Lecture/Discussion Series to Promote the Betterment of Buffalo
Comments
Leave a comment"according to Pietrzak, the lecture will include a discussion of the Burchfield Penney in terms of "...a preliminary analysis of the facts required to complete a complex project."
Hopefully Pietrzak will not reiterate the anti-fact that the public was involved in the design of the project. A select group of BP friends were consulted. Among this unpublic group's suggestions was that the entrance face Elmwood Avenue. The architect decided that an entrance facing a parking lot is better. Though the college claims the entrance faces the campus the "fact" is that it does not.
But this IS the way to complete a complex project!
Yeah, when the building was being constructed and there was controversy over the site plan, I was sort of on the side of those who said that it's a campus building and it is appropriate that it faces onto the campus; that it didn't make sense to front onto Elmwood. To an extent I still feel that way. But it doesn't even face the campus properly. It really does only face the parking lot.
I do like the interior of the BPAC a lot, but the exterior just does nothing for me, either from an urbanism or an aesthetic standpoint. And I was trying to like it for quite a while!
yeah, dan was right. what, exactly, about a blank gray wall screams "art inside!" to anyone?
having said that i like ted and wish him the best in his next endeavors.
Programming has been terrific for years. Ted has done a great job as director of the BPAC. Maybe the purpose of the zinc wall is to get people to go inside so they don't have to look at the outside!
Leave a comment
Sponsor
Recent Comments
Sponsor
Interested in advertising on BuffaloRising?
E-mail John C. Powell
or call John at 716.602.0200




Hopefully they talk about 'Progress' and how we have been slaves to it for too long.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/49/Original_Buffalo_Library.jpg
Why was the original torn down in the 1960s, and who decided on the design of the current building? What was torn down to make way for the rest of the library campus?
I can answer some of your questions, anyway. The Victorian-looking "castle" that was torn down was the old library building, the Grosvenor Library. The Grosvenor was torn down because it was condemned and unsafe, and not worth repairing. My brother worked in the Grosvenor when he was in college as a library page, and he can attest to the collapsing floors and deterioration of the old building.
I believe county government made the final decision on the design; there is or used to be a plaque at the Elmwood entrance, under the library overpass that I believe tells the architectural firm and the people responsible for building the building.
I worked in the new building also as a page from 1969-73 and can attest that it was state of the art for its time, with a pneumatic tube system for stack requests and dumbwaiters between the stack tiers and the departments requesting stack materials. I always liked the building, myself.
Wow what a loss! I always found it remarkable how sterile and utilitarian the current BPL building is. It's looks so out of place in the context of Lafayette Square.