City December 2, 2009 1:48 PM

The Fairfield Library

The Fairfield Library
The Fairfield Library in North Buffalo has been standing vacant since 2005.  Owned by the City, the former church-turned-library was passed up for a Restore New York grant the City applied for earlier in the year, and it looked like the slowly decaying structure would have to be saved by a private entity.  That posed another set of problems, as the last assessment was done over 2 years ago, but the price tag of $75K has stood firm. See this Buffalo Rising post from Steel in July of 2008, in which he asks the question: Is This One Doomed Too?

A team of local developers has shown interest, but when Councilman Michael LoCurto set up a meeting with City of Buffalo Director of Real Estate John Hannon in early November, the developers were a no-show.  "That's usually not a good sign," LoCurto said, "but they said they're still interested.  It will be up to them to get a reassessment and present it to our review panel."  The potential developers, who have done many successful rehabs around the city, are out of town, but will be back soon.  

LoCurto says it would be nice to see the Fairfield in private hands, if only because the City owns a lot of real estate that needs attention.  He concedes that the building has problems, and that the city has tried to rectify most of them on an as-needed basis, but says that "a private owner with a good plan is probably the best bet at this point."

In the meanwhile, The Parkside Community Association (PCA) has sent a letter to the mayor, asking the city to do their utmost to "facilitate the transfer" to a private developer.  The letter from PCA Executive Director LaVerne Peakes, addressed to Mayor Brown, is as follows:

At the November 17 meeting the Parkside Community Association Board of Directors discussed the future of the Fairfield Library.   Despite the PCA's efforts to save the library and preservations' efforts to preserve it for a public space, there does not seem to be a good solution available.  Preservationists have not been able to come forward with funding or a viable use, and the Library Board has made it very clear that they will not use is as a library again.  The City's efforts to obtain funds through Restore New York have failed.

For these reasons, the Board feels it is time to sell the building to a private developer who will rehabilitate the building.  We understand that pipes have broken, causing significant damage; asbestos abatement will probably run as high as $40,000; and holes in the roof have resulted in considerable water damage.   The City needs to be reasonable about what they can expect for a building in this deteriorated condition. 

The Vernon Triangle neighbors are tired of looking at this disgrace; neighbors are voluntarily mowing the grass -- it's time to be realistic and let the private sector preserve the building.

We urge you to facilitate the transfer of the Fairfield Library to private hands.


Parkside resident Ruth Lampe, who made it clear that she was speaking as a resident and not as part of the PCA, said that although the City has assigned the building to the task force, nearby residents usually get to the mowing first and see the effects of the weathering first.  Since it was first mothballed 4 years ago, Lampe says heating pipes have burst and new holes have developed in the roof, thereby causing more water damage.

"It's all very sad," Lampe says.  "We'd love it to stay in the public sector, and at one point it was suggested that the PCA move there, but even if it were offered to them for a dollar, they couldn't afford it.  Let someone fix and use it."

PCA Executive Director LaVerne Peakes says, "Winter's coming.  We want it purchased."  

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

it so saddens me that this library was shuttered. my 67 year old mother used to walk here after school as a child. i wish i could say the same about my 6 year old.

now, north buffalo, and parkside have no library at all. giant failure to this community.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If the City says it's worth $75K, it must be true ... right up to the day it gets demolished or collapses on its own. Buffalo strangles itself with its own red tape.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Even if someone purchased this today, it would be at least 6-12 months before the city turned it over to the new owner. Would it even make it another winter?

Further complicating the problem is the fact that the property on which the library sits has extremely stringent deed restrictions.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

another reason to reactivate the beltway to rail!

seriously though, this is parkside, this building could easily support a restaurant, a starbucks, a spot coffee and any number of businesses that patronize the local community.

Its another example of how everything the city touches gets destroyed.

As Reagan would say "Im from the government and here to help"

Yup that about sums it up about right for Buffalo city government.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Your assessment of Parkside's ability to support a restaurant or cafe isn't borne out by the history of the much more visible, and higher-trafficked (word?), location at Russell & Parkside. The last four attempts there haven't stuck. I am hopeful about the current incarnation.


replied to Christine
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Didn't some nonprofit group want to buy it to use as a privately funded Grover Cleveland library? Maybe they gave up.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Hoss,
North Buffalo has a great little library. It is at 975 Hertel near the Quest Labs. There is a also a committee that is looking into community interest in building a new library in North Buffalo.
Watergirl

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

thanks watergirl. i haven't ventured into the stripmall temporary location yet, but having a budding reader in the household, i eventually will. it's a bit more of a haul than the fairfield was, and i'm guessing not as charming.. for the distance, i might as well go to merriweather. neither are within my community

it's really too bad that when the city/county was wanting to consolidate a new location on colvin a few years back, everybody complained..

and here is a blog i have been lurking. looks like some folks who are doing the walk on top of the talk. hopefully their efforts will be fruitful

http://northbuffalolibrary.blogspot.com/

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The city didn't even bother to cut the grass. That task was performed by members of the community.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What is the city's goal in holding this property? Maximising the resale price? In an investment climate where dollars are scarce, and one assumes more commercial property will be coming on the market at distressed prices... it just doesn't make sense. I looked at this property 18 months ago and came away impressed. I do recall water damage though, and can only image the additional damage of the last 18 months (to say nothing of the coming winter).
****
Maybe it does exist, but the city should have a straight forward pricing policy, something like market rate - 20% for three months, and an additional 5% off each month til it's sold. Without something like that, it's going to look like someone got a favor (when it's sold for $10,000 in a few years).
****
If investors can't scrape up 1.2 million for the Statler, do you wonder why this doesn't sell for $75,000? Don't get me wrong, it's a nice property, but the city has no business trying to set prices and hold properties that they can't maintain.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

i think it is worth noting that the city has no choice but to charge fair market value (which i am assuming is assessed at $75K) since NYS mandates that. Otherwise, you'd have instances where valuable properties could be given to connected people for a song. I still think there is something terribly wrong with the model and Buffalo should be aggressively advocating for that change in how it lobbies Albany. Its also important to note that this "interested buyer" blew off the meeting. Is the city trying not to sell this? Doesn't sound like that. It sounds to me like the interested party should show up next time, maybe have independent assessments, etc. Its also worth noting that the city should maybe consider what is being proposed for the re-use when dispossessing property. Does the interested party intend to demolish the structure? Do they plan on making it artist lofts?

Things are never as easy as it sounds and PCA's letter seems heavy handed without a reason. Should they send the same letter to the party who failed to show up to the meeting with the City's real estate office?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

bflobr>"the city has no choice but to charge fair market value (which i am assuming is assessed at $75K) since NYS mandates that"

Isn't 'fair market value' only a guess at what a hypothetical buyer would be willing to pay?

If there's no buyers year after year, it's real value is obviously less than assessed. Has the Fairfield ever been put up for public auction? If not, why isn't council member LoCurto pushing for that? If is was auctioned and received no bids then that says something about its real market value.

benfranklin's suggestion sounds good to determine fair market value:
"the city should have a straight forward pricing policy, something like market rate - 20% for three months, and an additional 5% off each month til it's sold."

LoCurto and Hoyt should try to change city law and state law to allow something like what ben described. Or maybe current state law could be interpreted to allow it?

Fair market value shouldn't mean a price no real buyer is willing to pay within a few months of a building being for sale.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

In fairness to the interested developer - the meeting date was never confirmed so they assumed it wasn't happening.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

@whatever: i understood 'fair market value' to be an assessed value performed by a professional, i.e. an assessor or appraiser. Could it be open to interpretation? Maybe. I don't really know. Could an interested buyer bring in an independent appraisal of the building? Maybe. I agree that benfranklin brings up an interesting and innovative way to interpret this. it seems to me that the brown administration falls back on this 'fair market value' law mandated by the state whenever they get called out for a dysfunctional real estate office. why don't they lobby for a change in that mandate at the state level instead of lobbying for red light cameras? why doesn't Hoyt champion it? Or A. Thompson? All good questions.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"why doesn't Hoyt champion it? Or A. Thompson? All good questions"

Also the full time council members, LoCurto and his colleagues, should be publicly calling on the state legislature to make changes if state law is a problem.

The building has been sitting there empty for years, and it's just one example. How come LoCurto and other council members aren't pushing for common sense ideas like benfranklin's?

I doubt Common Council members read blogs, but if anyone who reads this knows any of them they should pass along ben's suggestion.

replied to bflobr
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The Friends of Fairfield - our next 100 years -

The Fairfield is in a low income census tract, which will allow a developer to use 20% historic preservation tax credits to help fund the redevelopment of this property.

The Fairfield has a "blue form" which is the first step in giving it historic landmark status. SHPO has a system now for fast tracking status applications.

Any developer that buys the building should be using historic preservation tax credits and energy subsidies.

Asbestos removal is not required for personal home renovation. If the City sells the building into a homeowner situation, I believe the new owner will be able to do asbestos removal themselves and put the asbestos to the curb in black plasic bags. Not a very safe way to dispose of it.

Historic preservation status allows for green roofs, solar panels and geothermal systems: all of which could be applied to this historic structure as part of a significant energy savings for the users of the building in future.

Without a significant energy upgrade, any tenant or homeowner of the building will most likely be paying huge heating bills in future.

Some general assessments of the site show favorable solar and geothermal siting potential along with green roof potential on the flat roof.

The site most significantly for land use planning is a "large non profit foot print" in an otherwise residential neighborhood. The site is made up of 4 subdivision lots from the Subdivision of Parkside Lands on record with deeds and maps at the County.

Vernon Triangle was not included in the PCA's "Parkside Historic District" however it is considered part of Parkside. However, many of the buildings in Vernon Triagle were documented at the time and could now be reviewed to be part of a new historic district. This would be a possitive outcome for the area and for the PCA community; and allow new historic tax credits to be used on many buildings in Vernon Triangle.

The 4 lots of Fairfield site are deed restricted which runs with the land, these restrictions were put in place in late 1800's by Mr. Bennett owner of the Buffalo Cement Co. and developer of Central Park. And cannot be used for commercial development.

Mr. Wicks, a partner in the firm of EB Green and Wicks designed the church building and the rectory (house next door). He was a member of the Parkside Unitarian Church, and served as one of its founders of incorporation. He worshiped at the Fairfield site and built it. He and Mr. Bennett were associates or may even been related.

It does not seem that the S/S developers are interested in leveraging the tax credits or energy savings that could be put into building. As a Friend of Fairfield - our next 100 years - I hope that the City of Buffalo, Councilmember LoCurto can be a good steward along with the PCA and find a worthy developer to save this building and its large lot foot print for community use for the next 100 years.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll