City August 8, 2010 10:00 AM

History of the Hydraulics: Part Three

History of the Hydraulics: Part Three

Around the turn of the twentieth century, the Hydraulics neighborhood was a booming commercial and industrial center in the city of Buffalo.  Despite its relatively small size, the area boasted numerous large manufacturing facilities and successful commercial enterprises along the Seneca and Swan Street corridor.  The Hydraulics became a natural location for a wide variety of industries and businesses to emerge during the late nineteenth-century as grain, cattle and raw materials flowed into the city of Buffalo via the Erie Canal and railroads.  The Larkin Company, manufacturer of soaps and toiletries, was certainly the most notable business which originated in the Hydraulics neighborhood.

THE LARKIN COMPANY, 1875- 1940s

larkin1.PNGOf all the businesses and industries which found a home in the Hydraulics neighborhood, by far the largest and most successful was the Larkin Company, makers of soaps, toiletries and a wide variety of household products.  In the age before the industrial revolution of the mid-nineteenth-century, soap making originally was a small, cottage industry in the United States.  Soap making became one of many industries which benefited from mass-production, thanks to new machinery and technologies.  Like many of the companies in the neighborhood, the Larkin Company took advantage of the Hydraulics area's proximity to regional and national transportation routes, raw materials and ample labor force.  Rising from humble origins in the late-nineteenth-century, by the early twentieth-century the Larkin Company grew to become one of the largest companies in the city of Buffalo and also the country.

John Durrant Larkin was born in Buffalo in 1845 at 13 Clinton Street (where the Lafayette Hotel now stands), the middle child of seven born to Mary Ann (Durrant) and Levi Larkin, founder of the Clinton Iron Works.  John D. Larkin became involved in the soap industry in 1862, when he began working as a clerk in the office of the Buffalo soap works of his brother-in-law, Justus Weller.  By 1865, Larkin was made a partial partner in the company, and when Weller decided to relocate the company to Chicago in 1870, Larkin was invited to relocate with the firm, becoming a full partner.  Larkin spent five years in Chicago, forming personal connections and learning much about the business end of the company.  His time in the growing metropolis laid the foundation for his later individual career in the soap industry.

DSC_01203.JPGSometime in 1871 Larkin was introduced to Weller's uncle, Dr. Silas Hubbard, who lived in Bloomington, Illinois. The relationship between the Hubbard family and John Larkin became a significant association, and the two families would become intertwined following this initial meeting.  Dr. Hubbard's teenage son, Elbert, was encouraged to join the soap company of Larkin & Weller as a salesman, and John Larkin would marry Elbert's older sister, Frances (or Frank as she was nicknamed), in 1874.  The happy times of the Weller, Hubbard and Larkin families would not last for long, and by 1875 Justus Weller's marriage to Mary Larkin ended in divorce, forcing John D. Larkin to leave the Larkin and Weller company to establish a soap works of his own.

After travelling to Boston, Larkin eventually returned to his hometown of Buffalo, which provided the transportation and animal fats needed to grow a successful soap industry, especially the Hydraulics neighborhood. Larkin's first factory was located at 196-198 Chicago Street in Buffalo's Old First Ward area, and by 1877 the company had grown so rapidly that Larkin purchased property at 667 Seneca Street in the Hydraulics neighborhood in order to build a larger factory, adjacent to rail lines and the needed raw materials.  Larkin employed his brother-in-law, Elbert Hubbard, as his first salesman and a one-third partner. Hubbard travelled widely for the company in his years as a salesman or "slinger" as they were known, spending the years between 1875 and 1878 travelling between Buffalo, Chicago and Milwaukee.  In 1875, Hubbard's role in the company grew, and he hired Frank Martin from Dayton, Ohio to lead a crew of door-to-door "slingers" for the company. In 1879, Frank's young thirteen-year-old brother Darwin D. Martin was brought to Buffalo as one of the "slinger" crew. By the late 1870s, the "J.D. Larkin & Co." firm was well established.

During the height of its activities, the Larkin Company was a sales and marketing pioneer.  The company's initial sales strategy was a typical, door-to-door campaign which brought the soap and toiletry products direct to the consumer.  In the early 1880s the company began including a small premium item, such as a handkerchief or a small chromolithograph, in each box of soap to entice customers to purchase larger quantities.  The idea of including a premium was not invented by the Larkin Company, but the company was highly successful at the combination of direct-mail solicitation to the customer (rather than a shopkeeper or middle-man), and the enticement of premiums allowed the company to sell directly to the customer.

