Advertisement
Subscribe
Buffalo: We're not alone
Earlier this morning I happened upon an Associated Press article mapping out a former steel town's recipe for rebirth. The small town is Vandergrift and the idea is to capitalize on two basic principles - embrace and repair the Olmsted fabric that has been forsaken while researching green technology in the process. They have a new mantra, which if you read between the lines might as well be, "Do or Die."
This is not an overnight revitalization per se, but by enlisting the help of University of Pittsburgh students to research ways of harnessing the rapidly flowing waters of their Kiski River you might say that the fight is on in a big way. They are looking into ways to reclaim lost parks and crumbling building stock. Even their JC Penney building (sounds like our AM&As) is in the process of being rehabbed in an environmentally friendly way. Activists fought to save their Casino Theater (sounds like Shea's, Allendale or even the Broadway Theatre), which has recently been restored. Why? Because like Buffalo there is a history that they don't want to forget. And there is a new generation of Vandergrifts (wherever they may be), who are paying attention (maybe for the first time) to what is going on back home. Plus, the young people who still live in Vandergrift are being given an opportunity to dig in and help. I bet some of those people already had one foot out the door but decided to take a chance when they heard that there was a real initiative afoot.
There's something about being able to help your hometown that is immeasurable. In Buffalo we are fortunate to attract urban activists from other cities too... people who are in search of a place where, like the early homesteaders, they can make a stake and raise a flag. These people are embraced by the community to such a degree that it doesn't take long for them to call Buffalo home. I get excited when I hear about the initiatives being plotted in places like Vandergrift. I look at their river initiatives and can point to similar efforts going on here in Buffalo (with out of state corporations rather than university). I hear about their plans to restore their parks and I can only hope that our own parks are allowed to continue on the right path without getting bogged down by politics.
While driving around town with my mother-in-law on Wednesday we passed the AM&As building. She told me about the days when she would shop there - how vibrant it was. For me, I don't really remember those days. I just recall a big vacant building, so to see the windows being replaced is invigorating. To know that people will soon be living there is inspiring and gives me even more hope that the next renovation is close at hand. To see these developments in real time lends credence to people who for years have imagined Buffalo as it reinvents itself. Yeah, I like to hear the old stories of Buffalo in its heyday, but I'll never know what it was truly like. I will soon know what it's like to visit an loft at the AM&As building, just as Vandergrifters must be feeling about their own department store. To me that AM&S ticket is just another one to add to my collective memory of 'Buffalos' - the one that I have known and the one that I am getting to know.
Photo is from the linked University of Pittsburgh article with the following caption: "Past and present views of Vandergrift come together at a main thoroughfare, Grant Avenue. The vintage illustration is held by Shaun Yurcaba of the Pittsburgh History and Landmarks Foundation, which is working with Pitt and other partners in the renewal effort. (Tom Altany photo)
This is not an overnight revitalization per se, but by enlisting the help of University of Pittsburgh students to research ways of harnessing the rapidly flowing waters of their Kiski River you might say that the fight is on in a big way. They are looking into ways to reclaim lost parks and crumbling building stock. Even their JC Penney building (sounds like our AM&As) is in the process of being rehabbed in an environmentally friendly way. Activists fought to save their Casino Theater (sounds like Shea's, Allendale or even the Broadway Theatre), which has recently been restored. Why? Because like Buffalo there is a history that they don't want to forget. And there is a new generation of Vandergrifts (wherever they may be), who are paying attention (maybe for the first time) to what is going on back home. Plus, the young people who still live in Vandergrift are being given an opportunity to dig in and help. I bet some of those people already had one foot out the door but decided to take a chance when they heard that there was a real initiative afoot.
There's something about being able to help your hometown that is immeasurable. In Buffalo we are fortunate to attract urban activists from other cities too... people who are in search of a place where, like the early homesteaders, they can make a stake and raise a flag. These people are embraced by the community to such a degree that it doesn't take long for them to call Buffalo home. I get excited when I hear about the initiatives being plotted in places like Vandergrift. I look at their river initiatives and can point to similar efforts going on here in Buffalo (with out of state corporations rather than university). I hear about their plans to restore their parks and I can only hope that our own parks are allowed to continue on the right path without getting bogged down by politics.
While driving around town with my mother-in-law on Wednesday we passed the AM&As building. She told me about the days when she would shop there - how vibrant it was. For me, I don't really remember those days. I just recall a big vacant building, so to see the windows being replaced is invigorating. To know that people will soon be living there is inspiring and gives me even more hope that the next renovation is close at hand. To see these developments in real time lends credence to people who for years have imagined Buffalo as it reinvents itself. Yeah, I like to hear the old stories of Buffalo in its heyday, but I'll never know what it was truly like. I will soon know what it's like to visit an loft at the AM&As building, just as Vandergrifters must be feeling about their own department store. To me that AM&S ticket is just another one to add to my collective memory of 'Buffalos' - the one that I have known and the one that I am getting to know.
Photo is from the linked University of Pittsburgh article with the following caption: "Past and present views of Vandergrift come together at a main thoroughfare, Grant Avenue. The vintage illustration is held by Shaun Yurcaba of the Pittsburgh History and Landmarks Foundation, which is working with Pitt and other partners in the renewal effort. (Tom Altany photo)
Leave a comment
Sponsor
Recent Comments
Sponsor
Popular StoriesSee More
Upcoming EventsSee More
ClassifiedsSee More
- For Rent UB area , Main Street Storefront
- New Downtown Restaurant
- A Fiesta for Buffalo ReUse!
- Music Lessons with a Signed Recording Artist
- Dance Film Screening
- Corpus Christi to Hold Lenten Talks
- Lovely Yorkie Puppy For Adoption
- Art Exhibit
- Auxiliary Magazine Launch at Cats Like Us
- ESTATE SALE FEB 5 & 6 9,4 11508 TOMARSUE,
November 27, 2009 12:30 PM
damn those obstructionists at the Pittsburgh history & landmarks foundation!
November 27, 2009 4:25 PM
There is an old saying that goes" What the father wants to forget, the son wants to remember."
(I wont bother making it gender neutral because feminist dont believe in marriage, fathers, family or children)
And we see it in the consistent backlash of criticism toward developers! The new generation wants to save their neighborhoods and they want infill to be high quality period buildings that blend in with the older urban fabric. Yes they are unafraid of modern and want their city in the avant garde but not the modern that so often becomes parking lot, wasted space, blank walls, stained concrete and out of date in 10 years.
Yes, people want modern...but they also recognize that there are key signatures that defined our city which need to be brought back such as full restoration Olmsted Parks, the restoration of our downtown street grid, the downgrading of expressways like the Kensington further away from downtown, perhaps replacing the Elm-Oak with Fillmore or Jefferson and key downtown signatures like the old Richardsonian French Chateau of Erie Savings Bank, the former brick and stone public library, the Art Nuveau Hotel Buffalo or the Dakota like Iroquoi Hotel to name a few....or in the case of our waterfront the Spaulding Mercantile.
Everyone I talk to hears stories of the cathedral like arches of Elms that lined nearly every street, brick and cobblestone that kept traffic to a safe 25mph on sidestreets, cheap mass transit and safe convenient walkable communities. Yes we want that...cries the generations following us.
Now how do we reform our city government, housing inspectors, housing court, public schools and other institutions to make that happen?
The last question to ask is how do we put together a design competition for urban office parks that can exist within a corridor like Genessee or within a city block...so that suburban office parks are NOT the only choice for growing our job base. We can fix everything but if we cannot bring jobs back into our city, fewer and fewer people will consider the city a serious alternative. People like to live close to where they work...and they like to pick neighborhoods with the best housing and schools close to where they work.
November 29, 2009 11:02 AM
hey Christine-
i wanted to address your comments regarding the idea of URBAN OFFICE PARKS (something you bring up very often), and how harmful this notion is (i may be misunderstanding the concept you have in mind, so correct me if i'm wrong). you may know some of these arguments already, but there are some surprising benefits to the dense, mixed-use neighborhood:
-by separating the places of work from the retail and residential sections, you are eliminating all of the benefits of the 'mixed-use' neighborhood. the daily turnover of people leaving their houses/apartments in the morning, others arriving to work/visit, and then the return commute is what drives the economic engine of small businesses, allowing a flow of potential customers all day. people who visit these walkable neighborhoods for one reason (visiting a lawyer or dentist office for example), will often find another reason to do business there (maybe getting a watch repaired or picking up groceries- just an example) and multiplies the benefits. when they find more than one reason to be there, they come back more often.
-this constant turnover in dense, mixed-use areas provides eyes on the street, making the area safer without having to hire one cop. if the area is well kept, those eyes often see places where they want to open shops or move in to live.
-it provides opportunities for people to live near where they work, reducing commutes and adding to the pedestrian traffic.
-lastly there is the hidden benefit that is hard to point to explicitly, but no doubt exists. walkable, 'mixed-use' neighborhoods help raise children. it sounds silly, but as children take part in the commute (going to school), or the local economy (buying a comic book, for example), they can see a variety of vocations along the way and how people interact with each other in a constructive way. they can point to a building on their walk and understand that a ARCHITECT or a DOCTOR works there (and what that means), and see a shop owner at work on the first floor. all the while the people who have an economic interest in keeping these neighborhoods in good condition have an unconscious eye on the children, adding to the stability of the area.
just something to keep in mind.
November 27, 2009 7:37 PM
Feminism: the theory of the political, economic and social equality of the sexes
"Feminism." Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. 2009.
Merriam-Webster Online. 27 November 2009
I do not see anywhere in that definition where it says the lack of belief in marriage, fathers, family or children. For the record, I am as proud to call myself a feminist as I am a wife and mother.
November 28, 2009 1:25 AM
KATW, wonderful! Under that definition you dont need laws for harrassment because your equal..just harrass back, or abuse your equally capable of defending yourself, dont need divorce laws either because your equally capable of taking care of yourself, ... and no reason to exclude you and fellow feminists from signing up for selective service to qualify for financial aid right.
All female units in equal numbers of men should be formed in the navy, airforce, army and marines...and not those cushy paperwork jobs...and you probably dont mind if we remove that pesky escape hatch of getting pregnant just when your over-seas ship out orders are received.
And now that girls make up 60% of call associates, bachelors, masters and doctorates...in some cases 70% of high school graduates...you dont mind if we start affirmative action and giving educational and professional slots to boys...and based on the 80% of truancy and dropout occurs with boys...that there is probably a necessity to rebalance a head start focus on boys in reading writing speaking and socialization.
Statistically speaking feminists have manipulated the victimization of all forms of data to focus explicitly on the issues of girls at the expense and deprivation of the male gender.
Truth is sweetheart...boys and girls are not equal, nor are men and women. They are different and they have different issues and different advantages and different disadvantages.
Feminists believe in emasculating and effeminizing boys while masculinizing girls into a gender neutral society and attack any institution such as christianity which says this is a lie and that while responsibilities should be shared equally...the genders are not the same and their are not identical and can never be interchangeably equal.
Sweetheart, your living an empty headed degenerative lie and sweetie...I hope all your children are boys so they can be disenfranchised boy the feminist values that you espouse.
November 28, 2009 9:49 AM
f*ck off, dude
November 28, 2009 10:09 AM
don't waste your time. if christine/queen city isn't a bitter old bachelor who blames his inability to attract a mate on the women's movement instead of his own repellent attitudes & personality, then he sure does a good online impression of one.
November 28, 2009 1:05 PM
the last word, is that your sons will inherit the feminist biases enshrined in liberal laws against them and you will have to watch them struggle with the hypocrisy that you as a feminist espouse
(even though you chose a traditional role true to your gender and real values of marriage, husband, father, family and children....and hypocritically espouse feminist political values that completely opposite).
It is not about me sweetie and my politics...its about your life values and the life values the males in your life will have to endure because of your ignorant hypocrisy as you watch.
November 28, 2009 9:50 PM
I agree that "Christine" is probably not a woman, at least I would hope so given that "she" seems to have such a general bias against "her" own gender. "She" may be transgender and if that is the case there is sexual reassignment. Though "she" would be equally intolerable as a man, her male privilege arguments would at least be more valid.
That said, BR provides a preview window and spell check "sweetheart". Please utilize that next time lest you choose to expose your lack of intelligence.
By the way, I have a fully enfranchised son and last I checked my husband wasn't very feminized.
November 29, 2009 9:13 AM
You and serve up an inconsequential argument, then attack Christine because of some typos and call her intellectually challenged? Why, because she has laid out a cogent argument poking the flaws in the feminist agenda? I really hope you and grad are capable of something better, otherwise do us a favor and shred you diploma, or write intellectually lazy across in maker
November 29, 2009 10:21 AM
Dear Christine/KarlMalone (who is also possibly Albert on the The Buffalo News),
1.) Again, use the preview button - it is your friend.
2.) If Christine is really a woman, then she would be benefiting from the affirmative action she is complaining about regarding education.
3.) It is a lovely day today - please get up from your computer and enjoy the fresh air while it is still nice out. More productive than spewing vitriol on comment boards at the very least.
With that I bid you adieu. I know your comments will continue, but I have a life. I must go and join my fellow feminist on our quest to bring down MANkind - baaahaaahaaahaahaa! (Seriously, weren't these arguments from the 70's?!)
November 30, 2009 8:53 AM
no, karl, we object because christine's rants about feminism are off topic. look at the top of your screen. does bro have a social issues tab? what if i used every article on bro to rant about capital punishment or the designated hitter rule?
November 30, 2009 4:07 PM
BRO constantly dablles in the political and social issue realm so it open's itself up to the discussion. If it's off topic aren't they suppose to remove it anyway. Since they haven't it must be relevant, although you are right. Maybe they should just have "Liberals Unite" tab.
November 30, 2009 5:18 PM
so who is forcing you at gunpoint to endure all this dreadful liberal propaganda?
December 1, 2009 8:34 AM
NY State
November 28, 2009 12:06 PM
But where oh where will people ever park... and how could development ever happen without ample shovel ready sites!
November 28, 2009 3:04 PM
That corner building in the background of the photo looks like it could be a wonderful gift to the street...