Regional October 13, 2009 3:17 PM

Olmsted Parks: Discussions Minus Negotiations

Olmsted Parks: Discussions Minus Negotiations
The City of Buffalo's Acting Corporation Council, along with various other City departments, met with a group from the Olmsted Conservancy last week in a meeting that was more discussion, less negotiation, according to Olmsted Board of Trustees Chair, David Colligan.  The meeting comes on the heels of the County turning over control of the Olmsted Parks to the City of Buffalo.

"The City is in an information gathering mode now," Colligan says. "At this point in time, they've done nothing to allay or increase our fears." Colligan also says that now that the conservancy has supplied the City with volumes of information, they hope for a prompt response, with no next meeting scheduled at this time.

Colligan explained that the initial fear came from one sentence in Mayor Brown's initial letter to the conservancy.  Though it took Mayor Brown almost one year to respond to County Executive Chris Collins' offer of giving the parks back to the City, the sentence that startled the conservancy is as follows: "In addition the conservancy or a new operator will need time for transitioning to the new agreement..."

Or a new operator.

"I don't think the mayor started this," Colligan states.  "It's fair to say it was started by Collins a year ago, and it probably took this much time for the City to come to a conclusion."

Colligan says that right now, the conservancy has to look ahead as to how the City's charter relates to workers and other entities in contractual terms. He is particularly interested in the infrastructure that guides municipal decision-making as it might relate to the operation of the Olmsted Parks. 

"The bottom line is that we're certainly willing to negotiate around legitimate issues," Colligan says.  Because the parks have been run with regional guidelines, the conservancy would be less than willing to be held to stricter residency standards than any other City entity.  As for diversity, the conservancy more than upholds requirements and, therefore, has no worries in that regard.

In a change of hands that the conservancy was hoping would be a matter of the City signing the contract where the County once did, there are still questions; Colligan says 'why' still hasn't been answered.

View image

1 TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://www.buffalorising.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4852

Today is the long awaited deadline, when the Olmsted Parks Conservancy is supposed to receive a term sheet from the City of Buffalo that will tell their fate for the coming year.  But when Chair of the Board of Directors for the Olmsted Parks Cons... Read More

Comments

Leave a comment

The only card the city administration ever has to play is "fear".
And it's not because anyone is actually afraid of these meat heads,
they just knock people off balance - because they're bullies.

And once a new contract is signed, Brown/Casey will lose their leverage.
In the meantime, they are killing the fundraising efforts and momentum of the Conservancy - and we are all entitled to know "why".

Whatever it's called, it is NOT called "leadership".

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Its a travesty that we received accolades and recognition for having FLW Conservancy here just days ago, accolades and recognition for having the Olmsted Conservancy headquartered here which a restoration plan (not to mention other cultural and historical recognition and accolades)....only to place one of the lynch pins for Buffalo's renaissance (not to mention national and international respect) on jeopardy.

Even the discussion with the Olmsted Conservancy is repugnant whether from the county or the city.

Any organization that can bring matching funds not just for its survival but for further investment/restoration should not be treated in such a manner, for such organizations contribute greatly to our quality of life.

Last point, Buffalo cannot do much to counter the domination of one party politics in the city, nor can Buffalo do much to counter the inside business deals and corrupt patronage that accompanies it, nor can Buffalo do much to counter Albany unfunded dictates that cause us such great buracracy and high taxes...all of which discourage employment and business growth. The one way Buffalo can counter and compete against all these negatives beyond our control is quality of life (architecture, arts, education, history, sports, geography, cost of living, housing, parks, etc). The Olmsted Parks Conservancy has a restoration plan that would put Buffalo on par with other great city's like Boston. Yet...for many...every golden egg our city has must be held ransom for some special interest instead of for the city and region as a whole.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This all goes back to the fact that Sam Hoyt has been a key player in the successes of the Olmsted Parks and Brown is his nemesis. Politics at its finest.

This will be a shining example of City Government f'ing up a successful entity. Why doesn't the Brown Administration address issues that are failing under its guidance (or lack thereof)neighborhood infrastructure, safety for example.

How about tackling something easy like sidewalk snow removal or ensuring all the streetlights work for beginners?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Mayor Brown can't keep the streets plowed -

http://www.buffalorising.com/2008/12/the-bar-just-keeps-getting-lower.html -

what makes him think he is able to care for our parks?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Most of you who commented so far are jumping to the conclusion that the city is planning to discontinue having Olmsted manage the big parks.

That seems very unlikely.

The mayor's public statement sounded like he might want to force more diversity in Olmsted's management and some kind of residency rule. Those are dumb liberal ideas, but that doesn't mean the city is planning to drop Olmsted as most of you seem to be assuming.

Both City Hall and the Olmsted group have something to lose if the arrangement isn't continued. What's likely to happen is some public posturing (some of which already happened on both sides), followed eventually by a new negotiated agreement.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment

Buffalo Rising Poll