City December 2, 2009 9:05 AM

19th Street Rehabs

19th Street Rehabs

Homefront, Inc, one of Buffalo's community development non-profits, and a very important resource for home ownership in Buffalo and Erie County, is rehabbing six houses on 19th Street on the City's West Side. 

100 19th inside.png

The houses will be gutted down to their foundation frames and will feature new roofs, new siding, new windows, new interiors, new wiring and new mechanicals. All of the rehabs will sell in the range of $49,000 to $56,000 with a purchase subsidy and are targeted for first-time homeowners. The rehabbed dwellings will all be single-family units.     

The first house rehab, 106 19th Street (top image and right, below), is well under way, and work has also started on  100 19th Street (left, below). 

100 19th during.png

The rehab of houses at 110, 113, 114 and 38 will begin on a staggered schedule in the near future. The goal is to have the entire project finished by the end of the fall of 2010. Financing for this project comes from the Buffalo Urban Renewal Agency (BURA), HUD and two New York State Housing agencies.

100 19th before.png

(100 19th Street before)

This project is the latest in a number of home rehabbing projects that Homefront has been involved in since 1975. Homefront has had successful home rehab projects in Schiller Park, Lovejoy, South Buffalo and the University District. Interested readers can pursue further information at Homefront or call 716.856.2952.

 

View image

1 TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://www.buffalorising.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/5326

Early last December, Buffalo Rising contributor John Straubinger brought you this story about HomeFront, Inc's 19th Street rehabs.  This past week, HomeFront, a not-for-profit community development corporation based out of the City of Buffalo, ann... Read More

Comments

Leave a comment

This is what a rehab is supposed to be. Good work, we need about 2000 more! Six houses on one street is enough to turn around an entire neighborhood, or at least get the ball rolling. I think flipping houses should be welcomed barring they are done in this manner. It turns a profit for the investor while changing neighborhoods and allowing people to buy an affordable home that is practically new, while maintaining the amazing character of our architecture.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

the interiors their site's gallery look great. its amazing how much detail was put into homes in the past.

replied to brownteeth
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I am always for salvaging the original interiors however sometimes it's not possible due to either extreme damage or even the fact that its just better to completely gut an interior and rebuild with a better, more appropriate layout. I am strongly against altering the exterior with the exception of using modern materials to replicate old ones such as hardi plank or composite siding. Obviously the more kept original the better but sometime we must choose in order to make a project doable. You and I will chat some more about this I hope in the near future. BTW the Cheater says hello.

replied to sin|ill
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I definitely agree with you. The arches, hardwood floors, and original craftsman details in the windows and staircases all add an incredible amount of detail, warmth, and livability that is often times hard to replicate.

replied to sin|ill
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Honest "flipping" that put people in homeownership and improved existing housing stock in the city would be a welcome idea. Essentially, HomeFront is doing this but with subsidies to keep prices affordable, which is fine. If the City really wanted to have homes rehabbed, they'd offer them for sale on a continual basis, not once a year at an in rem auction. Why not develop a housing program that provided the subsidy in the form of the free vacant home or lot to a builder/rehabber in exchange for an agreement to rehab or build to a certain standard and sale price? Essentially, instead of spending $20,000 on a demo, the city gives the property (granted they have to be rehab-able) away (no cost to them) and it gets rehabbed.

There has to be a better way to do what seems painfully obvious.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What a novel idea, too bad no one in city hall is progressive enough to do that.

replied to buffalofalling
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The one house with the top and bottom porch looks good but the front attic has a gable vent. A window similar to what was there would look a thousand times better, the vent gives this building a cheap look compared to the houses on each side. If this is still unheated attic space, then cheap single hung units would do the trick - just a suggestion.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This house was in a fire and the whole roof was replaced with roof trusses to keep with green building practices. City homes with attics that are not properly insulated are huge heat loss spaces. This house was designed not to have an attic because of the roof trusses. R-38 insulation will be installed in the celing joist to maintain the R-Value of the home. When renovating homes to meet Energy Star reguirements and where ever possible a ridge vent is installed along with venting the soffits to properly vent the attic space so insulation can be installed in the roof rafters. Putting a window servers no purpose. The decorative piece was added for character only. Thanks for the comment.

replied to northbuff
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I luv seeing BLOCKS of houses being rehabbed at once. Now if only we can do some in the East Side too instead of knocking them all down.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

And I also luv the fact that these will be Single Family homes. It's a no brainer that since the city is losing in population and losing great old homes. The best way to save them is turn these doubles and mixed apartments into Single homes. Renovating them and having ownership instead of rental brings the property values up and more pride in the community while having a more guarentee that these homes will be filled since they are not doubles. On the other hand, if and when our area does re-gain in population, we have almost an entire EAST Side that has miles and miles of empty land to re-build new living spaces.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

One reason Rochester has been having more success than Buffalo in saving more homes is exactly the reason you mentioned. Rochester has more single family homes and fewer doubles.

If Buffalo can convert more of its duplexes to single family homes, then that could be a way of stabilizing the housing losses.

But still...50k for a fully remodelled home...thats a good price...but the drawback is...no garage...no off street parking.

replied to Lego1981
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

As I have said on this site before. "If you live in the city, why do you need a car?". We should be promoting 'WALKING' Communities in the city as it was ment to be. I find it said to see many beautiful city streets and very few people WALKING on them. I thought the need for driveways and garages was a suburban thing?

replied to Christine
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The West Side is walkable as far as having sidewalks, but until a grocery opens closer than 1.3 miles from me, I need a car. The nearest drug, hardware, and other necessary stores are just as far. The nearest library is even farther, and forget about a doctor or dentist !

replied to Lego1981
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Nice to see but demolition is inevtiable with a city population half of what it was and a metro population also bleeding population. Without growth trends in employment and opportunity who will fill all these homes? It is simply reshuffling the deck with less and less residents. The residents are like the chairs in musical chairs and somebody has to go in the the housing stock when a chair is taken away. These vacancy issues arent lasting afew months, its been decades of this and I just cant see how the east side with all its issues could be somehow saved by rebuilding homes there unless population decline, employment, income, crime, are all resolved first. Otherwise what are we doing? Just rebuilding neighborhoods that were destroyed in part by some of those who live in them?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is one of too few "neighborhood-based" rehabs that "builds from strength" of nearby Richmond Ave.

Sadly, WSNHS (WS Neigh Housing Service) has not been mentioned in this positive initiative, nor in the exciting "Extreme Makeover" on Mass Ave last month. WSNHS was founded in 1980 to 'stop WS decline'& 'promote homeownership' but with a staff of 7+ & an administrative budget of about $730K has too often been part of the problem instead of part of the solution.

Producing an average of less than two "scattershot" acquisition-rehabs a year over the past decade, they have rarely made any visible inpact on neighborhoods where they have purchased houses.

For example, WSNHS purchased 116 19th St on 6/22/05, selling it for $55K on 3/29/07 to a new homeowner surrounded by blight. Indeed, right next door at #114 was one of the most notorious flip-scams in Bflo. It was first owned by notorious Houston scammer Scott Wizig, then dumped to notorious California JD MAX, finally going to Homefront after two more flips.

Without major reform, WSNHS will continue to be part of the problems on the WS, dragging down the exciting efforts of PUSH & Homefront who have been forced to move into the vacuum created by a longtime disfunctional, but 'connected' WSNHS.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You know, Dick, I knew you'd pop you ugly mug into this article and somehow try to make it a pissing contest. You might want to get your head out of your azz and see that while WSNHS may not do rehabs like this, there is much more to what they do, like keeping low-income families from giving up and leaving their derelict properties since there is no other way for them to fix them. through different initiatives and funding sources, they have completed almost $1MM in rehab projects in each of the last two years all across the city; most of it on the West Side. I was one of those that were assisted (a couple years ago) and couldn't be happier.

Regarding the gut rehabs that they did do, why not ask the new home owners what they think...oh, wait...none of them LIKE YOU! Aside from 16th St, how many of them have lost their homes or hate their decision to buy where the property was located? How many sold their home? Pretty sure the answer to both is ZERO! As tough a project as it was to complete, I'm pretty sure my neighbors around the corner on Essex love their rehabbed homes.

I, too, Dick...can do my research and have access to WSNHS' transactions with the County. How many of THOSE are ending up in foreclosure? Not many these days, since WSNHS offers free foreclosure prevention services to help stave off that terrible disease, on top of top-notch pre- and post-purchase counseling.

Since I know about the situation on 16th St. personally, you do realize that the homeowners, when they split up, could not afford to keep the home? Was $55k too expensive a home for them to buy when there was two (actually 3) incomes? Sure wasn't. Homeowner's parted ways...that made it tough to handle. What happened with the property afterwards is not the fault of WSNHS. Find me any area in the city where a foreclosed home resells for what it was initially mortgaged for? Nowhere, Dick.

Also, according to WSNH, they did not buy many of the properties that were rehabbed. A couple were donated. None were in great shape. Back then, enormous subsidies were not available to blow a quarter million on each home like HomeFront/PUSH is doing. You do realize that while the article says the homes will sell from $49-$56k, there will be considerable subsidies attached to the selling price that would require payback should they decide not to keep the home for 10-15 years? Guess what, Dick. If someone buys one of these homes and decides to sell a few years down the line, THEY WILL LOSE MONEY!!! The same thing you blasted WSNHS for all these years, yet hasn't happened to date. Sure...WSNHS can do gut rehabs like this now, but they're also busy helping anyone else that needs it.

All in all, with a staff of 7+ (none of whom make anywhere near the $100k you like to infer while throwing out their annual budget), they manage to counsel over 300-400 prospective home buyers, fund rehab projects on almost 100 properties, provide the aforementioned Foreclosure Prevention counseling to almost 90 more, and leverage over $2MM in purchase mortgages across the City...

...IN THE LAST YEAR ALONE.

Geez, Dick....you're right...they do nothing. I think after however many years of you whining it's time to bury that hatchet.

I love what HF and PUSH are getting done in my neighborhood, but you need to let go of your "Rehab/Resale is the only way" mantra. You can rehab 50 of these homes a year, but if you let 100 more properties fail, where does that get you? Everyone has a niche. Just because you really dislike one of them, doesn't mean you need to try to bash them every chance you get.

Do what you do well, and let others fill in the gaps when you don't. How much in your life have you done well?

replied to Dick Kern
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I REALLY hope that some of the woodwork will be reincorporated into the structures. If not that is a really shame. New layout or not drywall and ticky-tacky finishes from depot don't do it for me. It is amazing how hard it is to find an affordable houses with really good woodwork nowadays.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What? Just go to North Buffalo, almost all the houses have nice 4 inch wide molding around doors, and 8 inch around the floors. I actually just went and looked at some houses for my sister in NT, and all the houses had nice old woodwork. Not one of the hoses was above 90k

replied to Sean Brodfuehrer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

..."while maintaining the amazing character of our architecture" ... Is that what they're doing? The photos show conversion to featureless boxes using off-the-shelf items, whether they fit or not. I realize that the intention is to provide affordable housing for first-time buyers and that these places would otherwise be demolished, but let's not pretend that any preservation is involved.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What I meant was rehabbing these homes the way they are doing is a better option than demolishing them. I think these homes have more character (exterior anyway) than a new plastic home or empty lot.

replied to B and B
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Rehabs are croping up all over the West Side. Just the other day I walked by a funny looking house @ 388 Breckenridge (corner of Hoyt) and saw that it was undergoing a major renovation. If someone could see value in this charred, ravaged house situated on a lot narrower than most driveways, than perhaps the neighborhood really is coming around.


http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&tab=wl

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

388 has a garage, actually. What was "funny looking" about it? Looks like a nice brick/siding double, to me.

replied to Armchair MBA
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I saw the garage.

As far as the house I just thought it was a little wierd to build a home on such a narrow lot(10' at the most). Try looking at it on google maps head on and not from the intersection and you will see it has a unique profile from the Breckenridge side.
I have always liked the place since it is a throwback to a time when land in that neighborhood was much more valuable necesitating construction on such a small parcel. When I saw that a fire had tore through the attic, I figured the place was done for.

Whoever is fixing the place up has put a much nicer beige siding to replace the lime green asbestos shingles. I cant wait to see the finished product.

replied to B and B
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Okay, that explains my confusion: you mean 389, other side of the street! Yep, the City site says the lot is 11 feet wide (and a little wider at the rear)! Wow. I know the place, now. Last time I saw it, it wasn't boarded-up. I share your wonder that anyone would bother with it ! The floor plans would be of interest.

Weird: on only that side of just that block, the houses and lots are at a slight angle to the street, apparently lined-up with Parkdale instead of Hoyt.

replied to Armchair MBA
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Someone or some company has done a fantastic job rehabbing quite a few houses on the last block (the 400 block) of Parkdale near Forest too. I am on the next block and I met a the new owner who bought the only boarded up house on my block in the most recent foreclosure sale. He told me he intends to update/remodel it and sell it too!! He already brought over a contractor to look at some of the work that needs to be done. This is great. I hope it keeps growing. These houses on the Lower West Side are so individual and have neat unusual architectural features. As many of them as possible should be saved.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If anyone knows who is responsible for the rehabs on Parkdale that Fredrico just mentioned, please let me know through a post to this story. I'll contact them and do a story on their rehabs.

replied to fredrico
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I will try to find out who is rehabbing all these properties on that first block of Parkdale and get back to you. The workers let me walk into one of the houses last month. This particular house was a disaster and used to have one of those stencils of Pataki on the door.
Well - you should see it now. Every wall and ceiling was rebuilt. It has a new roof and completely new porch. It's a huge spectacular house now. The two apartment buildings on the corner have been redone also. There is a tiny cottage size house in between that was completely rehabbed too. They are all on the right hand side of the street if you want to drive by.

replied to jstraubinger
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Probably Elmwood Village Contracting (aka Greenleaf, aka "Bflo West Side Properties, LLC") which owns 420, 422, and 436 Parkdale.

replied to fredrico
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

BUFFALO RISING: OMG! Is BR intending to tolerate becoming a gossip site, especially against people who might not know of BR's existance? Does BR understand how a number inversion is also a privacy invasion???!!!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Uh oh, I hope nobody at Buffalo Rising needs to divide any fractions

replied to Crisa
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll