Real Estate March 18, 2010 3:45 PM

Paterson Agrees to Amendments to Historic Tax Credit Program

Paterson Agrees to Amendments to Historic Tax Credit Program

Assemblymember Sam Hoyt formally announced today the introduction of a Governor program bill that will include two amendments vital to the Historic Tax Credit program.  These amendments will allow for the sale of the tax credits to banks and insurance companies.

The introduction of a program bill by the Governor demonstrates tacit approval from the various state agencies that had previously objected to similar provisions that were in Hoyt's original bill. A month of negotiations with top state officials has resulted in the agreement that paved the way for these amendments.  Once the bill is signed into law, developers will be able to immediately take advantage of this new flexibility and begin working on projects, bringing in millions of dollars of local investments and putting people to work.

Hoyt said, "These much-needed amendments will enable developers interested in rehabilitating buildings like the Lafayette Hotel and the Statler in Buffalo to use these tax credits to generate upfront capital. With this new bill in place, a major obstacle will have been removed for developers undertaking the projects that Buffalo and upstate need to help restore their proud heritage and revitalize their urban core."

In Western New York alone, there are nine projects with an estimated investment value in excess of $175 million that can begin as a result of these amendments. While the Historic Tax Credit program was successful for homeowners and small to medium-size business owners, developers of large-scale projects wanted the amendments to help them generate capital for projects that required more upfront costs than other types of rehabilitations.

Rocco Termini said, "Thanks to Assemblymember Sam Hoyt's tenaciousness and persistence my two projects - the Hotel Lafayette and the AM&A's building - will be redeveloped and become cornerstones for a renewed and revitalized downtown Buffalo."

"I have spoken with Rocco Termini, Clinton Brown and other developers and advocates throughout the negotiation process," Hoyt concluded.  "Rocco assured me that if we were able to secure these two amendments he could complete the financing on the Hotel Lafayette and AM&A's projects with construction likely to begin soon after.  Now that I have secured these amendments, developers like Rocco, who have the vision and the drive, can begin the revitalization of Buffalo in earnest."

 

Projects positively affected by Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credit

BUFFALO
Alling and Cory Building - The six-story, nearly century-old Eagle Street building was sitting vacant until a Buffalo architect and developer, Jake Schneider, came along to invest $16 million to transform the one-time paper warehouse into a 95-unit complex for students. The building, now called Lofts at 136 after its street address, is expected to welcome residents this fall.

AM&A's Building - $70 million dollar project that will include a Hilton Garden Inn, apartments, a food court and banquet facility. AM&A's and Hotel Lafayette projects are expected to bring in $30 million in new investment and create 130 jobs.

Bethune Hall, 2915 Main St. - Rehabilitation into loft-style apartments of warehouse building designed and built by Lockwood, Green & Company in 1915 for the Buffalo Meter Company, a manufacturer of liquid meters.

The Cooperage (entry image) - $6.6 million, construction ready historic rehabilitation of abandoned and blighted former factory complex on Buffalo River into 24 market-rate live/work lofts, as part of transforming former industrial area downtown into one for residential and recreational use.

DSC_0732.JPGCorn Exchange Building, 100 S. Elmwood Ave. (image right)- The circa-1910, four-story structure is being rehabilitated into Class A office space at a cost of approximately $5 million.

The Gardens Project (Affinity Realty Partners) - 276 units of preservation housing already approved by NYS Housing Finance Agency. Project expected to be an anchor to the Buffalo/Cheektowaga border. $27 million overall investment to preserve a 65 year old complex built in 1942-43 under a Department of Defense housing bill. 

The Genesee Gateway - A series of late 1800s and 1900s buildings with over 60,000 square feet of space that stretch between Oak and Ellicott Streets that the project's development team is renovating into a mix of office and restaurant space.

NIAGARA FALLS
Niagara City Lofts - $14 million historic rehabilitation of abandoned, blighting former public school into 54 lofts and commercial space in the heart of Niagara Falls. Governor Paterson announced a $5 million Restore NY grant on site in September.

NORTH TONAWANDA
Remington Lofts on the Canal, 184 Sweeney St. - Previously the home of The Remington Rand Co., consists of four stories that cover a total of just under 180,000 square feet.  When complete, the building will be converted into a mixed-use facility, housing both commercial and residential space.

DSC_0186.JPG


 

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

Great News!!!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Is Bethune Hall actually under development? If so that's wonderful news for the Heights! Loft-style living will add some much needed diversity to the housing market in that area.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

great picture of the lafayette and good list showing exactly what this tax credit means for buffalo.

now will you please get started on it, rocco?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Awesome!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

so does this mean both Lafayette and AM&A's are a definite GO?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Hopefully this gets pushed through and everything can start. Wonder if this is truly hanging things up or its just the developers blowing smoke. If not, there will be a lot of action this summer!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Great! So when can we see the renovations begin? I would luv to see the Washington/Eagle Streets filled with life 24/7. That might, just might get the Main Place Mall owners to think about 'UPDATING' that piece of crap into this decade and stay open later than 5:30pm and SUNDAY.....Just how many people have to live downtown before we see businesses open on Sunday. So far it's only Spot Coffee (Delaware/Chippewa) and the Downtown Food Mart (Main/Lafayette Square) that stay open EVERYDAY/LATE!!!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Not to fluff your feathers or anything, Mr. Hoyt.

While I can generally appreciate the architecture of the Lafayette, I just can't get around the blah-ness of that two-tone brick.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think that with these (publicly-backed) tax credits should come some obligation from these developers to GET THESE PROJECTS DONE (notice, that I am not mentioning some kind of profit share back to the City taxpayers...which would not be out of line either.)

These developers should be put on a timeline to get projects done. Savarino,let's move on the Livery. Paladino, same for the Greystone. The further the projects delay, the further the reality of anything being done extends out.

At the very least, these developers should be required to safely mothball these properties for future use.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

awesome!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is great news, hopefully banks and insurance companies become a bit less conservative and help make this opportunity a reality.

The Greystone is beyond repair, take it down before someone gets hurt! The same with the livery stable, thanks to the City of Buffalo for not enforcing the law as usual, they allowed Freudenheim and Co. to destroy a very significant historic building. What's worse, they give the property to a developer when there is little if any of the building left? There are not enought tax credits in the world to make those projects worth while!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

i respectfully disagree. these tax credits coupled with the rising desirability of their respective neighborhoods make them more repairable than ever before.

replied to PeytonsCorner
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I wouldn't mind a few tax credits that I could sell and do the needed work on my house. I'm only getting poorer by paying my taxes so these developers can get richer!!!

Just saying!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

A fine point.

replied to Allentwnguy
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Its Funny - People in WNY complain about high taxes and how it drives business away. And then when NY lowers taxes - as in this case they complain about the lower taxes.

In this situation NY lowers taxes and it appears as if it will immediately spur economic activity in the state and people still complain!

replied to Allentwnguy
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

yeah the property value complaints are pretty funny, too. people whine if values fall because their wealth is wiped out. then they whine if values rise because their taxes go up.

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is not a tax cut, it is a tax credit. It, in fact, raises the tax burden of the average citizen because they cover the shortfall.

These are handouts designed to benefit larger developers. The ones who donate to every campaign in this town.

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Exactly. If the state wants to cut business taxes, it should cut them for all. Tax credits to a very select well-connected few doesn't count as lowering taxes.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It is a business tax cut. It is delivered in the form of a tax credit. Your semantics are meaningless.

It apparently is a very effective form of tax cut as well in that it will instantly spur hundreds of millions in new economic activity. I really don't see how anyone in NY can have a complaint about that.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

False premise:
"it will instantly spur hundreds of millions in new economic activity"

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Whether it's a problem or not depends on if someone favors this kind of increased public spending on old buildings. Some people favor this amount of spending and more. Others might not.

Steel>"I really don't see how anyone in NY can have a complaint about that."

As Reggie replied to you, it "raises the tax burden of the average citizen because they cover the shortfall".

I really don't see how anyone can really not see his point.

I can respect arguments that say it's worth spending more public $ to save old buildings. I won't always agree depending on which buildings and other details, but it's an honest viewpoint some have. It's merits and priorities should be judged along with other spending the state does.

But when you guys try to say it's reducing taxes or that it will create new businesses or new jobs - to me, all that sounds like b.s. Reducing taxes means reducing the rate of some tax. Things like specialized deductions or credits are subsidies (as BlackrockLifer likes to point out here about mortgage deductions - that isn't tax reduction, it's a subsidy in exchange for certain behavior, just like this).

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Can I assume you have a similar disdain for the story in today's Bufflo News about Bryant and Stratton getting a few million in tax breaks from the Amherst IDA so they can move from one Amherst office park to another? Or does that count as economic activity because it happened in a suburb?

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Reflip, of course IDA money to Bryant & Stratton is a ridiculous waste. What difference should it make if it's in a burb or the city? Why should they be getting any public $ at all?

How about Coffee Culture in Williamsville getting IDA $ too (I'm pretty sure it was tehm... some coffee place on MAin St). It's stupid anywhere.

replied to reflip
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

As they should.

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There are city, state, and federal tax credits available for homeowners who want to restore their house in a historic preservation district such as Allentown. I don't know if a homeowner can sell the credits in advance to banks and insurers (and would you have the contacts and know-how to do so anyway?), but the state credit, for example, gives you 20% of the restoration costs back on your taxes. The city property tax laws exempt you from any increase in assessment due to your restoration for 5 years, with the assessment increase gradually phasing over years 5-10.

replied to Allentwnguy
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yes I have looked at that tax credit but unfortunately I don't have the funds available to spend the minimum of 5,000. Once I can access my retirement fund (4 1/2 years) I will have the money. Most other grants I can't qualify for because my pension is high enough to disqualify me. Such is life.

replied to JSmith
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I wouldn't say it's limited to a very select well-connected few. There is a residential component for individual homeowners in historic districts and smaller single-building developers can utilize the commercial credits as at 501 Main St.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Ok, it isn't totally limited to the well-connected - but won't the practical effect be that the well-connected receive almost all of the money from this?

By "few", I meant compared to how Steel's comment characterized it as "lower taxes" which makes it sound like a broad based policy.

It's basically spending public money to save old buildings. Some people would favor that, but it is not "lowering taxes" as he described it.

replied to nick
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The tax credit is available to anyone who applies for it. If you are restoring a building you apply and then you get it in which case you are then bound by certain rules for restoration. I really fail to see the problem. The result is lower taxes which spurs development that is beneficial to the city and state. It has the added benefit of directing reinvestment at the core where the infrastructure is as opposed to spending tax dollars on new infrastructure at the perimeter of the metro. Reuse of old buildings is also beneficial to the environment. It is an all around win. If Termini dose both AM&A's and Lafayette these blocks will be massively transformed with new businesses and life.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Don't bet on it.

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Bet on it.

replied to queenie
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm not sure why people are complaining. Currently these buildings are in desperate need of repair and are negatively impacting communities. Bringing these buildings back to life will create businesses, jobs, greater community diversity and new housing units, which should have positive impacts on home values and public safety.

I know I'm excited!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

We can agree to disagree about intangibles like diversity and public safety.

But you also said new businesses and jobs. Will it really create any new businesses and new long term jobs that wouldn't otherwise exist? How?

replied to lynnemarie
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Compromised public safety is one of the cost associated with the "do nothing" option. If programs like historic preservation credits do not exist these projects are less likely to come to fruition leaving the obsolete buildings to rot. Vacant properties are hazard to the public unless they are torn down (also at the expense of the public) or reused. It is as reasonable to justify expenses to convert structures for the sake of public safety as much as it is to justify demolition.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It should be looked at case by case. Sometimes demo is the most practical cost effective way to deal with the kind of safety issue you're talking about. There's no single best answer for all buildings.

replied to Armchair MBA
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yes its good to see the work getting done.

Can anyone explain how the tax credits work or direct me to a link where they are explained....

The down side to this is that with a declining population we have more supply of apartments than qualified people to rent them.

So those building owners who have maintained their buildings properly and payed full property tax are losing their best tenents to the newly built units that are subsidised by the government and can offer lower rents because they don't pay any property tax.

None of the cash flows on these new tax credit rehabed buildings seem to be positive...even with not having to pay any property tax for a number of years.

Once the rehabed buildings are put on the tax roles, their cash flow will be even worse and by that time they will no longer be new and will require maintence.

In the meantime the other, non subsidised buildings (sorry no spell check here), that are older will not have been able to charge enough rent, have the best tenants etc to properly maintain the properties....so in the end, the taxpayer has paid a lot and many properties have suffered. Supply/demand type economics.

So who can explain how the tax credits work?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Actually they do have positive cash flow. Other wise the developers would not do the projects and you could say the same thing about suburban apartment complexes which received the benefit of new gvernment infrastructure which made them possible and able to take tenants from well maintained urban locations.

replied to Eastwood
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What are you talking about there are 10 projetcs in WNY alone which will move forward as soon as this bill is signed . Just 2 of them together come well over 100M.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You get a big F, Steel, for spelling, punctuation, grammar and sense (plus lack of an antecedent). Ten projects! Whoopee! This used to be the Empire State. Crazy fundamentalist Texas has about 500 similar projects going at any time.

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You said "hundreds of millions" "instantly", so we'll see if at least $200M of new real economic activity starts up.

I don't know if new residential units should count as real increased economic activity (other than short term construction jobs). Residential in a shrinking area won't create long term jobs or new businesses. There's nothing wrong with people deciding to move away from Buffalo's other neighborhoods to downtown if they want to, but moving isn't growth. The public $ from Albany to developers and investors through tax credits won't grow on trees, so it takes from other economic activity.

Albany can spend as much $ as it wants for converting old buildings across Upstate into residential or offices. It could be the Lafayette, the Donovan, or some day the Statler, Tishman, Richardson,... on and on. That won't magically create new occupants here.

Arguments can favor more public $ for old buildings in Upstate for other reasons (architectural, morale-based, etc), but "economic activity" sounds like a weak claim.

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Out of curiosity, are you suggesting that virtually every new building in WNY (residential homes included) for the last 40 years has resulted in no new economic activity, since population has been in decline the whole time? I might agree with that, I might not, I don't know - but I do know that such a proposition would be the logical extension of your comment.

"There's nothing wrong with people moving away from Buffalo's other neighborhoods if they want to, but that isn't growth."

Again, I probably agree. But, do you feel the same way about new houses in Pendleton and tax breaks for companies that move from one suburban location to another? Or do you just generally support policies that enable suburban "growth" (suburbs grow because they're better, after all) while opposing policies that encourage and enable urban "growth" (cities only grow because communo-fascists use your tax dollars to force people to be over-crowded into inhumane death traps in crime ridden urban areas where they can foist a "pink collar" agenda on all of our children, after all).

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Great comments as usual. I agree that many people have a double standard on marketplace interference depending on if it impacts suburban or urban development. These types will hail sprawl subsidies as "progress" or a product of choice but pick apart much smaller incentives to steer development into the central core.

Badmouth a publicly funded road widening project in a 3rd ring burb and you will hear lectures on Supply and Demand, the need to move more people by car, and downplaying of the funding source as if it was of no cost to the public. Praise a policy that stimulates development in an urban area of similar or lower cost and you will hear them lament big government spending, zero sum shuffling of the deck, and again, a lecture on Supply and Demand.

replied to reflip
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

reflip>"are you suggesting that virtually every new building in WNY (residential homes included) for the last 40 years has resulted in no new economic activity, since population has been in decline the whole time?"

Did you see where I said "other than short term construction jobs"? Even Sycamore Village employed people to build. Maybe that's why Brown and Kearns supported it - lol! And the remodeling work inside One Sunset was some economic activity too. So, yeah, obviously any time something is built or remodeled there's some economic activity. That shouldn't be mixed up with real economic growth (even though it all shows up in GDP, part of why that's a flawed measure).


reflip>"do you feel the same way about new houses in Pendleton and tax breaks for companies that move from one suburban location to another?"

None of those should get tax breaks - not the houses or companies who move.


replip>"Or do you just generally support policies that..."

The word policies is too vague in your question. If you want to clarify the question, I can answer, but maybe my reply to the previous already did.

replied to reflip
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It is a tax cut that will result in hundresds of new construction jobs, jobs for architects, new residential units and the people that come with them (the type of units that are attractive to young educated types- the type of units that are virtually 100% occupied and in downtown), new hotels, new offices, new retsaruants all in a place that has none of the above. I really do not see the down side. For my money this is far better government spending than on southern tier highways or $100M toll booth relocations, or rebuilding route 5. Complain about that wast before you complain about a project that will have instant results.

By the way that is 10 projects In WNY alone that will instantly be on the books when the bill is signed. There are many more acorss the state and many more that will come on line in the near future.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

When will this finally be signed?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll