Regional November 4, 2009 11:08 AM

Buff State Students Make Major Coup With Bottle Bill

Buff State Students Make Major Coup With Bottle Bill

Students from the Buffalo State College chapter of the New York Public Interest Research Group (NYPIRG) got a different kind of Halloween treat this year - one that benefits the environment as well as communities across New York.  The long anticipated expansion of our nickel deposit system for beverage containers finally took effect. As of 12AM on Halloween, bottled water is covered under our states most successful recycling and litter-prevention program, the Bottle Bill.

"The Bottle Bill is New York's most effective recycling law, and one of NYPIRG's most important environmental victories," said Justina Potenzo.  "We are proud to be part of the generation of students who worked to expand and improve the law. 

The Bottle Bill requires a 5-cent refundable deposit on beer and soda containers.  Starting October 31st 2009, it expanded to include water bottles, which account for more than 3.2 billion containers sold each year in New York, nearly a quarter of total beverages sales.  The new law, passed as part of the state budget back in April, also requires beverage companies to return 80 percent of unclaimed bottle and can deposits to the state, which will generate an estimated $115 million annually to benefit the public.  Until now, the beer and soda companies have kept the unclaimed deposits.

The expansion to bottled water was originally scheduled to occur June 1st of this year, but has been delayed for months due to a lawsuit filed by the beverage companies. However, a court order issued last Friday lifted the injunction as of October 31st, so that water bottles can now be targeted for recycling, rather than becoming litter or adding to the waste stream.

"For years, this positive environmental measure was blocked by powerful special interests with deep pockets- first in the legislature, then in the court system," according to Melissa Ginn.  "It will be a truly influence people on making better recycling choices"

"College students care about our planet and having a clean and healthy environment," said Erin Doyle. "Adding a nickel deposit to water bottles will mean that a lot more will get recycled, and a lot fewer will end up in our landfills or polluting our beaches and parks."

"The original bottle bill has done a great deal for the health of our communities and the environment," Justina Potenzo said. "But times have changed, and this expansion will ensure that we make our best recycling program in New York even better."

NYPIRG has a long history advocating for the Bottle Bill and other recycling measures.  In 1982, students from across the state marched to Albany to call for passage of the original Bottle Bill.  Since that time, the law has proven to be a tremendous success, boasting an average redemption rate of over 70%, as well as reducing litter volume by 30%. 

NYPIRG has spearheaded the campaign for a Bigger Better Bottle Bill since 2002.  More than 700 nonprofit groups, small businesses, and local governments have called for updating the Bottle Law, and polls show that more than 80% of New Yorkers support it.

Over the past 7 years, students from the Buffalo State College NYPIRG chapter have educated students and community members about the issue, written letters, generated phone calls, conducted litter surveys, held news conferences, and traveled to Albany to meet with state legislators about the need to update the Bottle Bill. 

Opponents of the proposed "Bigger Better Bottle Bill," including Coke, Pepsi, the Beer Wholesalers Association and the Food Industry Alliance reported giving over $2 million in campaign contributions to state legislators in 2007 and 2008, and ran an ad campaign against the measure.

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

It is just a shame that it wasn't expanded to ALL bottles like it was originally intended but it is a start I guess. This is a great bill and LONG overdue.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Good to see the bottle bill finally expanded. My son worked on this years ago along with the requirement of lawn spray notification. NYPIRG does a good job of challenging the special interests that use our political system to protect profits at the expense of our environment.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is the best news a bum could get! Think of all the additional revenue available to those willing to pick through garbage.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Guess I'll have to switch to whisky & wine! Why not make it ten cents or a quater? That be even better for the environment and the companies that produce the items. When can we expect to start paying for the plastic shopping bages we get at the super markets?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Hopefully soon.

replied to arm53
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Love the shopping bag idea.

replied to arm53
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

IKEA already charges for each bag.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

CONGRATULATIONS AND THANK YOU to all who worked on this in any way. The irony has always been that water bottles are already clean and thus even easier to recycle. Seeing them pitched all over the place was awful. The nickel deposit seems a small thing but it will make discarded unrecycled water bottles go away. Maybe we will even start drinking water from our faucets! Or, carry some around in a little glass bottle, tastes great that way. . . We still need lots of recycling containers everywhere.
Next step: outdoor concerts and events where beer is sold -- require merchants switch to biodegradable cups or charge them to clean up and recycle properly. . . .

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

They weren't kidding when they said that NY nickels and dimes their residents to death. This is such a revenue grab for NY, you can paint it with an environmentalist's brush, but the fact is that it is revenue for the state. Just one more reason to head south.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I would rather have unclaimed deposit go to the state than the company coffers. All that does is encourage them to fight bottle recycling measures in the state.

This exactly a reason that I would stay in NYS. To live in a place that doesn't care about recycling, the environment is not a place to live and raise my kids.

This isn't some teabagger tax, this is the only proven incentive to get people to recycle their bottles. Walk through any parking lot or street in the region. You will be guarenteed to see many water bottles just thrown about... but probably not a single pop bottle.

You place a value on the bottle and someone will take advantage of it. Even if an individual doesn't care and continues to litter them around, someone else will profit from their poor judgment.

replied to dblplusgood
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So we increase taxes on soda and water, we add $.05 per bottle for deposit, and then we add an additional tax for anything that is deemed unhealthy by the state. None of these additional charges go to the company, they go to the state.

I find it funny that we protest every penny increase in taxes on gasoline and justify it with statements about how the poor will be unable to afford it, but it is fine to take another $.05 per bottle of water, soda, beer, and eventually juice that they have to buy. Where is the concern for those who are least able to handle this increase?

replied to Sean Brodfuehrer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This doesn't have ANYTHING to do with health or a 'fat tax' it a deposit on water bottles... only H2O.

Stop trying to make connections where none exist. And you know I didn't fight against any penny increase on gas. Go for it. Drivers do not pay for enough of the costs of highways, the pollution, damage to property, negative health effects and environmental effects of their luxury. I WISH it was raised more.

Maybe the 190 drivers should pay for the health care premiums for all the families with asthma their exhaust causes in all the neighborhoods they drive through, or the environmental problems of their dripping leaking cars next to the river. The same water we drink, bath and cook with. Or the tons of rubber dust their tires leave behind, or the garbage (including water bottles) they toss out their windows because they don't have to directly pay for ANY of those problems.

It is all about selfishness, if people cared about their neighbors they wouldn't discard water bottles in the street, they wouldn't drive for a gallon of milk or despoil the land for their McMansion.

Unfortunately the ONLY thing that will change the way Americans act is to hit their wallet... because doing the right thing is something people in America don't care about anymore.

replied to dblplusgood
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

People often cite the impact that small price increases have on the poor as a problem. Raising the gas prices a few cents per gallon makes it prohibitive for some poor to get to work. Raising the price of cereal by $.50 a box makes it difficult for the poor to feed their children a healthy breakfast. Raising the price of drinks, and eventually yogurt, milk, and cottage cheese containers limits the amount of other products a person can buy. This was my point. It is great that we have a bottle bill, and I figure that it will expand to other containers soon.

The thing that you miss in your claim that the only thing that changes behavior is to hit the wallets is that the rich can absorb the increase in costs and not change behavior while those who are least able to afford it are forced to not only change the one behavior but also to make other sacrifices due to the change.

You obviously have your issues with cars and suburbs, but who are you to tell others how they should live or to severely impact their ability to live where and how they want.

replied to Sean Brodfuehrer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Why stop at bottles or plastic grocery bags how about using cotton diapers that can be washed and reused. Just think how much less trash would be in our land fills and the tons of plastic that we would cut down on.

Let us not forget all the polyester clothing, drapery, carpeting. We can tax that ( i mean add a deposit to it ) unless we return it in for recycling.

We can put a deposit on our recyclable television parts, our computers, auto interiors, batteries, plastic wrap, aluminum foil, and the list could go on and on.

replied to Sean Brodfuehrer
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You obviously don't have kids

replied to ghost
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It is only revenue for the state if people are too lazy to return their bottles. Presently that revenue is just an undeserved windfall for the beer and pop companies.
Pennsylvania doesn't yet have a bottle bill and the contrast is dramatic. I have done a lot of canoe trips in that state and the litter is incredible, bottle and cans laying all over the place even in remote areas. Sometimes there are logjams with hundreds of containers wedged up in the debris. I don't see that here in New York.

replied to dblplusgood
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Well, the way I understand it, the booze companies are responsible for the cost of recycling, so the income they got from unrefunded bottles helped offset that cost. All this lost income will do is force them to raise prices. And its not like they're huge multinationals. It hurts small, local companies. Also it again cuts into social/nightlife activities further. Just another tax that hits common people honestly. The 5 cents on the bottles is cool, but why does NYS have to siphon off more money for themselves?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll