City December 11, 2009 2:35 PM

Harbor Bridge Choices: Two Down, One to Go

Harbor Bridge Choices: Two Down, One to Go

A previous BR story and subsequent poll* gave BR readers the opportunity to vote on one of four possible scenarios of mixed-transportation bridges that would connect the inner and outer harbor.  As a result of further plans and studies on the part of the Erie Canal Harbor Development Corporation, that choice is down to two.

The Michigan and Ganson Street bridges have been tossed, leaving the Erie and Main Street choices, a subject that will be put to further public review in a 5:30PM meeting this Wednesday at the Waterfront School, 95 Fourth Street.  Erie and Main are seen as more favorable because they would form a link to the business district. 

According to ECHDC Senior Project Manager Steven Ranali, the Main Street project would cost around $87 million, and necessitate two bridges (Main to Kelly Island, Kelly Island to the Ship Canal), while the Erie Street bridge would cost $63 million, and could include reinstating Erie Street, a plan long favored by preservationists. An Erie Street tunnel was looked into, but rejected due to cost.

In the meanwhile, plans and a bigger file of the top image can be viewed online, as well as at the Buffalo &Erie County Public Library. 

*Final Poll results:

Main: 309

Erie Street: 167

Michigan: 88

Ganson: 16

View image

2 TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.buffalorising.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/5407

In the late 1950s, one of the two lift bridges at Michigan Street became inoperable while the other was soon thereafter hit by a freighter, causing it to collapse. These fateful events left the Queen City without a direct route to prime land along Lake... Read More

Teen sex. from Teen sex. on May 7, 2010 4:48 PM

Teen sex. Read More

Comments

Leave a comment

Can we have both?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Two bridges would be WONDERFUL!

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

yes... the more the merrier!

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm trying to imagine the bridges without the skyway there (i know i'm dreaming but long run it is a possibility). But when i do, it seems like we should have both. They are trying to envision this as a new district, why not have two ways of access? Yes it will be more $, but I think it would ease traffic.

If I had to choose one it would be the Main Street one, just because i dont see the area where the Erie Bridge being more popular than the Main area anytime soon, thats just a preliminary opinion.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Main Street makes the most sense. It would be less intrusive as there is currently more foot traffic on erie st that will make for a slow drive thrugh there I think. I'm curious to know how they plan to deal with sailboats? I know this will be a draw bridge but as a sailor myself I thnk that will cause a bit of a problem for the 1000 or so sailboats in the outerharbor slips during the summer. I guess it would be a small price to pay for better access. It's also nice to see that someone had the common sense to plan this meeting in the evening so the working force can actually attend.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

yeay!! a bridge to nowhere! 87 mil would get light rail pretty close or UB North. you know, where people live/go to school/work?

*sigh*

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I remember reading that light rail costs about $1m per FOOT... So $87M would get you to about halfway through the UB parking lot...

replied to al labruna
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

According to Wikipedia (famous last words!), the average new light rail system cost is $35 million per mile, or $6629 per foot, MUCH less than $1 million per foot.

Also, that number includes startup costs like the train vehicles which are already paid for here, unless extending the Metro Rail line required adding train cars to keep frequencies where they are (or increase them).

replied to jattea
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

3mil to 85 mil a mile (i guess there is always a possibility for higher) is the very broad range for new LR.

Id guess 10 mil a mile might not be too far off the mark - particularly since shops/vehicles/ROW already exist.

replied to jattea
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

35 sounds about right... when I was doing research for a architecture \ urban planning studio about the costs for light rail construction the range was anywhere from 20 million \ mile in St. Louis to 100 million in Seattle. One of the biggest costs in the project is the acquisition of the ROW. With 10% of ALL the city's land already devoted to Railroad ROW and a nice wide 'highway' connecting straight to North Campus little new ROW are needed.

http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&hl=en&msa=0&msid=115736043256615441006.00044eb528193e33bf877&ll=42.924755,-78.896942&spn=0.335363,0.468292&z=11

replied to jattea
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

yeah I would also prefer to see the LR extended to north before this bridge... only because making that connection would bring tons of money, people and life to downtown and really support further development and stabilization of the area... and make a better case to connect to the outer harbour.

replied to al labruna
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I don't think expanding the rail should be the first thing.

It's too costly in comparison.

It'll be more bureaucratic (try sending that through the Amherst town board to ask to dig up north bailey or millersport for a rail).

And it'll take too long to build.


The bridge will be another way to bring people into the city but, it will help out in times of emergencies when the skyway is closed. This is important to Southtowners.

However, they shouldnt build a Main st. bridge unless they open main st. completely up for cars.

replied to al labruna
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Main St is already going to be opened to cars probably why Main St was an option.

replied to Greg
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

When is Main Street opening up? I haven't seen the final plan or timeline. Is it published somewhere?

replied to Sean Brodfuehrer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Too costly? Assuming it would cost more (and im not sure it would) - lets talk about value.

Say it does cost 87 mil to build that bridge. Why would they cross with the skyway still in place? How many people will cross it? 100 a day? 1000? Whats the per user cost?


replied to Greg
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Time for a bridge design competition. This is a chance to do something really beautiful.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I live in New Rochelle and there is Glen Island park. It is a county park with a draw bridge out to the sound. There a a decent amount of car and boat traffic during the summer months. Bridge goes up an down every 15 mins or so. Not much of a problem, bridge is smaller though.

I hope that the planners are thinking about what would happen should a developer want to build a high rise residental building there, which I believe is planned long term.

I'd hate to hinder further development because a bridge is too cumbersome.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

In the long term if the community aspires to have a dense active downtown and active outer harbor area hopefully with TOD type dense housing and employment centers I feel the city needs at least two or three crossings to really effectively and efficiently connect the two areas. The benefit of a grid street pattern is that it diffuses traffic and offers a number of options for transportation rather than funneling all traffic one way. the same should be said for bridge planning. Especially if the city hopes to one day rid itself of the skyway!!!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Am I the only one who doesn't think the Main Street option is so great? If the ride line indicates just where the bridge entrance begins...would'nt that block off the new development plans for the Inner Harbor around those blocks including the Mero Rail Events Station and entrance to HSBC Arena? So why is this such a good idea? It looks great if all you do is drive, but how will the pedestrian navigate on and around the entrance on Main? Please, someone explane and give more details on this.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The LRT line already goes through most of the red area. The only thing that a bridge at the Foot of Main would do is increase the accessibility of the outer harbour and expand where people could walk to around there.

The special events station will likely need to be changed once further development happen down there anyhow. Ideally it would become incorporated into a larger building or maybe into the HSBC itself... I have always found it stupid that the LR goes right TOO the station but you still need to get off 300' away and walk, when you could easily get off right inside the arena itself.

I would also hope that a bridge here would serve as a bridge to expand LR to the outer harbor and the Lakefront Business Park and further south to South Buffalo and beyond.

replied to Lego1981
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

First let me remind everyone that the Ohio Bridge needs to be reconstructed and it wouldnt hurt if its location was reconsidered because there does need to be a return bridge that reconnects the south end of the Outer Harbor to the First Ward.

I have heard a few people make a big picture plea when looking at whether it should be a lift bridge at Erie Street or Main Street.

Neither a trolley nor a light rail can make a right angle turn onto Ganson or Furhmann Boulevard so Main Street wont fit that purpose.

The bigger picture people are talking about is the possibility of uniting the Peace Bridge, Buffalo State Marine and Great Lakes Center, Ward Pumping Museum, LaSalle Park, Ojibwa Waterfront Residential, Canalside, the DL&W, the Buffalo Creek Casino and a new Convention and Conference Center into some MASTER PLAN. Plus if an offshoot could be built then there would be a straight line path for a trolley or light rail to Furhmann Boulevard from Erie Street...and even a connecting loop along Ohio or South Park.

We cant just think of a lift bridge only in terms of Canalside.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think you might be taking their little diagram too literally. Cars can't really do right angles either but I am sure that any bridge \ road connection anywhere would have a smoother curved transition and if they didn't design it to be LR ready... they are making a huge mistake.

replied to JohnQBuffalo
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I just love looking at Sean's map and dreaming - I've had it bookmarked for awhile, but like a good movie, it's a worldstopper for me - I'll still click on it when he links to it. I enjoy it that much.
.
Not to demean in any way or form, but some of his ideas are just so dang obvious, especially from the La Salle station to NT and through Parkside and North Park - with all the ROWs we have why is this not moving forward? The thought he put into the less obvious stations and lines is broad and exciting.
.
Oh, if this really were our Metro system...

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

thanks! yeah the google version was just one way to express the information and planning done for months. It is very obvious because the ROW is already there making it very affordable to build in comparison to other cities. Assuming we didn't build extravagant stations I bet that we could easily get close to that 20 mil mark per mile and 80 mil could get us 3 miles of LR. Toronto

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The biggest problem is that the railroads own the right-of-ways and many of them have an indemnification policy that basically states, "If something happens on our track and it's our fault, YOU pay the damages." Few entities are willing to accept a use agreement that amounts to full liability on property that they do not own. It's a failure on the part of this country 150 years ago to make railroad ROWs public property. If the State's owned the ROW's, like highways, it would be a whole different story.

On another note, public transit between UB North and Downtown already exists (intermodal bus-rail). Granted, it’s not bus rapid transit, but I refuse to buy the argument that the current system is so inconvenient that it's a hindrance to people who want or need to get Downtown. Yes, it would be nice, but extending the LRRT to North Campus might save 20 minutes on the commute time over the current system and will keep riders from having to walk the 150 feet from the bus stop to the LRRT station when they get to South Campus. That hardly seems like an inconvenenience to me and I fail to see how the more convenient alternative of an extended LRRT system will somehow generate tens of thousands of new trips Downtown....at a price of $140 million to get that 4 extra miles ($35 million per mile), it hardly seems justifiable.

Nonetheless, I think any new bridge to the Outer Harbor needs to incorporate long-term plans for extension of LRRT out there. I don't think we'll see that with a foot-of-Erie Street bridge siting.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Let Ron Reinas have this bridge project instead of the Peace Bridge. He could even move a couple poles on Kelly Island for a "truck plaza".

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Take the South Park lift bridge (near Lee) and move it down here. It is not needed anymore since Republic and Mobil are no longer up river. Float it down the river and reinstall it. Create a cheap standard bridge at the south park location. Could save a few bucks?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Light them up too!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll