City April 25, 2010 12:48 PM

Get out and VOTE on May 4th

Get out and VOTE on May 4th
When it comes to school board elections, what is it that you want to see in a candidate? Really. Think about it. What sort of qualifications does it take to be on the board, and are we electing board members for the right reasons, or are we electing them at all? When so few people vote during these elections, it is apparent that many people could care less about taking the trip to their polling places, especially since the elections take place apart from the governmental elections (and why is that?).

To remind people to get out there and vote during the upcoming May 4th school board election, I decided to ask three North District candidates to submit their platforms. Since that time Matt Ricchiazzi was challenged and is no longer on the ballot. After talking with Matt, he asked if we would please add his platform statement, as he is looking for enough write-in votes to win. As for the two candidates who will be listed on the ballot, they are Lawrence Scott and Jay McCarthy.

School-board-Buffalo-NY.jpg

Platform summation from Lawrence Scott:

With my experience in public education as a school psychologist, I believe that I can best represent parents, teachers, and most of all our students. Everyday in my work, I advocate for students and make them my number one interest when making decisions. If elected to the School Board I intend to do the same. Not only do I have a vested interest in this school system professionally, but personally as well. My wife and I are expecting our first child this summer and intend on one day sending him to the Buffalo Public Schools.
 
Our undeniable truancy issues and high drop out rates need to change. We need a comprehensive district-wide attendance policy with clear expectations and accountability and personnel assigned directly to this task to collaborate with the schools, parents, and appropriate community resources, such as law enforcement. I believe that sound alternative programs can effectively address truancy and drop out rates in middle school and high school. Our at-risk students need programs that provide a more personalized setting with smaller staff/student ratios, consistent counseling, and a hands on/vocational component. We need to prepare students, not only for college, but for careers. As a family counselor, I understand the importance of parent involvement in their child's education. As a school community, we need to compel all parents to be accountable for their child's social development and school success.

I strongly support small class sizes, afterschool programming, expansion of ESL services, and early intervention for students in need. We need to continue the gains that have been made in the areas of ELA and math as a result of reading and math coaches and an extended day/school year. School safety needs to be a number one priority. All students have a right to come to school and be safe both physically and emotionally. While campaigning, I've had the opportunity to hear the concerns of many parents, educators, and other city residents who are passionately concerned about our children and their education. If elected, I intend to create a network of advocates for education, who will inform me of relevant concerns in our schools and guide me in making decisions on critical issues affecting our children.

See scott-for-schools.org

Platform summation for Jay McCarthy:

I'm Jay McCarthy and I'm running for School Board because I believe in Buffalo and Buffalo's future.  I know that the key to that future is our school system.

I believe strong schools make strong neighborhoods.  My candidacy is about bringing a fair, common sense approach to the School Board.  To me, that means four key points:

•    More accountability for better results (for teachers, children and parents)
•    Reducing busing and reviving neighborhood schools
•    Smaller class sizes
•    Improved school safety

My wife Betsy and I are raising our daughter Elise in North Buffalo, in the same neighborhood where I grew up.  Too many of our friends have moved out of Buffalo because they were worried about the schools, but we don't want to leave.  Buffalo is our home and I want to fight for better schools for my daughter . . . and your children, too.

In 2006, I founded Buffalo MicroParks and created the Barkyard Dog Park in LaSalle Park.  In spite of the best efforts, the idea of a dog park had languished, blocked by bureaucracy and inertia.  By offering some new ideas and creative compromises, I was able to lead a coalition that in August 2007 opened Buffalo's first off-leash area for dogs.  That's the ability, passion, and leadership I will bring to the School Board. 

I'm running for school board because I believe in Buffalo's future, and that future is in our schools.  I don't pretend to have all the answers but I do believe that by working together we can explore new ideas and find innovative solutions to some of the problems facing our schools.  I'm the only candidate who has a real record of accomplishing change.  Please join me in my campaign.  Thank you.

See: jay4buffalo.com

Platform summation for Matt Ricchiazzi:

Don't send another incrementalist to the school board.  Incrementalism isn't good enough now.  We're in crisis mode, and times like these demand a top-to-bottom rethinking and restructuring of our public education system.

I'm asking for more than your vote.  I'm asking you to be aspirational.  I'm asking you to join me in setting ambitious goals that will be challenging to achieve.  I'm asking you to believe that no law, contract, or regulation is so permanent that it cannot be changed; I'm asking you to believe that reasonable people can forge meaningful compromise.