By 1885 the Larkin Company was able to completely eliminate the middle-men from its business dealings. In 1886, Larkin marketing mastermind, Elbert Hubbard, created the successful "Combination Box," an assortment of soaps and toiletry items which was shipped on thirty-days approval, allowing customers to try and use the products or return them for a refund.  The company's selection of premium items also expanded during the 1890s to include products such as the popular "Chautauqua Lamp" first offered in 1892 and the "Chautauqua Desk" which was offered in 1893.  These high-quality premium products encouraged bulk purchases of soap and other products.  The "Larkin Idea" marketing strategy embodied the spirit of the Larkin Company's direct-to-the-consumer approach; if a customer was willing to commit ten dollars (about one week's pay for most people at the time) to a direct purchase of a year's supply of soap then the Larkin Company agreed to share the advantage in the form of an attractive premium item.  This strategy promoted a sense of "quasi-familial" intimacy between the consumer - or "Larkinite" - and the company and is the root of much of modern marketing strategies today.

larkin2.PNGThe Larkin Company also pioneered the concept of getting the average consumer involved in the sales process.  Called "Larkin Clubs of Ten," which began in the early 1890s, these clubs consisted of ten families, generally under the guidance of the females of the family, who pooled their financial resources in order to buy the expensive combination boxes and to share the premium offerings.  While members drew straws to win the premium prize, by the tenth month all members obtained a premium.  Some enterprising people purchased the boxes and sold them to their friends, family and neighbors, keeping the premiums for themselves.  In this way, the Larkin Company replaced the typical sales force with primarily housewives and women, effectively reducing packaging, shipping and administrative costs, and because the women who ran the club acted in the place of the more typical corporate-sponsored sales staff, the Larkin Company saved on labor and other related costs.  These clubs were the forerunner of Avon, Tupperware parties and other types of female consumer-sold product.

As early as 1881 the Larkin company employed nearly one hundred factory workers, and had organized into four departments of shipping clerks, mail-advertising helpers, bookkeeper and a "miscellaneous" group. Borrowing the card-ledger system of the local YMCA library, Darwin Martin created a unique bookkeeping and tracking system for the Larkin Company in 1885, recently promoted from his sales position.  By September of 1885, Martin noted over 35,000 accounts in the ledger, and as business continued to prosper, he soon created and supervised both the Order and Bookkeeping Departments and hired a staff of assistants.

The combination of the business sense of John D. Larkin, the administrative skills of Darwin D. Martin and the salesmanship of Elbert Hubbard turned the Larkin Company into one of the most successful companies in Buffalo in the late nineteenth-century, as the company expanded its business into selling toiletries, furniture, lamps, home products and a myriad of other items.  As the quantity and variety of the products produced by the company increased, the size and scale of the production factory also grew.  The small brick factory at 667 Seneca Street was quickly outgrown, and the Larkin Company constructed a series of simple, utilitarian buildings near the intersection of Swan and Seneca Streets between the 1880s and 1912.

larkin4.PNGBeginning in 1895, the company constructed twelve new factory buildings ranging from eight to ten stories in height on an entire block of land at Seneca Street between Larkin (formerly Heacock) and Van Rensselaer Streets.  While appearing to be one enormous building, the large bulk was actually divided in several smaller facilities for specialized production ranging from soap making, wrapping, storing, lumber storage, perfumes and a myriad of other functions.  A large Power House building (1902) and a railroad terminal warehouse building (1912) were among other specialized building added to the growing Larkin Company complex.  Designed by the R.J. Reidpath Company of Buffalo, these steel framed brick-clad buildings were ideally suited for the needs of industrial manufacturing, but were unsuitable for the office and corporate needs of the ever-growing company. 

In 1903 alone the Larkin Company was receiving over 5,000 letters per day, and new members of the office staff were hired weekly to accommodate the rapidly growing administrative needs of the thriving company.  Housed in the E and F Buildings of the factory, the increasing administrative aspects of the company, coupled with the constant demand for new production spaces within the factory itself, soon created the need for a new separate administration building.

Although the factory site in the Hydraulics was selected based on the area's proximity to several major railroad routes, the noisy, dirty and polluted industrial neighborhood was not ideal for a significant office building to be constructed.  The typical office worker at the time was female, and the Larkin Company felt they would not be enticed to work in this area of the city.  The new administrative building was also seen as a sort of figurehead for the company as well. John D. Larkin selected Frank Lloyd Wright as the architect for the new building on the recommendation of Darwin Martin (who by this time had become Treasurer) and Larkin's brother-in-law, William Heath, who was the company's head of the legal department.larkinAdmin1.PNG 

Designed and constructed between 1903 and 1904, the new Larkin Administration Building at 680 Seneca Street was located just north of the company's largest factory building. 

In response to the industrial atmosphere around it, the building was the height of modern technology, creating a sealed, healthy indoor environment, and pioneered several hygienic features in large office buildings. Clean, fresh air was circulated in the sealed building through a rudimentary type of air conditioning system which turned the blocky corner piers of the building into a massive circulation system. 

A large interior courtyard infused the interior with natural light and allowed for additional air circulation.  In order to prevent the clutter common in large offices, Wright custom designed built-in metal office furniture, file cabinets, desks and even wall-hung toilets.  The Administration Building also featured an elegant restaurant and conservatory where the female office workers could unwind and be entertained.  Everything about the building was designed to be clean, efficient, pristine and modern in order to accommodate a staff of over 1800 people.  Upon its completion in 1906, the Larkin Administration Building was hailed as a triumph of modern architecture and office building design by European and American architects, critics and historians alike.
 
The Larkin Administration Building also was notable for its removal of the administrative and management functions from its previous location in the midst of the production floor.  Previous to this era, management staff and facilities of a majority of American factories and industrial buildings were typically located right in the heart of the production floor, keeping management in touch with the labor force and the manufacturing process.  The Larkin Administration Building created a separated building designated solely to the management and office tasks of the business, perhaps spurred by the labor strikes and turmoil of this period in American history.  While the result created an emblematic building which was specifically designed to house and economize the clerical functions of the company, the construction of the Larkin Administration Building effectively severed the deep-rooted connection between management and the labor force.

The Larkin Company continued to be successful well into the 1920s.  By 1925 the company manufactured a majority of the over nine-hundred catalog items in its expansive factory complex which covered over sixteen-and-a-half acres on Seneca Street in the Hydraulics.  In addition to their own soaps, cleansers, cosmetics, perfume, pharmaceuticals and food, they offered consumers everything from clothing and furniture to utensils and radios. 

With its primary corporate headquarters centered in Buffalo, the company had branches across the East Coast in Boston, Chicago, Peoria, Cleveland, Pittsburgh and New York City. The company had expanded into many aspects of daily consumer life, including the 154 Larkin chain stores in Western New York and Peoria, Illinois and the Larkin-branded fuel stations which pumped gas in Buffalo, Rochester and Erie, Pennsylvania. Over 4,000 employees proudly called themselves "Larkinites."  By the 1920s, the Larkin Company had expanded their range of products to cover nearly every aspect of daily life.

 

Source:  National Register Multiple Property Documentation Form prepared by Architectural Historian Jennifer Walkowski of Clinton Brown Company Architecture.

Previous:

Part One

Part Two

Next: The Decline of Larkin and Demolition of the Administration Building

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

Yes, I am going to say it again because its worth repeating.

Rebuild the Larkin Administration Building!!! If we can built Blue Sky, the Gas Station and the Boathouse then we can rebuild the Larkin Administration Building.

Who would I like to see inhabit the prestigious Larkin Administration Building? Answer: The Buffalo Niagara Enterprise/Buffalo Niagara Partnership (which I hope they will change their name to the Buffalo Niagara Chamber of Commerce). Can anyone think of a better building to great and introduce visitors wishing to invest and/or expand their business to our city / to our region than the Larkin Administration Building which is known locally, regionally, nationally and internationally.

Ok that being said...last thought:
The hydrolics district was indeed old and industrious because of its access to water and canals just as Black Rock. Its true today as much as it was 100 years ago. The Hydrolics and Black Rock were connected to downtown Buffalo via the Beltway.

To have a vibrant Hydrolics, Black Rock and downtown we should consider reactivating the beltway for Light Rail in addition to UB and the Airport Corridors.

Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It would be a worldwide attraction. A Frank Lloyd Wright Museum with traveling archecture shows.

If you want to think big for canal side that would be huge.

replied to JohnQBuffalo
Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Q: If the Darwin Martin house (house, mind you) cost $40m to renovate/partially recreate, what do you suppose the Larkin Administration building would cost to recreate from emptiness? A hospital or three? Wouldn't it have to cost at least ten times as much than that house? More?

Start taking up collections, ChristyLou. good luck on that.

Score: 1 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Sssh. He's busy. He just put a hotel on Pacific Avenue and is hoping to buy the Short Line Railroad.

replied to biniszkiewicz
Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

We don't really need a new hospital or three. And the Larkin Admin building was a lost treasure of American art. Along with the Guarantee Building, it is studied by EVERY architecture student in the world (yes, on the same level as Chartres cathedral and the Parthenon).

The cost to rebuild it is comparable to the cost to protect the Mona Lisa or preserve the Smithsonian collection, it has inherent value and cultural return no matter what the cost.

Considering that HSBC is willing to spend hundreds of millions to build a new HQ rather than stay in their current building, the price tag is not a question of gathering collections, but finding sponsorships and reaping the benefits. Just try to schedule a tour of Fallingwater, their reservations are full nearly a year in advance. The entire F. L. Wright package of original, rebuilt, restored and post-built structures in the city could be an economic draw far in excess of the investment required.

Score: -3 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Wow -- this was the Kodak Park of Buffalo. I love these articles -- I don't know why (or how) someone gave this article a -1 rating :-(

Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That was me: I tried to give it a star, but somehow it showed up as a -1 instead of +1. I don't even know how one can award a negative star. Maybe I messed up or maybe the site did. If there's some way to give a negative star (as opposed to 'thumbs down' comment), please illuminate, someone.

replied to RaChaCha
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Fantastic articles, thank you!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree, great articles on this area of our city.

replied to quesaisje2
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It is a shame that the building wasn't appreciated for what it was when it was still standing. The architectural community snubbed the building and the architect in much the same way that architects turn their noses up at buildings like the Burchfield-Penney gallery, and just about everything else that is built today. The building sat empty from 1945 - 1950, during that time it was extensively damaged by the local community. The Larking Company and City tried to sell it for nearly a decade, and much like the Statler, Central Terminal, AM&As, Bethlehem Steel, (and the list goes on and on), no one wanted them for anything other than speculative purposes.

It took us nearly 30 years after the building was demolished until people even showed the slightest interest in it as an architectural or local treasure.

Let's remember that when the architectural snobs turn up their collective noses at other buildings being built and demolished today. I hope the local community remembers this when they decide to break-in and vandalize a building to the point of no return. I also hope our local government has learned from their mistakes with the Larkin Admin Building. Finally, I also hope we remember this the next time a company threatens that we "have to" tear something down in order for surrounding structures to survive.

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The Larkin Building would be a tough rebuild. If this were Germany, we'd have the national treasury at our disposal to do such a project but when we can't even get the Buffalo Central Terminal renovated it's hard to imagine anyone here stumping up the $100 million plus dollars to rebuild the Larkin. Maybe NYS can sell special lottery tickets to pay for these kinds of big ticket items...

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Is $100mm the price? Is there even an estimate out there?

The one thing about a possible reconstruction of the Larking Admin building is that it would not have to be at the same location. This would be a huge difference to the CT, which no matter how people try and spin it, is in a very bad location.

I wonder if a reconstructed Larking Admin building would be a draw downtown?

replied to sonyactivision
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Ehh... Central Terminal is really in no worse location that the current Depew Amtrak station - in the middle of nowhere with nothing within walking distance to do during a layover. At least a restored Central Terminal would be nice to look at while you wait.

replied to longgone
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

And if I remember correctly when they first tried to demolish the Larking Admin building, it was so well built, that they basically ended up having to take it down brick by brick.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm sure the wrecking ball would disagree.

replied to FredOak
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yeah great, get the poor people who have nothing BUT a dollar and a dream to rebuild that thing.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Great account! But the truth is that once it is gone, it stays gone. The administration building would have no practical application today especially when you consider the open air interior center.

Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Imagine how much money we could dedicate to reviving business and infrastructure if we reallocated some of the $7 Billion dollars per month spent on the unjustified war in Afghanistan or the $5.5 Billion we spend each month on the unjustified war in Iraq. If we could recover even half of that amount, we would see a reduction in taxes paid by the middle class, an increase in funding available for social services, and money available for local projects. We might also see this applied in ways that reduces our national debt. If we are really concerned about the future of America and our economic stability as a nation, then lets focus on where we are wasting the most money each month. It is not on corporate or social welfare, it is on the wars overseas.

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"unjustified war in Afghanistan"

An opinion, of course. And a tougher argument to make than Iraq. I'll just say I disagree.

Good article. Silly though to think it would ever be rebuilt.

Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Totally my opinion, I know it is not shared by all or even the majority. I wish I had a better word to use to describe my feelings for our occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq.

replied to LouisTully
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll