Real Estate March 11, 2010 12:00 AM

PUSHing Forward on Massachusetts

PUSHing Forward on Massachusetts

People United for Sustainable Housing (PUSH), a grassroots, non-profit community organization working to rebuild the West Side of Buffalo, is advancing plans to renovate three vacant buildings on a four-block stretch of Massachusetts Avenue.  The group is working with residents to create and implement an action plan for improving the neighborhood.  A prime focus is the redevelopment of empty houses for occupancy by low-income residents.

The City of Buffalo designated PUSH as the redeveloper for 397 and 398 Massachusetts Avenue (left and right in entry image), two vacant City-owned properties, in October 2008.  460 Massachusetts (below), at the corner of Chenango, was acquired in November 2009 from a private owner.  Eleven apartments will be created in the three structures.

 

460-A.PNGFunding consists of a $1.47 million grant from the state Department of Housing and Community Renewal and $400,000 from the City of Buffalo.  The Buffalo News has details on the "green" rehab plans:

Architect Kevin V. Connors of eco_logic Studio said one important feature is that the rehabilitation projects will embrace green technology. They will have energy-efficient windows and water heaters, solar electric panels and recycled-content materials.

The housing complexes will be painted in "turn-of-the-century" Victorian colors, said [PUSH executive director Aaron] Bartley.

Rents for one-bedroom apartments will be $375 a month, while three-bedroom units will go for $525 a month. PUSH already manages six units of housing.

460C.PNG

460 Massachusetts Avenue- from Google Street View

 

Work is expected to start in the spring and be completed later this year.  PUSH has longer-term plans to clean up vacant lots and rehab approximately 200 housing units in a 25-block area south of West Ferry Street and west of Richmond Avenue. 

The larger effort may receive funding through the New York State Sustainable Neighborhoods initiative announced by Governor Paterson in his 2010 State of the State address.  The pilot program, if it proceeds, is expected to create new, affordable, high quality homeownership opportunities by rehabilitating vacant and abandoned buildings and making them available to first-time homebuyers.

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

This is great news!!! If only we could see this kind of progress on the East Side too. Instead we are stuck with new suburban plastic homes replacing all older homes on that side of town..yuk. Go WEST SIDE!!!!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

maybe its best for all agencies/organizations to concentrate their efforts inside the borders mentioned, and build up the most attractive, livable neighborhood possible. the bones of good urbanism are still there (short blocks, corner stores, easy access to cultural centers), and there is a decent model for infill from Makeover.

the east side is a real mess overall.

replied to Lego1981
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

maybe the 'east $ide' wouldn't be $uch a 'me$$ overall' a$ you $ay, if para$itic leader$ like Dariu$ Pridgeon reinvested thoughtfully and meaningfully in their own community ~ a community btw that net$ him enough tax free $acred offering$ to buy expen$ive car$, crazy expen$ive waterfront apartment, and outrageou$ly offen$ive bill board$ ~ all in the name of god of cour$e.

you get what you vote for, and that goe$ double for the re$t of u$, e$pecially we$t of the 'great divide'. deci$ions$ are made by tho$e who $how up.

$how up ~ or $hut up in other word$$$.

replied to sin|ill
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

On point.

Well done

replied to paul morgan
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

According to STEEL's latest post, the suburbanites are complaining about the suburban style housing in the city due to the loss of parking. I wonder if this was built just to spite those suburbanites who need something to complain about?

Maybe it is due to the subsidized nature of the East Side houses, they think that by building suburban that people who are living in the suburbs might not know the difference and move back by accident.

The fact is that these are the only houses being built on the East Side or West Side. There are very few home owner funded developments, unless they are a for-profit renovation.

replied to Lego1981
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

the reason they are allowed is zoning laws. when you go to a city and see an attractive area that seems to have an overall 'feel' and aesthetic, the main reason is because of the zoning laws. also, for the past 40 years or so, the only areas that have seen major investment is the suburbs and many people unconsciously associate that with success and how neighborhoods are built. zoning laws need to break that habit.

replied to jimmy
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Incorrect, I know of many owner funded rehabs going on in the West Side, Black Rock, and even parts of the East Side. These projects are under the radar, just good neighbors quietly doing their part to better our city.

replied to jimmy
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I ought to relay Jimmys talk radio rant to the guy I saw fixing up his Fruit Belt cottage on his own today. He should halt his renovation immediately for the sake of high horse rants badmouthing his neighborhood.

replied to Blackrocklifer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The style of housing for some project is just one item.

Here is another...

$1,870,000 for 11 units or $170,000 per unit for an area we a home listed a block away at 471 W. Ferry St. is listed for $48,9000.

Ya. That is going to pay off and is a wise use of money.

One of the basic rules of real estate is you NEVER want to be the most expensive home on the street. The homes in this neighborhood are NEVER going to reach the value of these properties because the gap is too much.

Instead of raising up the value of surrounding properties, this project is going to get pushed down. This simply is a horrible use of government money.


If the COB was serious about fixing things, they could spread this $1,870,000 to work over 15 homes in the area and taken the remaining $370k for street and community improvements. That way you do not have such wide disparity in housing quality.

This is a silver bullet project on a small scale and another example of the lack of long term vision for the city.

replied to jimmy
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

that is an awesome storefront building. the renderings look good. go push!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

looks amazing, keep up the good work.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is great news! I wish there was an organization like PUSH on the East Side.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

PUSH going into the landlord business is not good news, especially when it's subsidized housing for the poor. That neighborhood needs pride of ownership, not expensive apartments with low rents.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

PUSH isn't 'going into' the landlord business. Their mission is to develop environmentally healthy housing for low income people. Their rents, since this is a non-profit, are rolled over to help the resident make a down purchase on a home further down the road. You know, to give them the 'pride of ownership.'

replied to MrGreenJeans
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

They now have six rental units, and will have 17 when this is done. They are renting the property they own, so therefore they are going into the landlord business.

Exactly how are they going to "roll over" monthly rent to help the tenants make a down payment? Are they going to keep it in escrow? Will there be a time limit on leases, to give the tenants incentive to better themselves and not have the advantage of cheap rent forever ?

Much less than $170,000 per unit will buy the nicest doubles on the West Side, complete with renovations and environmentally healthy features. This looks like pouring money down a hole to me.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Wow, I walked by 460 Mass just a week ago -- it's a former paint store -- and was thinking it's too nice a building to sit unused. Way to go, PUSH!

Would love to know if there are plans for the storefront portion of the building.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

ridiculously expensive, as are many of these projects. $170k/unit? Seems to be the going rate, whether here or the doubles under construction on Jefferson near William, or the Packard, etc. I agree with greenjeans and others that there has to be a more cost effective way to fix neighborhoods.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

At first, I thought the negative comments made on this site are really offensive to me but on second thought I feel relieved to know the people making them will never be involved in this neighborhood, so who cares !
......................................................
"There are very few home owner funded developments, unless they are a for-profit renovation."

"they think that by building suburban that people who are living in the suburbs might not know the difference and move back by accident."
......................................................


Really?

**** you Jimmy!

**** you...your an idiot!

Where do you live?
What project are you developing?
What have you been doing for the past twenty years?...
Ten?...
Five?...
Month?...

It's easy to be negative and talk out of your ass. Usually the squeaky wheel hasn't done a thing.

Much to your surprise, there are many owner funded projects going on all over the city and a lot of beautiful ones in the Massachusetts/Nineteenth neighborhood.

So again, what have you been up to?


Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

*Golf Clap*

Thank you for perfectly summarizing the polarizing mindset that is a huge part of the problem with the COB.

You say there are many owner funded projects going on? Well that is great news. Too bad the COB and PUSH is screwing them over.

Simple real estate lesson.

A homeowner saves up on his own and makes a risky investment in this area. This is great. They purchase a home for say $40K to $50K. Odds are the home they purchased needs some work and even better odds is this person does not have the $10k to $40k to do the necessary work. So they hold on to dear life and try to ride out the storm.

Along comes this push project where each unit spend is around $170k. This investment does not really help the guy who owns the $50k house because it is only 3 properties. These 3 projects are not going to boost the neighborhood value or the tax base for the city. The owner down the street builds no equity via his neighborhood. Thus making it harder for him to get financing to make improvements.

However, if the COB were to use funding in smaller amounts, over more units, the odds of this persons equity increasing would be higher.

Why not take the $400k from the city and offer $10k matching grants to homeowners or 40 very low or no interest loans of $10k each? That could provide $800K in investment or provide improvements to 40 units instead of 3. And this is just the funds from the city.

When you change, even just a little bit, of 40 units...that is when you really start to change the whole neighborhood.

As a taxpayer, I would much rather money go to homeowners in a matching funds situation or loans. The reason you ask? Well if a homeowner is matching the funds, they are going to look for the VERY BEST price possible. If they are taking a loan, they are going to try and get the most bang for their buck.

Furthermore, when you have 40 projects, you have the chance to give business to multiple local companies. I wonder how many contractors will be used on the 3 projects by PUSH?

You can hate all you want but at the end of the day you have to realize that some people just want the BS spending to end.

Projects like this, which are VERY EXPENSIVE and do not provide much impact have been done for decades. The COB needs to stop trying to projects that provide ribbon cutting and hard hat photo opportunities and start doing projects that make sense.

Nobody with common sense is going to say you should not help people. What some people are trying to say is there is a better way to help more people.

I would start with helping those homeowners who live in the area with little grants or loans. As they get paid back, roll them back out.

Rinse and repeat.

replied to Joe Galvin
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I wish 1,000 more of these for the East Side.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

A while ago (before the last snowstorm but well after all the media attention) we drove along Massachusetts Street, saw the Powell house and the surrounding neighborhoods and marveled at how seriously badly hype trumps reality.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll