Real Estate May 20, 2010 11:15 AM

Walmart Sticks Toe Into City

Walmart Sticks Toe Into City

Buffalo doesn't have a Walmart store, but could soon have its traffic.  A dilapidated plaza in West Seneca could be the home of a new Walmart Store under plans announced yesterday.  Access to the store will be from a driveway loacted in the city. 

The 2400 Seneca Street property has been the home of Twin Fair, Gold Circle and Ames stores in the past.  It has been vacant for eight years.  The proposed store would be 115,000 sq.ft. and employ 300.

4623088069_ec2953751f_b.jpgDespite persistent rumors of Walmart looking in the Hertel/Delaware/Elmwood area of North Buffalo for a store location, the big box retailer with over 4300 U.S. locations has yet to land a city site (pssssst Central Park Plaza). 

According to South Buffalo Assemblyman Mark Schroeder in today's News, "We need a game-changer and we got it."

Photos by David Torke @ Fix Buffalo.

walmartaerial.bmp

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

Why not locate in the old K-Mart site across from the Broadway Market?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is good news for the residents of South Buffalo. I would love to see WalMart move into the Central Park Plaza area as well. That would be a tremendous boost for the residents of the East Side as it would bring jobs, shopping options, and much needed growth to that area.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Say goodbye to the remaining small businesses on Seneca Street, though. Game-changer indeed.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Most ill informed comment I have read in quite some time. Look at any new supercenter built in WNY over the past 5 years and you will see that each has coat tales that draw in other national retail and restaurants. There is nothing worth saving on Seneca Street now - it is ghetto.

replied to JSmith
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What small business? the Family Dollar? the 3 rental centers? I don't think Walmart is a Bar or Pizzeria.

replied to JSmith
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Sally, JM.............I couldn't agree more! Do your homework JSmith.

replied to JSmith
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

They need something there, I grew up right next door on Edson, and have been surprised how long this lot has sat. I'm not a big fan of Walmart but a store here makes sense.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Seneca street is in rough shape - this may be the nail in the coffin for any chance at urban retail ever making a real comeback. Would be shortsighted and a major shame.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

agreed. walmart is a net loser for any community. for every job it provides, it eliminates 1.5 jobs, often jobs with better pay and benefits. more numbers here:

http://www.walmartmovie.com/facts.php

replied to townline
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Grad: You are against Wal-Mart? Shocking...

replied to grad94
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm not a huge fan of Walmart, however, there needs to be jobs to lose in order for this to happen. Seneca street at the moment isn't at the point where it has jobs to lose.

replied to townline
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You're not completely right - Tops just opened an urban-esque designed store on the street - certainly a nice step towards better big box grocery in the city... a new locally owned pharmacy recently opened, several restaurants do very well, and there are many smaller businesses - pet shop, liquor store, flower shop ....

Certainly though, they're not in great shape. But, I would bet that at least half to 75% of those would close within a few years of Walmart opening.

But lets say you're right - there is already no worthwhile business left on the street. Then the fundamental argument becomes...

- do we accept the thought that small retail will never return to this area, allow Walmart to enter the market and dominate. In this case - at least we're providing residents retail services, albeit without the "urban quality of life" factor. In this, we're also accepting that the urban built environment fabric in the neighborhood is likely to more rapidly decline.

or

- do we realize that a 2-decade trend of decline in a neighborhood is just a blip on the radar in the life cycle and development of a city. That it is likely that small retail will make a return to the area eventually - so we should make sure that we preserve conditions (physical and economic market) that will allow urban retail to thrive in the future.

This is the basic scenario that happened on Delaware and Elmwood Aves... Delaware in north Buffalo chose the 1st option. Elmwood Ave chose the 2nd option. Where would you rather live?

replied to galaxyjay
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It is now a steady 6 decade decline from it's peak not 20 years. Every census since 1950 has shown a population decline in South Buffalo. I submit that a 60 year decline in a City only 178 years old in not merely a blip. That area has been in decline for fully one third of it's existance,

replied to townline
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Not true. Tract 6, 7, and 8 were adding residents as recently as 1980. They also have some of the lowest concentrations of poverty in the city.

replied to Sally
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

My bad. They were adding residents when the 1970 census was taken.

replied to The Kettle
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think it's a false choice of either storefronts on Seneca or Wal-mart. Those storefronts will never be able to supply the neighborhood with the staples of modern life. Those storefronts are perfect for the flower shop, Seneca Pet Shop (good selection of tropicals btw), and small shops. You're not going to go buy your dish soap, underwear and other items on the Seneca strip, those items are already being purchased at other big boxes. We're not talking about taking houses or Greenfields for the new development, but a redevelopment of a decades old big box. I don't see the issue.

replied to townline
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree with your comment that "You're not going to go buy your dish soap, underwear and other items on the Seneca strip, those items are already being purchased at other big boxes." This store would just divert traffic from one big box store (i.e. Tops) to another. Traditional storefront businesses in urban neighborhoods have adapted to or survived 50 years of big box retailing by serving niche markets and establishing themselves as boutique shops. So, I don't see a bunch of mom and pop businesses closing up shop. I think the argument is more about quality of place. I think we would rather see the site redeveloped using traditional neighborhood design principles than typical suburban big box plaza design. Auto-centric big box retailer centers erode the urban fabric by taking away foot traffic, sense of unique place and identify, psychological comfort of pedestrian scale design, etc. That may have more of an impact on the traditional commercial corridor than the products being sold at the big box store.

replied to nick
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So would you propose clearing the entire site and redeveloping it with housing at the rear and a traditional 2-3 story first floor retail upper floors residential/commerical? I have no problem with that if there's demand, but so far that has not happened. I guess I'm looking at this more from a the POV that Wal-mart is going to go somewhere. At this location you already have the bones for a big box so why not use it? I don't think it will be anymore detrimental to the neighborhood than the Ames/Gold Circle.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree with that, too...Wal-mart is going to go somewhere and I like the idea of an existing big box site near an existing neighborhood being redeveloped. To clarify, what I'd really rather see is a multi-use development with a more traditional urban density...it doesn't necessarily need to incorporate traditional neighborhood design principles. Thinking more realistically, a bus stop and more park-like landscaping would go a long way (I’m sure that landscaping comment will be misinterpreted by someone). I’m just not a fan of a concrete box surrounded by a sea of asphalt that’s only ever half-full on its busiest shopping day.

replied to nick
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"I think we would rather see the site redeveloped using traditional neighborhood design principles than typical suburban big box plaza design.""

Then why didn't you do it. You let the place lie fallow for a decade then have a hissy fit when someone else does something with it. Why didn't you organize a community group to redevelop the site? You certainly had enough time to put one together!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That would mean be diverting one's attention from their Mac...

replied to Sally
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

A.) I'm not a gazillionaire developer or multi-national company. 2.) I would hardly characterize my comments as a "hissy fit." III.) I'm just an observer and commentator who, in the grand scheme of things, could really care less what happens to the site - I'm just trying to contribute to the discussion. d.) Why don't you angry about it.

replied to Sally
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

well said. thank you.

replied to townline
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

townline>"Delaware in north Buffalo chose the 1st option. Elmwood Ave chose the 2nd option. Where would you rather live?"


People have different preferences, but obviously many choose to live and/or shop near Delaware in NB. They may not comment much on blogs like this, but many show by actions that they like surface parking. It isn't just big box stores either - look at how full parking lots get for stores on Delaware near Great Arrow and near the Kenmore intersection.

It's good for Buffalo to have both kinds of options - Delaware style and EV style (which also benefits from a decent amount of convenient surface parking in most busy blocks on Elmwood). Having a mix is smart.

replied to townline
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Small storefront businesses already can't compete with big boxes located in other areas. Those storefronts can only succeed with niche products and offerings not found at the big boxes. You're not building on greenfield and are reusing a currently underutilized big box location. I think it is a win for the area.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Talk about tucked away... This store will have no frontage. Are there any tax abatements associated with the project or is it a purely organic decision by Walmart?

I'm not a big fan of walmart, but sometimes something is better than nothing.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This should (and is becoming) WalMart's best scheme for new stores - replacing vacant suburban style shopping centers. They're doing it in Amherst at Sheridan and Bailey, the old Lockport Mall and they did it in Hamburg on Rt 20. These are areas that were accustomed to heavy retail traffic until the stores died and sat vacant. These are established retail areas that are much better to redevelop than at virgin suburban sites (the stereotypical WalMart scheme). This will increase traffic on Seneca in a good way - it will draw people from West Seneca back in, and suddenly the businesses on Seneca get a second look. What killed Seneca Street was probably the development around the Seneca Mall area 40 years ago by the I-90, a typical location for a WalMart. I'm glad this site is being considered.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

City officials should push for WalMart to open up in the Central Park Plaza. Take the land from its current owner and do it.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I grew up a few blocks away. When I was a kid that plaza was a Hills and Fays, with a Fantastic Sams too. The other plaza in front was full (Blockbuster, Dollar Store, Furniture place, a few smaller stores). Sad to see it deteriorate and sit empty for so long.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

People are so quick to jump on Wal Mart. When they built a Walmart in Lockport, the only places I saw go out of business in was KMart and Hills. The little shops in the city that were struggling before didn't get effected, and in fact there is more development around that area then there was before Wal Mart. I would take issue with Wal Mart building on Elmwood ave, but the proposed site is fine.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

BINGO - and Hills and K-Mart did not close the Lockport stores because of Wal-Mart. They closed them because they both went into bankruptcy nationwide. Hills totally liquidated and K_Mart shuttered hundreds of stores. Some near Wal Marts, others not.

replied to DMZ
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If anyone has pics from back in the day when this was Hills and you'd like to share them, please let me know. Thanks - davidtorke@gmail.com

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Just saw this: http://www.wkbw.com/news/local/94283379.html

WKBW reports the following from Bentonville...

Part of the site lies in the city of Buffalo. “This is an exciting development project that will add hundreds of new jobs for residents in this region,” said Buffalo Mayor Byron W. Brown. “My administration is committed to working cooperatively with Walmart Stores, Inc., Assemblyman Schroeder and Supervisor Piotrowski. We want to insure that the redevelopment of this vacant property continues the revival of commercial activity along Seneca Street, produces jobs for our residents and strengthens the quality of life for the community.”

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So does this mean Buffalo has risen?

Can we all get lives now?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Wal-mart represents the worst of America. Low wages, discrimination against women, low quality disposable crap, exploitation of third world workers, and concentration of profits in the hands of a greedy few. Anybody that sees this as positive just isn't paying attention.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Want to see crap go into some of the small shops on Elmwood that try to sell Dollar Tree items for 5 or 10 dollars.

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Question for all of you economic development experts: if big boxes are detrimental to small shops, how come Hertel Avenue is flourishing? Big Lots, Kohls, Kmart and Target have not killed that strip.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

WCP and Jimmy suggested Central Park Plaza for the next Walmart. That location isn't on anywhere near a big enough street for them to select. Also, I doubt the surrounding density of shoppers would be enough.

Beyond all that, I'll be suprised if Walmart ever tries for a store in the city (even the Hertel site) and subjects itself to our Common Council. We'll see if part of this West Seneca site being in Buffalo causes any problems for them, but if a whole WM project is ever fully in Buffalo I'd expect the protests and demands would be more hassle than it's worth.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The system works.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

True, in a way it works.

WM-haters who want to be sure there's no WM near them can be sure of that by living in the city - except S. Bflo after this opens at the border there. (But as we saw in Lakeside Commerce Park comments, some opinion apparently doesn't consider SB to be a part of Buffalo anyway!)

replied to The Kettle
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Although I wouldn't shop there, I would welcome Walmart to the city with open arms. As I said before, I dont think any of the neighborhood retail districts would be hurt by competition because they dont offer the same products and many city residents shop at suburban Walmarts, or other mega stores now anyway. At least with a city location there is an opportunity to keep the jobs and tax revenue within our borders.

That being said, Walmart's reputation for being anti-worker and anti-small business is the fault Walmart and not the "haters"(count me as a hater). Perhaps if management engaged in better business practices you wouldnt see grassroots opposition to proposed store openings.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

pit>"Although I wouldn't shop there, I would welcome Walmart to the city with open arms."

I'd welcome them too, as would many of our fellow city dwellers. Still, I'd predict more "keep WM out" efforts in the city through activists and the Common Council than the small amount in burbs like Amherst. If the Hertel site is attractive enough, maybe some day we'll find out.

I don't know if WM's practices are much different than Target, Home Depot, etc., who didn't get much opposition to locating in Buffalo - but haters aren't always consistent.

replied to The Kettle
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Right now it's proposed, we all know how the Walmart saga's playout....HSBC closed it's Seneca Street Branch, Ettore Winter Photographers ( there for fifty years) moved to Amherst (of all places) and Seneca Street has been in a constant state of decline for the past several decades. Rumors were that the South Side consolidated library (after closing Cazenovia Branch, the 2nd busiest branch at the time)may have been built along Seneca....never materialized. We do have a new liquor store and Fransesca's! and Americorps...and Mickey Kearns reclaimed the library as the Cazenovia Reading Room....The million dollar question becomes.....how do you divy up a limited pot of money and get the biggest bang for your buck? Walmart might not be the greatest solution but business along Seneca Street won't suffer, there isn't anything left.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I have to agree. Most of the urban commercial strips, healthy or not, do not carry the same goods or services that a Walmart or other mega store would. Elmwood, Hertel, Main st. in Williamsville etc. seem to get along just fine despite being near Kmart, Target, and Walmart.

replied to truestar
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So, what about the new City Development Codes that were recently updated? Will it NOT apply here? So, Wal-Mart gets a green light on a 'Suburban' style store in the city? So, that new zoning update means NOTHING???...Oh, that's right, this IS Buffalo, nothing changes.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I don't think they actually get updated for another 3 years....

replied to Lego1981
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"So, Wal-Mart gets a green light on a 'Suburban' style store in the city?"

The new WM will be in the suburb of West Seneca, not in Buffalo. Its driveway will be in Buffalo. So unless the city's new codes prohibit something about the driveway, they won't matter even if there's a 3-year delay.

Beyond that, it sounds as though you expect the new codes prohibit anything that you consider "suburban" from being anywhere in the city. That expectation might be setting yourself up for some disappointment.

replied to Lego1981
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

what ever

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

west.
seneca.
isn't.
in.
buffalo.
it's.
a.
separate.
town.

(1 word at a time - worth a try)

replied to Lego1981
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Does Benderson Development own this lot?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

We don't restaurants following Wal-Mart into the city there are plenty of amazing restaurants here already. Keep the big box and chain restaurants in the suburbs. The city does need some help but not from the vacuum cleaner (Wal-Mart). Ps if you disagree try reading The Geography of Nowhere by James Howard Kunstler.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Just to check, everyone here that is against this store does not patronize big box stores right?


Also, is there any other proposal to utilize this location for an alternative development or is vacant preferable? It's not like bringing a big box to this site is a new, there's decades of precedent.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

For all those saying "Wal-Mart should locate at Central Park Plaza" ... they won't. The site selection criteria for Wal-Mart, like most national retailers, requires that the store be located on a major arterial street with a certain minimum level of "ADT" - average daily traffic. CPP is not located on a major arterial; its a couple of blocks away from a minor arterial street, and the ADT of Holden Street and Hill Street are in the hundreds, not the tens of thousands Wal-Mart demands.

Face it - retail will never return to CPP, not necessarily because it's on the "wrong" side of Main, but because there's just no traffic passing by the site. Yeah, it's nice to dream of Wal-Mart or Ikea or Crate & Barrel or Whole Foods at CPP, but major retailers do not locate on side streets.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Central Park Plaza? LOL! They'd have better luck putting it on Grant St., Main Place Mall, or the old AM&As.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment