City December 7, 2009 3:31 PM

The Fairfield's Would-be Rescuers

The Fairfield’s Would-be Rescuers
Back from a cruise, Sal Zambito and Tim Sick had a chance to catch up with BR concerning their wish to purchase the Fairfield Library from the City of Buffalo and restore it.  They are the private developers who were mentioned in last week's post on the Fairfield, but their names were withheld pending their return to town and confirmation.

Zambito and Sick say they are "certainly interested in doing business again" with regard to the former library.  "We're interested in making a single family home with an in-law apartment," Sick says. "Using the main building as the main home,laid out just as it was when it was a church, with no additional partitions or walls, and making the addition that was built in 1959 into a separate house."

As a point of reference, Zambito and Sick have rehabilitated homes and apartment buildings throughout Buffalo - properties that even the City told them to run away from - to dramatically beautiful and liveable results.  There was The Whitney, 255 Huntington, 328 Summer, 111 Richmond, (and several other homes on Richmond), and the list goes on to the tune of between 35 and 45 houses, Sick says.  "We don't keep count, but there have been at least 30 in the 9 years since Sal and I have been doing this together."

With that kind of track record, there is surety that Zambito and Sick can get the job done, and done well.  Neighbors who know of the interest the two have shown want them to have the Fairfield, and quick.  Sick says they plan on having another meeting with the city about the property soon.

fairfield racks.jpg
"We've already sunk some money into this property, and now we need to get a commercial assessment that will cost anywhere from $1,000 to $2,000, but we'd like to know we're not throwing good money after bad.  It was our wish to get the house closed on by spring." And the house has problems.  Sick quotes $30,000 for the heating system that was drained, but not properly blown out.  Add in another $40,000 for the asbestos removal, and add to that the patching of the hole in the roof, along with fixing the damage it caused to ceilings, walls, and the floor, and Sick says the $100,000 to do those things pushes the house that the City currently has assessed at $75,000 into a negative value.

Why then, would anyone take this job on?  Sick says that at some point the house will be fixed, they'll just about break even, and the neighborhood will have what the two call a "King of the Hill".  He says that not only will the house itself bring good tax dollars to the City, but the neighborhood around it will appreciate.  He also says that he and Zambito have never taken one favor from the City to do a rehab, that it's unnecessary and not worth the politics of it.
fairfield long.png
"We do this because we really, truly have fun doing it," Sick says. "And it's what we do.  We really like to restore old homes with character."  He makes note of the fact that, often, the homes surrounding their projects are not comparable in value, but that "the restoration of a gorgeous house pulls up the value of those around it."

From there, Sick has plenty to say about assessments, noting that his own just rose by 100 percent after being raised 300 percent in the last round of assessments three years ago. He says it's the price of renovation to a house that wasn't even on the tax rolls when he took it on, though he doesn't agree with the methods used by assessors.  "It's all a game of mathematics; they should throw out the high and the low and then use the same parameters for whole neighborhoods, even on the high side, but it should be fair and it shouldn't be based on individual houses."  As it stands, Sick believes the cost of keeping a house aesthetically beautiful costs the owner in taxes, and it worries him with rehabs like the Fairfield.  

Then again, Sick and Zambito have taken houses out of the City's hands and made them into $5,000 yearly tax sources.  If the assessment of the Fairfield goes well and passes the City's review board, they'll do it all over again.  "Yeah, we're going to schedule a walk-through soon," Sick says.  

Can the City afford not to get this potential King of the Hill into the hands of Sick and Zambito?


Exterior Fairfield Image: Buffalo as an Architectural Museum 



View image

Comments

Leave a comment

so the county just abandoned the books?

nice.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Was this building ever put up for auction? If not, why couldn't it have been? Is that done only for properties the city obtains by forclosure?

At this point, it sounds like the city should just negotiate a middle ground price with these guys before the thing starts rotting apart even worse. If years have gone by and nobody's willing to offer $75K, then how can that be a fair value using a common sense defintion?

For the longer term, the common council should try to get a system in place to have auctions or automatic price drops every few months as benfranklin described here:
http://www.buffalorising.com/2009/12/the-fairfield-library.html#comment-25916

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

How is it that the Buffalo and Erie County Library can just dump an abandoned building onto a city neighborhood. It is bad enough that the city has to deal with absentee landlords and scum-bag flippers but to have its own government do that same thing? Crazy!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

in buffalo, all branch library buildings are the property of the city of buffalo, not the library system. your gripe is with city hall.

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The previous post on this property had a nice picture of the down spout that appears to be part of a yankee gutter (the gutter is built in to the roof, not hanging off the edge like 99% of properties). Can't help but think all the rain has been draining into the building, the floor tiles in the one picture even appear to be curling up on the edges.
*************
Municipalities have turned to online auction sites for getting rid of excess equipment, and their getting ALOT more money than they used to. Locally, Erie County used to auction things once a quarter or so on a Saturday morning. Most things went for scrap prices. (When I could, I'd buy computers by the pallet, Mr. Collins, rightfully so, put an end to that.)

The city would do well to turn to a similar, simple online system for peddling these properties. The 5000 properties in four days raises too much uncertainty, and therefore low prices. Remove some of the uncertainty (ie. allow for a person to get financing in order) and the number of properties saved would go up. Prices could start at full assessed value, and fall a set percentage each month, or some other agreed upon time period.

Bureaucrats hired in 1970 won't go for it, but once the system is in place, it would create transparency, and remove the boondongle that appears to exist now. I did enquire about a property that was not sold at this past auction, and I was told to call back in March 2010, and ask that the property be put back up for the next in Rem sale (October 2010). It's open to the elements til then. It's a system that works fine for city hall.... but not for the properties, or the people that live next to soon-to-be eyesores, or the people who'd like to do something positive with them.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

...sorry, last comment on this... Why not take the half hour it would take to turn the spreadsheet into a google map (different color flags to mark the different kinds of property)? For my own personal use I did this, if city hall is so clueless about technology, it brings the entire process into question.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Why not initially take an hour and temporarily plywood/paper/tar the hole.

It's ridiculous how they treat the most important aspect of the properties for their long term viability(the roof). The longer the wait the exponentially worse the repairs are down the road.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I like these guys attitudes towards rehabs, I have the same take on it as well. The difference is they have more scratch to make it happen than I do. I wish more developers looked at rehabs like they did and took more risk on the more "iconic" properties like this one. As for the Interim auction spreadsheet, I agree they could have done more to at least organize it by neighborhood, like Buffaloniagarahomes.com does now. Especially because they release the list like 3 weeks prior to the auction which gives little time for due dilligance. That list should be evolving all the time and those properties should be available for bid all year long or at least quarterly. But what do you expect from City Hall anyway? I can't even find the right phone extension on their website half the time.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I wish the best of luck to these two. I used to come here with my Aunt all the time when I was a kid... it would be nice to have it restored and handsome once again.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Friends of Fairfield - our next 100 years -

The developers need to use historic preservation tax credits and energy credits to renovate this building. Friends of Fairfield our next 1oo years will meet this week and next, see community announcements to catch the meeting and discuss the next 1oo years for fairfield.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Look at all those books that were left behind! Every time I have seen a library close, they sold the books at low prices. The public mobbed these libraries. Anything not sold was sorted and donated to institutions. What a waste!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll