City November 16, 2009 5:33 PM

Starring Role for Buffalo In Chicago

Starring Role for Buffalo In Chicago
Buffalo has a place at front and center in the spectacular Arts and Crafts exhibit, which just opened at the Art Institute of Chicago.  The exhibit is titled Apostles of Beauty, Arts and Crafts from Britain to Chicago.  No less than 9 items with a connection to Buffalo are represented in the show.  Additionally the exhibit poster, exhibit catalogue cover, and brochure cover prominently feature the world famous Wright designed Tree of Life window from the Darwin Martin House in Buffalo.   The exhibit is composed entirely of work from collections in the Chicago area.

The Tree of Life window is shown in the exhibit along with work by East Aurora's Roycrofters and Buffalo's Charles Rohlfs.  While I was there a delicately crafted chair by Rohlfs was gathering quite a crowd.  Its skillful construction and sumptuous carving are hard to describe in words.  It is a spectacular work of art. Rohlfs may be one of the least known American design geniuses.  Seeing his work in person was a memorable experience.  Elbert Hubbard was, of course, a major player in the Arts and Crafts movement in the United States along with Syracuse's Gustav Stickley. Individually they played the greatest role commercializing and spreading the popularity of what came to be known as "American Arts and Crafts".  The exhibit includes three exquisite copper vases produced by Hubbard's Roycrofters.  It also includes three beautiful books written by Hubbard and printed by Roycroft presses.  Even through a glass case it is easy to appreciate the beautiful craft and texture of dense richly colored inks on the hand made paper.

boskfwfkewf.jpg

A Wright-designed chair from Buffalo's now destroyed Larkin Administration Building is also on display.  The very basic wooden side chair sits just below and to the right of the Darwin Martin House Tree of Life window.  This window is normally on display in the stair court of the main building of the Art Institute.  There, it is hung above eye level against a stone wall.  This could not be a more inappropriate way of showing the window.  In this special exhibit it has been given star billing with back lighting, which brings out the brilliant colors and intricate patterns.  It is easy to understand why this is one of the most famous design patterns in the world.  Unfortunately this is also not the best way to see this magnificent piece of art.  The only place it can truly be seen and appreciated the way it should be is in the place it was designed for, The Darwin Martin House.

Many of the original Martin House windows remain as part of the house in their original locations but many, perhaps the majority, were scattered to far reaches of the globe.  Two of them exist in Chicago.  One in a private collection and this one at the Art Institute.  The Martin House restoration Corporation plans to procure high quality replicas of all the missing windows.  To me this seemed like a sin if you know where an original window currently exists.  Viewing fragments of destroyed buildings in a museum makes sense to me.  Viewing fragments of still extant buildings in a museum doses not.  So a few years ago I inquired with the Art Institute and with the Martin House about what it would take to get the window back to Buffalo and reincorporated into the house. Unsurprisingly the museum could not comment without some research into the matter but I am sure it would involve a huge effort and some controversy.

The response I got from the Martin House was a BIG surprise.  Paraphrasing, they said that while they would like to have as many original pieces of the house as possible they did not have a strong desire to have the Art Institute's Tree of Life window back.  This was because they were not ready for it and they believed that the Art Institute would be a good steward of the piece and that having the window on display there would be benefit the house and the Restoration Corporation's mission. I can now see their point as the Art Institute has so prominently positioned it in this wonderful exhibit.  The problem is they make no mention of the fact that the house still exists.  How many people are looking at this disembodied fragment thinking that the building is gone? The Exhibit will not travel and runs through January 31, 2010.

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

I must humbly disagree with the opinion that any original windows must be returned to the original building and displayed there.

From a marketing perspective and a business perspective, I think it does an enormous benefit for the windows of the Martin House and whatever, statues and lighting from the Central Terminal, etc. It is of enormous benefit for someone to have the privilege of seeing one of Buffalo's world class treasures and give them a taste, a dream, a hope, a passion to come to Buffalo and visit the Roycroft, the Martin House and GrayCliff, the Central Terminal, etc.

Its one reason I would love to see the Hotel Buffalo art nuveau white and green terra cotta reconstructed...and maybe key pieces of its terra cotta donated to architecture museums across the world, key pieces of the Prudential Building Terra Cotta, etc.

Replica or Real, Buffalo should be known for the very best whether new or whether historical, we can have both in abundance where other cities can only have the new.

In additional to Presidential Libraries, Bicycle and Transportation Museums, Great Lakes Museums, Historica and Botanical Gardens...Buffalo certainly has enough to support a furniture museum.

Last Word, a big failing of our local culturals is that they do not interlock marketing. For instance, the Botanicals in south park with the lake (restored) could easily be a regional exhibit of Great Lakes Flora complementing a Buffalo Zoo that exhibits Great Lakes Fauna which would complement a Great Lakes Aquarium at Canalside...see how the exhibit at one museum could provoke interest in another museum. If they did this...they would be much more profitable than their current go it alone plan.

Im not an elitist or a purist...it matters not whether its original or reproduction as long as it brands Buffalo, is known as being from Buffalo and attracts people to Buffalo.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Interesting. Maybe it would be a worthwhile for the Martin House organization to request that the Chicago Art Institute include information with the window about the house and where to visit it? Then it will be great PR for buffalo while Chicago can keep the window. Win-Win?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Exactly!

How often have we gone one place and after getting a taste we decide that we want more? How many times does an ellicott ski trip lead to Vermont or Colorado? How many times does a boat trip in our harbor lead to a cruise? How many times do we read an article and decide to read the book, see a painting and decide to go to a museum to see more of their works.

Its why I say...rebuild the Larkin Administration Building, rebuilt the Art Nuveau Hotel Buffalo exterior but with a brand new interior residences...if its the best...thats all that matters! With 60% of Buffalo empty, there is plenty of room for the best of the best in modern, in contemporary and from our history...and we have an opportunity to give tourists and potential visitors an interest in Buffalo merely by sharing who we are...

Chicago has a FLW window from Buffalo...few reallize how much respect and interest in the Martin House Museum and potentially all things Buffalo...one item could have...that if that window were not there...they would not even consider a trip to our city.

Again comes the big problem with our culturals and our history...there is no cross linking. When one buys a ticket to the Buffalo Zoo...there should be a 50% on a ticket to the Science Museum, Albright Knox, Historical Museum or Botanical Gardens good for one week...and the exhibits should be cross referenced.

Further, our canals need canal boats, our prominence with the war of 1812 and the battle of lake erie have no museum or tourism venue, libraries for Cleveland and McKinley have no venue, furniture...no venue, bicycles...no venue, Pan Am Gateways and Fountains and Bandshells...no venue etc.

Of course we need a new 450k convention and conference center to take our tourism to the next level and support both our growing hotel rooms and culturals...but...what we have...we are sitting on in silence...and it all needs cross linked marketing and taken to the next level.

replied to 300miles
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

300miles, while Steel's local pride thinks a repatriation of sorts would be a worthwhile endeavor, the Art Institute of Chicago owns the piece and they won't relinquish it. It's a museum after all.

In any case, there are pieces of Buffalo in museums across the country. The Milwaukee Art Museum has at least one Wright window, too. Perhaps, the biggest piece of Buffalo in a museum is the interior section of the Metcalfe house from Delaware Avenue at The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City.

Museums have strict guidelines regarding the descriptions that accompany the art on display. If the Art Institute, for example, were to accommodate this request, where would they draw the line for requests from other entities regarding other items in their collections?

replied to 300miles
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

First,
No one is asking them to return it. No one is suggesting that they have no right to it and if the Martin House did try to obtain it I am sure they would offer to pay for it.

Second
I think the window should be displayed with an explanation that the original building still exists. The way it is currently displayed in the general museum collection hung on a stone wall with other relics from demolished buildings is the same as hanging a painting on the wall backwards. Also the current special exhibit shows it with bright light shining through it. This brings out the colors but the clear glass segments read as frosted glass. It gives a totally misleading impression of the work of art. At minimum it should be accompanied with some context information. Even better it should more be displayed so that the viewer can look through it to an exterior view. Ideally it would be back in the Buffalo house.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

'... a few years ago I inquired with the Art Institute and with the Martin House about what it would take to get the window back to Buffalo....'

Steel, your own words indicate you were motivated to see the window back in Buffalo. There's nothing wrong with that and I wasn't suggesting anything else. However, unlike lesser quality paintings and sculpture, rare architectural details are not often deaccessioned by museums.

Yes, the Metcalfe house no longer exists, but I wasn't comparing that aspect to the Darwin Martin complex. I was merely stating that Buffalo is surprisingly well represented in a number of museums in the United States and used the Metcalfe as just one well-known example.

For an apples to apples comparison, antiquities on display in many museums are not always from long-gone structures: the Elgin Marbles in the British Museum are an infamous example. Should they be sent back to Athens?

replied to STEEL
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I've been to both Athens and the British Museum, and found it very interesting that they share so many pieces from the same structures and places. It is seen all over Europe in all sorts of Museums, the horse heads that now stand atop St. Mark's in Venice were originally from Greece, taken by the venetians, then taken back to France by Napolean and then returned to Venice years later. It's very interesting to see art and architecture from one person or structure spread throughout a continent or country. They all tell a story, of conquest, culture, etc. Personally i enjoy it, it creates a link between cities and countries in terms of cultural and artistic values. I thought it was awesome to see the elgen marbles in London, and months later see the acropolis that once held them over 1400 miles away... this article makes me think of that. Let the window stay in Chicago, let it serve as a beacon to the house here, and work on trying to grow and expand our cultural links to other cities.

replied to PaulBuffalo
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Also the stair at the Met is from a building that no longer exists. It can't ever be put back in place. Buffalo snagged another piece of that building, the Metcalf house that used to be on North near Delaware. A couple of rooms were saved and reinstalled in Rockwell Hall at Buff State. Unfortunately no one in Buffalo had the foresight of the Metropolitan Museum or art and so the spectacular entry hall and stair are now part of NYC.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

One thing that bothers me to no end is giving it the silly name "Tree of Life".

Love the design, hate the stupid made-up name.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

no one can make chicago surrender its window to the martin house but it would be an extraordinary act of generosity if they did. they'd get a boatload of good pr. in return, chicago should get a replica window. they did this in reverse in rochester with the maxfield parrish painting. the original was at risk of theft or vandalism at the eastman theater so it went to the art gallery and a replica now hangs in eastman.

skilled replicas can do the job of promoting the martin house outside of buffalo, thus enabling the originals to return there they belong.

oh, and i am all for repatriating the elgin marbles.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

In the Victorian era, plaster reproductions of famous art works were common in many museums in the US and Europe; but, aside from one popular gallery at the Victoria & Albert Museum in London that features gigantic reproductions, no one goes to art museums to see replicas.

replied to grad94
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

so visitors to the martin house do not deserve to see the authentic windows but museum visitors in other cities do. thanks for clearing that up.

replied to PaulBuffalo
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The entire cover has a Buffalo connection, The font used is P22 Pan-Am designed by my good friend at P22 type foundry, Richard Kegler: http://www.p22.com/products/panam.html

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll