Regional November 2, 2009 11:10 AM

Two Races to Watch Tomorrow

Two Races to Watch Tomorrow

Sitting on a sofa on a Sunday afternoon /
Going to the candidates debate /
Laugh about it, shout about it
/ When you've got to choose
/ Every way you look at it, you lose.

This is how a lot of people may feel, looking over the upcoming regional elections with its obvious slam-dunks or otherwise scant offerings of candidates.

Buffalo Mayor's race: Incumbent Byron Brown runs against no one.  A campaign that eliminated fellow democrat Mickey Kearns in the primary decided this race in September.  Adding insult to injury, Erie County Democratic Chairman, Len Lenihan, whose party withheld an endorsement of Democrats Brown or Kearns prior to the primary, was quoted in The Buffalo News as saying, "Not to be able to find one human being to run for mayor of the City of Buffalo is a pretty odd situation." 

Erie County Sheriff:  Current sheriff, Republican Tim Howard is being challenged by John Glascott, the Democratic Police Captain of Cheektowaga.  It's a nasty race in which both seasoned law enforcement veterans are pointing to the fact that although their opponent may "get their man," they also lose them--from murderers too rapists.  With Glascott's 12 cells, compared to Howard's 25,000 inmates a year, each has made erroneous releases (to disasterous consequences), and had suicides and escapes under their watch--the highest profile one being that of trooper killer Ralph Bucky Phillips from Howard's county jail.  Still, the State Police are endorsing Howard.

In a debate held a few weeks back (see this Phil Fairbanks story in The Buffalo News), Howard justified allowing a Hollywood film crew in, but has denied the Department of Justice access to the jail for investigative purposes.  Howard says he doesn't trust the Department of Justice. 

Erie County Legislature: 5 of the 15 legislators is running unopposed this year. Timothy Kennedy (2nd District) , Barbara Miller-Williams (23rd District), Maria Whyte (6th District), Betty Jean Grant (7th District) and John Mills (13th District), have no challengers.  Last week's Buffalo News accused incumbent legislator Michelle Ianello, who is being challenged by Republican Kevin Hardwick, of being racist for asking that members of her canvassing crew be removed.  The two African American representatives of the Working Families Party were going door to door, asking voters to sign a pledge stating they would vote for Ianello.

Ianello's quote in The Buffalo News, stating that it was a "difference of opinion," looks like it was an answer to the charge of bigotry, but in context, it was Ianello's feelings about the tactics used with voters. Hardwick's campaign is being partially financed by It should be mentioned that County Executive Chris Collins offered campaign help to Hardwick when he recruited him to run against Ianello.  According to Hardwick, Collins offered help, "financially, politically," though there is no record of any funds coming from Collins to date.

This Buffalo News story by Bob McCarthy examines the ways in which Collins inserted himself into the campaigns of fellow Republicans, including Hardwick.

In tomorrow's election, with obvious slam-dunks and otherwise slim pickin's, is the number of races that are already decided a sign of everything going right, or general apathy?  The numbers at the polls will tell in the end, along with any major shifts, particularly those between Howard and Glascott and Hardwick and Ianello.

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

Mayor of Buffalo- sad, no takers for captain of the Titanic. Brown is competent but brings no passion or new ideas.

Sheriff- Howard "doesn't trust the Department of Justice" sadder yet and the best reason to vote for Glascott.

Erie County Legislature- Can't give Chris "I hate the city and I know the antichrist" Collins any more power. This guys ego is out of control and if he is comfortable making crazy comments in public just imagine what he says in private.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Lenihan's quote was in reference to the Erie County Republicans, who didn't run a candidate for mayor in order to suppress voter turnout (primarily Democratic) in the city in the November election, to discourage votes against their candidates for county sheriff and comptroller.

Here's a link to the article containing the quote and a discussion of the voter turnout issues:
http://www.buffalonews.com/cityregion/buffaloerie/story/846650.html

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Jsmith, Any city resident who wanted to could have registered as a Republican and gotten enough valid petition signatures to run on the R line for mayor unopposed in their primary. They wouldn't have needed party committee approval.

At least the Republican committee left their ballot line wide open for that possibility, unlike committees of the 3 other local parties (Independence, Conservative, and Working Families Party) who all cross-endorsed Byron Brown this year.

As the article you linked points out, if Republicans were worred about city turnout they wouldn't have run a sure-to-lose challenger to Lynn Marinelli whose district includes some of Buffalo.

Your complaint should be directed at the local officails of the Conservatives, Independence, and WFP much more so than the R's.

replied to JSmith
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Perhaps, although I suspect a Republican running without any organizational funding would not be able to pose a credible challenge to Brown (which would be an uphill battle even if supported by the party).

The difference between running against Brown and against Marinelli is that the mayoral race is much more visible and likely to attract voters. I suspect (but don't have proof) that the city portion of Marinelli's district has a much lower percentage of voters that would be galvanized into action to vote for her and other Democrats the way voters in other areas of the city would be if Brown's seat was at stake.

I completely agree with you about the minor parties, and I think there is no benefit to fusion voting except to provide another level of patronage, back-door dealing, etc. I am as irritated as anyone that no party provides me with even a symbolic option to vote for someone other than Brown.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Even if well-funded, a Republican running would be only symbolic too.

In Nov '05, Republicans ran a well-funded candidate, far more experienced and qualified than Brown who won a landslide. Brown also won by landslides in the Dem primary two months ago and Sept '05.

Brown is who most Buffalo voters by far want as mayor. Some in BR Land refuse to admit it, but there's no reason to think anybody would be a credible challenger to Brown. If he wants a third term in 2013, he'll win that too unless between now and then he's indicted for something or decides to seek a better job.

replied to JSmith
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

even with an indictment he will still win in 2014

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Whatever>"Brown is who most Buffalo voters by far want as mayor. Some in BR Land refuse to admit it, but there's no reason to think anybody would be a credible challenger to Brown. If he wants a third term in 2013, he'll win that too unless between now and then he's indicted for something or decides to seek a better job"

You are not the first person to figure out that mayoral incumbents dominate the City of Buffalo for as long as they like. Griffin + Tony served until they decided they wanted to do somthing else and there is no reason to believe BB wont do the same. Jimmy stocked city hall with his cronies, thumbed his nose at minorities and the G/L community, and was inolved in a parks dept scandal but he still got re-elected. The fact that Brown is a strong favorite to win doesnt mean the registered voters have to roll over and not voice support for an underdog.

Its interesting to see your motivation for stumping for Byron all summer. You pick the side of the candidate who is a virtual lock regardless if his ideals jive with yours, and then lecture "BR land" from atop your high horse for not sharing your foresight.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Incumbency doesn't explain it.

BB wasn't an incumbent when he won by two landslides in 2005 - both the primary against a well-known Democrat opponent in Gaughan, and again in the general against a well-funded better qualified Republican opponent in Helfer.

I've always said BB is a mostly a bad mayor and never stumped for him. I pointed out your man Mickey was on balance no better, in some ways worse, and said why.

If you're hunting for somebody more supportive of BB than me, you can look to the first comment at the top of this thread in which BRLifer says BB is competent. I'd never say that.

replied to Armchair MBA
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

My comment was not exactly a compliment of Bryon Brown. Competent simply means able or legally qualified to do the job. Your comment infers you believe Brown is incompetent, or unable/not legally qualified to do the job.
We can agree he is not a star but he is competent.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

BRLifer, I see what you mean but def 2 of incompetent from Websters is 'inadequate to or unsuitable for a particular purpose'.

Inadequate and unsuitable are subjective, but seem to fit a lot of what's happened:

Sycamore Village and other residential new builds, the Pitts-Savarino episode, lots of politicized hiring, economic dev spending for hotels and restaurants, allowing snow plowing to fall apart last yr reportedly due to worker turnover, fiasco with national recruiting for the police exam, wasteful spending for things like the Bway Market, foot dragging to publicly release crime reports, bad upkeep of many streets... lots more I can't think of.

Some things he's done well, like crime cameras, better priority on demolitions, etc. The question is what balance of good/bad separates adequate from inadequate. I agree he's legally qualified for the office and probably at least as good as Kearns would be. Those can be true even if he's incompetent.

replied to Blackrocklifer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Im going to put in a write in vote for assaroni.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

No one in the City is going to vote anyway, look for a big Collins victory across the Board. Suburbs will turnout in good numbers to ensure it. As a City resident I say screw the democrats.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Go Kevin Hardwick!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Michelle Ianello's concerns of being represented by African Americans going door to door in lily white Kenmore - is a FAIR criticism. It's about the candidate connecting with her voters, NOT about the volunteers - unless you are her opponent.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

ECB>"...Republican Kevin Hardwick, with campaign funding that comes from County Executive Chris Collins,..."

ECB>"It should be mentioned that Hardwick's campaign is being partially financed by County Executive Chris Collins."

Must be important to be mentioned twice in consecutive paragraphs. Also important to not mention anything about where any of Iannello's much richer campaign financing is from. That would be boring and clutter up the article.

Is there a reference about Collins financial donations to Hardwick? I'm not saying it didn't happen, but what's the basis?

Iannello's donor list has over $85,000 so far. Hardwick's is under $9,000 and I don't see any contributions listed so far from Collins.

http://tinyurl.com/iannello-donors

http://tinyurl.com/hardwick-donors

One of them did very well with donations from public employees and other labor groups.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

ECB doesn't like Collins and she is using this site to grandstand against him. Simple as that.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I changed the placement of the fact and should have struck the first reference from its rather unwieldy sentence. It was announced last May that Collins had asked Hardwick to run and was offering campaign money. See the May 18th statement on the link below, if the BR link in the body of the story didn't tell you everything you wanted to know about proposed monetary campaign help from Collins. It was reported on major news outlets as well. http://www.thealbanyproject.com/tag/Chris%20Collins

As for anything negative about Collins on this site, you will notice it came from Kathy Konst, whom Collins has since hired away from the legislature (link below). Her quote in the story was, "I called in and was stunned by his arrogance." She is Collins' new environment and planning commissioner. http://archives.buffalorising.com/story/property_tax_cures_and_budget

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The Board of Elections web page of donations to Hardwick doesn't look to show any money from Collins as of mid Oct.

While there's no need for blogs to be balanced, it's interesting to see accidental double mention of claims Collins is helping fund Hardwick without real sourcing of it actually happening, along with silence about who are any major donors to Iannello's nearly 10x bigger funding so far.

1199 SEIU NYS PAC NY, NY 10108 $2,100.00
1199 SEIU-NYSPAF NY, NY 10108 $2,000.00
A.F.C.M.E. LOCAL 1095 CHEEKTOWAGA, NY $852.00
AFSCME LOCAL 1095 PAC CHEEKTOWAGA, NY $1,000.00
BUFFALO DISTRICT COUNCIL#35 AFSCME $1,000.00
AFSCME LOCAL 650 AFL-CIO $250.00
BUILD.-TRADES COUNCIL WEST SENECA, NY 14224 $650.00
BUILD.-TRADES COUNCIL WEST SENECA, NY 14224 $500.00
EMPIRE STATE CARPENTERS HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788 $500.00
FREINDS OF PAUL CLARK WEST SENECA, NY 14224 $250.00
... and more

Links to each candidate's donation lists on the BoE web site in my comment above.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I guess we'll have to find out if he reneged. We had no reason to doubt Hardwick's statement.

And here is a very good Bob McCarthy story from The Buffalo News on the subject: http://www.buffalonews.com/cityregion/story/831177.html

Excerpt:

Though none of Collins' money has yet to surface, he has said all along it will be there for those who need it.

"None of the candidates we support will lose because of a lack of funding," he said.

For those he supports, the Collins effect is more than welcome.

"In general, I support what the county executive does," Hardwick said. "I don't think it's a negative; it's a positive."

Like all of his Republican colleagues, Hardwick insists he will prove no "sock puppet" for Collins. He hopes to revive a regionalism agenda that Collins never embraced, and thinks the county executive can do a better job of "partnering" with the Legislature.

But with only $472 in his campaign treasury, Hardwick also says he will prove a supporter in most instances, and will gladly accept financial help from Collins.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"will be there for those who need it"

It's possible Hardwick may have been running so far ahead of Iannello all along in polling that it wasn't needed. Either way, McCarthy showed how to word it accurately.

Hardwick trounced Iannello easily in the Independence primary. It won't be surprising if that happens today too. We'll soon see.

I wonder if members of all those unions are happy to have had some of their mandatory dues handed over to Iannello's campaign - especially since much of the official union backing was then withdrawn (or "reneged"?) from her. That was very unusual.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Vote against all the incumbents. Change the status quo!

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Unions suck

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I love elections. Let the people decide who they want to govern. This country shines on days like today.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Looks like Hardwick didnt need the money after all.
http://www.tonawanda-news.com/local/local_story_308014035.html

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I like Hardwick even though he is republican, maybe he can talk some sense to Collins about regionalism.

replied to Armchair MBA
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yeah. I also think its nice to see someone from accedemia get involved in politics. The guy knows his stuff and gets along with people from both parties.

Im not holding out much hope for him talking sense to the little tough guy though.

replied to Blackrocklifer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Hardwick made clear all along that he generally agrees with and supports the current policies of Collins.

Anybody who wanted a legislator who would try to change direction from what Collins is doing probably shouldn't have voted for Hardwick. On the other hand, he was a good choice for any voter who mostly agrees with what Collins has done so far.

replied to Blackrocklifer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I am hoping he will challenge Collins, especially on regionalism. Hardwick seems much more intelligent and has a more global outlook as opposed to Collins narrow parochialism. I doubt these two will see eye to eye on every issue.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think you are right. Knowing what I know about KH he will agree with most of what lil Napoleon says as far as spending but he will be far from a Collins robot. Regionalism is one issue that they will not see eye to eye. I dont think Hardwick owes the little big man allegiance on every issue just because Collins offered him support.

replied to Blackrocklifer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Regionalism can be used to mean very different things by different people.

Giambra pushed some bad changes in the name of regionalism. One was county takeover of the city's smaller neighborhood parks. Both the city and county were unhappy with results, and I think Hardwick has said he opposes it. Another was to start using the county holding center as the city's pre-arraignment lockup. That added to overcrowding and staffing problems.

Any idea's support from Collins or Hardwick shouldn't depend either way on whether the regionalism label is attached. Due to financial outlooks of the county and state, the next few years should bring more cutbacks than new programs.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Whatever>"Regionalism can be used to mean very different things by different people"

Very true. Our last county exec viewed it as savings through regional cooperation while the current one views it as his power base in the region is all that matters.


Whatever>"Giambra pushed some bad changes in the name of regionalism. One was county takeover of the city's smaller neighborhood parks. Both the city and county were unhappy with results, and I think Hardwick has said he opposes"

Hardwick has been calling for delivery of regional serices like parks at the county level long before Giambra got elected. Im not sure what he would think about the smaller parks or if he would even make the distinction between those and the larger ones. That alone is progress over the "fear the city" mongering by lil Napoleon.

Whatever>"Due to financial outlooks of the county and state, the next few years should bring more cutbacks than new programs"

True. And as long as the majority of suburban voters swoon over his corporate tough guy routine we can expect four more years of the same once his time is up. The grim financial outlook could be used as an opportunity to call for savings through cooperation again. That type of thing may be over Napoleons head but if his appeal wears thin through more public gaffes maybe he can be pressured to change.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

pitbull>"Im not sure what he would think about the smaller parks or if he would even make the distinction between those and the larger ones."

According to Google, it was as I recalled reading or hearing KH say (don't remember where - maybe radio) that he disagreed with the county maintaining city neighborhood parks:
http://www.speakupwny.com/forums/showthread.php?p=492963
"Kevin Hardwick Gold Member Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 11
...I half liked the County deal to take over the city parks when it was initially proposed. I think the county should be responsible for maintaining the Olmsted Parks. These are jewels and regional assets. I had a problem, though, with the county taking over neighborhood parks. ..."

To some, that could mean KH opposes regionalism. It's a vague word.

Having the county run Buffalo's neighborhood parks never made sense. Even Dems at both county and city level complained for different reasons about it. County Dems criticized high costs to the county budget, city Dems complained about park conditions after the deal.

replied to Armchair MBA
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

pitbull>"an opportunity to call for savings through cooperation again"

Not everything referred to as regionalism has real savings.

What Giambra agreed to for city neighborhood parks was the opposite of savings for the county. Some anti-Collins people try to make it seem Collins was the only one who wanted to end it. But there were Dems who did too, including comptroller Poloncarz (an anti-Collins city resident) and some Dem county legislators.

Another so-called regionalism idea of Giambra's that isn't saving money is having the county run the Buffalo police lockup in the county holding center. Like with the neighborhood parks - bad results and higher than expected costs.

There are savings from having Olmsted maintain big parks mainly because they pay workers less than govt employees and they do private fund raising. The county govt isn't necessary for Olmsted's involvement. City Hall is free to hire Olmsted directly.

replied to Armchair MBA
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll