Olmsted Parks: Up a Tree
Comments
Leave a commenti have to wonder if this is the best avenue for olmsted to be taking regarding this issue. Brown & co. don't like bad press, especially when its thrown at them. Perhaps not the most tactful move for Olmsted to call Elena regarding this issue.
853-0907. Call the Buffalo Control Board and express your support for the Conservancy continuing to care for the Olmsted Parks. Ask them how Byron Brown expects to give the citizens the same quality for the same cost (or less). It can't be done. 853-0907
My guess is that existing union contracts with the city are the issue. Some local union is probably threatening union action if this isn't a city contract for union workers. I doubt the city has the existing employees sitting around who can do the work and will have to hire (see: campaign patronage) staff to take over the work. If existing staff will be utilized, what roles are they abandoning (if any).
Brown got re-elected because of voter apathy. This region is so scared of change and would rather have the status quo than the unknown. But at what point do we say "It can't get any worse?"
Today I passed Delaware Park at the Nottingham entrance and saw two Olmsted Parks Conservancy workers shoveling snow - SHOVELING SNOW. The mayor can't even plow the city's streets and these dedicated Olmsted Parks Conservancy workers were SHOVELING.
MAYOR BROWN,
WE ALL KNOW THAT YOU OWE JOBS TO THE FOOLS THAT VOTED FOR YOU, BUT THAT SHOULD NOT BE AT THE PARKS EXPENSE. YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELF! STEP AWAY FROM THE PARKS!
Note to the Mayor: Dude, you're blowing it!
And for whatever it is worth, last night I attended the latest in Olmsted's live music series at the new Lodge cafe http://www.buffalorising.com/2009/12/music-at-parkside-lodge.html . I do not know if anyone else here attended, but this is only the latest in a long, long, LONG line of successes that the Conservancy has achieved in recent years. Anyone who thinks the Parks aren't better under the Conservancy's supervision has not been paying attention.
Note to the Conservancy: what can we do to show our support for your efforts in a way that will be visible and effective? (I am already a member and Annual Fund contributor, but am looking to help push this forward.)
This delay might not matter either way.
Olmsted isn't going to walk away from the whole thing since it's a major source of their funding.
The Brown admin probably knows they don't have any real choice other than to retain Olmsted. There's not the money sitting around in the city budget to replace Olmsted's private fundraising. Also, the city doesn't have Olmsted's ability to pay parks workers without the costs of union benefits that the city would have to pay.
The delay might be just a negotiating tactic of the city, thinking that if they wait until the last minute or even later, they might get the most concessions from Olmsted (maybe residency rules or management quotas?).
Needless, ridiculous, childish games. An absolute waste of time, not to mention messing with the functioning Olmsted Parks Conservancy.
Like the Brown administration has nothing better to do. On second thought, the Brown administration has nothing better to do, because it accomplishes nothing. Unless you count underhanded dealings, podium photo opportunities and handing out key's to the city as something. I DO NOT!
I have to agree. This is Byron Brown politics at its worst, and I'm SHOCKED it hasn't gotten more press. There was a VERY QUIET article in the Buffalo News about a month ago asking for residents to call 311 to voice their opinion about the takeover, and I bet that very few people have done so. I'm also shocked at how the Olmstead Conservancy is playing victim rather than taking it to the streets. Both sides are handling this poorly. Here's the facts as I see them:
The city had 80-some years to manage the parks, and at the point the county/Olmstead took over, the parks were in gross disrepair, neglected, and forgotten. The bureaucracy (like every city bureaucracy) that ran the parks was (again, like every city bureaucracy) bloated, corrupt, and ineffective. The Olmstead Conservancy is a grass roots effort that has raised MILLIONS in private grant money to sustain the parks. This is something the city NEVER did and really doesn't have the resources to do. If we allow this to happen, we're kissing that money... and our parks goodbye.
That begs the question, why? Why would Byron do this? Because it's a bullied play for low hanging fruit in the political machine that runs this city. He feels that too many minorities are passed over for jobs with the Conservancy, so instead, he'll undo a decade of hard grassroots effort to give jobs to a handful of minorities. It doesn't make sense, and if it were a white mayor doing it to give jobs to his cronies, he'd be called out on it. We should do the same... but nothing is going to happen unless people make a stink, and my guess everyone is too preoccupied with the Bills playing in Toronto and other VERY important issues to make the time to voice their opposition. I truly hope people prove me wrong.
Colligan's thumbnail sketch of the proposed contract seems to be a no-brainer.
The Olmsted group's support of a 46-car parking lot and a Walgreen's-like office in the middle of South Park has turned their "Supportability Factor" to Zero, for me. Not that the City hasn't treated, since about 1895, every park as a building lot, but the Olmstedders could have at least pretended to oppose another intrusion.
Verdan, what in he!! are you talking about? Why do you think it's called a The Olmsted Parks Conservancy - it CONSERVES green space, and has confronted neighborhood groups about their desire to remove existing structures. You are utterly misinformed.
Are you talking about the Botanical Gardens?
The OC endorsed both the parking lot and office structure in South Park.
I'd like to see organized labor and the "regionalists" come out against this. Organized labor, as a progressive movement, has made some great strategic strides that recognize the higher good. More than anyone, they understand that this is all about making the pie bigger.
It's great to shrink elected representation, but why aren't they crying foul about decentralizing public works like this? That realm should be going in the opposite direction.
Olmsted can take it to the streets - they have a lot of support in the city.
Leave a comment
Sponsor
Recent Comments
Sponsor
Interested in advertising on BuffaloRising?
E-mail John C. Powell
or call John at 716.602.0200




how did Byron Brown get elected again????