At the root of my candidacy is an unwavering understanding that complacency is not a conscionable option.  History demands of us extraordinary reform in an increasingly global and competitive world.  The jobs and industries of the future will emerge where the most skilled and productive workers are--nothing short of our relevance in the global marketplace is at stake.

Buffalo Public isn't competing with Clarence or Orchard Park--we're competing with Shanghai, Hong Kong, and Tokyo.  We have an opportunity to make Buffalo Public a world renowned brand in education, and to reshape what public education can look like in America.

But it's going to take much--much--more than another incrementalist.  And no law, regulation, contract, or special interest should be able to stand in the way.  If you're ready to refuse the stale air of orthodoxy, please consider "WRITING IN RICCHIAZZI" on May 4th.

See ChangeBuffalo

View image

1 TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://www.buffalorising.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/6733

As promised, following is the platform for Dr. Patricia E. Devis, who is running for North District seat for the Buffalo Board of Education, along with these candidates posted on April 25. Now it's time for you to decide who to vote for. Take the time ... Read More

Comments

Leave a comment

According to the board of elections (as of 4/21) there are three candidates on the ballot. Did you contact Patricia Devis for her platform?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Oh please, why would you possibly think that "queenseyes" would write about Devis, a person who actually cares about what she is running for. Much easier to repeat sound bites from that idiot ricciazzi.

replied to ecogeo
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You are absolutely correct - there are 3 candidates on the ballot (and a write-in runner) - here is BRO's fix to their omission - candidate Dr. Patricia Devis:

http://www.buffalorising.com/2010/04/platform-summation-from-dr-patricia-e-devis.html#SlideFrame_0

replied to ecogeo
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

People may wish to hear the candidates for themselves and can do so at:

Thursday, April 29 at 339 Genesee St. 7-9 p.m. Sponsor: the Alliance for Quality Education and Citizen Action of WNY. Info at: 855-1522 x 1

Saturday, May 1st, 1-3 p.m.; King Urban Life Center, 938 Genesee St. Sponsor: the Metro Buffalo Alliance of Black School Educators an Affiliate of NABSE; with Rod Watson, Buffalo News; L. Nathan Hare, Executive Director of the CAO; and Mrs. Eva Doyle, Columnist at the Criterion Newspaper.

There will also be another forum next Monday evening for East side candidates...perhaps one of the readers has the details. I think BLAC is sponsoring it? It may be at Merriweather library?

replied to KAZ Buffalo
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thanks so much for including my write-in campaign on BRO, Newell! I think you do more single handedly to enhance the quality of our Democracy than perhaps anyone else in the City. BRO facilitates such a unique and valuable public discourse on a great range of issues. Many thanks!


I'd like to invite everyone to check out my education reform plan at www.changebuffalo.org/education-reform-plan. I've just added a brief 22 page outline of my reform agenda as an attachment on the website. Just to warn you, I set aspirational policy and management strategies that will be difficult to achieve, but we desperately need a long term direction and I hope this helps contribute to that discourse.

As always, feedback and comments on the policy issues are welcomed and apprechiated.

Again, thanks so much!


matthew.ricchiazzi@changebuffalo.org

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Matt - What do you want to do? Mayor, School Board Member, Senator, Block Club President? Anything that lets you stoke your ego? We might take you seriously if you weren't all over the place trying to find a home for your platform.

If you were so serious about running for the School =Board position, then why are you late to the table again? Isn't this the same thing that happened with you Mayoral bid? Lack of planning and forethought is not a good sign for any elected official.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Ouch! What a scathing critique, hehe. I'm really disappointed by you're perception of me, so let me give you my perception of things:

I'm the only one of the candidates who isn't bought-and-paid-for by special interests and politicians with the expectation that they'll vote however they're told.

For the record, I have refused to accept a single dime of political contributions from anyone. I ran for Mayor last year on just $500 (of my own money) spent on fliers, clipboards, and pizza for volunteers. I regularly refused campaign contributions, while many people offered. Similarly, I've refused to accept contributions as I run for school board, because I think the way we finance our democracy is the root of our City's demise and dysfunctional governments.

I'm not for sale, and that tends to scare the **** out of anyone who has their hands in the proverbial pocket of the government. But when I fall on my face, it's going to feel good and I'm going to be proud.

If you perceive me as being motivated by ego, then I've obviously not been focusing enough on ideas, so let me apologize for that and share a few:

-I'm a proud supporter of charter schools (and I'm not afraid to say so) because they empower principals to innovate, they give students more program choices, and they allow for the specialization of curriculum and student services.

-We need to end teacher tenure as we know it, because it's antiquated and irresponsible.

-If you're a really great AP Physics or Calculus teacher, you should be able to earn $140,000 p/yr, if you're worth it (based on performance).

-We need to transition from a defined benefit to a defined contribution retirement system.

-We need to transition to a 240-day trimester schedule, and offer new intensive values education programs during the summer, focusing on wellness, responsibility, and tolerance.

-I want to eliminate the Central District Office, because the "top-heavy, top-down" decision makers on the 8th floor of City Hall are too detached from daily in the classroom realities, and as such are unable to optimize resource allocation.

-I want to create "faculty senates" at each school so that we can fully integrate teachers into the management structure of each school, and empower them to cultivate new ideas and to help drive the organization. So many young and energetic teachers have such low moral because they feel powerless to affect change in the system. They're on the ground and can see best how programs do or do not work. That perspective must be central in our management.

-Every administrator should be required to teach at least one course, so they don't become detached from daily in-the-classroom realities.

-A comprehensive anti-bullying strategy, with intensive socialization programing is a matter of civil rights.

-We need to hire the most innovative, energetic, outside the box principals... and then we need to let them reinvent what education can look like in America.

-Schools should compete for students in a universal voucher system (that funds each school directly and solely based on enrollment), because giving kids more choices is never bad. That system should include public, charter, private, and parochial participation (so long as participating schools are unable to charge in excess of the voucher value).


.... I could go on and on and on, or you could read the entire 23pg plan at changebuffalo.org/education-reform-plan


Do I think I'll get elected? Maybe, maybe not. But it doesn't mean that their shouldn't be someone who is pushing the envelope and forcing the "plausible" candidates to grow a gut and to stand up to powerful special interests that are robbing too many students of the education that they deserve.

Is that ego? Maybe a little. But I'm pretty sure it's mostly anger.


replied to jimmy
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So why are you late to throwing your hat in the ring as a candidate? Did you not have enough support to complete the petition?

You have some good ideas, many that have been stated on BRO, but right now they are just that, ideas. If elected, how would you implement your ideas? Would you have the authority to throw out teacher contracts and start over? Have you thought of the ramifications of your ideas, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. If you raise the pay of one teacher to $140,000, do you lower the pay of another teacher to make up the difference? Do you tax the people more to make up the difference? Do you expect the state to make up the difference? What are the next steps, or are you like any other idealistic candidate selling us a bill of goods that you cannot deliver?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I would encourage you to read the 8 page outline of my plan that addresses strategies for cost control.

replied to jimmy
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Is that the plan that has Kindergarten teachers earning $30K per year with an Associates, while 12th grade teachers earn $85K with a PhD? Do you have any idea what it takes to educate elementary age students? Your lack of respect for the lower grades shows just how little experience you have with school systems and how unqualified you are for this position.

I did not see much in your cost control strategy that shows a reduction or control of costs, beyond the open or privatization of resource management for the district. Paying for laptops for students, smart boards for classrooms, higher bandwidth to classrooms, PhD programs for teachers, and pension buy-outs do not constitute cost control if you do not have the funds for the initial investment.

You remind me of Dr. Barbay in Back to School. You are full of hypothetical idealism and lack real life experience and practical knowledge of the educational system, business, and the real world.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Let me answer you points in turn:

1- Yes, we need to differentiate teacher salaries across grades, because teachers need to have a greater depth and breadth of knowledge that they can bring into the classroom. I want to attract teachers from the top third (rather than the middle or bottom third) of college graduates, which requires that we pay professional salaries with performance incentives (which has been proven to attract higher caliber staff in a range of professional contexts).

2- I don't disrespect teachers in lower grades, but I do understand that someone with a Phd in a non-education discipline can bring extraordinary depth and perspective into the classroom that a Kindergarten teacher has no need to do. We do need to create programs that allow any teacher to pursue their Phds at no cost while teaching.

3- You say I have "little experience" with school systems? That's an ignorant statement. I have been navigating education systems for the last 20 years of my life as a student. I see from the student's perspective what is wrong with the system. I've attended four different public school districts, a parochial school, undergrad, and two grad schools. I think I have a deep knowledge of the system and I'm the most recent product of it.

4- I'm unqualified to serve on the school board? What a joke... despite ivy league degrees, an MBA from a top tier business school, a fellowship at Princeton's Woodrow Wilson school, working as a lobbyist in NYC, etc, etc.... I see how I'm so unqualified to serve on the school board. You keep thinkin' that, buddy.

5- As for technology expenditures, they do indeed lead to cost control. Technology leads to increased labor efficiencies and cost savings elsewhere. As for the data and monitoring systems, they also save money by virtue of informing our decision making quantitatively with real time operating and performance data. I don't have access to internal operating data, but if I did, I would happily build those valuation models for the range of policy issues that I propose.

6- The central cost control strategy should be to create a market mechanism that controls costs and forces principals to prioritize spending and compete for students. This should take the form of a universal voucher system in which funding is directly related to enrollment. This does a number of very important things: a) we constantly realign supply of curriculum offerings and services with student demand so that we're not wasting money with the inherent ineffectiveness of organizations that lack a competitive market mechanism; b) we empower principals to manage their schools, because they are in a much better position to optimize resource allocation with consideration for the niche needs of the subsegment of the student population that they seek to serve; c) it forces the closure of under enrolled programs and failing schools by virtue of offering students choices and treating them like customers; d) specializing each campus in a way that is tailored to serve the needs of niche groups of students will allow us to specialize services and curriculum by campus at an acceptable economies of scale.

You need to realize that I'm not proposing cuts in how much we spend per student. Rather, my aim is to frame and structure a system that has the operational flexibility that allows for the constant and perpetual reallocation of resources so that we can optimize our spending.

replied to jimmy
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I understand that you have an impressive academic pedigree; however you lack experience in leadership and business operations. To think that you understand the inter-workings of the school district because you were a student is as naive as someone thinking they understand the logistics behind Walmart just because they shop there.

I also wonder why you would be interested in running for the School Board when you proposed disbanding the School Board and handing control over to the Mayor. Was that proposal only viable if you were elected to Mayor? You proposed making the Mayor the Czar of the School District, are you expecting to fill that role if you are elected to the School Board?

You still haven't fully addressed why your name is not on the ballot for the Board seat. Is this a matter of funding or disorganization?

If elected to the School Board, will you promise to keep yourself free from party and public contributions to future campaigns?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

When you use the term "understand the inter-workings of the school district", to me that sounds like "you don't understand how corrupt, grimy, petty, you don't know the all the micro-politics, or the relationships, or who has their hand in what pot."

And frankly, I'm not ashamed of my naivety on those types of "inter workings" in the least.

About Mayoral control of the schools - When I was running for Mayor, I was putting this idea on the table because NYC has made incredible progress with Mayoral control under Mayor Bloomberg. Obviously, we don't have the same quality of leadership here in Buffalo, so I've come to the conclusion that a decentralized management approach that empowers innovative and outside the box principals is far more preferable in the long term (so long of course that the system is framed with implicit market mechanisms that encourage competition, reward performance, and move schools towards specialization of offerings).

You ask "why I'm not on the ballot"? Because I could just as easily win by spending money on fliers for a write in campaign rather than spending it on lawyers. Personally, I'd prefer it if our democracy worked that way.

You ask: "If elected to the School Board, will you promise to keep yourself free from party and public contributions to future campaigns?"

I wouldn't accept political contributions from anyone who has moneyed interests in the District's operations. I think that's a blatant conflict of interest. As for Party contributions... I don't know if you know this or not, but the Republican Committee in the City hates me and the Democrats don't trust my "market-based bull****", as they have put it.

replied to jimmy
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

When I say inter-workings I am talking about things like procurement and distribution, labor relations, parent and community relations, government relations, and the like. If you see all that as grimy and corrupt, and believe that you have the power and wisdom to reinvent the entire system, then good for you. I hope you win and have the ability to live up to your high expectations and ideals.

I don't buy your retraction of comments made while you were running for Mayor. If you felt passionate enough about it to put it in your platform and in your press statements while running for Mayor, then you should believe strongly enough in it today. Pulling back on something this significant is too convenient, now that you are running for the position that you proposed to eliminate.

I honestly think that your lack of official entry in this race proves that you do not have a sincere interest in the position. If you were serious about running, then you would run. You can make all the excuses about fliers and lawyers, but you still aren't on the ballot. I am thinking that if you don't run you won't be disappointed if you don't win. Keep in mind that John Licata was on the ballot last year, and he spent less than $200.00 on his privately funded campaign.

So what is the real story Matt? Are you seeking name recognition from the public and a public soapbox to spout your ideas on how you would run our government, even though you are not officially running for office? What makes you different than the blowhard at the bar who tells us how things should be done but is still sitting at the end of the bar each night?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Is this another one of Mr. Gleed's online blogging aliases, I presume? It's good to see that the political operatives are earning their due, hehe.

replied to jimmy
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I have no idea who Mr. Gleed is. I am not with any candidate or party. I am just a guy who is wondering about your qualifications, inconsistencies, and lack of formal candidacy.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Are you insinuating that Jay McCarthy and Lawrence Scott are for sale? I think they have a better track record of community service and delivery on promises. Are they indebted to the political machine, or are you just spewing rhetoric?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm saying that they're not going to stand up to the interests that have put thousands of dollars into their campaigns. I don't think that I'm telling anyone anything that they didn't already know.


replied to jimmy
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Matthew.Ricchiazzi>"I'm saying that they're not going to stand up to the interests that have put thousands of dollars into their campaigns."


Questions for Matt --

Who are the interests you're saying are putting a lot of $$$ into this campaign, and to whom?

Obviously there's the BTF (not just $, but also foot soldiers). The Maria Whyte - Mike LoCurto political organization is reportedly backing the same candidate as the BTF is.

Other than those two interests, who else and which candidates are you saying are the benficiaries? I'm not saying there aren't any. Just asking.

If you're going to make the accusation, shouldn't you say which candidates and interests you're talking about? Otherwise it sounds like vaguely painting all 3 of your opponents with a broad brush.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think it's open knowledge that Devis is owned by Rumore. Scott is a pawn in Hoyt's political calculations, and McCarthy is backed by Jacobs. That's common knowledge, and I'm sure I'm not telling anyone anything they didn't already know. What I don't understand is why Hoyt initially committed to supporting McCarthy, and then he refuses to endorse him publicly, all the while he's been behind Scott? There is an underlying story there that I'm sure is ripe with political calculations that are far beyond me.

If I was to vote based on which puppet master I agreed with most, then it would certainly be for McCarthy. But there are few things more personally insulting than when someone hires lawyers to try to keep you from participating in the political process.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Wow - so who "owns" you Mr. Ricchiazzi? If receiving support from anywhere means you are "owned" by that support then someone must also own you. Of course, if you have no support from anyone then perhaps it would be wise to vacate the race as it's most difficult to win an election without any support.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You misunderstand my point. Receiving support is good. I have a lot of supporters. You know how I get them? By walking door to door and explaining to people who I am, what I think, and what ideas I have to improve the system.

Soliciting money from voters, contractors, administrators or employees of the government, etc corrupts our politics. My point is about the need for campaign finance reform. I think an honest reading of the above dialog makes that clear.

replied to KAZ Buffalo
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

{deleted- filth}

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Mr. Malone--this is not an appropriate comment or germane in any way to the conversation. My greatest hope would be that, when the dust settles and the election is over, people who really do care about education, schools and children in our city will continue to work and volunteer in the community and in our schools for their betterment and the success of our kids. We would be in such a different situation if every person in our community takes that responsibility--and privilege--to heart and does what they can. We would move giant steps forward in realizing a school system that truly serves and educates.

replied to KarlMalone
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If this site wants to go political than the question was fair.

replied to KarlMalone
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

LOL...anyone who knows me, knows that, if I thought Dr. Devis was owned by the BTF, I would not be working my heart out to support Dr. Devis. The fact that the BTF sees Patricia as fair-minded and independent--despite my support--is a credit to her integrity and dedication. Rest assured, she will serve all the North district's and our schools' best interests. I look forward to--and thank--Newell for the post that will be up soon to shed some light on her candidacy.

replied to jimmy
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Sherry, I've known you for a number of years and know your high standards of ethics and ideals. I know that you would only vouch for someone with equal passion for the community and dedicated to the betterment of the under served in WNY. I have the highest amount of respect and admiration for you and all that you do for the people of Buffalo.

replied to SL BYRNES
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

According to the left wing democrats like BlackRocklifer the biggest issue with the Buffalo Schools is poverty. What do these four candidates have in mind for fighting the economic divide in Buffalo? If memory serves, some frequent commentators on BRO have stated that truancy, failure, drop-out, and low test scores are all the result of the concentration of poor and special needs in the city schools. Is there a plan to distribute the poor more equitably so that all schools can share the burden?

What are the candidates' thoughts on schools that separate the best and brightest away from the rest of the students? Schools like City Honors and Olmsted. I wonder what their stance is on Charter schools. These are the major issues facing Buffalo, according to what I have read on BRO, yet there are few mentions of these in their platforms. Matt Ricchiazzi states that the answer is to make all Buffalo schools privately run Charter Schools. Is this truly an answer to the problems with the Buffalo Schools?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Very disappointed that Buffalo Rising chose not include Dr. Patricia Devis in this article since she is the most qualified candidate running in this race, with nearly 25 years of teaching experience at ECC and Buffalo State College.

It's one thing to not interview her, but to not even mention her as a candidate is simply inexcusable.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Dr. Patricia Devis, position 2A on the ballot for the North district, offers her qualifications and platform to the public who cares about Buffalo public education and children first at:

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dr-Patricia-E-Devis-for-School-Board/109525685749722?ref=ts

and

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=105112076198664&ref=ts

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Dr. Devis also wants the public to have every opportunity to know about the candidates in this important race. Here is a schedule of upcoming forums for the candidates running for all the subdistrict races:

http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=109525685749722&topic=74

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm gonna miss Catherine Nugent Panepinto. She was the best! I don't even vote in North District, yet she would always respond to my emails..

I hope BR addresses all the district's before May 4th..

So do any of these candidates have anything to say about unstructured play time? Olmsted students get 2, 20 minute sessions in the playground every six day cycle. This is unacceptable for the proper socialization of children. You talk about longer school day/year, but if it's just to force feed memorization for the assessment tests, you're missing out on the big picture. We're not educating children to be future factory workers anymore.. And does anybody know why Buffalo isn't part of BOCES? Does it have it's own trade school I'm not aware of? Seems like many would benefit from focussing on a skilled trade as opposed to College prep workloads. Maybe fewer would drop out...

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Seems like many would benefit from focussing on a skilled trade as opposed to College prep workloads. Maybe fewer would drop out...

Thats how it should be. Not every student is college material. Teach them something useful like carpentry or electrician, plumber something.

replied to hoss
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The City of Buffalo operates their own vocational and technology programs that mirror those offered by ERIE1 B.O.C.E.S. Most of the Buffalo Public High Schools offer specialized vocational and technology training for students who are not on the college track. Most of the suburban districts use BOCES for these programs.

replied to Sean Brodfuehrer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

As people have mentioned, I am terribly disappointed that Bflo Rising ignored the candidacy of Dr. Patricia E. Devis. The media in this town repeatedly "misses" facts--perhaps our media should go back to school and learn the "who what why where and how" of reporting. By thoroughly checking the "who" of the north district school board race, Bflo Rising would have discovered Dr. Devis. Dr Devis has the qualifications, the passion and the integrity needed to fight for our children. I ask Bflo Rising to add a profile of Patricia to this article. She offers the board and our children, Hope, Opportunity and Strength. Humanity needs hope, for without hope we don't care, we don't try, we don't advance. Humanity needs opportunity, for without seeing opportunity we stop trying. Humanity needs strength-- we must support people who enter public service to serve the public, instead of themselves. By supporting Patricia Devis we are offering her the strength she needs to fight for our kids. This city needs public servants who believe in Buffalo. Dr Devis believes in Buffalo and in our children. Vote for Patricia Devis May 4th.
The Rev'd Cathy Dempesy

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Everyone makes mistakes, and apparently I have made one here. After BRO posted on a fundraiser for Jay, I was sent emails to do the same for Matt and Lawrence. I reached out to all three asking for their summations instead. Originally I had never planned on posting anything other than the usual 'Get out and vote' post. I have reached out to Dr. Devis on Facebook and have asked her to submit a summation and photo. If she responds I will post it as soon as I get it. Once again I am sorry, but I never anticipated the emails from readers asking to post info regarding particular candidates.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thanks Newell, everyone does make mistakes and that's ok, especially when the mistake is noted and corrected.

replied to queenseyes
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I appreciate BRO’s recognition of the error but am nonetheless dismayed by the oversight of Patricia Devis as a candidate for the North District seat. I particularly have to question this apparent "oversight" in light of Dr. Devis’ superior qualifications in comparison to the other candidates presented. I am relieved that this was simply an error and not another case of the all-too-frequent and familiar local news and "good old boys network" at play.

replied to queenseyes
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

why oh why can't school board elections be held in november along with ever other race?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF SCOTT'S CAMPAIGN, HOYT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SCOTT'S CAMPAIGN. IN FACT, SCOTT DOESN'T EVEN KNOW HIM AND IS APPALLED BY HIS POSITIONS ON EDUCATION.

IN ADDITION, SCOTT SUPPORTS STRUCTURED FREE TIME IN A SCHOOL DAY FOR SOCIALIZATION AND FITNESS. HE IS A STRONG PROPONENT OF EXPOSING STUDENTS TO TRADES AND VOCATIONAL PROGRAMMING.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I was told of Hoyt's maneuvering from McCarthy's campaign manager, for whatever it's worth. My apologies if I conveyed something that was misrepresented to me. A number of operatives were under the passive assumption that Scott was Hoyt's "stealth" pro-charter schools guy. From what you say, I guess that may not be the case.

Which of Hoyt's positions is Scott appalled by?

replied to Lisa
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Lisa - if you are truly a representative of Scott's campaign, you just killed it by stating he is appalled by Hoyt's positions on education. Thanks.

I am glad to see some interest here, but not surprised as BRO readers/commenters often show interest, belief and a can-do attitude regarding the betterment of our community.

Please encourage your family, friends and neighbors to VOTE on May 4th for the future of our children and our City!

GO, Jay GO!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I believe an education advocate can be both pro-charter and pro-district because I support better schools for everyone, everywhere in the City.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

...is it just me, or is the prospect of actually electing a school board member who types 'hehe' in a publicly visible political Q&A appalling, terrifying, childish, inappropriate, immature and not in the least something to 'lol' about???

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think actually makes you look out of touch. If it was in a memo, yes, on a blog, no. See Emily Post, RIP.

replied to paul morgan
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm dismayed that Dr. Devis was not originally represented, as the only woman representing (I assume that by nature of being female she has a much more through understanding of what an effective education might entail)! However, I hope that I have enough character to forgive NN for the oversight, given the circumstances of the snakepit that political blogging can be. And considering what he already does, on a daily basis, to help get the word out.

That said, one more brief comment - I think having a younger voice to represent a voice for next steps is absolutely essential and completely consistent with online communication tools such as heheh and LOL. What concerns me far more are the MANY "grown" adults who frequently fail to acknowledge, and correct, their own immature behavior, perspectives, and decisions and are excused simply because of the language they use, the costume that they wear, and their purported expertise. sigh.

Let the games begin.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Interesting article in Artvoice about external money being injected (illegally) into the school board race:

http://artvoice.com/issues/v9n17/here_we_go_again

I have to admit, I liked a lot of what I heard about Jay McCarthy, but I may have to reconsider if his campaign is being bankrolled by shadowy organizations who feel the need to hide behind made-up names like "Education Reform Now" instead of just disclosing their identities and interests. Especially if, as implied in the article, if there is any connection at all to Steve Pigeon, who has become my litmus test for figuring out who not to vote for.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm a huge advocate for educational choices. The Buffalo Board needs much more than a smart person with credentials, it needs an innovator, a remarkable person who can influence others to fight for programs that cater to students’ strengths and interests, reduce drop outs through engaging projects, and involves students and parents in on discussions that advocate safety in schools. Let’s elect someone who inspires students to take an active role in the community now and in the future, instead of dropping out and joining the streets.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm a huge advocate for educational choices. The Buffalo Board needs much more than a smart person with credentials, it needs an innovator, a remarkable person who can influence others to fight for programs that cater to students’ strengths and interests, reduce drop outs through engaging projects, and involves students and parents in on discussions that advocate safety in schools. Let’s elect someone who inspires students to take an active role in the community now and in the future, instead of dropping out and joining the streets.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll