Buffalo News Takes a Dim View of Council Action, Confuses Bridge Project with Plaza Project
Comments
Leave a commentbuild the bridge, he decaying houses and area around this whole project are a detriment to the entire west side and the city. the burger king and gas station on porter were both robbed at gun point within the last 2 weeks. all of the blight and run down houses are an indirect cause of this and other crime in the area
build the bridge, improve front park and implement strategies to lessen the impact of all the trucks
Houses cause crime? Let's arrest houses.
that would be called 'house arrest' wouldn't it?...
All those derelict houses in the area...you knew sooner or later, one of them was going to act up!
Again, someone who has never been to this neighborhood. How is wasting a upper middle class enclave going to help crime?
At this point I dont know why the PBA doesnt just take its bridge north and over through Grand Island and leave Buffalo out of it. Should be plenty of room on the island and in the Tonawanda's along River Road to set up some freight and warehousing operations to complement the truck commerce. But if the bridge went north i'm sure it would start the us versus them city versus suburb debate all over again and once again alot of nothing would occur. It would be just like the Casino in Cheektowaga, no Buffalo, no no place because its not good in either and is hung by a lawsuit and bad economy even though we do have a second, third class casino already operating onsite that is expanding and somehow that is better than a higher quality facility. WNY seems to love constant infighting between all the little arbitrary municipal boundaries in towns and villages and cities. I've pretty well given up on the idea that anything will happen within the next 10 years. By then the Peace bridge will be well past its prime and WNY will continue to fight about it. I dont think its a good idea to mow down a historic neighborhood either but if people don't start coming to the table and negotiating with a drop dead start date in mind for construction instead of digging in then nothing will happen as usual.
Absolutely the best thing that could happen for the city. I don't think they have any interest in moving to Grand Island, unfortunately
I think that is what everyone is hoping, that they will take the bridge and move it to Grand Island or Queenston/Lewiston or Whirlpool. It is extremely obvious to even the most dense of Buffalonian (resident, bridge authority official or political representative) that this bridge plaza is both unwanted and will not get built.
The westside/blackrock area is the last of the real erie canal area neighborhoods. The Erie Canal warehouse district stretching from the old Ohio Canal (Hamburg/Louisiana) or the Lehigh Canals (which is now Tifft Preserve) to the Clark/Skinner Canals (which is roughly where the DL&W/Buffalo Creek Casino are) have all but been demolished. The old Erie Canal Terminus is being reconstructed (Yea!) but the real Erie Canal area is long since been burried under the Expressway, demolished for what is not Ojibwa residential area/LaSalle Park between the River and the Expressway and urban renewal/municipal housing between the Expressway and Niagara Street.
The Peace Bridge addition only gives Buffalo and the Bridge Authority a negative reputation locally, regionally and nationally because the decade long delays prove that this bridge will not get built. The community doesnt want it and neither does the Common Council which represents the community.
For the money wasted over the decades acquiring property, letting it decay so it can be quietly demolished in a backdoor Saturday permit, lawsuits, protests, delays, etc...Buffalo could have gotten an underground truck plaza, a decked Niagara Expressway, a reconstructed Fort Porter and Front Park and a Niagara Street that is a Gateway to downtown Buffalo and the City of Tonawanda.
This is the price and waste resulting from the Bridge Authority insisting upon its plan only!
This is the legacy of Robert Moses in all NYS Authorities! The idea that the power of Albany knows what is better for a community than the residents of a community and that community opposition is little more than disgruntled roaches to be stepped upon, discredited, worn down and bypassed.
The Bridge Authority follows the NYSDOT lunacy of opposing the rewatering of the Commercial Slip because Granite Stones burried more than 50 years could explode if exposed to air and sunlight. Only this time it is the fate of the Westside/BlackRock as a viable community rather than burried stone.
When you stand with and defend the westside/blackrock community in opposition of demolition and the bridge plaza, then you are standing with the humanity and dignity of the community...and not just those that live there today but the ancestors of that community and the future progeny of that community.
For once I really hope nothing happens. I feel this whole build a new bridge & plaza issue should be dropped and keep status quo. PBA should should sell the houses they own and everyone should move on with their lives. The need for either of these is debatable at best and the money involved could be put to better use. There clearly is no great solution anyway, just lesser of two evils.
I second that. I dont see much upside to moving forward with the PBA plan. In fact, I see much more coming from dialing our role as a border crossing down. Nicer neighborhood, nicer park, nicer waterfront.
yet another ringing buffalo news endorsement of demolition by neglect.
I'm guessing tomorrow's Buffalo Factless News story (because that's all they are ... stories) will record that NYSDOT has apologized for the typo of including the "Peace Bridge Expansion Project" in the list of 'curtailed projects with uncertain funding' and that the Honduran Government's Committee for Democratic Reform has confirmed there will be shovels in the ground by April Fools Day 2030 and that the PBA's recently updated EIS (what do you mean you haven't seen a copy?) and upon opening day decades from now there will be an immediate increase of 31.287% more trucks crossing the new 'iconic' Peace Bridge with another 31.287% crossing the old bridge than there were pre-9/11 and you just watch out, because the all powerful Public Bridge Authority with GM Ron Rienas at the helm won't be stopped by a crazy bunch of preservationists, or a handful of self-absorbed neighborhood residents and certainly not the obstructionists on the Common Council because nothin', not no one can stand between the PBA and that duty free cash flow especially not even the tender lungs of 25,000 children who as Elena pointed out will be breathing in all the polluted benefits the truck plaza will be spreading around.
what about all the crack addicts? what are they going to do? where are they going go when its built? where is their voice in all of this? Typical America.
What is the big deal? If the PBA is going to buy the properry of those currently living in the neighborhood take the money and move to Clarence. Less crime, bigger back yards, better schools.
If someone did that in your neighborhood wouldnt you try to stop it? Be honest.
I can aswer that honestly but it wouldn't be fair to your point. I don't love my neighborhood. I purchased my house (2 family) as a rental property with no intention of staying in it for more than a couple years. Where I live now, I would take the money and run. I know that some in that neighborhood my be in what they consider their dream home which is hard to let go of. I personally love new projects and changes of scenery. If the PBA was offering a fair market price, I would quite honestly be excited about builiding/buying a new home elsewhere. I know if I were in my seventies and not in my twenties I would feel quite different.
Elena, Every home shown in the picture is slated for seizure and demolition. Even the street itself will cease to exist. They will be replaced by the entrance to a 517 space parking garage across the street. Parking spaces that are needed for the mega-duty free adjacent to the garage. Do these houses look like slum property? Of course not. Neither were the houses on Busti until the PBA got their hands on them. Wake up people, no private or public interest group should have the right to illegally purchase private property for the sole purpose of slumming them so that someday they can use them for their own financial gain. OOOOH Wait-that is illegal- it's called Mission Creep- but since it's a powerfully rich public authority who is doing it, why enforce the law!
Is it possible to start thinking outside the box and coming up with more creative solutions that would allow the preservation of historic structures and moving forward the plaza project. Other cities have moved historic properties to other sites. If the poorest city in the country, Detroit, could move historic structures for a stadium, why can't NYSDOT and the City of Buffalo take time to examine the feasibility of moving the historic structures that stand in the way of the project. There are numerous vacant lots scattered throughout Westside and Eastside that could benefit from creative infill.
a quick review of the wonderful benefits of new road construction:
the 198, the 33, route 5 and the 190 all have had disastrous effects on adjacent neighborhoods decades after they have been built. why would anyone consider following those successes with a truck plaza for a crossing with diminishing traffic? its just nuts.
hell - im betting for the price of that bridge, there could easily be regularly scheduled TO-BFLO rail service with new stations and equipment.
They're not really separate projects -- where do you think the new bridge is supposed to land?
the area is a waste land what is the solution if this project is permanently canceled?
a middle class, tax paying, beautiful neighborhood gets spared. On the flip side, the expanded plaza will bring pavement and fumes. Oh yeah give me option #2!
I'm amazed how insensitive some of these comments are. For many a home is more than just a structure, it is a place shaped by years of hard work and dedication. It is a place of memories sometimes over generations. The idea that we should forcibly remove anyone from their home for the expansion of a truck plaza is despicable.
A truck plaza will provide NO benefit to this neighborhood or to our city. We in Buffalo are too often expected to sacrifice our quality of life for "the benefit of the region". Can anyone give an example where one of our neighbors have sacrificed anything for the good of the region?
Truckers already prefer the Q-L bridge, and there's plenty of room there for expansion. Peace Bridge traffic decreases every year, without fail. It should be for private cars and local deliveries only, as originally intended.
There would be no benefit to expanding the Peace Bridge, and the only reason the Feds don't want to move truck processing is because of their new, Nazified, Anti-Constitutional "homeland security" nonsense.
I agree but I hope we begin to move away from truck dominated long distance transportation. Rail is so much more efficient and produces far less pollution per ton/mile.
If truckers prefer lewiston then why do more trucks cross the peace bridge. Have you taken it upon yourself to poll truckers?
What does anyone expect from a paper published in Omaha?
I don't know what all the fuss is about. Buffalo needs this giant waterfront truck parking lot to generate jobs. Buffalo will be a leader in using its waterfront for this purpose. What other city would have the forethought to dedicate waterfront property to truck parking. Buffalo can be a leader in this kind of planning!
Who in their right mind chooses a historic waterfront neighborhood to truck parking?
Personally I like the made-up asthma issue the best. But why stop there? Looking at crime statistics reveals a high crime and drug arrest rate per capita in the surrounding zip. Why not blame the bridge on that as well. Then move on to obesity, etc.
Elena you are NIMBYs NIMBY. Bring back Zimmermann, at least he got funnier with his comments as he got drunker.
And you call me uninformed? The rate for the entire zip code doesnt tell the whole story about this particular neighborhood. Dont belive me? Look for yourself. Trust me its safe to leave your car. And you call me uninformed?
How bout we put the bridge in your neighborhood? Would you cry nimby then?
Poodle: did I wrinkle your little red thong. BTW: I called you irrelevant, not uninformed. You called yourself that, but who I am to argue.
I live on both countries, so the Peace Bridge is in and part of my neighborhood on both sides of the border. Build it in my backyard. Maybe we can even pave you over as part of the project.
Doesn't do a damn thing in terms of retail creation, but certainly creates jobs in the transportation and logistics side which is a nationally recognized cluster in this area
Karl- Diesel exhaust is a well documented and very serious health threat, there is no debate in the real medical community about this issue. Children and the elderly are most affected.
Diesel exhaust contains 100 to 200 times more small particles (particulates) than gasoline exhaust and is responsible for 2/3 of all air pollution along roadways. Truck plazas especially produce unhealthy levels of pollutants with a long line of idling engines slowly moving through customs. These facilities should not be built in densely populated neighborhoods regardless of the socioeconomic status of the residents.
As someone who has called for the disolution of City Hall, I have to say I am impressed with the cc's stance here. In fact stuff like this justifies keeping city goverment imo. I have a hard time believing C Collins or the majority of the county leg. would have the vision and courage to stick up for this neighborhood.
Thanks Elena for another good piece. Thank goodness we don't have to rely on the Buffalo News for all of the views. I am counting the days to when the News closes. Their allegiance to this Public Authority and politicizing views demonstrates the impact of this one newspaper town.
I also have renewed faith in our local government who are willing to stand up for what is right for our community. Bravo to the council for having the guts to stand up to the PBA and to preserve a piece of Buffalo's history.
Nice article. The News is wrong again.
BTW. The News Editorial is not an "op-ed" piece.
Op-ed refers to articles that are "opposite" the editorial page, and usually written by people that are not part of the Editorial Board.
if we know that transportation, especially shipping/trucking, will increase by having a new bridgee and check station, then we should certainly go through with it. that said, is there a reason the weigh station can't be on the canadian side? do we need one on both sides? can we divert the traffic somewhere else or is that not feasible? if it leads to buffalo becoming a larger shipping route, and draws buisness from detroit bridges and northern NY then this is a smart business move. if not a new bridge is only for esthetics and self image for the city...
There is no benefit to hosting a truck plaza and in fact truck plazas devalue and make neighboring communities become much less desirable. The city gains nothing from processing more trucks, only drives out taxpaying stable residents. Trucks just don't make good neighbors and certainly don't belong where many people live.
The main reason Bush and Obama don't want Customs on the Canadian side: If someone has a problem and decides to turn back, the Canadians will allow that. The Americans want to "detain" (arrest without charges) such people. Canada will not allow this, and that's apparently the end of the huge Fort Erie truck plaza, already built, as planned long ago.
Detainment and arrest are to completely different actions. Once again you show your vast knowledge and complete ignorance on a subject
Arrest/detain/seize/capture/"hold for questioning" - call it what you like, but the Canadians find it repugnant and refuse to allow it. They also object to armed customs agents.
What's your problem, anyway? Why so nasty and quick to attack people here?
To be clear: "These issues included concerns over arrest authority; the right of individuals to withdraw an application to enter the United States while at the land preclearance site in Canada; mutually agreeable fingerprinting processes; how information collected by U.S. officials at the land preclearance site would be shared; and concerns that future interpretations of the Canadian Charter could adversely impact U.S. authorities at the preclearance site"
from: http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/ny27_higgins/pr090326.shtml
KarlMalone, Speaking of air pollution - you're comments are toxic and uncalled for. Glad I'm not sharing neighborhood space with you bud!
A few points:
1. RE: is this two projects (bridge and plaza) or one project? The neighbors are wrong. The PBA was the first to claim that these are two distinct projects. They were all set, ready to commence construction of the companion bridge when they were stopped at the last minute only by a successful environmental lawsuit which said: "These are NOT two separate projects, but rather one combined project, albeit implemented in separate stages." That is settled law. The courts are the ones who determined that this is one project, not two. That battle is over.
It's a good thing, too. Why? Because without that lawsuit the other bridge would have been built already and that bridge would have driven plaza layout further into The Front. Once the bridge is in place, then options for the plaza are dramatically limited.
2. The land upon which sits the plaza and admin buildings is Buffalo's only elevated waterfront, 60' above the River. Spectacular views are blocked by administration buildings and toll booths and ramps. When the bridge was first built, Fort Porter still stood. There were two toll booths and they connected to Busti. Over the decades, the bridge (and then the 190) took more and more and more, eventually swallowing all of the Fort Porter site.
There was a reason that Buffalo's military defense was situated here. There's a reason Frederick Law Olmsted considered The Front Buffalo's parks' crown jewel (not Delaware). The views are unparalleled. You can see for miles out across the lake and at least a mile down the river. It's breathtaking, but completely obscured by the plaza infrastructure.
I, for one, would be much happier reclaiming that lost park land, even at the cost of some of the tired neighborhood to the north is lost. Keep the nicer neighborhood south of Vermont. Save the better homes in the targeted area by relocating them. In exchange, restore, as best we can, the site of Fort Porter. It's Buffalo's most impressive waterfront view and no one knows about it.
3. I would love to see the International Railway Bridge site developed for the other bridge. I realize many in Black Rock objected, but although I live in Black Rock I think it's the best site. I love its potential for multi-modal transportation. And the land lies fallow now.
The International RailRoad Bridge is near the end of its life and is needed for Rail. I doubt CSX or any of the Railroad Companies would give it up. It will no doubt be replaced with another Railroad crossing.
The International Railroad Bridge would not solve the problem but double the fights since there would need to be 2 truck and customs plazas instead of one. Thus demolishing 2x as much as is being proposed with one plaza. Further, Buffalo State would enter the battle as they have announced the land that would be used is included in their future plans to expand the Buffalo State Campus. (Ironic that Buffalo State wants land extending all the way to Niagara Street in the future but is afraid of embracing Grant Street).
The ideal sites are the Whirlpool Bridge and the Lewiston Bridge. Grand Island would be ideal but as I understand it Canada will not approve a new bridge crossing only expansion of existing crossings.
Christine where are you getting your info from. That bridge is in fine shape for rsil and is not in need of being rebuilt. You make claims but you obviously have no knowledge of the subject. You don't even know who owns the bridge or the tracks on and after the bridge. Stop with the ignorance
that makes sense. that or grand island.
'3. I would love to see the International Railway Bridge site developed for the other bridge. I realize many in Black Rock objected, but although I live in Black Rock I think it's the best site. I love its potential for multi-modal transportation. And the land lies fallow now.'
Biniszkiewicz, Black Rock residents don't like your suggestion and the residents of Fort Erie have not expressed any interest in using this bridge, either. Using this bridge tramples through more residential areas and doesn't resolve any issues.
I have spoken to some in Canada who think the town's opposition is coming from above, the thinking being that a unified front might carry the day, but if they have alternatives on their side it will only muck up the works that much more. But one counterpart to our common councilmen up there told me that he thinks there's more support for the IR site up there than it seems and that if it really were accepted on the US side in his opinion that would turn the tide.
On the Canadian side, the railroad right of way is very similar to the US side in that it gets industrial just past the water's edge and spreads out. The land connects easily to Rt 3.
That said, many in Black Rock object. I don't. I'm not that afraid of the incremental exhaust; I think it could be mitigated and engines are getting cleaner and cleaner. Plus I love the capability of crossing to rail here. If there is sufficient land upon which to process trucks, then trucks needn't idle for long. There is bountiful land across the tracks in which to build an enormous facility. But I'm not denying that it would be a heavy lift politically. Just opining about the option I personally like best.
I would direct you to the GBNRTC website newsletters which intern get much of their information from their parent the NYSDOT. They placed 3 bridges at the end of their lifespan. One was the Lift Bridge at the end of Furhmann Boulevard called the Ohio Street Lift Bridge. Another was the International Railroad Bridge. I forget the third.
Thats all I will say.
"I, for one, would be much happier reclaiming that lost park land, even at the cost of some of the tired neighborhood to the north is lost. Keep the nicer neighborhood south of Vermont. Save the better homes in the targeted area by relocating them. In exchange, restore, as best we can, the site of Fort Porter. It's Buffalo's most impressive waterfront view and no one knows about it."
B.- Your're a family man and a compassionate man. This must be seen in it's entirety which includes the castrophic impact on human health and the environment. Demolishing homes will not change air pollutuion. Neither will moving any of the homes. The neighborhoods left behind will suffer daily from increased pollution from the trucks. That has been the whole purpose behind the campaign to move the trucks.
The logical solution is to address the source of pollution, mitigate it and move it away from humans. Let's get our priorities straight - nothing is valued more than a human life. No one should have to pick their poison based on where they chose to live. A diesel fueled operation does not belong in a densely populated urban district where 25,000 children under the age of 18 live.
Let's not lose sight of doing what's right for people.
I agree that this whole issue has lost sight for what the greater good or purpose really is. It doesn't take a scientist to figure out that more trucks equal more exhaust which equals more pollution. I really feel the whole issue is irrelevant now that traffic/need has decreased significantly. It seems like they want to move forward just to be spiteful. Who does this really benefit, honestly? As I said before, just drop these plans and move on to more important issues with our region instead of finding a way to let trucks pass through our metro area a little faster.
Still my bleeding heart... Teddy would be proud.
Where in Black Rock do you live, to favor this truck plaza?
I live near amherst/military. All our neighbors now share in the plume of the thruway exhaust and no one favors additional truck plaza exhaust.
State SEQR laws and past rulings dictate that the entire known scope of a project (property) must be considered at once.
Lewiston connects to the 190 which runs right into Buffalo. Buffalo need not be the truck parking lot for the rest of the county/state/country.
The biggest issue is that the Peace bridge is controlled by one entity while the other 3 are controlled by another. Just like our local governments it gives us overlap and fighting over monetary scraps instead of trying to work and grow together. We have 4 bridges which can handle the capacity. They should be ran and funded as one machine. This way the PBA would not be fighting for the truck funds and trying to build its own truck lot. They would share in it anyways.
The PBA gets more toll money and Buffalo losses a neighborhood and more waterfront.
Again, Diesel truck plazas are not compatible with densely populated neighborhoods. Doesn't matter if it is at the Peace Bridge, Black Rock, or anywhere else people live. No citizen should be subjected to dangerous levels of air pollution for the convenience and profits of trucking interests or the PBA. This isn't about being a NIMBY or whining about traffic or noise, its about protecting the health of our families from a very real and serious threat.
Agreed...ultimately. If we demanded all crossings for goods be by rail and established intermodal facilities in our yards, the bridge could be returned to regular vehicle crossings only, Buffalo would reignite its rail economy and Canada would be doing likewise at their end. By the way, there is an increasing call to convert all diesel engines in trucks to natural gas so the asthma issue might eventually go away.
Leave a comment
Sponsor
Recent Comments
Sponsor
Interested in advertising on BuffaloRising?
E-mail John C. Powell
or call John at 716.602.0200




knock down the house and build the bride already....The more reasons and opinions that I hear from the nimby's, the more and more i am convinced that this is the right project
yes!! build that BRIDE!!!!
I've heard of mail order brides but now you can have them custom built? wow...
"The Bride Wore asphalt"!
Shows the education level of the "tear down everything-build anything" movement.
maybe he's just lonely.