City March 9, 2010 12:10 AM

Fixing the Kensington

Fixing the Kensington

The Peace Bridge expansion project is not the only transportation battle brewing within the city.  Through $2 million in funding secured by Senator Antoine Thompson, the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) is working on a Kensington Expressway Mitigation Feasibility Study.  The objective of the study is to identify a "reasonable and feasible mitigation for identified quality of life impacts while maintaining the transportation connection and rebuilding part of the Humboldt Neighborhood." 

4402891918_09e3db233b.jpgTwo primary options have been put on the table thus far including capping one mile of the highway to create an elevated park or lowering the expressway to allow for a capped park to be built at-grade.  Community leaders, including Mayor Brown, are pushing for a third option- filling the expressway 'moat' and creating a lower-speed urban boulevard.  David Torke has been writing about the study at his fix buffalo blog

The City Bicycle-Pedestrian Advisory Board has recommended that the NYSDOT consider the third (Boulevard) option within the feasibility study to determine what the benefits or consequences of an at-grade, eight lane boulevard would provide for the surrounding community and its associated costs compared to the other options.  It is an idea being promoted by the New Millennium Group through their Kensington Project brief:


The Kensington Expressway carries 70,000 vehicles per day thru the portion once occupied by Frederick Law Olmsted's Humboldt Parkway in East Buffalo. The freeway created the conditions for unsustainable suburban sprawl, blighted a once beautiful and desirable neighborhood, and devastated East Side retail corridors by robbing them of traffic. The year the freeway opened, Genesee Street, Broadway, Fillmore Avenue, Jefferson Avenue, a score of important commercial corridors in East Buffalo, were vacated by cars that sustained vibrant storefronts and active neighborhoods.

Options now being considered by NYSDOT to "mitigate" the Kensington Expressway by "capping" the freeway fail to take into account its negative economic impact in sapping East Side commercial districts of traffic and commerce. NYSDOT estimates, at minimum, the cost of capping only a single mile of the freeway to start at $260 million and could top a half billion dollars. If implemented, the resulting "cap" would represent the most expensive grass lawn ever constructed in history.

The multimillion dollar grass lawn would not support large shade trees, would not allow the street network across Humboldt Parkway to be restored, would not reconnect neighborhoods, and would not bring new life to desperate East Side commercial strips. The project would either require blasting through solid bedrock to lower the elevation of the freeway, or building an earthen mound over the trench of the freeway that would not exactly resemble Olmsted's vision or function properly as a public space. The concepts now being considered by NYSDOT are unworkable.

kensington.PNGBut there is another option. NYSDOT can conserve the corridor as a high-capacity arterial while restoring Olmsted's vision by filling the trench of the highway and replacing it with an at-grade, lower speed, multiway boulevard. Olmsted designed multiway boulevards, themselves based on the boulevards of Paris and Berlin, to accommodate large amounts of traffic and create central recreational corridors connecting parks and public spaces. The closest applicable American model is Ocean Parkway in Brooklyn, photographs at left, which carries 70,000 vehicles daily without considerable congestion while creating vibrant public spaces and framing high-value residential areas. It is a long successful model that should be considered in Buffalo.

Filling the Kensington trench, from East Delevan to Best, and replacing with a high-capacity, at-grade, eight-lane boulevard (six inner lanes, two outer lanes, separated by wide landscaped medians) would lower speeds, diffuse some highway traffic to local corridors, support East Side commerce, and recreate an Olmsted vision for Humboldt Parkway. Under this scenario, based on the width of the ROW, 52% of the width of the boulevard would be greenspace. Filling and replacing the highway with a traditional boulevard would be cheaper, faster, and better.

In 2010, NYSDOT is merely considering options that should be evaluated. All feasible options for mitigating the impact of the highway should be considered. The Boulevard Option would meet project needs, restore an important Buffalo neighborhood, and could be implemented at a manageable cost. It deserves to be studied!


A similar boulevard was proposed for Route 5 along the outer harbor to no avail.  Some neighborhood residents adjacent to the Kensington are hoping for a better outcome.  The Restoring Our Community Coalition has been formed to advocate for remediating the Kensington Expressway mistake and are urging the NYSDOT to study all the design possibilities.  The study is expected to take two or three years to finish.

More Coverage:  Artvoice
More Photos:  Fix Buffalo
4402910866_2fd0a733a7_b.jpg

Photos by fix buffalo's David Torke.

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

Can I buy my 'Tame the Trench' t-shirt on BRO?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I doubt that any meaningful changes will happen until Buffalo reclaims ownership from the State, if that is even possible. Handing over possession of any city-owned land to the State was a huge mistake. The State now owns this, the Thruway routes, the State Hospital/Normal School lands, and more.

Never trade your rights for some money.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I would adopt a different bigger picture approach.

1) End the Kensington as we know it between downtown or either Jefferson or Best and revert it back to a Humboldt Parkway entrance into and out of the city as Olmsted intended.

2) come up with a grand eastern entrance to the Fruit Belt / Center for Excellence in Life Sciences at Jefferson or Best or Both.

3) My preference would be to have the expressway underneath and Humboldt Parkway above even if it means blasting the Kensington deeper

4) Remember that the Science Museum wanted to build on top of the Kensington and rejoin the Parades on both sides of the Kensington. I like this and want to see it happen.

5) Filling it in is the most stupid insane idea. All one need do is go to Rochester and see their Inner Loop or drive the Scajaquada to reallize that the traffic volume is to high and its only going to get higher. An at grade boulevard is not going to be an at grade boulevard but an at grade expressway....if not now then it will be expanded into one in the future as the traffic demands it.

So blasting deeper and putting a grass park on top for me is the answer because as traffic does increase in the future, the potential investment will be to enhance that grassy park with an cross streets and 2-tiered road (expressway below, parkway above).

We Buffalonians must learn to think longterm and big picture. Just because we cannot have full light rail today doesnt mean we should not have a plan to add 1 or 2 miles every "x" years. Just because we cannot get cross roads and parkway criss crossing the grassy capped park over an expressway does not mean that we should give up and take the lesser solution.

Like the Light Rail, take the solution offered today as half the solution to the best alternative and then plan for the future to provide the enhancements for the best solution.

The Kensington will never ever be a parkway and it will never have its speed reduced and it will never have less traffic. Lets just accept it, burry it and come up with a longterm plan for the surface even if today it can be nothing more than grass.

You can put me in the camp of blasting to make the Kensington deeper and then coming up with a surface plan.

Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

First off, you are insane, Second, nothing will happen, but it's always nice to dream. Third, if divine intervention takes place and something does happen, it will still come down to money-as it always does. Blasting it to make it deeper will cost somehwere between $500 billion or $10 trillion dollars.

replied to Destiny
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"The Kensington will never ever be a parkway and it will never have its speed reduced and it will never have less traffic."

Right. And that's because you have given up hope that NOTHING EVER CHANGES? Okay, my friend.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"5) Filling it in is the most stupid insane idea. All one need do is go to Rochester and see their Inner Loop or drive the Scajaquada to reallize that the traffic volume is to high and its only going to get higher"

Sorry to tell you, my functionally-illiterate friend, but the Rochester NOOSE of highways is deadly and NYC moves far more cars per hour through Central Park, at 25mph AND on single lanes, than you can imagine. Traffic volume on Route 198 hasn't threatened to "get higher" for 50 years, for that matter.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Whatever we do, we should put a light-rail rapid transit through the middle of it. Make it run from the Airport to the Business district or Medical Campus, and connect into the Main Street line.

Any plans or suggestions should include this as a requirement.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

YES PLEASE! YES PLEASE!
I read this article in Artvoice and hope it would be discussed here. There is a HOLE ALREADY DUG for rapid transit. Any worry about whether new parkway streets would suffer massive congestion could be mitigated by well-planned rapid transit where the Kensington is now. Place some tunnels, bury them, and run some trains through!
The mayor's plan seems sensibly viable AND it provides us even more opportunities than discussed in the Artvoice article. I think some vocal citizens could get this idea heard by the right people.

replied to sho'nuff
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That's a great idea. Really, really good.

replied to sho'nuff
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Fill it in! Give those east side neighorhood the park and parkway they can be proud of.

This traffic sewer was the death nail for several of the east side neighborhoods and continues to be a blight... who wants to live near a highway... no one.

Think of the money saved on bridges, overpasses, exit ramps, walls, fences, graffiti painting. All of these items would be completely gone. This would save the city and state money for generations to come. We need to stop creating huge, expensive to maintain infrastructure projects and go back to simpler, city friendlier and cheaper designs.

Also... I know a great place to get some fill... time to quarry the quarry gardens and put all that dirt back where it belongs.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The same argument applies here as with the outer harbor... City residents, property values and health should not be devalued for the convenience of those who don't live and pay taxes in the city.

As long as there is still a simple and efficient route to the airport from downtown, let it take and extra 10 minutes.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Not quite the same (because no one lives out there), but I see your point.

Higgy Bear dropped the ball on that one.

replied to Sean Brodfuehrer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

sean and sho-nuff are right. fill this sucker in and run metro rail out to the airport!

i read once that only the state can take parkland for some other use. probably a law enacted to keep municipalities from handing over valuable parkland to big donors. anyway, that is why humboldt pkwy became a state route, because only the state could take it.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Maybe fill it in, and reserve a lane in each direction for a BRT to the airport and a massive Park & Ride nearby. If we're spending the money anyways, incorporate rapid transit into the design that wouldn't incur quite the costs of rail.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

townline,

BRT isnt quite the value it may seem to be. Construction costs are lower than say light rail, but long term costs are much higher.

Now, you could always run light rail (or heritage streetcar, or new streetcars) down the grass medians like NOLA, and add some real urban value to the neighborhood.

replied to townline
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I have criticized the mayor an awful lot on this board in the past but I have to give him credit for advancing this idea. Keep up the good work.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

restoring humboldt parkway would be one of the best projects the city has ever done. it will correct one of the biggest mistakes this city has ever committed.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Light Rail! Bring on side (either or East or West bound to street grade. Leave a 4-6 lane Blvd. Cover-over the other side leaving a tunnel for high speed light rail. Knock down the old Bells warehouse (at least I think it was Bells) on Genesee and build a huge park'n ride parking ramp/airport rail station. Done.

Since it is my idea, I will pay for it too :)

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

> Filling it in is the most stupid insane idea. All one need do is go to Rochester and see their Inner Loop or drive the Scajaquada to reallize that the traffic volume is to high and its only going to get higher"

Not true. Traffic volume there today is the *same* as it was before the expressway was built! Our population is decreasing. Let's act our size, be happy, fill it in and make Buffalo even more beautiful than it is.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

PS: Positive spinoffs to filling it in:

1. The "bathtub", the most dangerous intersection in Buffalo, will disappear.

2. It is incredibly expensive to maintain as is. (Bridges, maintaining unstable rock, accident prevention devices, etc.)

3. No more angry rocks (or bowling balls, remember that one?) into vehicle windshields from the pedestrian bridges. It happened to me.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Which intersection is the 'bathtub'?

replied to KeepItSimple
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Whre the Scajaquada meets the Kensington.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Check out this rendering of what they're proposing in Los Angeles over a stretch of the Hollywood Freeway: http://www.groovygreen.com/groove/?p=2521

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Personally I would prefer the cap idea. Not sure why the preference would be to fill and bring traffic to grade. What residential single family home really wants to front on something like Niagara Falls Blvd or Union or Transit Road? Sorry but i dont get the fascination with creating low speed boulevards out of routes meant for high speed access to and from the airport and downtown. I would rather look out at a park as was the historical design of that corridor. One possible addition to this project might be considering a light rail extension to the airport out of downtown? This would serve the Humboldt Parkway area residents well.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

because it wouldn't be anything like niagara falls blvd or transit. watch the video on fixbuffalo's blog.

replied to flyguy
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The problem with capping the whole thing is that you can't put anything significant on top. no trees, no roads, no buildings etc.

Perhaps the area directly under the road could be used for a LR tunnel but filling it in would provide the earth needed to support mature trees, park amenities, connecting roads etc.

replied to flyguy
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think the preference would be the cost savings of capping v. filling. It would be great to know the cost of filling in this section is compared to capping it. I could not find a number but it was said to be a cheaper option. If the savings is tremendous, filling in sounds like the best option.

Also consider if it was filled in, it would not look like Niagara Falls Blvd or Transit Rd because there will never be malls or big box stores built. It could look like Main St in Williamsville or Elmwood Ave with retail taking over the space along the park and feeding the housing on the side streets.

Another point is now that the S. Ogden tolls have been removed, you are only adding distance to the commute and not a daily cost. That is one objection that no longer exists. :)

A project like this, while not as sexy as a light rail extension or a new high rise downtown, are the building blocks that make a city turn the corner.

It all comes down to cost as the devil is in the details.

replied to flyguy
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

From the Artvoice article - http://artvoice.com/issues/v9n9/bury_this_big_mistake:

"A rough cost estimate for the project in 2007 tagged the second capping option at $265 million for covering less than one mile of expressway. When people talk about the price now—and it’s a guessing game, to be sure, until the study gets underway—the figure ranges from $350 million to $500 million. No funding for construction of the project has yet been identified.

On the other hand, the cost of simply burying the expressway is probably less than $100 million."

I don't know where those numbers come from. $100 million seems low for the filling and building an aesthetically pleasing 8-lane boulevard all the way from Delavan to Oak. But I am sure it would be far less expensive than a "Big Dig".

You are assuming that the DOT is actually interested in choosing the most cost-effective solution, though.

replied to Really?
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If the cost savings is at least 50%, as these numbers suggest, fill the sucker in.

replied to JSmith
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

>Can I buy my 'Tame the Trench' t-shirt on BRO?

Love it PaulBuffalo! I'll add it to my collection:

"UB LAW @ STATLER"

"WE DON'T NEED NO STINKIN' BRIDGE"

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

>One possible addition to this project might be considering a light rail extension to the airport out of downtown?

Good idea flyguy. However, if this doesn't happen, a lower-speed urban boulevard would at least facilitate better NFTA bus service and perhaps another Park 'n Ride lot.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I support putting the original park OVER the expressway. This could be the Richmond Ave. of the East Side again. Imangine all these big old homes getting renovated and facing a beautiful park again? THAT is what our goal should be. THIS will bring property value UP.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It's probably worth pointing out that the area of study is from Delavan (and the interchange with the Scajaquada) to the terminus at Oak Street. The segment from Delavan to the airport will remain in all scenarios. So a subway to the airport is not really feasible.

Lego1981, one of the reasons the boulevard plan is being proposed (besides it being incredibly less expensive than capping the expressway) is that is is very unlikely that the cap will support mature trees. Like the New Millennium Group press release says above, it would be a half-billion dollar grass lawn.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

All the arguments point towards capping and building a park over it being the best option. Mixing cars and pedestrians, vs. pedestrians only? Residential lining a busy boulevard vs. lining a park?

Leave the flanking streets and add the occasional cross-street. It's a win for everyone.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Got to love all the studies, where would Buffalo be without them all.The good news is that this one will only take 2-3 years.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Writing in from Scottsdale, AZ: Origionally from Bflo, I'm extremely familiar with the Kensington Expressway and the problems it has created.
In the planning of Interstate 10, at a location where the proposed freeway was to cut across and through the very heart of Phoenix (East/West and crossing Central Avenue with five lanes each way), the decision was made to "cut and cover" thereby creating a major tunnel for the Interstate 10 to pass beneath Central Avenue. Created above the tunnel/Interstate, a major park was created and named after the former Mayor Margaret Hance. Furthermore, Central Avenue was elevated so as to maintain the continuity of the park. I have photos of the park showing the Central Avenue overpass, and the Westbound enterance to the tunnel of the Interstate. I would be happy to forward as an attachment if anyone would care to see how this design proved to provide a solution for all concerns. Furthermore, the individual who provided the idea of utilizing the Kensington Expressway's path to share with the light rail is quite smart.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Anything is better than the current state. In the Bronx there is a parkway called the Pelham Parkway. It is a very highly used parkway with a great deal of lights, but you always see people out walking their dogs, running, biking, playing chess, etc.

The approach to the museum of science was very dramatic before the highway was put in. I couldn't find any pictures, but I remember seeing them.

This is an example of how re-doing the roadway could reactive a community. The houses that line humbolt parkway are beautiful, but in dire need of work.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Buffalo, here's the dig: NYSDOT is refusing to even study the Boulevard Option (filling the Kensington and replacing with a lower-speed at-grade boulevard) to weigh its costs and potential benefits. NYSDOT is now in the phase of identifying which options to study to mitigate the expressway. The options NYSDOT has committed to studying - all of which propose to "cap" the expressway with the most expensive grass lawn ever built in history - can not and will never happen because of the astronomical cost.

The cap will never, ever happen. It will cost at minimum $260 million and more likley up to a half billion dollars. NYSDOT appears to be pursuing this $2 million study simply to prove to the "community" that nothing will ever change. But they can change!

The boulevard option is a bargain. It can happen. NYSDOT is in the very early stages, simply determining which scenarios to study. I'm sure no one here has any objection to NYSDOT taking a close look at the bouelvard option. So, why is NYSDOT resisting? Are they afraid they may identify an option that can affordably rid Buffalo of this blighting expressway for good?

Let's support Mayor Brown's brave call to study this option as well as the others. Let the public decide based on the costs and benefits identified in an objective study.

Bravo, Mayor Brown!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

They like what they have. DOT's create traffic sewers because you have engineers making urban planning decisions. VMT, Average Vehicle speed, are the driving forces in ALL of the DOT's plans.

Creating a great, beautiful, holistic, city \ place is NOT their goal. Our problem is we keep assuming it is. Look at the waterfront, look at the expansion of Transit, Maple, the 'classy' 4 lane highway along the 90. Their actions and mentality are the same as it was in 1960.

replied to EB_Blue
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yes, engineers make the decisions. What bothers you about that? They're the people who have spent their adult lives studying the factors involved. Would you prefer that artists design highways? Sculptors tape out aircraft? Musicians write computer programs? Get real.

replied to Sean Brodfuehrer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I don't think it's unreasonable to note that traffic flow is just one of many considerations that should go into designing a street, and that the DOT's engineers have historically been neither qualified nor particularly interested in considering the others.

replied to Dan
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Nothing better than the light rail advocates coming out of the woodwork to propose their endless subsidizing of transportation options that no American(*) wants to use.

(*) save those who loves them some European style, which ain't close to enough to cover the costs of running the stupid things.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Jesse - just curious, and I don't mean this as a dig, but have you ever been outside of Buffalo or WNY?

replied to Jesse
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm thinking this comment was meant to be ironic. If it was not, it won't even matter because I'm writing in "European" language that real Americans don't understand anyway.


Have you ever even been on the light rail here in Buffalo? Because I have never been on it when it wasn't crowded (and I don't even speak any of them fangled Urope languages).


I believe there are times when the train is not crowded, but I seriously doubt that you would make such a stupid comment unless you were some kind of clown/unmitigated narcissist.

replied to Jesse
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

what a disaster it was to destroy that great neighborhood. i used to live in louisville (parks also designed by FLO) and Southern Pkwy ( a park connector) always reminded me of what humboldt could've been today.

I've been thinking about this for a while. though i like the idea of low-speed boulevard ( like should be done with the scajaquada), the 33 does create a high-speed connector for getting around town. it's not like you're getting some great subterranean view anyway. why not cap it and reunite those neighborhoods. costly i'm sure. but when humboldt is no longer a border community, but rather thriving and successful, the naysayers will agree on it's success.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

we could always make like the larkin administration building and knock the statler down and use that to fill in the kensington.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Wasn't the Elm-Oak arterial sold as a 'parkway' option back in the day?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That was also supposed to be a moat of cars until they woke up and re thought the concept.

replied to Platt4
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Maybe fill it in partially leaving the roadbed of a new boulevard 5 or 6 feet below street grade and line the route with bermed greenswards to soften the noise. it can come to street grade at major intersections. Pedestrian overpasses would still be needed given the traffic volume but a well-designed arrangement could at least enhance the desirability of the neighborhoods along the route.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I hate to rain on the parade but I'll repeat my remarks on this project @ Artvoice: the Kensington denied our city the opportunity for a functional arterial parkway; we instead got a concrete ditch which has all of the appeal of a surgical scar.

That stated, given the current harsh economic realities, the notion of filling it to grade in 2010 is fantasy. New York State is close to bankruptcy and funding a "study" is sheer lunacy, unless we get legions of volunteers out there with shovels.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

seeing how people came out for the Makeover house and various re-tree events, volunteers may not be that crazy of an idea.

replied to Max
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

>"a concrete ditch which has all of the appeal of a surgical scar"

Love it! Right on target! Almost as good as "Tame the Trench". Max, you have a way with words.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

We had a similar disaster in San Francisco which turned into an amazing Boulevard. Check this out....

http://brokensidewalk.com/2010/05/17/this-street-in-san-francisco-used-to-be-a-highway/

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll