in this house, including a former first Lady who spoke from our staircase.

The tour has been carefully crafted by the good people of Preservation Buffalo Niagara and the Theodore Roosevelt Inaugural Site. It takes place Saturday August 21st from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. and is now self-guided. You will have a chance to meet some of the homeowners, hear their restoration stories, and relish the wide ranging styles, from an 1870s Italianate on Oakland Place to Grace Millard Knox's masterpiece at 800 Delaware (currently Computer Task Group). The mansions on Delaware now house non-profits, firms, and agencies. But each of them has breathtaking grandeur, including the baronial library of the Lockwood House, which sported one of the finest private libraries in the country (now happily ensconced at UB's Lockwood Library), to the ebullient marble staircase of the Knox house, which has the air of a Medici Palace.

Architecture-ny-Buffalo-ny.jpg

On Oakland Place, the tour acquires a more intimate, evening cocktails feel. These are homes still privately lived in, and yet they retain the formal graciousness of a time when houses of the well-to-do were designed to privilege beauty over all else. There are turns from one room to the next where the eye catches a stunning new pattern of leaded tracery on a window sash. Or where the ceiling height blossoms into an exquisite, almost confectionery crown molding. John Cowper , the man who built City Hall, built his own home on Oakland Place in the 1920s. The living room walls are some four centuries old. Disassembled from Monmouth House in Wales, they are reincarnated in a grand 1920s drawing room. That's re-use with a late gilded age touch.

Yet what makes Buffalo's residential architecture so irresistible is the great spectrum we enjoy, from charming brick workman's cottages, to stout shingled Queen Annes, to the gilded age hauteur of the Knox and Goodyear homes. In this tour, the accent falls on the gilded. But as Buffalo re-imagines its future, and as we prepare to host the National Trust Conference next year, a steady look at this elegant grandeur is maybe the tonic we need as we measure what we've lost and what we've gained in this city garlanded by such beautiful homes yet wounded by tidal changes of fortune. It's a poignant story, and there is no better place to feel it than in the plastered, marbled, hand carved rooms of the Delaware District.

knox-house-house.jpg

To Purchase Tickets: In advance, tickets are $25 ($20 for members of the TR Site or PBN). Tickets can be purchased at the TR Site, 641 Delaware Avenue or by calling 852-3300. Purchase online at www.BuffaloTours.org. If still available, tickets on the day of the tour are $30 and will be sold at the TR Site starting at 9:30.

Lead photo: Knox House

2nd photo: Richmond-Lockwood House, Library mante

3rd photo: Knox House
View image

Comments

Leave a comment

Good thing that the Obstructionists saved this mansion and 3 of its neighbors.

Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There is a huge difference between obstructionists and preservationists. Preservationists tend to be truly focused on, well, preserving the significant and often neglected elements of our built environment. Obstructionists use the preservation card to further a political agenda that is often unrelated to the project at hand. For example, see the H-O grain silo preservation lawsuits and protests, there was absolutely no interest in preserving that building until it was presented as a site for the Casino. Once that plan was on the table, then the preservation card was used in an effort to stop development on the site. The city is no poorer for losing the H-O grain silo, but the preservationist community has lost a fair amount of respect with common citizens as a result of the anti-casino antics.

I think the preservationist in Buffalo lack leadership and credibility. They have done a lot of truly tremendous things, but it only takes a few events like the H-O silos or the recent lawsuit against Bass Pro, filed by several leading preservationists, or the lawsuit over the Gate Circle condominiums that was filed under the guise of preservationists by a group that had a more self-serving agenda.

The preservationists need to focus on proactive preservation of the built environment, instead they are often seen as reactionary, agenda driven, and more interested in politics than in preservation. This is one of the reasons that they are seen as obstructing instead of preserving, and that is unfortunate.

replied to STEEL
Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You lump everyone together as it they are one group who meets and decides what project to try and stop. You also act as if their profession is preservation and that they have all the time and resources at their beck and call to save buildings. Preservation of our irreplaceable historic heritage is done only at a grass roots level. There is no time, no money no grand plan to stop projects, Just a concern for continued loss of something that can never be brought back.

These incredibly valuable mansions are only in existence now because of concerned citizens who knew that it would be a massive mistake if they were to be lost. At the time these people were labeled obstructionists and were blamed for hurting the economy. Turns out they were right. The value in obstructing the demolition of these houses has been proven as has the case of preservation again and again and again.

For every lost Bass Pro I can show you 3 successes in preservation. For every lost Bass Pro I can show you 3 major mistakes that unfortunately had no preservationist obstruction - if only we had people willing to speak up when the Kensington was rammed through the city.

replied to sho'nuff
Score: 4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I disagree. Buffalo has a tremendous wealth of buildings that have been saved by the large and well funded preservation organizations. They have quite a few successes, but unfortunately they are clouded by some of the high profile lawsuits filed by the leaders of these organizations. When Tim Thielman or Bruce Fischer files a lawsuit to preserve or fight demolition or construction, they are not doing it as private individuals. They are doing it as leaders of Buffalo's preservationist movement and preservation community. This diminishes from the entire mission of the preservationists.

Our preservation movement is well funded but poorly lead. It lacks vision, direction, and credibility, these are all the result of poor leadership. Nearly 2 years after the creation of Preservation Buffalo Niagara, the organization still suffers from the same issues that it was created to correct. Granted, they are doing some good things with walking tours and architectural appreciation; however they still lack leadership to bring the organization to the next step. This is something that is of dire need in Buffalo.

Preserving the mansions along Delaware, significant churches, the Guaranty building, Shea's, Kleinhan's, etc... these are things that the Preservationists should be doing, but should be doing proactively. We know where these buildings are, who owns them, their condition, their tax status, etc, but we fail to act until the 11th hour and usually only after someone has already made plans with the neglected building. Where are the preservationists in the years leading up to destruction? Where are the surveys of historically significant properties that we should focus on? Where is the mobilization of volunteers and community organizations? Answer: No where, because the organization lacks leadership and vision.

BTW, there were preservationist involved in blocking both the Kensington and the Scajacuada; however they lacked credibility and strength. They waited until the last minute to get involved and failed to muster the strength and critical mass needed to fight the project. They almost lost Shea's and Kleinhan's for the same reasons, they almost lost the mansions on Delaware for the same reasons. They will probably lose the Summit building for the same reason.

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I strongly disagree. The H-O grain elevators should still be standing. They were structurally sound, no danger to the community & an important part of our heritage. You don't do an end run around the state constitution & grant an illegal monopoly to the Seneca. I strongly support the Gates Circle condos - Olmsted envisioned significant development adjacent to his parks and parkways. Bass Pro was a misguided effort - developers need huge big box retail anchors when they build malls in the suburbs, which can be anyplace, USA. Canal Side is already a destination - the lake, the river, the Erie Canal terminus, the Naval Park, the HSBC arena. Build off of those advantages.

replied to sho'nuff
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"You don't do an end run around the state constitution & grant an illegal monopoly to the Seneca" -

This is exactly the type of issue that I am talking about, you are using preservation of the H-O silos to fight a political agenda against the Seneca Casinos. Fight the casinos without besmirching the reputation of the preservationists. No one believes that the lawsuit to save the H-O silos was about saving the silos, it was about stopping the Casinos.

replied to skarnath
Score: -2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"instead they are often seen as reactionary, agenda driven, and more interested in politics than in preservation. "

Agree. Preservationists in Buffalo are often more trouble than asset. It's just like how you're socially wrong if you don't have a ribbon on your car to support the troops because of the way veterans were treated after Vietnam. Because some horrible decisions were made we must jump to the other end of the spectrum and be radical preservationists. My sidewalk is torn apart and falling apart. But it is historic. Must not be replaced.

replied to sho'nuff
Score: -2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Few people on this website are opposed to preserving old buildings like this. It's a huge problem when the preservationalists (or obstructionalists) start to dictate what should be built on vacant land and sue to prevent anything worth while from being built there because it doesn't meet their standards.

Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Jumping,

You say that in hindsight but every preservation effort has been labeled obstructionist and almost every preservation effort has been a major success in Buffalo. On the flip side there are reams of failures where preservationists were not present.

replied to jumpingbuffalo
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The problem is when preservation is lumped in with obstruction. The people suing to stop the Gates Circle building were not preservationist for example - but that did not sop people form grouping the entities into one mindset.

People are fighting a gigantic truck parking lot in place of a historic neighborhood on the west side. This is not unlike the Kensington disaster except that now we have people telling us to wake up and take notice of the stupidity before its damage is done. If 5 stupid things are stopped for every one good project that is stopped then we win. We won't know if Bass Pro was going to be a failure or a massive success we do have a long long list of massive failures that had no benefit of obstruction. We also have a growing list of major successes based on the obstruction of a small group of preservationists.

Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

But not every replacement project is as pathetic as a parking lot or highway dividing neighborhoods Steel (eg. what if the Teddy R site was not just restored for a handful of annual visitors that actually went there, but a company employing 200 people was put in its place).

It's all situational. Any reasonable person would object to knocking something down for an empty lot, to a developer with a plan to be named later, but a reasonable person might not sue ECHDC just because they object to tax dollars going to retail (I must infer that lofts and hotels are not considered retail to those same people).

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

BH,

That is interesting except that the TR site WAS proposed to be knocked down but not for a place to house 200 employees. It was planned to be replaced with parking as was most of the buildings that have been saved by preservationists. As a matter of fact the Guarantee building (a world renowned landmark by the way) was targeted for convenient parking. It currently houses well over 200 very well paid employees.

The fact is that preservationists have spurred development in Buffalo not the opposite. You will find that companies that employ people will be attracted to intact historic urban places as will be intelligent energetic and highly educated people.

Buffalo's experiment with turning itself into a parking lot is a proven failure. Saving our heritage is a proven success. It amazing to me that we still have to argue for preservation anymore.

replied to bhorvath
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

We don't need to argue for preservation, at least we should not have to. What we need to argue for is a more cohesive and unified preservation movement. We need more proactive leadership and stewardship, and less proactive lawsuits that tie into political agendas.

No one questions the need for preservation or the good that it does for the community. What we are asking for is better coordination, better leadership, and better organization. Get the community involved in the preservation movement, provide a survey of at-risk structures, provide guidance for owners who cannot take care of their structures. We need the preservationist movement to be a movement in the City of Buffalo and the surrounding area. Unfortunately, they fall short in this area today.

You can stop with the false dilemma, this is not a matter of either we have preservationists or we have a city full of parking lots and highways. The argument isn't about the need for preservationists, it is about the quality of our preservationists and what they can do to improve.

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"what if the Teddy R site was not just restored for a handful of annual visitors that actually went there, but a company employing 200 people was put in its place)."


bhorvath,

thats not really how it works. first off, the statistics for the site visitation are about 15,000 annually. secondly, there isnt really an either or proposition - particularly since there is so much open/available space in Buffalo.

replied to bhorvath
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Was just using an example idea of when you might actually consider knocking down / remodeling an old building for a new use. The TR site is probably skewed towards wanting to keep, but the printing house on Franklin was not something you would fight over (again just an example) and people did and the owners were turned off. I think outside companies are turned off by the vibe they get from the whole ball of Buffalo wax (everyone's hand is in your business). If there is no clear re-use, new plan, no liabilities, then no need to destroy, we all agree on that.

The TR site - well I don't have data, so your number is your number, but I was there twice the last two times I visited and nobody, not one person, was there and those were holiday weekends when it was open. So maybe 14,000 of those are grade schoolers on field trips...youre talking over 50 people a day, and well I just didn'd get that impression there was that much traffic. But it's not the point.

replied to al labruna
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The Allentown printer building bh mentioned is a better example than the TR building.

Another example is when Teilman and the Preservation Board a few years ago tried blocking demo of the small vacant doctor's office which used to be next to the Wilson Farms on Elmwood. It wasn't historic or even old. It wasn't even built to the sidewalk. The owner was able to go ahead with the demo anyway, because of City Hall paperwork incompetence as I recall.

Then there was when the Pres Board tried to block some changes to the Pearl St Grill/Brewery. Didn't the Common Council overrule the PB that time?

Those were some ridiculous things they did that became newsworthy. If that's their usual attitude, who knows what anti-business obstacles they impose quietly.

replied to al labruna
Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It was the last ditch effort to have the Park Lane condos designated as a historic landmark, and the Landmark Societies desire to champion this cause that made this look like an attempt by the preservationists to obstruct construction and development. Granted, the lawsuit was filed by Arnold Kahn, but the filing included testimony from several prominent preservationists and preservation groups. The focus of the lawsuit was preserving the historically significant Park Lane Condos, and they were very careful to say that this suit was not about stopping construction.

This is an example of how the preservationists are often branded or perceived as obstructionists.

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That stairway is gorgeous.

Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Preservationists are not some organized monolithic group but a patchwork of thousands of individuals. Most are quietly working to protect and preserve the great architecture and neighborhoods that Buffalo is fortunate to still have. Most are doing just a small part, restoring old houses, improving and expanding greenspace, and investing their time and money into our city. To label them as "obstructionists" is not just unfair but ignores the fact that the vast majority of preservationists have had no hand in any of the lawsuits nor are they "more interested in politics than preservation".
Preservation is the one force that has given our city hope and brought not just investment but committment, in other words a future.

Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So very true, most homeowners, block clubs, community organizations, and church groups do a fair amount of preservation in their own right. That said, there are organized groups with financial backing and a seat at the table with local governments and agencies.

When people think about preservationists in Buffalo, names like Tim Thielman, Bruce and Scott Fischer, Henry McCartney, and a few others. In reality, there are hundreds of others like Andrew Byrd, Michael Miller, Louis Harmeski (?), and others who are preserving Buffalo one building and neighborhood at a time. They are rarely seen as obstructionist, but unfortunately they are all to often branded as such due to guilt by association.

replied to Blackrocklifer
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Preservation is almost always about choices, so it's frequently political, or at least characterized as political. So what? That doesn't change the dialogue. The average citizen in Buffalo/WNY doesn't know any of the names you've mentioned - even Tim Tielman's. There is value in educating the public through tours, and there is value in being proactive by identifying historic buildings that are currently at risk. But preservationists disagree on lots of issues, and that's okay. I also don't worry about being called an obstructionist if I've thought through the issue, and I'm convinced that I'm on the right side of it. I'm guessing that a lot of other preservationists feel the same way. "Branded as such" and "guilt by association" - you're using a vocabulary that has no relevance for me, because it's not going to change my decision-making process, or any future actions I take. In the past, I have changed my position on specific projects, but that takes facts, and compelling logic.

replied to sho'nuff
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I don't disagree, if you feel strongly enough about the pros and cons of a particular project then you will work to fight it or support it from the beginning. If a lawsuit was required, it would be filed early enough and with proper forethought and planning. Unfortunately, that isn't always the case, and the preservation card is pulled out of desperation, often at the last minute. I am not in support of tearing down the H-O silos, or any building for that matter, I just feel that our preservationists could do a much better job of preserving our built environment if they had better leadership and coordination.

If someone was to propose the demolition of one of the other grain elevators, would the preservationists step in with the same vigor as they did with the H-O silos? For some reason I doubt it. The H-O preservation was more about fighting the Casino than about preserving the structures. Just admit that this is the case.

replied to skarnath
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Put aside the preservation/obstruction debate and just admire the fantastic beauty of these homes. These structures were all designed as homes--not offices, not businesses, but homes!--and they are of the highest calibre. If you're out of town and thinking of a visit, or you haven't been inside any of these homes, then I prescribe this tour for all manner of ills. What a day you'll have.

Score: 4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Agreed. I've been in a number of the Delaware mansions & a few homes on Oakland. Some take your breath away. But for pure, irreplaceable woodworking craftmanship, the former Chancery on Lincoln Parkway (recently restored by the Arrisons) is my favorite. But debating preservation vs. obstruction is much more fun than genuflecting before these amazing homes.

replied to EricOak
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I hate the ubiquitous modern use of the term "Home." So real estate agent-esque.

These were built as houses. And they are wonderful.

replied to EricOak
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So, the obstructionists "saved" the HO Oats Silo... yet they have done nothing with them...not even a damn light show...Nothing. Nor have they offered any alternative, so they sit there and rot leading to a certain demolition eventually. Plus, we have no Casino, No Anchor Tenant for Canalside, no hope for any new development from any business who knows anything about the area. Obstructionists, please mind your own business and go home...to your studio apartment on Allen. Preservationists, you are welcome here, just dont comingle with the others...

Score: -8 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

H-O Oats grain silos were demolished several years ago. Preservation leads to development; demolition leads no where.

replied to assaroni
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"Preservation leads to..." I can just picture some stoned out grad student with little practical experience uttering this useless statement, followed by, "Dude, that was so profound."

replied to skarnath
Score: -4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Good one. Dude.

replied to BuildMe
Score: -2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

@buildme - your name belies your comments. I've read your last five, and the score: nothing humorous, nothing insightful, nothing constructive.

My statement that "preservation leads to development, while demolition leads no where" is backed by 30+ years of experience, the last 3 doing equity investments, including historic equity, in 13 northeastern states. The statement is intentionally simplistic - but it's accurate.

replied to BuildMe
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Skarth: "Your statement here..." I rest my case.

replied to skarnath
Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Let it be. BuildMe, we'll take your online machismo and boasting as an indication that you have practical experience, and are in fact the greatest human being ever. And you don't use the word dude.

replied to BuildMe
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thnaks, Tully. I left the toolbox out back so feel free to jump back in it whenever you like.

replied to LouisTully
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

buildme - rest all you want - I suspect you're an expert by now.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Poodle:

Score me a win on that one, right.

Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

With all due respect, that is the ugliest fireplace I have ever seen. It is a time-honored tradition for the RICH to throw tons of the money which they stole from the POOR at bad imitations of European art which was also built on the backs of the poor. If you look at this stuff with or without the hype of the POSH NOSH it is boring and stodgy, the stuff that mausoleums are made of. The over opulent mansions on Delaware, Linwood and Rumsey are painful reminders that within 100 years after the founding of our nation on the ideals of freedom and democracy that vision had been eclipsed by the oligarchy of the robber barons and their disgusting GREED. I lived in an apartment on Linwood for a brief time and was grossed out by the cheap "SERVANT'S QUARTERS" in the attic where young women lived as virtual slaves to the little bell which the masters downstairs would ring any time of the day or night. No, I'm not making this up, I knew someone who came to this country in the 1920s and had to live in one of those little rooms and pass the "WHITE GLOVE TEST" of the RICH LADY OF THE HOUSE. She hated every minute of her servitude. Buffalo would do us all a great service by bulldozing these mausoleums and liberating the land from MASSAH's ugly monuments to the ALMIGHTY DOLLAR.

Score: -3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

wow. bitter much? My grandmother on my mother's side came from Germany when she was 12 to work as domestic help in such a house. It was a decent living to her and her family at the time and a way for her to emmigrate to the US. Come adulthood, she married (another German immigrant) and they built a house and raised 8 kids. I don't think she was scarred or abused by the employment. It gave her a toehold in America.

Compared to the owners' quarters, the servants quarters were very downscale, sure. But those servants' quarters compared pretty favorably to the average house of the average person at the time. Compared to the houses I grew up in, those servants' quarters would have been just fine.

Who among all those domestic servants was tethered to their job? Who couldn't leave for better prospects? You want to demolish the vestiges of the rich because few were rich and most were poor? Decry, if you like, the uneven economic distribution of a flawed economy. I'll support you on that. But destroy these works of craftsmanship and art because people (all of whom are now dead) weren't as fair in their day as we feel they ought to have been? There is something dark and evil in your quest for 'justice'.

replied to bobarrel
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

some people are way too hung up on tim tielman. it is tiresome and stalkerish. go find a healthier outlet for your obsessions. if he is so wrong, then use your energies to show everyone what is right. turn off your macbook and contribute some time & effort to a neighborhood or building you love. and please quit hijacking stories on bro to b-tch about tim.

Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

grad, when he advocates as a private citizen I don't criticize him for doing that.

But it isn't obsessing to criticize his decisions as a public official. The Preservation Board has powers to order around what can and can't be done on private property. In that role, aren't they accountable and open to public judgment of their decisions? They accepted that official power and have sometimes used it in ways deserving criticism.

replied to grad94
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"You want to demolish the vestiges of the rich because few were rich and most were poor?" No, you are spinning what I said. Those mansions are first and foremost UGLY, BLOATED,OVERDONE IMITATIONS OF EUROPEAN UGLY, BLOATED, OVERDONE IMITATIONS of NEOCLASSICAL ROMAN UGLY, BLOATED, OVERDONE IMITATIONS of CLASSICAL GREEK STRUCTURES some of which were not too bad. They are nineteenth century versions of today's UGLY, BLOATED OVERDONE McMansions and should be bulldozed as bad examples of what not to do with your money when you have too much of it. They are a testament to the nineteenth century worship of GREED and robber baron cut-throat corporate capitalism which turned a nation of small independent farmers and shopkeepers into a nation of a handful of RICH OLIGARCHS and a vast majority of
poor who were forced to work 18 hour work days in horrid conditions in their SATANIC FACTORIES AND MILLS which exploited child labor. If you want to worship at the altar of UGLY, BLOATED, BAD ARCHITECTURE go right ahead, but please don't whine about the CRAFTSMANSHIP on these mausoleums when there are plenty of charming, unassuming, delightful homes and buildings in Buffalo which tell the story of Middle Class Americans who knew how to light up the imagination of their children by turning a house into a home without enslaving everyone else in the process.

Score: -2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree with much of your take, as on exploitation of factory workers and child labor in coal mines, etc. And I agree that the rewards of capitalism, most egregiously but certainly not exclusively pre-TDR reforms, were distributed unfairly, disproportionately, were exploitative and shameful.

That said, I still would like to look at these houses. I wouldn't want them bulldozed. I'm pretty sure Buffalo would not be better off with these homes all demolished and the land "liberated".

Your last line in your post said: "Buffalo would do us all a great service by bulldozing these mausoleums and liberating the land from MASSAH's ugly monuments to THE ALMIGHTY DOLLAR". Very Cultural Revolution of you.

The Athenians were warring, enslaving thugs, but I still liked going to the Parthenon anyway.

The Egyptians, Aztecs and Incas were ruthless enslaving thugs, but I'd still like to see the pyramids of the world.

As for bad architecture, well . . . I've been in the Knox mansion and the Miller mansion and a few others. They might be all you allege in terms of poor taste, but they're still interesting to me.

Regarding domestics: I think domestic help was a relatively popular job in part because it beat a lot of the other options available at the time. It was temporary, mostly. Young women were expected to marry. By the day's standards, both overseas and here, the job was seen in better light, especially given the choices, including farming which was the most common occupation. Becoming a domestic was the foot in the door for many an immigrant. If it was legal today, we'd have lots of Latin American and Asian and African adolescents signing up to come over. Given the options available to many in the world even today, the life of many a 19th century domestic would be preferable.

I'm not advocating a return to child exploitation. And capitalism's rewards were out of whack. The excesses and injuries of that day begat a more egalitarian America in the middle of the twentieth century. Still, the injustices of that day's economy don't make me hate the creations of those robber barrons, uninspired as they might be.

replied to bobarrel
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

oh, and what's with lecturing everyone about having to be proactive? this is about as earth-shattering as informing people that if they want to avoid cancer, they should quit smoking. honestly, who doesn't already know this?


the bulk of this community's preservation efforts over the last few decades have been proactive. such as:


- establishing the buffalo preservation board
- requiring preservation board review of all city demo permits
- landmarking individual buildings
- establishing historic districts
- promoting what we have here, using walking tours, house tours, blogs, lectures, newsletters, videos, etc.
- educating real estate professionals about the value of city properties so they don't automatically steer everyone to the 'burbs
- forming block clubs and neighborhood associations to address problems before they get so big they take down a whole neighborhood
- winning the 2011 national trust conference
- passing preservation tax credit legislation
- advocating for smart code, to enable reuse of more old buildings

and so on.

Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"I think domestic help was a relatively popular job in part because it beat a lot of the other options available at the time." Apparently you have never worked as a domestic servant
since your image of it is mostly fantasy. It was a way to exploit immigrants who could not speak English, just as it is still used throughout the world to take advantage of naive young women who speak a foreign language. No other type of employment for a woman save being a prostitute would have been as stressful or demeaning. Her fate was totally at the mercy of her employer. Not only was she subject to humiliating bell ringings at any time of the day or night, but also inspections in uniform, suspicions of theft, nit-picking criticisms as well as the sexual advances of the master. Not a great way to discover America. The person I knew was only too happy to leave after 3 months when she got a job at Mama's cookie bakery on Jefferson Ave. As for the servants quarters "comparing pretty favorably to the average house of the average person at the time" is also fantasy. A living space comparable to a walk-in closet without windows is more likely. Actually, on a recent episode of House Hunters International in Kuwait, as the couple looked through an apartment, the agent pointed to a broom closet size room off the kitchen and said that that was where the domestic lived. And Kuwait is a very rich country.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

@bobarrel - We can start and end every conversation with an observation about how the world is an unfair place. It's likely that most of the workers on these mansions were exploited. They lived hard lives - overworked and underpaid, with no health insurance. Okay. We get it.

But even though we don't know their names, they will be remembered - because they created masterworks that will last for centuries. They left behind the fruits of their talents and their labors. Their work is an essential part of their legacy. It's their collective voices traveling through the decades and saying to us: We were here...look at what we built. Do you honestly believe they would agree with you that their work should be obliterated and forgotten because they were overworked and underpaid?

I'm going to take a wild guess and say that you want your legacy to be more than a collection of angry rants on several websites.

Score: 5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"But even though we don't know their names, they will be remembered - because they created masterworks that will last for centuries." If you think that fireplace or that Roman style McMansion is a "masterwork,"I would say "a masterwork of what?" It is a reproduction of a reproduction and is a bloated bit of show-how-much-money-you have garbage which America is the grand kingdom of. So please don't spin it
into something like the New York Central depot or City Hall which are truly inspired local "masterworks." As for the workers who built that fireplace and most of those other mausoleums called mansions, they were probably well-paid and they were not who I was speaking of nor did I refer to them. I only spoke of domestic servants and their quarters whose plight I happen to find morally repugnant. To see their shoddy quarters next to such lard laden excess as that ridiculous fireplace is a reminder of an America of which I am not at all proud.

As for leaving a "collection of angy rants on several websites" it reminds me of the words of William Blake in the Marriage of Heaven and Hell when he said "the voice of honest indignation is the voice of God." That indignation was present in Jefferson's declaration of independence and is the first step toward real change in a democracy. For too long the big shots in this area have gone ahead and abused the
natural beauty of the area by building monuments of greed and boring cement, cinder block, vinyl siding and asphalt with barely a voice raised in opposition. The result is a legacy to our children of strip malls and cul-de-sacs without a hint of inspiration or imagination in sight. Is it any wonder that they seek alternative worlds in cyberspace, drugs and fantasy? We can do a lot better than that.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm currently reading 'Lies Across America - What Our Historic Sites Get Wrong' by James Loewen. I have to admit that a few of the examples he cites are just a bit too politically correct, even for me. But there is a very interesting essay in the book's forward.

Any historical marker must be judged from three angles: 1) its original context; 2) the period in which it was elevated to historic reverence; and 3) the current attitudes of the people who visit it.

Original context is always the most truthful, but is seldom understood by anyone other than the people who lived there, and that truth often dies when they do. The period when it is designated a landmark is almost always candy-coated to some degree to benefit the people who are preserving it and the location it inhabits. It has only been in recent years (and still remains quite rare) to make a landmark of something that is purely part of a painful or shameful past.

That leaves the MOST important interpretations up to the modern-day viewer, to balance the 'greatness' of a site against the often unmentioned pain it may represent. To acknowledge one without the other is almost as bad as bulldozing the site and completely forgetting its social lesson altogether.

Surely, these homes represent some of the greatest contributions in the city's past, yet they also tell intense stories of exploitation, corruption and greed. Even a landmark to the exploited factory or domestic worker would be incomplete without a reference to the money machine that provided the jobs in the first place. We simply cannot ignore these sites because we favor one side of the story over another.

For those who care about the future, it essential to understand (and accept) the past. What has been done cannot be undone, but it can still be learned from... as long as we don't ignore history's lessons or cover them up.

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"Even a landmark to the exploited factory or domestic worker would be incomplete without a reference to the money machine that provided the jobs in the first place." Unfortunately 99 percent of the time it is the monument to the money machine which gets preserved and in the preservation has enormous amounts of money wasted on it, money which would be better spent preserving sights which have real significance or some more individually human meaning than greed. One such site was the hand-built house of Al Ricciuti at 276 Kensington Ave which was bulldozed by the city shortly after Mr. Ricciuti died in 1988 despite the efforts of a handful of preservationists. The house was dedicated to Mr Ricciuti's father, a stone cutter, and contained handcarved stones from all over the world as well as an exceptional hand-made 6 ft
window. Another was Billy Lawless's Green Lightning sculpture, a delightful assemblage of steel and neon which was torn down a few days after final assembly in 1984 because Mayor Griffin thought it obscene. Fortunately the structure still exists, but not in Buffalo where its presence would add artistic fun and spice to a downtown dominated by that boring cement hulk with the HSBC logo on it.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I can't say I'd actually want to see Green Lightning preserved. It's in a box in Cleveland and can stay there as long as it needs to. The few weeks it stayed in Buffalo had little to do with the city's heritage.

As for industrial legacy, is Buffalo not still referred to as 'The City of No Illusions'? The book I mentioned points out that there IS a growing awareness that history always has more than one story to tell. 50 years ago, it was unheard of to commemorate anything other than glorious achievements. Today, the trend is slowly growing to be more open-minded about our past. If there is any city where that attitude can be advanced, it is Buffalo.

It is up to us as citizens to make sure that the real stories are told. We can't always rely on city hall and the tourist board to do that for us. In other cities, it has been corporations and organizations (like daughter of the confederacy) that dictated what was preserved. In Buffalo, it is the people, and that is our biggest asset.

replied to bobarrel
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

In the end it is the cool stuff, not the big dumb towers of bankster domination or robber baron opulence, but the little eccentric, odds and ends kinds of cozy spots which make a place interesting. No doubt everyone has their own list of favorite haunts & watering holes which the Big Shots have made disappear in WNY. Take Onetto's Restaurant on the corner of Main & Bailey which had been an inn since the days cattle were driven into Buffalo along Main St. Bulldozed for a Burger King which was later replaced by a Dunkin Donuts. Barnacle Bill's was a rinky dink little outdoor/indoor seafood restaurant/bar on the corner of Niagara Falls Blvd & Eggert run by a WWII veteran who looked like Jimmy Durante & had photos of himself alongside the Schnoz. Bulldozed for what is now a U-haul. Jeff's, an aquamarine colored round shaped custard stand at the corner of Eggert & Sheridan.
Bulldozed for a strip mall. The house of Gus the goat herder which was on Colvin in Tonawanda. Gus used to herd his goats along the open fields under the power lines. Bulldozed for something "more important." A drive-in & miniature golf course on Delaware Ave in Tonawanda. Bulldozed for the 290.
A whole collection of little shops in Tonawanda including the
Star theatre which ran parallel to Ellicott Creek. Bulldozed for urban renewal. An old grist mill on Ellicott Ck just north of SUNYAB Amherst, bulldozed & replaced by nothing. The thousands of great old homes which used to exist where the 190 and 290 expressways now sprawl in Buffalo & Tonawanda. Bulldozed by those who wanted to spend less time in traffic.

Unfortunately it is a list which just keeps growing longer.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll